Dreamstime
Fayetteville, North Carolina, cops have charged 17-year-old Cormega Copening with sexual exploitation of a minorhis girlfriend, who is the same agebecause the couple sent each other nude photos of themselves during their relationship.
Theres no evidence the photos were ever sent to anyone else, and police only became aware of them because they searched Copenings phone for unrelated reasons that haven't been specified. Even so, the teenformerly the starting quarterback at his high schoolfaces decades on the Sex Offender Registry and up to ten years behind bars if convicted. Hes also been benched from the team while Jack Britt High School investigates the matter.
Copenings girlfriendwho remains unnamed in the news articlesis also facing charges, ABC11 reported.
These teen-sexting witch hunts are almost always outrageous; they conflate child pornography with something far less sinister. Its perfectly normaland wildly commonfor kids to express an interest in sex. Should authority figures discourage underage sexting? Sure. Should they ruin kids lives for doing it anyway? Absolutely not.
But Copenings situation is more outrageous than most. As far as I can tell, the pictures werent shared with anyone elsethis isnt a case where a boy texted a girls nude photos to all of his friends and caused her some considerable public humiliation. The photos were private, and remained that way, until the cops got hold of them. If theres public humiliation here, police intervention is the cause.
Consider as well that Copening reciprocated with photos of his own. Does not a mutual, voluntary exchange of photos undercut the notion that sexual exploitation is a factor here? Its more than a little ridiculous to accuse these two of exploiting each otheralthough this is precisely what the authorities are doing, I presume (the specific charges against the girlfriend were not reported).
Lastly, it bears repeating that these teens were 17. If they had waited until they were 18 to send the photos, no crime would have occurred. Eighteen-year-olds are recognized as fully-autonomous sexual adults. Kylie Jenner, who just turned 18, has been inundated with requests to make a sex tape (indeed, filmmakers began making these requests even before she turned 18). The law, by its very nature, permits no nuance: you are 18, or youre not. But its ridiculous to think that teens are magically transformed into adults on their 18th birthday. Many of themperhaps Copening and his girlfriendmight be ready for mature relationships that involve sex (or, at least, sexy pictures) prior to the governments randomly-selected date.
Theres one more disturbing angle to this story. If Copening is too young to send pictures of his own body, is he not also too young to be made a social pariah? Dont news agencies often withhold publication of the names of crime victims when they are underage? Copening is a crime victim, according to the police, but multiple local news agencies reported his name and the full situation. They reported on his suspension from the high school football team. They showed his headshot. They pointed out the likelihood that he will have to register as a sex offender.
The criminal charges and possible jail time are the worst consequences of the police investigation, but the smearing of Copenings name and ruining of his high school experience are also unfortunate outcomeseach of them much worse than the harm from a nude photo swap that would have never come to light if the cops had minded their own business.