U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles
Title: Denver Police Continue Harassing Jury Nullification Activists, One Day After a Federal Judge Told Them to Cut It Out
Source:
Reason
URL Source: http://reason.com/blog/2015/08/27/d ... ice-continue-harassing-july-nu
Published: Aug 27, 2015
Author: Jacob Sullum
Post Date: 2015-08-27 09:18:45 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 404
Comments: 2
Two days ago, a federal judge ordered Denver police to refrain from harassing activists distributing jury nullification pamphlets near the Lindsey-Flanigan Courthouse, activity that the city conceded is protected by the First Amendment. Yesterday morning, according to a new motion filed by the lawyer representing Eric Verlo and Janet Matzen, the two activists who sought the injunction, "a cadre of Denver police officers" descended upon them and several associates as they were engaged in exactly the sort of pamphleting described in the injunction. The lawyer, David Lane, says the cops seized "all literature regarding jury nullification including about 1,000 pamphlets, a small shade shelter, a table, four chairs, buckets, a cooler, signs and other items." He adds that the officers even "attempted to take personal property such as purses, computers, backpacks and other items" from the activists, but "the pamphleteers resisted the attempts by the police to steal their personal property." The official justification for this raid is that the seized items constituted illegal "encumbrances of the right-of-way" under Denver's municipal code. The code does not define that term, Lane says, so police "have decided that anything and everything in the possession of the Plaintiffs and their associates is an 'encumbrance' and may be removed." To the left is a photograph that Lane submitted along with his motion, which asks U.S. District Judge William J. Martinez to hold Denver Police Chief Robert C. White in contempt of court. The picture, which I have helpfully labeled so you can identify the "encumbrance" that Denver police found intolerable, shows that the activists were not by any stretch of the imagination obstructing traffic into or out of the courthouse. "The mere presence of a packet of literature, a small shade shelter canopy, a cooler, a small table and signs encumbered nothing," Lane writes. "The Denver police, acting as jack-booted thugs in blatant violation of this Court's Order, came into the plaza and began seizing all property not being carried by a pamphleteer. The only plausible explanation for this is that the police were acting in retaliation for the exercise of the free speech rights of the pamphleteers." The Fully Informed Jury Association (FIJA), which produces the pamphlets distributed by Verlo and Matzen, joined them in their lawsuit, and plans to hold a Jury Rights Day event at the courthouse on September 4, reports that the activists' property had not been returned as of last night. "When one of the juror rights educators went to the police department to inquire what was the reason for the delay in returning the stolen property," FIJA says, "he was told that property owners must identify their property to retrieve it." A pattern seems to be developing. Yesterday I noted that Denver, even while admitting that distributing jury nullification pamphlets near a courthouse is constitutionally protected, is still prosecuting two activists, Mark Iannicelli and Eric Brandt, for distributing jury nullification pamphlets near a courthouse. The official charge against Iannicelli and Brandt is jury tampering, but the Denver District Attorney's Office won't explain how their actions, which were not aimed at influencing the outcome of any particular case, qualified for that description, or how they differed from the peaceful pamphleting the city says "does not violate Colorado law." Now police are continuing to harass the very activists the city promised to leave alone, on the pretext of enforcing a vaguely worded prohibition. It seems Denver is willing to tolerate jury nullification activists in theory but not in practice. Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason magazine and a nationally syndicated columnist. Follow Jacob Sullum on TwitterAccording to the cops, a stack of pamphlets is an illegal "encumbrance."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
(Edited)
"The pamphleteers resisted the attempts by the police to steal their personal property." WHAT? Why don't Denver's "Bravest" try this BS with rabid homofascists, black anarchist-racists, or La Raza Illegals shouting "KILL WHITEY!! "KILL HOMOPHOBES!! KILL GRINGOS!!"?? Oh, that's right -- CNN and MSNBC would be ALL over the story. Instead the MEEK are a danger to the criminal, hypocritical Uni-Party status quo (whose apple cart Trump is trying to dump off a cliff.) Funny how courageous Denver's LEO have been as they've been ordered to harass a bunch of middle-aged whites (THEY surely are THE biggest danger to the Republic!!) who are supporting their constitutional 1A right. The LEOs seem to be enjoying "Just following orders" a bit too much. THIS incident and select targeting of a certain demo is Exhibit "A" of why Donald Trump will win the Presidency (if the PTB don't pull some major shenanigans.)
Better hope he doesn't go to Dallas. Si vis pacem, para bellum
Cops seized "all literature regarding jury nullification including about 1,000 pamphlets, a small shade shelter, a table, four chairs, buckets, a cooler, signs and other items....attempted to take personal property such as purses, computers, backpacks and other items" from the activists..."
#2. To: Liberator (#1)
" Donald Trump will win the Presidency (if the PTB don't pull some major shenanigans.) "
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]