United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Shooting of Unarmed 19-Year-Old Highlights the Drug War's Depravity
Source:
Reason
URL Source: http://reason.com/blog/2015/08/10/p ... oting-of-unarmed-19-year-old-h
Published: Aug 11, 2015
Author: Jacob Sullum
Post Date: 2015-08-11 09:23:45 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1969
Comments: 17
Last Friday the Seneca, South Carolina, police department identified Lt. Mark Tiller as the officer who shot and killed 19-year-old Zachary Hammond in a Hardee's parking lot on July 26. Hammond, who was unarmed, was on his first date with 23-year-old Toni Morton, who was eating an ice cream cone in the front passenger seat of his car at the moment of the shooting. Morton was later charged with possessing 10 grams of marijuana. According to The New York Times, police had targeted her as part of "a sting operation." The Washington Post says "undercover agents set up the drug buy." Tiller claims he fired two shots in self-defense through the driver's side window because Hammond was trying to run him down. But an autopsy commissioned by Hammond's family found that one bullet entered his left shoulder from behind while the other entered his chest from the side—wounds that the family's lawyer, Eric Bland, says are inconsistent with Tiller's story, which he calls "ridiculous" and "offensive." Police say they have dashcam video of the encounter, which might help clarify the facts, but they have not released it yet. Bland complains that the shooting of Hammond, who was white, has not received the same sort of national attention as incidents in which unarmed black men were killed by police. "It's sad, but I think the reason is, unfortunately, the media and our government officials have treated the death of an unarmed white teenager differently than they would have if this were a death of an unarmed black teen," Bland told The Washington Post last week. "The hypocrisy that has been shown toward this is really disconcerting." Bland may have a point, but to me the main lesson to be learned from this utterly senseless incident has to do with the depravity of the war on drugs. Even if we assume that Tiller is telling the truth and that he reasonably believed lethal force was necessary to avoid death or serious injury, this entire situation was created by the cops. Hammond and Morton were minding their own business when Tiller initiated the use of force because of a pending transaction involving a third of an ounce of marijuana, a drug that is legal for medical or recreational use in 23 states. Furthermore, it was the police who arranged the transaction to begin with, in an attempt to catch Morton doing something that shouldn't be treated as a crime because it violates no one's rights. That's what a drug sting is: a trumped-up version of a fake crime. Whether or not the shooting is deemed to be legally justified, it is outrageous that a young man is dead for such a stupid reason. Maybe this incident will wake up more Americans to the reality of the war on drugs, which uses violence to stop people from getting high and therefore constantly risks outcomes like this. Or maybe not. Here is how one Hardee's customer reacted to the shooting: "We're so thankful here in Oconee County that our police departments and sheriffs and things like that, that they're on top of the drug problems and trying to eliminate all drugs and everything." 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
(Edited)
If the shooting does turn out justified, the shitbird didn't die because of your undying love for drugs... he died because one of his peers, a police officer, used his natural born right to self defense. Our founding fathers set up the criminal justice system as "innocent until proven guilty"... So you make the DA prove you're guilty IN COURT... not get the charges dropped by trying to running the officer over. By the way, "if" the deceased did in fact attempt to run the officer over, he's justified to shoot him as he approaches, drives by and drives off... as long as his actions aren't reckless towards others in the area. The deceased bullet wounds in the side and back won't mean shit if the video shows this shitbird trying to run the officer over. Now... with that said, if the drug loving criminal scumbag shitbird was just trying to flee and he didn't try and run the officer over, and the officer just shot the drug loving criminal scumbag shitbird to avoid his flight... then charge the criminal scumbag shitbird officer and wood chip him after his due process.
From the article : ...an autopsy commissioned by Hammond's family found that one bullet entered his left shoulder from behind while the other entered his chest from the side... Piss off badge licker.
1) left shoulder from behind while the other entered his 2) chest from the side... 1) shooting as the criminal scumbag shitbird DRIVES OFF 2) shooting as the criminal scumbag shitbird DRIVES BYE Just like I stated in post # 2 You really have poor reading skills. lol
Shooting a teen passenger over a driver having 10 grams of weed and driving off is just wrong. There is nothing substantive here worth the huge lawsuit that the PD will be paying out. This isn't the right hill for the pro-LEO posters to die on.
#10. To: TooConservative (#9)
We both know that's not what the officer allegedly shot the deceased over. You disappoint me. If the jury finds it wasn't self defense, I'll agree he shot the little scumbag over fleeing an arrest.
The passenger had the marijuana. The driver was shot because he tried to run down the officer with his car. Here we have yet another story of someone who'd be alive today if he had just kept his car in park and not tried to harm law enforcement. You got caught. Man up. Take personal responsibility for your actions. Criminy, ain't worth dyin' for.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestWhether or not the shooting is deemed to be legally justified, it is outrageous that a young man is dead for such a stupid reason.
#6. To: GrandIsland (#2)
By the way, "if" the deceased did in fact attempt to run the officer over, he's justified to shoot him as he approaches, drives by and drives off..
#8. To: Deckard (#6)
...an autopsy commissioned by Hammond's family found that one bullet entered his
#9. To: GrandIsland (#8)
Replies to Comment # 9. Shooting a teen passenger over a driver having 10 grams of weed and driving off is just wrong.
#12. To: TooConservative (#9)
"Shooting a teen passenger over a driver having 10 grams of weed and driving off is just wrong."
End Trace Mode for Comment # 9.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]