The establishment media has gone quiet on the Virginia shooting since evidence that it was a hoax has gone viral.
Yet, their silence hasnt stopped the conspiracy research community from finding even more damning evidence that it was indeed an elaborate hoax. If this doesnt prove that the Virginian Shooting was a hoax than nothing will.
YouTube researcher Peekay22 found a glaring mistake in the Virginia shooting production. He proves that each camera angle shows the actors doing different gestures during the precise moment the gun was fired.
They are not merely two distinct camera angles. Rather, they are two separate instances altogether, indicating that the production team of this staged shooting event took several takes to get the reaction they wanted.
Its such a sloppy production mistake that it almost seems deliberate.
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
How about this: You're a kook and you like to post videos from other obsessive kooks.
I'll gladly second that... I thought about posting the same sentiments prior to yours, but I was trying to avoid giving Deckard an easy oppertunity to call me some derogatory colorful propagandist term.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
I really run out of patience when we get to the Crisis Actor phase of discussion about almost any tragedy (9/11, Sandy Hook, Boston marathon, etc.). It makes me angrier than the usual garden-variety kookery we put up with.
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
After taking time to really give this a chance....
In the gunman's video, the reporter's face slides slightly out of frame at the instant of nodding. It's also lower quality, and the different angle catches less of her face because her hair is obscuring more of her face.
The lower quality vid isn't catching her hair movement as well as the higher quality TV camera catches her face movement. Between that and her face being out of view at the instant of the nodding to me explains the claim of a discrepancy.
So... the claim of a hoax is itself a hoax, in my view.
Deckard: "Perhaps you have an explanation for the discrepancies in the two videos."
TooConservative: "How about this: You're a kook and you like to post videos from other obsessive kooks."
"How about this: You're a kook and you like to post videos from other obsessive kooks." TC, that's not an answer, you are usually pretty good at fact checking, but your answer to Deck is beneath you.
TC, that's not an answer, you are usually pretty good at fact checking, but your answer to Deck is beneath you.
No, it isn't. What is beneath me is letting vile crap like this go unchallenged.
This is part and parcel of the online nutjobs that seem to come out with accusations that every massacre is actually a phony massacre instigated by the government, that no one was killed, that the injuries were faked, etc.
These Truther kooks have been doing this for years now, with the Sandy Hook school massacre, with the Boston marathon bombings, with every large-scale massacre.
This is the paranoid trying to out-paranoid each other. But if government deception is so pervasive, we are already well past the point where believing any news report is completely futile.
TC, that's not an answer, you are usually pretty good at fact checking, but your answer to Deck is beneath you.
No, it isn't. What is beneath me is letting vile crap like this go unchallenged.
This is part and parcel of the online nutjobs that seem to come out with accusations that every massacre is actually a phony massacre instigated by the government, that no one was killed, that the injuries were faked, etc.
These Truther kooks have been doing this for years now, with the Sandy Hook school massacre, with the Boston marathon bombings, with every large-scale massacre.
This is the paranoid trying to out-paranoid each other. But if government deception is so pervasive, we are already well past the point where believing any news report is completely futile.
I really hate kooks, Bob.
My old Friend, all that is fine, but it is opinion, not fact, I always look to you for opposing facts. That way i get both sides, but when it comes to post by Deckard, you seem not to be objective.
Fighting a post with opinion, instead of fact, only adds to the credibility of the original post.
Now, because of the overwhelming amount of evidence against Sandy Hook, I am becoming more than concerned, like wise the eulogy by the boyfriend three minutes before the shooting concerns me as well, I simply cannot come up with the answer to my question "Why? Why would they stage this?"
I have been looking to you and a few others to show where that three minutes was not before but after.
Fighting a post with opinion, instead of fact, only adds to the credibility of the original post.
No, debating their kookery is what gives them legitimacy.
Either you believe these events like the Boston marathon or Sandy Hook massacres occurred. Or you do not. Either you believe the victims were fabricated (and their grieving families) and "crisis actors" are the survivors. Or you do not.
It is a sharp dividing line. On one side of that line are Kooks. On the other side is everyone else.
The very fact we have to "debate the issue" is why I've realized these online chat forums are most likely a waste of time and a distraction.