Health/Medical
See other Health/Medical Articles
Title: Chronically Ill 6-Year-Old Walks for First Time After Medical Cannabis Treatment
Source:
Activist Post
URL Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2015/08 ... edical-cannabis-treatment.html
Published: Aug 12, 2015
Author: Josh Mur
Post Date: 2015-08-13 08:35:56 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 3824
Comments: 21
By Josh Mur The medicinal benefits of cannabis used to inspire heated debate—used to. With ongoing discoveries and successful treatments, denying the efficacy of cannabis treatment is no longer a matter of opinion but, rather, a complete fallacy. Around 100 years of propaganda, fear-mongering, and criminalization has attempted to not only discredit the plant’s medicinal value, but to portray the virtually harmless flower as dangerous, as well. Thankfully, those days of irrational fear and denial are slowly coming to an end. In fact, the steady shift in the general public’s perspective on cannabis has been significant enough for a growing number of parents to consider cannabis oil as a viable option to treat their sick children. Such is the case with Bella Chinonis. Bella is a six-year-old girl from Michigan who suffers from a rare condition called 1p36 Deletion Syndrome—a disease that can lead to a series of very serious health issues including inhibited speech abilities, developmental delays, and chronic seizures. In addition to dealing with her rare disease, Bella also struggles with kidney failure, several holes in her heart, and until just a few months ago, she was unable to walk. After several pharmaceutical treatments failed and she was denied a medical cannabis prescription from her neurologist, Bella’s parents sought help from doctors in Texas and Detroit that were actually willing to help. As one may have guessed, this was not an easy task. In the state of Michigan, it is policy that any patients under the age of 18 must seek examination and approval for medical marijuana from not one, but two doctors. Thankfully, after her examination, Bella received a recommendation for cannabis oil. So did the cannabis oil help 6-year-old Bella? According to her mother, it absolutely did. “She can stand now. She responds to voices and she loves the movie ‘Frozen.’ She didn’t do that before and the only thing different we are doing is giving her medical marijuana,” she said. Although Bella’s disease cannot be cured, her introduction to cannabis oil has enhanced not only her own life, but the lives of her family members. Bella’s parents no longer have to see their daughter struggling to stand or remain unresponsive to the broken hearted people around her.Bella isn’t the only child to be effectively treated with cannabis oil, nor is she the youngest. Dr. William Courtney of the Cannabis International Foundation announced in 2012 that his youngest patient was an 8-month-old infant with an inoperable brain tumor. After 2 months of treatment that put small amounts of cannabis oil on the child’s pacifier, there was enough of a reduction in the tumor’s size that the oncologist allowed the treatment to continue. By 8 months, the tumor had virtually disappeared, leading people to dub the child a “miracle baby.” These are not isolated incidents. Cannabis increasingly serves as an effective medicine for sick children—despite the fact that the American Academy of Pediatrics has stated it does not support cannabis treatment for children because of the drug’s negative effects on brain development in people below the age of 21. However, Dr. Courtney disagrees, stating that the use of non-psychoactive cannabis allows for significantly larger doses that allow the medical benefits to take effect much faster. In an interview with the Huffington Post, Dr. William Courtney states: There is a lot of information out there that has been built up with the intent on causing confusion […] the non-psychoactive use of the plant really facilitates a lot of its benefits because it allows elevated dosage.” The idea of giving children marijuana as medicine may still seem taboo to some, but one can’t help but wonder why this is so. Is the power of fear and propaganda that much more powerful than the ability to heal sick children? Are outdated notions and faulty studies more reputable than direct observation of successful treatments? Why is it that the U.S. government—the very institution that has perpetuated these absurd misconceptions—has admitted that cannabis can cure cancer…yet there is still a naïve herd of clueless Americans that sees the D.A.R.E. seminar they sat through in 3rd grade as more credible? 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Kinda tacky even for LF.
"Tacky" is the notion that marijuana can make people walk who couldn't before. "Tacky" is giving false hope to paraplegics. "Tacky" is using 6-year-old sick children to promote an agenda to legalize recreational marijuana. "Tacky" is using anecdotal stories in lieu of actual research as a means of convincing an ignorant public.
This has nothing to do with recreational marijuana you braying jackass. Drug warrior freaks like you are a dying breed, thank goodness. In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much It has EVERYTHING to do with legalizing recreational marijuana, you ignorant asshole. “We are trying to get marijuana reclassified medically. If we do that, we’ll be using the issue as a red herring to give marijuana a good name.”
This isn't weed to get high with. It has the wrong type of THC in its oil. It's the plant oil they're after, not recreational THC. Many states distinguish between the two. You do realize that doctors prescribe strong opiates to patients every single day? Far more dangerous, far more addictive, a lot more ruined lives as a result of dependence. You carry your Drug War too far and give your opposition the chance to make very easy points against your entire position. Tactically foolish, strategically suicidal.
In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much Oh - one "activist" said that 36 years ago? Yeah sure - OK paulsen. In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much
He was the founder of NORML.
According to the article, it's "cannabis oil". You don't know what's in it and neither do they. "You do realize that doctors prescribe strong opiates to patients every single day?" Yep. You do realize that marijuana has the analgesic effect of two Tylenol? Yet you're saying patients are substituting marijuana for opiates? "Far more dangerous, far more addictive, a lot more ruined lives as a result of dependence." Sure. You have to be careful. You can die if you abuse them. Some do. Ain't my f**king fault.
Deckard, you've convinced us that after smoking that funny smelling weed the blind see, the deaf hear, lepers are healed, the dead are raised, you can now walk on water, and it cured your ED. Jesus could learn sitting at your feet.
Error, indeed, is never set forth in its naked deformity, lest, being thus exposed, it should at once be detected. But it is craftily decked out in an attractive dress, so as by its outward form, to make it appear to the inexperienced … more true than truth itself—Irenaeus, Against Heresies
I'm saying that the consequences of the Charlotte's Web oil are minimal and patients and parents see dramatic improvement in at least some cases. These are not libertarian weed activists. They just want their children to have a more normal life. These opiates are greatly overprescribed and form a substantial part of the legal drug addiction industry. And there is a large black market for these drugs. The legal opiate pain drugs do far far more harm than allowing disabled children to use the CW oil to relieve disabling epilepsy.
You really are clueless, aren't you? Did you not read the article? You think Jesus is opposed to using cannabis as a medicine yet has no problem with using some drug manufactured by big pharma? Oh well - you believe the official fed.gov propaganda on 9/11. It's no surprise that you believe their BS about medical cannabis. In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much Is that what she was given? I didn't read that. All I read was "cannabis oil". "These opiates are greatly overprescribed and form a substantial part of the legal drug addiction industry." Was this 6-year-old being given opiates? Again, I didn't read that. Two strawmen in one post. A new record.
"Bella is a six-year-old girl from Michigan who suffers from a rare condition called 1p36 Deletion Syndrome—a disease that can lead to a series of very serious health issues including inhibited speech abilities, developmental delays, and chronic seizures." CW oil is what they use for epilepsy. The hippie types don't want it because it isn't recreational THC.
I am very much aware of this elixir. The anecdotal claims are impressive. If this girl did take CW, then we can add "allows paraplegics to walk". But back to my original question. Where did you read she was given Charlotte's Web oil?
I wouldn't go that far. Or say "allows the mute to speak". She would have been capable of speech and normal development and walking if it wasn't for the constant epileptic fits. Cure the epilepsy problem and the rest sorts itself out. I don't favor cannabis oil for anything but severe epilepsy. But then, unlike most people, I do know someone who had a hemispherectomy (half of his brain removed to reduce constant disabling epileptic seizures), a condition that in his case developed in young adulthood. And, yes, he still seems pretty normal despite half his brain being gone. Of course, he does all the half-a-brain jokes to death.
Well, doctor, you'll find few professional organizations in agreement. "A 2014 review by the American Academy of Neurology similarly concluded that "data are insufficient to support or refute the efficacy of cannabinoids for reducing seizure frequency". A position statement by the American Epilepsy Society states: "The recent anecdotal reports of positive effects of the marijuana derivative cannabidiol for some individuals with treatment-resistant epilepsy give reason for hope. However, we must remember that these are only anecdotal reports, and robust scientific evidence for the use of marijuana is lacking... at present, the epilepsy community does not know if marijuana is a safe and effective treatment, nor do they know the long-term effects that marijuana will have on learning, memory and behavior, especially in infants and young children."
The laws do not allow human trials for efficacy. So of course these statements state the obvious in medical terms: no tests support this because no tests can be conducted under current laws. No big pharma operation or university is going to conduct testing as long as the laws are as they are. Until then, there will only be anecdotal claims.
No big pharma operation or university is going to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to conduct clinical trials and go through the FDA process when some jagoff will legally be allowed offer a home brew made in his basement. Enforce the existing laws. Shut down these illegal suppliers.
"Chronically Ill 6-Year-Old Walks for First Time After Medical Cannabis Treatment"
#2. To: misterwhite (#1)
#3. To: TooConservative (#2)
"Kinda tacky even for LF."
#4. To: misterwhite (#3)
"Tacky" is using 6-year-old sick children to promote an agenda to legalize recreational marijuana.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#5. To: Deckard (#4)
"This has nothing to do with recreational marijuana you braying jackass."
-- Keith Stroup (founder of NORML), Emory University, February 6, 1979
#6. To: misterwhite (#3)
"Tacky" is using 6-year-old sick children to promote an agenda to legalize recreational marijuana.
#7. To: TooConservative, misterwhite (#6)
You do realize that doctors prescribe strong opiates to patients every single day? Far more dangerous, far more addictive, a lot more ruined lives as a result of dependence.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#8. To: misterwhite (#5)
“We are trying to get marijuana reclassified medically. If we do that, we’ll be using the issue as a red herring to give marijuana a good name.” -- Keith Stroup (founder of NORML), Emory University, February 6, 1979
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#9. To: Deckard (#8)
(Edited)
#10. To: Deckard (#8)
"Oh - one "activist" said that 36 years ago?"
#11. To: TooConservative (#6)
"It has the wrong type of THC in its oil."
#12. To: Deckard. ALL (#8)
#13. To: misterwhite (#11)
#14. To: GarySpFC (#12)
(Edited)
Deckard, you've convinced us that after smoking that funny smelling weed...
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#15. To: TooConservative (#13)
"I'm saying that the consequences of the Charlotte's Web oil are minimal ..."
#16. To: misterwhite (#15)
(Edited)
Is that what she was given? I didn't read that. All I read was "cannabis oil".
#17. To: TooConservative (#16)
"CW oil is what they use for epilepsy"
#18. To: misterwhite (#17)
I am very much aware of this elixir. The anecdotal claims are impressive. If this girl did take CW, then we can add "allows paraplegics to walk".
#19. To: TooConservative (#18)
"I don't favor cannabis oil for anything but severe epilepsy."
#20. To: misterwhite (#19)
#21. To: TooConservative (#20)
"No big pharma operation or university is going to conduct testing as long as the laws are as they are."
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]