United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Palin Women Masterfully Call Out Erick Erickson, Fox News On Trump-Kelly Flap
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... -fox-news-on-trump-kelly-flap/
Published: Aug 11, 2015
Author: Kevin Scholla
Post Date: 2015-08-12 13:18:51 by lana
Keywords: None
Views: 7466
Comments: 82
After being disinvited from a RedState event over the weekend, Donald Trump called RedState’s Erick Erickson “a major sleaze and buffoon who has saved me time and money.” The Donald may be on to something. Erickson, a RINO on steroids could best be described with an old Ralph Kramden line. “I’ve seen some hypocrites in my day but he is the hippiest critic I have ever seen,” Jackie Gleason once quipped on The Honeymooners. Now Erickson’s latest comments are being taken to task by Bristol Palin and her mom, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. The two completely expose the ridiculousness that is political correctness with a big Bang, Zoom. In her popular blog, Bristol Palin blasts Fox News for its Republican presidential debates last week and she chides Erickson for calling Trump a sexist. Palin wrote: “It’s official. I used to use this blog to point out how liberals use the ‘outrage industry’ to manipulate people and keep their power. Now Republicans are just as bad.” By now you’ve undoubtedly heard that there’s a guy named Erick Erickson, of RedState, who disinvited Donald Trump from a gathering of conservatives because, as he put it, “there are even lines blunt talkers and unprofessional politicians should not cross. Decency is one of those lines.” Erickson bumped Trump from the event after a war of words between Mr. Trump and Fox News host Megyn Kelly. After the second GOP debate Thursday, Trump said, “you could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her whatever.” Some took that as a dig at Kelly’s menstrual cycle. Erickson used it as an excuse to dump Trump. Kelly, a former guest on Howard Stern’s program, who also posed for pictures in GQ magazine while scantily clad was suddenly the poster woman for the fictitious war on women. That liberal logic was picked apart masterfully by Palin. She wrote : Want to learn some “lessons in sexual and political decency” from Erickson? Here are three: Palin listed just a sample of Erickson’s hypocritical comments and actions over the years. His use of a fake picture of her mother wearing a revealing shirt with Santa Claus, his profanity laced description of Supreme Court Justice David Souter, and a tweet from 2007 in which Erickson seemed to get his kicks off of Trump bashing Rosie O’Donnell on Fox–one of the very things Trump was slammed for in the recent GOP debate. Palin also gave specific examples of Fox hypocrisy. She ripped the network for host Chris Wallace joking about hoping Sarah Palin would sit on his lap, and included a quote from Fox News President Roger Ailes in which he said he hired the former vice presidential candidate “because she was hot and got ratings.” As for that former veep nominee, she is on board with her daughter evidenced by her promotion of Bristol’s Blog through social media. Sarah Palin provided a link to her daughter’s blog on Facebook with the intro of – “Rocks and glass houses don’t go together when you’re playing PC gotcha games, so please spare us the holier than thou routine. Read Bristol’s post on how hypocritical this ‘trumped up’ outrage is.” Both Palin women agree Fox should be ashamed to have asked Mr. Trump about his history of demeaning comments on women during the debate. It’s hard to argue with their commonsense stance. Bristol Palin’s blog gives a tidy wrap-up of just how ridiculous so many so-called Republicans and “fair and balanced” news outlets have become. “We only have so many opportunities to hear from the fifty million candidates who are apparently running for President. And we get the Fox moderators asking questions that the New York Times applauds?” Palin said. “Please. Let’s don’t use the Democratic ‘war on women’ talking points when we have ISIS to worry about.” “Fox and Erickson need to get off their high horse on how outraged they are NOW about sexism and decency,” Palin added. “Let’s focus on winning the election, not winning accolades from The New York Times.” We will surely see and hear plenty more from the PC brigade and “outrage industry” as Palin puts it before the 2016 race is decided, but on this day the score is clear. Mama grizzlies- 1 RINOs- 0. Read More Stories About: Big Government, 2016 Presidential Race, FOX NEWS, Sarah Palin, Donald Trump, Megyn Kelly, Sarah Palin, GOP Debate, Erick Erickson, Bristol Palin, RedState
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 41.
#1. To: lana (#0)
Trump/Somebody, until the inauguration, then a quick Veep resignation and Trump/Palin. An independent like Trump will need impeachment insurance, and that ought to do it.
An independent like Trump will need impeachment insurance, and that ought to do it. I've been wondering who Trump would pick for his VP. A Trump/Palin ticket....it could work.
No, that won't work. Many of the people who would vote for Trump will be turned off by Palin.
Who do you think would make a good VP?
Rubio. Trump is being accused of being anti-Hispanic because he wants to control the Border and stop illegal alien flow. Rubio as dreams about an amnesty, but if he signs up with Trump he will "fix" that blemish on his record. He will give conservative credibility. His supporters will transfer to Trump, because Rubio would be the heir apparent to the Presidency. Rubio would learn a lot from Trump, and would be more seasoned. Rubio brings things to Trump, and Trump will bring a lot to Rubio, and the conservatives/establishment will feel that they have a foot in the Trump team...but Rubio is young enough to really be influenced by Trump and shaped by him, if Trump is a good inside leader and boss (which I have heard he is). With Rubio, the whole racist charge is confounded. And Rubio would be a credible candidate were he older and wiser. Trump/Rubio is the actual ticket I'd like to see. I assume Rubio is pro-life, but I don't know because I've never taken him seriously. Also, if Rubio had the balls to sign on with Trump, it would show that he has vision, and is willing to take dramatic risks for dramatic gains. Trump/Rubio, for 8 years, followed by Rubio/?
What about Cruz? Rubio is pro-amnesty.
No, Cruz is too weird. To win, Trump has to gain the votes of independents and middle America, also blacks and Hispanics. He's not going to gain anything with Cruz. Yes, Rubio has been pro-amnesty. He is young and foolish, and has backed himself into a corner. Other than that position, he seems to be a good guy. The Veep is second banana. A young Veep to a billionaire President will literally be his apprentice. He will learn things, see much, and he will adjust his beliefs to face the more complicated realities. And Trump will have had eight years to impose a policy that works. All Rubio then need do is maintain a proven policy. That will be a change from his youthful "I can't really figure this out, so here's my stab at it" stance that produced amnesty (or the appearance thereof), and a more mature: "This works" position. Rubio can be rehabilitated, by Trump, and in the process he can add something to Trump. Trump/Rubio is not two equals. It's Master and Apprentice, and it will give Rubio the chance to change his mind, and to openly participate in the implementation of a different policy than the ill-thought-out one he proposed 8 or 9 years before (once he's been Veep for two terms). That's why Rubio. His amnesty stance will be irrelevant if he's Trump's apprentice. And 9 years' hence, he'll have learned better and be on board with Trump's by-then-successful Border policy, so it won't matter that, in his youth, he got it wrong. He'll have it right by the time he's ready to advance to power. That's good enough. We're not talking religion here, we're talking politics, which is about practical results. Serving as Trump's VP will rehabilitate Rubio. By contrast, H.W. Bush already had a deep political base that he kept when he served Reagan. Rubio doesn't have the long Bush tradition of being wrong about everything for generations, so he will be more moldable and fixable.
Other than that position, he seems to be a good guy. You mean other than insanely wanting to inflict upon the USA the menace and burden of supporting 50 million illegal invaders and annexing a quarter of the USA into a Northern Mexican state, Rubio's...a good guy?? Serving as Trump's VP will rehabilitate Rubio. Dat be some badazz weed yoo smokin', Cheech.
Yes, I mean other than that. And as Veep, he will be powerless for 8 years, during which the immigration issue will have been decisively addressed by Trump, in a way that is effective. Rubio will have accepted the policy that works, and won't return to his "We don't know what to do so we're all flailing" excessive young man's stance.
VPs wield a lot of influence these days. Besides -- there's no guarantee Trump would stand the rigors of your presumptive full two terms as President. Other than the above, Rubio's a counter-intuitive Veep for Trump...and the USA.
VPs wield a lot of influence these days. You obviously remember Dipshit Joe influencing that idiot Obozo into supporting homo marriage... (For the campaign contributions of course)...
I don't believe in gay marriage. The majority of the country does, and it is now the law of the land, and popularly so. So "Dipshit Joe", politically, is on the "right" side of history on that subject, when it comes to getting elected President.
You're still believing that polls reflect public opinion instead of shaping public opinion, tsk, tsk, tsk...
On that subject, yes, because they clearly do.
Let me guess you also believe in Bigfoot???
#44. To: CZ82 (#41)
No.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
Trump/Somebody, until the inauguration, then a quick Veep resignation and Trump/Palin.
#4. To: lana (#2)
A Trump/Palin ticket....it could work.
#5. To: Vicomte13 (#4)
No, that won't work. Many of the people who would vote for Trump will be turned off by Palin.
#6. To: lana (#5)
Who do you think would make a good VP?
#7. To: Vicomte13 (#6)
#8. To: lana (#7)
What about Cruz? Rubio is pro-amnesty.
#14. To: Vicomte13, lana (#8)
Yes, Rubio has been pro-amnesty. He is young and foolish, and has backed himself into a corner.
#17. To: Liberator (#14)
You mean other than insanely wanting to inflict upon the USA the menace and burden of supporting 50 million illegal invaders and annexing a quarter of the USA into a Northern Mexican state, Rubio's...a good guy??
#19. To: Vicomte13 (#17)
And as Veep, he will be powerless for 8 years, during which the immigration issue will have been decisively addressed by Trump, in a way that is effective.
#32. To: Liberator, Vicomte13 (#19)
And as Veep, he will be powerless for 8 years, during which the immigration issue will have been decisively addressed by Trump, in a way that is effective.
#35. To: CZ82 (#32)
You obviously remember Dipshit Joe influencing that idiot Obozo into supporting homo marriage... (For the campaign contributions of course)...
#37. To: Vicomte13 (#35)
The majority of the country does
#39. To: CZ82 (#37)
You're still believing that polls reflect public opinion instead of shaping public opinion, tsk, tsk, tsk...
#41. To: Vicomte13 (#39)
On that subject, yes, because they clearly do.
Replies to Comment # 41. Let me guess you also believe in Bigfoot???
End Trace Mode for Comment # 41.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]