politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: Quinnipiac poll of Iowa: Trump leads with 27% as Scott Walker crashes to ... tenth place
Source:
HotAir
URL Source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/09/ ... walker-crashes-to-tenth-place/
Published: Sep 11, 2015
Author: Allahpundit
Post Date: 2015-09-12 10:39:56 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 1622
Comments: 10
Remember, this is supposed to be Walker’s must-win early state. This compares to the results of a July 1 survey by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN- uh-pe-ack) University showing Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker at 18 percent, with Trump and Carson at 10 percent each. Today, Walker is at 3 percent, way behind in the pack. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush has 6 percent of Iowa likely Republican Caucus participants, with 5 percent each for Carly Fiorina, Ohio Gov. John Kasich and U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida. No other candidate tops 4 percent, with 4 percent undecided. Yes, that’s right, Scott Walker now trails “undecided.” In Iowa. In fact, check the RCP poll tracker for the state and you’ll find that it’s been a solid month since he’s cracked double digits there. The main cause, of course, is Trumpmania; Walker was at 22 percent in mid-July, right before Trump took off. But don’t underestimate the damage Ben Carson’s doing to his numbers too. The biggest takeaway from today’s Q-poll is that Carson’s ratings across a variety of “character” metrics — baseline favorability, trustworthiness, whether he cares about people like you — are simply phenomenal, almost unbelievably so. Here’s the data on the “people like you” question. Mind-boggling: Overall, Carson’s favorable rating is 79/6. When Republicans are asked if he’s honest and trustworthy, they split … 88/4. Strong leadership qualities: 76/11. The right kind of temperament to handle an international crisis: 72/14. Iowans looooooove them some Ben Carson — so much so that it’s a mystery how he’s still trailing Trump in the race. The answer to that, I think, is twofold. First, Trump’s numbers are now surprisingly good themselves for a guy who started this race with negative favorable ratings among Republicans. He’s now at 60/35 favorable, with 56 percent saying he’s honest and trustworthy, 61 saying he cares about the problems of people like you — darned good for a flamboyant billionaire — and 52 percent saying he has the right temperament to handle an international crisis. Even so, those numbers pale next to Carson’s, which brings us to the second reason for Trump’s lead: At this point, he’s still benefiting from name recognition in polls. Just four percent of Iowans said they hadn’t heard enough about him to form an opinion yet compared to 15 percent who say so about Carson, a guy who’s already participated in one national debate and has had literature promoting him in Iowa for many months. Given the way his numbers are trending, unless he has a terrible debate next week, I figure he’ll pass Trump in Iowa no later than a month from now. The poll’s a mixed bag for Ted Cruz, the third-place finisher. On the one hand, he’s sailed past Walker as the professional politician who’s best positioned to win Iowa if Trump and Carson falter. On the other hand, check this out: Cruz has spent two and a half years building the case to Republicans voters that he may be in Washington but he’s not of Washington. The fact that he trails a doctor who’s never run for office before by double digits suggests that that project hasn’t totally succeeded. Here’s another alarm for Cruz from elsewhere in the crosstabs, answering the million-dollar question of whether he truly is the second choice of voters supporting his good friend Donald. Answer: Nope. Not by a longshot. Cruz’s favorables are solid on all the metrics I mentioned above, but like everyone else in the field, they’re not quite on Carson’s level. I think Team Cruz is happy with this result, assuming (not unreasonably) that Carson will sound too shaky and amateurish on policy in the long run for Iowans to take the plunge for him on caucus night, but I don’t know. Carson’s a smart guy; he does in fact learn from his mistakes. If I had to bet on whether a famous neurosurgeon will sound more shaky or less shaky on policy as he bones up on it and spends more time interacting with voters on the trail, I’d bet on the latter. It’s easy to see why Iowans might eventually abandon Trump — the shtick will wear thin, the attacks on his bogus conservatism will start to bite, etc. It’s not as easy to see why they might abandon Carson. The best argument against him is that he’s a newbie with no experience, but look again at the second table I posted above. You really think “not enough government experience” is a winning attack in this climate? Then again, I think Cruz will be just fine even if he finishes second or third in Iowa. His goal there is to prove that he’s a serious threat for the nomination, especially with South Carolina and the “SEC primary” on the horizon afterward. If he finishes, say, second to Carson in Iowa and Trump wins New Hampshire, South Carolinians may decide that Cruz is the most viable possible compromise candidate, an anti-establishmentarian who knows Washington well enough that he won’t feel at sea there if he’s elected. That’s when Cruz takes off. Exit question: Can Walker come back from this? It’s early, yeah, but once you’ve got the stink of loser on you, how likely are voters who dumped you in the first place to come back to you later?
(3 images) Tenth farking place. Three months ago, I would have told you that a midwestern evangelical governor with Scott Walker’s record could stay home in Wisconsin and never campaign and still do no worse than, say, third in Iowa. Donald Trump has the support of 27 percent of Iowa likely Republican Caucus participants, with 21 percent for Ben Carson and 9 percent for U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#2. To: TooConservative (#0)
I see the polls and think bush is getting harmed by too many liberals running taking his votes such as(Christie,Graham,Huckabee,Perry,Rubio,Santorum) I wonder how long the 5% or less will stay in? Its down to Trump,Ben,Cruz and bush has no chance in hell winning or getting vp. I like Ben but I think he is way out of his league when it comes to politics. You have to be able to deal with poisonous and venomous snakes on a daily bases and I just don't see him able to cope with these types of people. Where Trump and Cruz have for most of their lives and have done well against them.
I think if Trump was not running, Bush would be walking away with this. It would be Dole/McCain/Romney all over again. He's a Bush. He speaks Spanish/His wife is from Mexico. It's "his turn". He has tons of money (meaning his donors own him). The GOP establishment loves him (because he'll do what they say). The MSM loves him because they think Hillary can beat him. I have no idea why he's not #2.
#5. To: misterwhite (#4)
No more bushes or klintons! LOL OMG I don't think Amerika could handle it.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#4. To: Justified (#2)
"I see the polls and think bush is getting harmed by too many liberals running taking his votes such as(Christie,Graham,Huckabee,Perry,Rubio,Santorum)"
Replies to Comment # 4.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]