[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Tim Walz Wants the Worst"

Border Patrol Agents SMASH Window and Drag Man from Car in Minnesota Chaos

"Dear White Liberals: Blacks and Hispanics Want No Part of Your Anti-ICE Protests"

"The Silliest Venezuela Take You Will Read Today"

Michael Reagan, Son of Ronald Reagan, Dies at 80

Patel: "Minnesota Fraud Probes 'Buried' Under Biden"

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Palin Women Masterfully Call Out Erick Erickson, Fox News On Trump-Kelly Flap
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... -fox-news-on-trump-kelly-flap/
Published: Aug 11, 2015
Author: Kevin Scholla
Post Date: 2015-08-12 13:18:51 by lana
Keywords: None
Views: 7448
Comments: 82

After being disinvited from a RedState event over the weekend, Donald Trump called RedState’s Erick Erickson “a major sleaze and buffoon who has saved me time and money.” The Donald may be on to something.

Erickson, a RINO on steroids could best be described with an old Ralph Kramden line. “I’ve seen some hypocrites in my day but he is the hippiest critic I have ever seen,” Jackie Gleason once quipped on The Honeymooners. Now Erickson’s latest comments are being taken to task by Bristol Palin and her mom, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. The two completely expose the ridiculousness that is political correctness with a big Bang, Zoom.

In her popular blog, Bristol Palin blasts Fox News for its Republican presidential debates last week and she chides Erickson for calling Trump a sexist.

Palin wrote: “It’s official. I used to use this blog to point out how liberals use the ‘outrage industry’ to manipulate people and keep their power. Now Republicans are just as bad.”

By now you’ve undoubtedly heard that there’s a guy named Erick Erickson, of RedState, who disinvited Donald Trump from a gathering of conservatives because, as he put it, “there are even lines blunt talkers and unprofessional politicians should not cross. Decency is one of those lines.” Erickson bumped Trump from the event after a war of words between Mr. Trump and Fox News host Megyn Kelly.

After the second GOP debate Thursday, Trump said, “you could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her whatever.” Some took that as a dig at Kelly’s menstrual cycle. Erickson used it as an excuse to dump Trump. Kelly, a former guest on Howard Stern’s program, who also posed for pictures in GQ magazine while scantily clad was suddenly the poster woman for the fictitious war on women.

That liberal logic was picked apart masterfully by Palin. She wrote : Want to learn some “lessons in sexual and political decency” from Erickson? Here are three:

Palin listed just a sample of Erickson’s hypocritical comments and actions over the years. His use of a fake picture of her mother wearing a revealing shirt with Santa Claus, his profanity laced description of Supreme Court Justice David Souter, and a tweet from 2007 in which Erickson seemed to get his kicks off of Trump bashing Rosie O’Donnell on Fox–one of the very things Trump was slammed for in the recent GOP debate.

Palin also gave specific examples of Fox hypocrisy. She ripped the network for host Chris Wallace joking about hoping Sarah Palin would sit on his lap, and included a quote from Fox News President Roger Ailes in which he said he hired the former vice presidential candidate “because she was hot and got ratings.”

As for that former veep nominee, she is on board with her daughter evidenced by her promotion of Bristol’s Blog through social media. Sarah Palin provided a link to her daughter’s blog on Facebook with the intro of – “Rocks and glass houses don’t go together when you’re playing PC gotcha games, so please spare us the holier than thou routine. Read Bristol’s post on how hypocritical this ‘trumped up’ outrage is.” Both Palin women agree Fox should be ashamed to have asked Mr. Trump about his history of demeaning comments on women during the debate. It’s hard to argue with their commonsense stance.

Bristol Palin’s blog gives a tidy wrap-up of just how ridiculous so many so-called Republicans and “fair and balanced” news outlets have become. “We only have so many opportunities to hear from the fifty million candidates who are apparently running for President. And we get the Fox moderators asking questions that the New York Times applauds?” Palin said. “Please. Let’s don’t use the Democratic ‘war on women’ talking points when we have ISIS to worry about.”

“Fox and Erickson need to get off their high horse on how outraged they are NOW about sexism and decency,” Palin added. “Let’s focus on winning the election, not winning accolades from The New York Times.”

We will surely see and hear plenty more from the PC brigade and “outrage industry” as Palin puts it before the 2016 race is decided, but on this day the score is clear. Mama grizzlies- 1 RINOs- 0.

Read More Stories About:

Big Government, 2016 Presidential Race, FOX NEWS, Sarah Palin, Donald Trump, Megyn Kelly, Sarah Palin, GOP Debate, Erick Erickson, Bristol Palin, RedState

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 50.

#1. To: lana (#0)

Trump/Somebody, until the inauguration, then a quick Veep resignation and Trump/Palin.

An independent like Trump will need impeachment insurance, and that ought to do it.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-12   13:26:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

Trump/Somebody, until the inauguration, then a quick Veep resignation and Trump/Palin.

An independent like Trump will need impeachment insurance, and that ought to do it.

I've been wondering who Trump would pick for his VP. A Trump/Palin ticket....it could work.

lana  posted on  2015-08-12   13:35:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: lana (#2)

A Trump/Palin ticket....it could work.

No, that won't work. Many of the people who would vote for Trump will be turned off by Palin.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-12   14:32:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Vicomte13 (#4)

No, that won't work. Many of the people who would vote for Trump will be turned off by Palin.

Who do you think would make a good VP?

lana  posted on  2015-08-12   14:47:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: lana (#5)

Who do you think would make a good VP?

Rubio.

Trump is being accused of being anti-Hispanic because he wants to control the Border and stop illegal alien flow.

Rubio as dreams about an amnesty, but if he signs up with Trump he will "fix" that blemish on his record.

He will give conservative credibility. His supporters will transfer to Trump, because Rubio would be the heir apparent to the Presidency.

Rubio would learn a lot from Trump, and would be more seasoned.

Rubio brings things to Trump, and Trump will bring a lot to Rubio, and the conservatives/establishment will feel that they have a foot in the Trump team...but Rubio is young enough to really be influenced by Trump and shaped by him, if Trump is a good inside leader and boss (which I have heard he is).

With Rubio, the whole racist charge is confounded. And Rubio would be a credible candidate were he older and wiser.

Trump/Rubio is the actual ticket I'd like to see.

I assume Rubio is pro-life, but I don't know because I've never taken him seriously.

Also, if Rubio had the balls to sign on with Trump, it would show that he has vision, and is willing to take dramatic risks for dramatic gains.

Trump/Rubio, for 8 years, followed by Rubio/?

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-12   15:02:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Vicomte13 (#6)

What about Cruz? Rubio is pro-amnesty.

lana  posted on  2015-08-12   15:05:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: lana (#7)

What about Cruz? Rubio is pro-amnesty.

No, Cruz is too weird.

To win, Trump has to gain the votes of independents and middle America, also blacks and Hispanics. He's not going to gain anything with Cruz.

Yes, Rubio has been pro-amnesty. He is young and foolish, and has backed himself into a corner.

Other than that position, he seems to be a good guy.

The Veep is second banana. A young Veep to a billionaire President will literally be his apprentice. He will learn things, see much, and he will adjust his beliefs to face the more complicated realities.

And Trump will have had eight years to impose a policy that works.

All Rubio then need do is maintain a proven policy. That will be a change from his youthful "I can't really figure this out, so here's my stab at it" stance that produced amnesty (or the appearance thereof), and a more mature: "This works" position.

Rubio can be rehabilitated, by Trump, and in the process he can add something to Trump.

Trump/Rubio is not two equals. It's Master and Apprentice, and it will give Rubio the chance to change his mind, and to openly participate in the implementation of a different policy than the ill-thought-out one he proposed 8 or 9 years before (once he's been Veep for two terms).

That's why Rubio. His amnesty stance will be irrelevant if he's Trump's apprentice. And 9 years' hence, he'll have learned better and be on board with Trump's by-then-successful Border policy, so it won't matter that, in his youth, he got it wrong. He'll have it right by the time he's ready to advance to power.

That's good enough.

We're not talking religion here, we're talking politics, which is about practical results.

Serving as Trump's VP will rehabilitate Rubio. By contrast, H.W. Bush already had a deep political base that he kept when he served Reagan. Rubio doesn't have the long Bush tradition of being wrong about everything for generations, so he will be more moldable and fixable.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-12   15:44:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Vicomte13, lana (#8)

Yes, Rubio has been pro-amnesty. He is young and foolish, and has backed himself into a corner.

Other than that position, he seems to be a good guy.

You mean other than insanely wanting to inflict upon the USA the menace and burden of supporting 50 million illegal invaders and annexing a quarter of the USA into a Northern Mexican state, Rubio's...a good guy??

Serving as Trump's VP will rehabilitate Rubio.

Dat be some badazz weed yoo smokin', Cheech.

Liberator  posted on  2015-08-12   16:45:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Liberator (#14)

You mean other than insanely wanting to inflict upon the USA the menace and burden of supporting 50 million illegal invaders and annexing a quarter of the USA into a Northern Mexican state, Rubio's...a good guy??

Yes, I mean other than that.

And as Veep, he will be powerless for 8 years, during which the immigration issue will have been decisively addressed by Trump, in a way that is effective. Rubio will have accepted the policy that works, and won't return to his "We don't know what to do so we're all flailing" excessive young man's stance.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-12   17:04:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Vicomte13 (#17)

And as Veep, he will be powerless for 8 years, during which the immigration issue will have been decisively addressed by Trump, in a way that is effective.

VPs wield a lot of influence these days. Besides -- there's no guarantee Trump would stand the rigors of your presumptive full two terms as President.

Other than the above, Rubio's a counter-intuitive Veep for Trump...and the USA.

Liberator  posted on  2015-08-12   17:11:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Liberator, Vicomte13 (#19)

And as Veep, he will be powerless for 8 years, during which the immigration issue will have been decisively addressed by Trump, in a way that is effective.

VPs wield a lot of influence these days.

You obviously remember Dipshit Joe influencing that idiot Obozo into supporting homo marriage... (For the campaign contributions of course)...

CZ82  posted on  2015-08-12   18:32:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: CZ82 (#32)

You obviously remember Dipshit Joe influencing that idiot Obozo into supporting homo marriage... (For the campaign contributions of course)...

I don't believe in gay marriage.

The majority of the country does, and it is now the law of the land, and popularly so. So "Dipshit Joe", politically, is on the "right" side of history on that subject, when it comes to getting elected President.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-12   18:58:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Vicomte13 (#35)

So "Dipshit Joe", politically, is on the "right" side of history on that subject

(For the campaign contributions of course)...

CZ82  posted on  2015-08-12   19:22:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: CZ82 (#38)

Hmmmmm...

Hmmmmmm, what?

Unless you live in a cave, you see it everywhere in your own life. Most people have become quite tolerant of this.

One can say "brainwashed!" but the same public education has sought to brainwash people into quite a few other activities, like recycling, but has not really succeeded.

On this subject, though, on the gays, the majority of the country is not gay, and doesn't want to be. But the majority of the country jokes about it with benign jokes, and really hates people who get bent out of shape about the gays much more than it does the gays themselves.

Most people do not care who other people sleep with, or how. And most people find people who go insane with rage over that sort of thing to be far more disturbing than the unhappy souls who call themselves "gay".

This is why corporations extended the benefits, and campuses, everywhere, and people just shrugged their shoulders or quietly agreed.

Me? I see the steady advance of Satan through libertinism, but this is just a rearguard action to sweep up a lower rank of sinner. This nation ALREADY damned itself, starting in 1973, by slaughtering 2 million babies a year. Having gays hold hands and make wedding cakes is small beer compared to mass murder.

Put to a vote - a plebiscite - in state after state voters have approved gay marriage now. It started with the courts moving it aside, but the more it exercised itself, the more people shrugged their shoulders and did not care.

Essentially, gay marriage followed the path of black civil rights, and the holdouts are stigmatized with the same brush as racists.

None of the Republican candidates is going to campaign for an amendment to the Constitution to abolish gay marriage. Abortion? Yes - people still stand up to that. But gays? The country has accepted them and moved on, and will bring the crowbar down on those who become too belligerent in holding out.

Biden got on the right side of history, from a political perspective, with that move.

I personally see a great deal of tragedy here, moral decay.

But then I look at our economic system, see how un-Christian it is, and see "Christians" standing against whole chapters of Scripture regarding money, interest, debt, release, relief for the poor, etc., and I realize that the moral foundations of the country have simply rotted away.

So I expect nothing. Trump is entertaining. The other dwarves standing up there on the GOP stage are not, and none of them have any hope of being President.

It will be Trump or Biden, the Republicans are going to take out Trump, so it will be Biden. And then the Republicans can spend eight years grousing about him.

Whatever.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-12   19:35:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Vicomte13 (#43)

If it's so damn popular then why does it always get voted down by about 70-30% at the state level??

CZ82  posted on  2015-08-12   19:47:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: CZ82 (#46)

If it's so damn popular then why does it always get voted down by about 70-30% at the state level??

It hasn't been. It was voted up by the people in direct ballot initiatives in Maine, Washington and Maryland.

In Minnesota, a referendum was proposed to define marriage as exclusively between a man and a woman. The people rejected it.

That's four states where the majorities of the people voted directly to authorize same sex unions, or to ban them, where the ban failed (Minnesota).

In several other states, the normal system of a republic, of elected representatives voting on legislation, enacted same-sex marriage laws.

There was a time when the numbers you cite are true. But that was a decade ago. In more recent years, people have changed their minds. The pattern of behavior is very similar to the pattern of behavior regarding black segregation and prejudice. It started out as normal and people resisted integration. Then came court cases that forced the issue. There were gales of outrage, but tolerance grew and the shoulder shrug "I don't care either way" grew.

Then came affirmative legislation. And as the culture changed, the segregationists became increasingly marginalized, and then finally fell silent, in public, for fear of the retaliation they would suffer if they expressed their racism.

One of the legacies of slavery and segregation, as it turns out, is gay marriage as a constitutional right. Because the degree of power that had to be applied to break the will of the racists required a whole political and judicial power structure, and once that was erected, it was not dismantled but left in place to be used as the instrument to break public resistance on other matters, gay marriage being the next.

It's a pity our ancestors were so ate up about keeping slaves and keeping blacks and whites apart, because if they hadn't been we probably wouldn't have to look at "Caitlyn" Jenner parading in a dress on the magazine covers.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-12   20:05:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Vicomte13 (#47)

Thank you for proving my point...

CZ82  posted on  2015-08-13   7:11:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 50.

        There are no replies to Comment # 50.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 50.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com