United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Parents sue after doctors decide their child is a girl
Source:
Fox News
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2015/ ... e_footer_text&intcmp=obnetwork
Published: Aug 18, 2015
Author: Arden Dier
Post Date: 2015-08-20 21:29:30 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 550
Comments: 1
About 1 in 2,000 babies born in the US are considered intersex. Pam and Mark Crawford of Greenville, SC, adopted MC when he was just 20 months old and then considered female. Born with "true hermaphroditism" or both male and female anatomy—including a penis, vagina, testicle, and ovarian tissue—doctors had performed surgery to remove MC's male anatomy two months before the Crawfords took him home. The surgery wasn't so unusual. An estimated one in 2,000 babies born in the US are considered "intersex," somewhere between male and female, and thousands of surgeries designed to give them either male or female anatomy are performed each year. But in the case of MC, the surgery occurred before the Crawfords could prevent it. Now 10, MC identifies as male and his parents are waging what Buzzfeed calls "a landmark lawsuit against the hospitals and state guardians who decided to put their son through sex-assignment surgery." Doctors say performing such surgeries early allows patients to carry on more normal lives. "Forcing children to be raised with ambiguous genitalia is really tough—that's almost unethical," one says. But Pam Crawford, who notes the couple would have sued even if MC identified as female, says "nobody had the right" to choose her son's gender and worries what his life will be like when he reaches puberty and perhaps gets a period or breasts. "We just hate that there were choices made that could have a significant impact on his being able to be a man. We just don't want people to have to go through what he's going to face." Patients and parents argue intersex surgeries can cause physical and psychological harm; some say doctors weigh a patient's eventual ability to have heterosexual sex above their own health, per Law Street. The Crawfords' lawsuit, however, will focus exclusively on informed consent. The trial is set for November. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: cranky (#0)
http://www.buzzfeed.com/azeenghorayshi/born-in-between The judges decided that they couldn’t rule on the case. Although the defendants may have violated M.C.’s right to procreation, they wrote, “officials are not liable for bad guesses in gray areas; they are liable for transgressing bright lines.” The state case, which will be argued in November, hinges on a different issue: informed consent. A jury will decide whether M.C.’s doctors did enough to convey the risks of surgery, and whether South Carolina’s social services failed to act in M.C.’s best interest while serving as his legal guardians — especially because M.C.’s biological mother was absent from the surgery, and largely absent from his life. Prognonis of state case: poor.
There are no replies to Comment # 1. End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Initially, the Crawfords filed both federal and state suits. The federal suit, which was dismissed in January, alleged that the MUSC doctors and social services employees had violated the 14th Amendment, which says that no state shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.”
Replies to Comment # 1.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]