New World Order
See other New World Order Articles
Title: Blame America? No, Blame Neocons!
Source:
The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
URL Source: http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archive ... lame-america-no-blame-neocons/
Published: Sep 20, 2015
Author: Ron Paul
Post Date: 2015-09-20 20:26:08 by Hondo68
Ping List: *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars* Subscribe to *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars*
Keywords: bad US policy, Military Industrial Complex
Views: 2024
Comments: 19
Is the current refugee crisis gripping the European Union “all America’s fault”? That is how my critique of US foreign policy was characterized in a recent interview on the Fox Business Channel. I do not blame the host for making this claim, but I think it is important to clarify the point.
It has become common to discount any criticism of US foreign policy as “blaming America first.” It is a convenient way of avoiding a real discussion. If aggressive US policy in the Middle East – for example in Iraq – results in the creation of terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda in Iraq, is pointing out the unintended consequences of bad policy blaming America? Is it “blaming America” to point out that blowback – like we saw on 9/11 – can be the result of unwise US foreign policy actions like stationing US troops in Saudi Arabia?
In the Fox interview I pointed out that the current refugee crisis is largely caused by bad US foreign policy actions. The US government decides on regime change for a particular country – in this case, Syria – destabilizes the government, causes social chaos, and destroys the economy, and we are supposed to be surprised that so many people are desperate to leave? Is pointing this out blaming America, or is it blaming that part of the US government that makes such foolish policies?
Accusing those who criticize US foreign policy of “blaming America” is pretty selective, however. Such accusations are never leveled at those who criticize a US pullback. For example, most neocons argue that the current crisis in Iraq is all Obama’s fault for pulling US troops out of the country. Are they “blaming America first” for the mess? No one ever says that. Just like they never explain why the troops were removed from Iraq: the US demanded complete immunity for troops and contractors and the Iraqi government refused.
Iraq was not a stable country when the US withdrew its troops anyway. As soon as the US stopped paying the Sunnis not to attack the Iraqi government, they started attacking the Iraqi government. Why? Because the US attack on Iraq led to a government that was closely allied to Iran and the Sunnis could not live with that! It was not the US withdrawal from Iraq that created the current instability but the invasion. The same is true with US regime change policy toward Syria. How many Syrians were streaming out of Syria before US support for Islamist rebels there made the country unlivable? Is pointing out this consequence of bad US policy also blaming America first?
Last year I was asked by another Fox program whether I was not “blaming America” when I criticized the increasingly confrontational US stand toward Russia. Here’s how I put it then:
I don't blame America. I am America, you are America. I don't blame you. I blame bad policy. I blame the interventionists. I blame the neoconservatives who preach this stuff, who believe in it like a religion -- that they have to promote American goodness even if you have to bomb and kill people.
In short, I don’t blame America; I blame neocons.
(1 image)
Subscribe to *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
RINO's say that "neocon" is another term for Jew, so according to RINO's the statement really means "In short, I don’t blame America; I blame Jews."
Neo-cons are RINOs. They are Israel-first liberals (Christian and Jew), predominantly from the northeast and the left coast. They fiscally support unlimited spending and unending war with no achievable military objective. Paleo-conservatives are the non-RINOs. The support limited government and limited spending and fighting war only to win and be done with it. Paleos say America first. Good luck to Israel and everyone else, but it is not our duty to fight their wars or pay their bills. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism_and_paleoconservatism
Look at the GOP leadership positions, and most of the candidates... neocons! RINO's are the paeloconservative/paelolibertarian patriots. I consider myself a paleolibertarian. The globalist leftist neocon REAL Reupublicans, McCain and Romney lost! So maybe the voters want RINO's? Real Republicans SUCK! The Wiki definition is wrong, D&R party globalist spin.
RINO's are the paeloconservative/paelolibertarian patriots. I consider myself a paleolibertarian. The GOPe leadership consists of RINO (Republican in Name Only) Neo-Conservatives, conservatives in name only. Before the Neo-Cons remade themselves from far left liberals, the conservatives of the GOP were the paleo-conservatives. They are the real, original GOP conservatives, not this group that emerged from the leadership of Leo Strauss, Irving Kristol, William Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Richard Perle, and Paul Bremer, et al.
There are no replies to Comment # 19. End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestIn short, I don’t blame America; I blame neocons.
#17. To: nativist nationalist, hondo68 (#1)
RINO's say that "neocon" is another term for Jew, so according to RINO's the statement really means "In short, I don’t blame America; I blame Jews."
RINO's say that "neocon" is another term for Jew, so according to RINO's the statement really means "In short, I don’t blame America; I blame Jews."
#18. To: nolu chan (#17)
Paleo-conservatives are the non-RINO
#19. To: hondo68 (#18)
Look at the GOP leadership positions, and most of the candidates... neocons!
Replies to Comment # 19.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]