[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Exclusive: RNC Chairman Reince Priebus to Meet with Donald Trump to Discuss ‘Loyalty Pledge’
Source: Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi ... ump-to-discuss-loyalty-pledge/
Published: Sep 2, 2015
Author: Alex Marlow & Stephen K. Bannon
Post Date: 2015-09-02 19:39:17 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 2462
Comments: 23

A source with knowledge of these matters has confirmed to Breitbart News exclusively that, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus will meet with Donald Trump “at Trump Tower in Midtown Manhattan tomorrow afternoon to discuss the ‘loyalty pledge‘” to the Republican party.

The source also tells Breitbart News that requesting candidates to sign a pledge has been a topic of discussion and internal debate the the Republican National Committee for several weeks.

Politico reported earlier today that the RNC planned a pledge that was designed to “force the front-runner’s hand after his ref”:

The Republican National Committee on Wednesday privately reached out to GOP presidential candidates to ask whether they’d be willing to sign a pledge stating they would not run as an independent candidate in the event they fail to win the Republican nomination in 2016.

The move is an implicit challenge to Trump, who pointedly refused to rule out a third-party run during the first GOP debate. He was the only candidate who declined.

The language of the draft pledge speaks directly to the issue vexing Republicans – the possibility that the billionaire could choose to wage a third party bid if he fails to win the GOP nomination, a prospect that could seriously damage the GOP’s prospects of reclaiming the White House. Tapping into deep anti-establishment animosity among the conservative grassroots, Trump has surged to the lead of the deepest presidential field in recent memory. If Trump were to pull just a fraction of the vote as an independent, write-in or third party candidate, it could be enough to sink the eventual Republican nominee.

 

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#2. To: cranky (#0)

South Carolina already has one as a prerequisite for getting on the ballot. Trump doesn't have much time left . Sept 30 is the deadline to get on the ballot for the crucial South Carolina primary. Virginia and North Carolina are also considering such a pledge . Virginia also has a sore loser law, which prevents anyone who loses in a primary from appearing on the ballot later as a third party candidate.

tomder55  posted on  2015-09-02   20:49:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: tomder55 (#2)

Sept 30 is the deadline to get on the ballot for the crucial South Carolina primary. Virginia and North Carolina are also considering such a pledge .

These laws may be challenged since the Court has steadfastly refused to allow any qualifications for office of president besides the three listed in the Constitution.

When it comes to presidential qualifications, the Court is very originalist, all while committing any egregious act using the commerce clause, inventing rights to privacy for abortion or right to "dignity" to create sodomy marriage.

Even if these laws were allowed to stand, Trump could argue he could win without those states and run a full-blown punish-the-GOPe campaign to deliberately sink the GOP nominee.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-09-02   21:00:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: TooConservative (#5)

These laws may be challenged since the Court

States run elections ;and all have qualifiers on who can get on the ballot . Here in NY they are more willing to let 3rd party challenges and we get stupid stuff like THE RENTS TOO HIGH party on the ballot . There are other things parties can do where they "rig" elections . These include the Dem appointing 'Super Delegates' to conventions ; States qualifying electors etc. The Appeals court already decided that SC's sore loser law was Constitutional . http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-4th-circuit/1531943.html

That doesn't mean that he would not find a way around such laws in the general election ,or party rules for getting his name on primary ballots . But he would have to consider the timeframe and costs of such challenges to the party.

tomder55  posted on  2015-09-03   9:46:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: tomder55 (#17)

Here in NY they are more willing to let 3rd party challenges and we get stupid stuff like THE RENTS TOO HIGH party on the ballot . There are other things parties can do where they "rig" elections .

Since a single candidate can be the nominee of multiple parties in NY (a unique state), this is a matter of expanding opportunities to appear on a ballot systematically.

Sore-loser laws are about limiting or excluding candidates based on any arbitrary criteria a state might enact, beyond the three qualifications in the Constitution. And the Court has been steady against allowing more state intrusions.

We haven't seen a real test of these sore-loser laws before the modern Court. Perhaps they would stand, perhaps not.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-09-03   11:53:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: TooConservative (#18)

We haven't seen a real test of these sore-loser laws before the modern Court. Perhaps they would stand, perhaps not.

or it could be a moot point.

www.politico.com/story/20...gop-loyalty-pledge-213302

tomder55  posted on  2015-09-03   12:50:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: tomder55 (#19)

The text of the pledge: “I [name] affirm that if I do not win the 2016 Republican nomination for president of the United States I will endorse the 2016 Republican presidential nominee regardless of who it is. I further pledge that I will not seek to run as an independent or write-in candidate nor will I seek or accept the nomination for president of any other party.”

Silly and completely unenforceable to require an endorsement later. What, if Trump doesn't endorse some other eventual nominee, South Carolina is going to send him to prison or something? Any fine they might devise would be something he could laugh off.

Besides, consider the last two election cycles. Ron Paul didn't endorse McCain but he wasn't otherwise disloyal to the GOP. If Ron Paul had won the nomination, what use would a McCain endorsement be to him, any more than a Ron Paul endorsement would be useful to McStain. Ron Paul was much more friendly with Romney but he didn't endorse him either, again not encouraging anyone to stay home or giving any "two wings of the same war bird" speeches during the campaign season.

Requiring an endorsement is stupid. Asking them to pledge to support the nominee or at least keep quiet until the election is over is as far as the RNC or any state should go with this pledge business.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-09-03   13:17:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 20.

        There are no replies to Comment # 20.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com