United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: BUSTED: Videos of Virginia Reporter Shooting Hoax Were Separate Takes!
Source:
Activist Post
URL Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2015/09 ... oting-hoax-took-two-takes.html
Published: Sep 3, 2015
Author: Joe Wright
Post Date: 2015-09-04 09:40:10 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1131
Comments: 13
The establishment media has gone quiet on the Virginia shooting since evidence that it was a hoax has gone viral. Yet, their silence hasn’t stopped the conspiracy research community from finding even more damning evidence that it was indeed an elaborate hoax. If this doesn’t prove that the Virginian Shooting was a hoax than nothing will. YouTube researcher Peekay22 found a glaring mistake in the Virginia shooting production. He proves that each camera angle shows the actors doing different gestures during the precise moment the gun was fired. They are not merely two distinct camera angles. Rather, they are two separate instances altogether, indicating that the production team of this staged shooting event took several takes to get the reaction they wanted. It’s such a sloppy production mistake that it almost seems deliberate.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Perhaps you have an explanation for the discrepancies in the two videos.
How about this: You're a kook and you like to post videos from other obsessive kooks.
TooConservative: "How about this: You're a kook and you like to post videos from other obsessive kooks." "How about this: You're a kook and you like to post videos from other obsessive kooks." TC, that's not an answer, you are usually pretty good at fact checking, but your answer to Deck is beneath you.
No, it isn't. What is beneath me is letting vile crap like this go unchallenged. This is part and parcel of the online nutjobs that seem to come out with accusations that every massacre is actually a phony massacre instigated by the government, that no one was killed, that the injuries were faked, etc. These Truther kooks have been doing this for years now, with the Sandy Hook school massacre, with the Boston marathon bombings, with every large-scale massacre. This is the paranoid trying to out-paranoid each other. But if government deception is so pervasive, we are already well past the point where believing any news report is completely futile. I really hate kooks, Bob.
TC, that's not an answer, you are usually pretty good at fact checking, but your answer to Deck is beneath you. No, it isn't. What is beneath me is letting vile crap like this go unchallenged. This is part and parcel of the online nutjobs that seem to come out with accusations that every massacre is actually a phony massacre instigated by the government, that no one was killed, that the injuries were faked, etc. These Truther kooks have been doing this for years now, with the Sandy Hook school massacre, with the Boston marathon bombings, with every large-scale massacre. This is the paranoid trying to out-paranoid each other. But if government deception is so pervasive, we are already well past the point where believing any news report is completely futile. I really hate kooks, Bob. My old Friend, all that is fine, but it is opinion, not fact, I always look to you for opposing facts. That way i get both sides, but when it comes to post by Deckard, you seem not to be objective. Fighting a post with opinion, instead of fact, only adds to the credibility of the original post. Now, because of the overwhelming amount of evidence against Sandy Hook, I am becoming more than concerned, like wise the eulogy by the boyfriend three minutes before the shooting concerns me as well, I simply cannot come up with the answer to my question "Why? Why would they stage this?" I have been looking to you and a few others to show where that three minutes was not before but after.
#13. To: BobCeleste (#12)
No, debating their kookery is what gives them legitimacy. Either you believe these events like the Boston marathon or Sandy Hook massacres occurred. Or you do not. Either you believe the victims were fabricated (and their grieving families) and "crisis actors" are the survivors. Or you do not. It is a sharp dividing line. On one side of that line are Kooks. On the other side is everyone else. The very fact we have to "debate the issue" is why I've realized these online chat forums are most likely a waste of time and a distraction.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: TooConservative (#1)
(Edited)
#3. To: Deckard (#2)
Perhaps you have an explanation for the discrepancies in the two videos.
#10. To: TooConservative, Deckard (#3)
Deckard: "Perhaps you have an explanation for the discrepancies in the two videos."
#11. To: BobCeleste (#10)
TC, that's not an answer, you are usually pretty good at fact checking, but your answer to Deck is beneath you.
#12. To: TooConservative (#11)
To: BobCeleste
Replies to Comment # 12. Fighting a post with opinion, instead of fact, only adds to the credibility of the original post.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]