United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Mark Zuckerberg’s Attack ad Against Trump: “The Parable of Pete Wilson”
Source:
VDare
URL Source: http://www.vdare.com/posts/mark-zuc ... ump-the-parable-of-pete-wilson
Published: Sep 17, 2015
Author: Steve Sailer
Post Date: 2015-09-17 12:18:36 by nativist nationalist
Keywords: None
Views: 1608
Comments: 11
Here’s a new ad from Facebook mogul Mark Zuckerberg’s Cheap Labor lobby FWD.us, “The Parable of Pete Wilson” about how supporting Proposition 187 in 1994 doomed the Republican Party in California. I realize that back in 1994, Mr. Zuckerberg was probably less interested in election data than in Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers, but there’s this thing called the Internet and you can use it to look up old numbers to see if somebody is trying to pull your leg. He should try it. I’ve gone over this a million times over the years, but this media myth is just a retconning of history. The GOP won California in 9 out of 10 Presidential elections from 1952-1988, but the historic turning point wasn’t after 1994, it was before it: in 1992 Bill Clinton whomped the incumbent Republican president George H.W. Bush 46-33 in California. And the Democrats won two open seat Senatorial elections in 1992: Barbara Boxer won 48-43 and Diane Feinstein won 54-38. Contrary to the myth, the GOP candidate did relatively better in 1996 than in 1992. I wrote in VDARE: Indeed, the GOP candidate did better in California in the Presidential election of 1996 than in 1992, both in absolute terms and relative to the whole country. Bush lost the U.S. in 1992 by 5.5 points and California by 13.3 points, while Dole lost the country in 1996 by 8.5 points and California by only 12.9 points. So, relative to their dire performance in the whole country, the GOP Presidential candidate closed the gap in California by 3.5 points from 1992 to 1996. Poster Comment: Pandering to Zuckerberg’s tribe is what has destroyed the GOP. The Jonah Golberg wing of the GOP were the ones pushing to remove Israels enemy Saddam, never mind how great he had been against our own enemy Iran. Zuckerberg’s tribal interest is to see western nations swamped by immigration to turn them into multi-cultural cess pools. And America of hyphenated Americans who may be played against each other, divide and conquer. While Americans are supposed to function as Janissaries to keeps Zuckerberg’s own tribal homeland inviolate. Stop pandering to Zuckerberg’s tribe, start pandering to Americans. If it takes economics that end up stripping some loot from Zuckerberg’s tribe, so be it. Preserving America is more important than preserving Zuckerberg’s purse.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
Not really. Hussein and Iraq were no real threat to Israel. He liked to talk crap about Israel just like the Israel pols liked to talk crap about him and Iraq,but that was just the game they played to appease the low-IQ people so they could stay in power. Truth to tell,he was maybe the biggest asset that Israel had since he and Iraq were responsible for the deaths of more fundie Muslims than every other nation on Earth combined. He and Iraq WERE a genuine threat to Saudi Arabia,though. it was Saudi Arabia that bought and paid for that one.
I was alive at the time. Jonah Goldberg's tribe was doing the full court press for that war. They've tried to rewrite history a la Marguerite. Big neo-con interventionists when they wanted the war. The ones shilling for the war had names like Perle, Podhoretz, Frum, Horowitz, Krauthammer and Goldberg. They wanted that war, they wanted it badly, there is way too much evidence to try and sweep it under the rug.
And don't forget Mr. Neocon himself, Mr. Bill Kristol.
#5. To: misterwhite (#4)
Thanks; I knew I was missing a big one, that was it!
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThe Jonah Golberg wing of the GOP were the ones pushing to remove Israels enemy Saddam, never mind how great he had been against our own enemy Iran.
#2. To: sneakypete (#1)
Not really. Hussein and Iraq were no real threat to Israel. He liked to talk crap about Israel just like the Israel pols liked to talk crap about him and Iraq,but that was just the game they played to appease the low-IQ people so they could stay in power.
#4. To: nativist nationalist (#2)
"The ones shilling for the war had names like Perle, Podhoretz, Frum, Horowitz, Krauthammer and Goldberg."
Replies to Comment # 4. And don't forget Mr. Neocon himself, Mr. Bill Kristol.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]