[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
The Establishments war on Donald Trump Title: Trump’s lawyer sends letter to Club for Growth: Stop your misleading attack ads or we’ll sue for libel But then, suing isnt really the point here. Alan Garten, Trumps general counsel, addressed a letter to Club for Growth President David McIntosh calling the ads completely disingenuous and replete with outright lies, false, defamatory and destructive statements and downright fabrications which you fully know to be untrue. Garten also pushed back on the groups claim that Trump supports raising taxes, saying the ads source material actually dates back to 15 years ago. Mr. Trump does not support higher taxes. This is the very definition of libel, he added, before noting that Trump would, conveniently, release his own tax plan next week. TPM has a PDF of the cease-and-desist letter in case you want to read it in full. A taste: The ad theyre complaining about, which had fewer than 100,000 views on YouTube as of early this afternoon, is this one, I believe, claiming that Trump supports higher taxes. Not true, says Team Trump; he used to support a one-time tax of 14.25 percent on the superwealthy 15 years ago but no longer does, so its libel to use the present tense. By that logic, I suppose its libel to claim that Marco Rubio supports comprehensive immigration reform despite his work on the Gang of Eight bill because he currently believes CIR is unfeasible in Congress. Besides, Trump said less than a month ago in an interview that hed lower taxes on the middle class but would let people making hundreds of millions of dollars-a-year pay some tax, because right now they are paying very little tax and I think its outrageous. A few weeks before that, he told Sean Hannity that he believes in a progressive income tax that would tax the rich more; when Hannity asked him what the cap would be, Trump told him hed figure it out. All of which is to say, the Club for Growths defense in court would be that its absolutely true that Trump supports higher taxes even at this very moment specifically, he supports higher taxes on the rich. Is a judge going to let a case like this go to trial because the Club didnt stipulate which taxpayers will be paying more in their ad? Or is he going to throw this out of court on grounds that it simply doesnt qualify as false for libel purposes and that a billionaire whos hot to challenge the claim could run his own counter-ads? The Clubs response: Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) September 22, 2015 So why make a stink about it if Trumps unlikely to win? You know why. Its PR. This is his way of reminding supporters that hes a fighter, one of the things they like most about him, and its also a way to preempt the many, many, many attack ads coming from the other candidates about his previously liberal record by suggesting to his fans that theyre somehow unfair even to the point of libel. Even so, Im not sure why hed want to force the media into the position of reminding readers that, verb tenses aside, the Clubs right that Trump has held some highly liberal opinions in the past. Better to just ignore the Clubs attacks the way hes been ignoring Jindals and focus on red-meat stuff that matters to conservatives right now, like the Iran deal and defunding Planned Parenthood. For a guy whos been shrewd lately about picking his political battles, this is an odd choice. Poster Comment: CFG's linked pic from their tweet: Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: TooConservative, wrong link, yukon (#0)
(Edited)
Basically this is some slip and fall ambulance chaser, pumping up a lawsuit that everyone knows is going nowhere. It's a boring PR stunt. Trump's record is lousy, and some of his dates are real dogs! You hear a lot about how beautiful his women are, but there's also an ugly side to that story. Club for Growth are no angels either. IIRC, that was a tongue-in-cheek proposal about a one-time tax on the rich specifically to retire the national debt. If that offends some people because that's a tax increase, fine. Then I say don't do it.
suing is what the businessman from NY does best .
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
I'd say that, as with P.T. Barnum, self-promotion is what Trump does best.
|
|||
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|