[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Bang / Guns Title: They want you dead: Liberal Professor compares law-abiding gun owners to slaveholders, calls for them to be shot (INTELLIHUB) In what will go down as one of the most disgusting, hate filled articles ever published on the hard left clickbait rag Salon.com, an author and liberal college professor has written a piece that calls for all gun owners to be shot. No, you did not read that incorrectly and this is not hyperbole. The article, written by Coppin State University teacher D. Watkins, not only calls for all gun owners to be shot but also ridiculously compares them to slaveholders while claiming that there is no legitimate reason to own a weapon. Starting out the article with the writers dreams of charging five thousand dollars per bullet, Watkins then makes his position on gun ownership in America startlingly clear. (emphasis mine) Rock was definitely on point, $5000 bullets would be great but Id take it a step furtherI believe that being shot should be requirement for gun ownership in America. Its very simple. You need to have gun, like taking selfies with pistols, cant live with out it? Then take a bullet and you will be granted the right to purchase the firearm of your choice. If we could successfully implement this rule, I guarantee the mass shootings will stop. Watching cable news now in days makes me physically ill. Week in and week out we are forced to learn about another coward, who cant stand to deal with the same rejection that most of us face so they strap themselves with guns and then cock and spray at innocent people. Heartbroken survivors and family member images go viral, as our elected officials remain clueless. He then goes on to attack the usual right wing boogeyman (Carson and Trump) before making yet another patently false statement that shows his complete ignorance on the actual facts of gun ownership. Watkins, like so many other clueless authoritarian liberals, simply does not understand gun ownership and its connection to freedom and liberty. Bullets are extremely hot and they hurt. I saw them paralyze, cut through faces, pierce children and take life. I have friends, relatives and loved ones be gunned down. Guns break apart families and ruin lives. Other than giving a coward the heart to stand tall, whats the positive part of gun ownership? Other than the people in rural areas who use them to hunt for food, I have only seen them destroy, both in the suburbs and in our inner cities. Watkins only sees them destroy so the millions and millions of other American citizens who do not share his opinion should be shot!? Its almost as if Watkins has decided to lift the veil and publish a piece chalked full of the actual thoughts that liberal authoritarians share with each other on a regular basis. Not wanting to have his call for all gun owners to be shot to be the only unbelievably messed up thing in his hate piece, Watkins then compares all gun owners to slaveholders in a transparent attempt to label those he disagrees with as racists. (a tried and true tactic of the authoritarian left) Gun praisers are just like the people who were in favor of slavery back in the day the elite, lazy and ignorant who werent being beaten, raped or in the field doing the work, so they were perfectly okay with involuntary servitude, which is a problem and why I think gun owners need to feel morethey need a taste of the other side. Got that gun owners. You are elitists, you are lazy, you are ignorant, and most of all you are like a slaveholder for owning those terrible firearms! In case the reader thought that they may had just misread what the author meant in the beginning of the article, Watkins closes by reiterating his belief that all gun owners should be shot. (emphasis again mine) So if you love guns, if they make you feel safe, if you hold and cuddle with them at night, then you need to be shot. You need to feel a bullet rip through your flesh, and if you survive and enjoy the feelingthen the right to bear arms will be all yours. Ironically, this hate piece was published by a news outlet that routinely labels anyone that they disagree with as dangerous, violent racists. Apparently they are not worried about calling for millions of Americans to be shot just as long as those Americans are on the other side of the political isle. The above quoted piece is a perfect example of how gun control advocates really feel about millions of America gun owners and should be a wake up call to anyone still on the fence over whether or not gun control fanatics are just calling for common sense reform rather than full-scale confiscation and attacks on actual gun owners. It is also important to note that the call for gun owners to be shot is possibly tied directly to the recent promotion of Australian style gun control by the mainstream media. Australia initiated a massive mandatory buyback program (also known as confiscation by government force) after a mass shooting and one can imagine Americans would not be so keen to turn in their weapons if a similar law were passed in this country. Attempting to implement this type of gun control in the United States is an obvious recipe for civil war and gun owners who refuse to go along with the confiscation would be subject to violence at the hands of the government. (see all gun owners being shot) But hey, we are all just crazy right wing extremists for worrying about gun control, even as the media calls for mass confiscation and gun owners across the country to be shot. This article originally appeared on Intellihub.com. About the Author Alex Thomas is a reporter and opinion journalist who has worked in the alternative media for over three years. His work has been featured on numerous news outlets including Infowars and RT. You can contact him here. Alex is an exclusive weapon of Intellihub. Read more articles by this author here. Feel free to post the above article in part or in full on your website or blog leaving the byline and all original links intact. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0 US) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Hmmm. I believe that before you can receive any form of government welfare, you must first work at a job and pay income taxes. You know. So you know how it feels for the rest of us.
Well, first since this dipshit thinks there is no legitimate reason to own a gun, where is he going to get a gun to shoot gun owners with? Next, if this SOB is so froggy, let him be the first to leap and start shooting. Will see how far he gets. Si vis pacem, para bellum Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
He is not a faculty member at Coppin State University because he's not a teacher there -- he's an adjunct teacher. But a better description is, "former drug dealer D. Watkins". And the $5,000 per bullet he got from Chris Rock Rock:
He wants to get rid of guns so that he can push drugs at school without getting shot? He enrolled at Loyola University, but his mind was elsewhere. His stepbrother had been murdered the year before, and he felt out of place at the predominantly white university. He lasted a little less than a year before dropping out to sell cocaine and heroin back in East Baltimore. He was entering the only family business he'd ever known. In his Salon articles and his "Stoop Stories" piece for the online magazine aeon, Watkins talks about his late older brother, whom he calls Bip in his writings. Bip sold drugs and was murdered before Watkins entered college. A close friend of Watkins who started selling drugs for Bip was also murdered. Feeling depressed and alienated at school, Watkins took the cash and drug stash that his brother kept in a safe and used it as the seed for his own selling. Liberal professors want to be the only slaveholders. They know that propaganda is a lot more limititing and debilitating in the long run than the threat from guns. The way to produce an compliant and obedient society is by controlling its minds and limiting or distorting access to factuality. Limit or channelize a person's thinking and you limit his options. Application of that principle is far more effective, complete, and hysterically voluntary than the threat of guns.
The lethal weapon is not our guns but our minds.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|