[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Trump campaign claims it fired top adviser -- who says he quit
Source: CNN
URL Source: http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/08/polit ... ld-trump-campaign-roger-stone/
Published: Aug 8, 2015
Author: MJ Lee and Dana Bash
Post Date: 2015-08-08 20:21:33 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 17864
Comments: 174

(CNN)Donald Trump's campaign said Saturday it has fired top political adviser Roger Stone -- who promptly denied being let go and insisted he had quit.

Stone's disassociation from the Trump operation Saturday highlights the campaign's seeming lack of veteran political advisers, even as the 2016 season is ramping up in earnest. And the dispute opens a window into two different factions of the campaign: one side that wants to maintain Trump's high visibility by capitalizing on his public feuds and bombastic rhetoric, and another that wants to pull the candidate toward more disciplined political strategy.

The episode caps a tumultuous few weeks for Trump's presidential campaign, which recently cut ties with two men accused of writing inflammatory Facebook posts. Trump, who is currently leading national polls, delivered an explosive performance at the first GOP debate in Cleveland Thursday, and went on to make inflammatory comments about Fox News host Megyn Kelly in an interview on CNN Friday night.

"Mr. Trump fired Roger Stone last night. We have a tremendously successful campaign and Roger wanted to use the campaign for his own personal publicity. He has had a number of articles about him recently and Mr. Trump wants to keep the focus of the campaign on how to Make America Great Again," a campaign spokesperson told CNN.

Stone, however, told CNN that he "categorically denies" being fired, and provided what he said was his resignation letter.

"Unfortunately, the current controversies involving personalities and provocative media fights have reached such a high volume that it has distracted attention from your platform and overwhelmed your core message. With this current direction of the candidacy, I no longer can remain involved in your campaign," the letter to Trump says.

Stone added: "I care about you as a friend and wish you well. Be assured I will continue to be vocal and active in the national debate to ensure our nation does not again turn to the failed and distrusted Bush/Clinton families."

Trump's campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, said the team never saw Stone's letter. For his part, Stone tweeted Saturday afternoon that he "fired Trump."

"Sorry @realDonaldTrump didn't fire me- I fired Trump. Diasagree [sic] with diversion to food fight with @megynkelly away core issue messages," the tweet read.

The Washington Post first reported that Stone was no longer a part of Trump's campaign.

Matt Mackowiak, a Republican political consultant and close friend of Stone's, told CNN that Stone was deeply disappointed with Trump's debate performance Thursday.

Stone, a former aide to President Richard Nixon who has known Trump for several decades, helped with the candidate's debate preparations. He had hoped that Trump would stay focused and disciplined, sticking largely to issues like illegal immigration and trade. Instead, Stone concluded that Trump had taken the debate to a "circus-like place."

The working relationship between Stone and Trump became further strained when Trump made controversial comments about Kelly in an interview with CNN's Don Lemon.

"You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes," Trump told Lemon. "Blood coming out of her wherever."

"Calling into CNN and making outrageous comments about Megyn Kelly and making it even more of a circus than it already is, Roger just felt like he couldn't stand by him," Mackowiak said.

Mackowiak also said Stone had planned to announce his resignation Saturday night, and when Trump got word, the candidate announced he had fired Stone.

One Trump associate and friend also told CNN that existing tensions between Stone and Trump reached a breaking point following the candidate's explosive debate performance.

"He has been disenchanted with Trump for a few weeks now," the associate said, citing Stone's perception that Trump's candidacy lacked "seriousness."

According to this source, Stone was unhappy with Trump's conduct on the debate stage in Cleveland, and when Stone shared these thoughts with Trump, the billionaire businessman "didn't want to hear it."

Another Republican source close to Stone said the adviser resigned in part because he grew frustrated with the campaign's refusal to focus on policy specifics and conduct polling.

"Roger has been trying to press the campaign to get specific on issues, to poll, to run an actual campaign, while others in Trumpland have been egging him on to continue to engage in these political food fights like the Megyn Kelly incident," the Republican source said.

Speaking with CNN's Poppy Harlow late Saturday afternoon, Stone again insisted he quit, saying he felt he "was having no impact." He said he hoped Trump would return to speaking about the "big picture" issues, such as trade and immigration, that helped fuel his rise to the top of GOP polls.

But Stone refused to elaborate in greater detail about how his relationship with the campaign ruptured, saying he had "no intention about talking about internal campaign deliberations."

He did say, however, that he and Trump remain friends, and although he isn't a registered Republican, said he would continue to back a Trump bid.

"If I had the opportunity to vote for him in the primaries, I would," he said. "I still think he is the right man to make America great again."


Poster Comment:

Roger Stone is Trump's longtime political adviser and ally, going back decades.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-71) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#72. To: misterwhite (#69)

To be fair, I don't believe he has ever performed that sort of action on the Sabbath day. Nope, he comes back from Sunday School all ready to preach damnation again to fire us up 'bout HELL & subsequent DAMNATION, if we don't get into his logick.

He reserves his "button thingy" for the business calandar days for us long standing heathens.

buckeroo  posted on  2015-08-09   12:22:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: misterwhite (#71)

I'm saying the people would have forced the House, despite party allegiance.

And the result of that when the GOP grassroots got the House (Lady Lindsey prosecuting, along with Kasich in support)?

The Senate let him off the hook.

Very unlikely either party will ever impeach its own president in the House. That was the threat over Nixon that forced his resignation, that sizable numbers of House Republicans would have voted to impeach. But the Dems had the majority at the time and were ready to proceed (Hitlery being one of the staff lawyers).

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-08-09   12:22:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: TooConservative (#70)

I've already posted my thoughts on the Fox News page.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-08-09   12:26:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: TooConservative (#73)

I wouldn't be surprised to read, years from now, that Bush was given an ultimatum by Congress -- invade somebody or you will be thrown out of office for inaction. The people want blood and they will get it.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-08-09   12:38:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: TooConservative (#68)

Like I said my own support of Trump surprises me. he literally is horrible at it but I fucking like the guy.

Pericles  posted on  2015-08-09   12:51:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: GrandIsland (#74)

I've already posted my thoughts on the Fox News page.

No doubt, they have a lot of angry Trump supporters posting there.

As far as intimidating Ailes (the "decider"), we can judge by how much angry reaction there was to FNC's obvious pro-Giuliani bias in the 2008 race, so much so that Giuliani occupied a strong frontrunner position in 2008, comparable to Trump's numbers now. And Giuliani, like Trump, is a New Yorker. And that means pretty liberal on a wide range of issues. Because they are NYCers, it's their worldview. As a longtime watcher, you know this is true.

The bizarre thing to me is that Giuliani was considered by the base as too liberal and McStain was able to consolidate his NH win (with a lot of Dem votes in their open primary) and build on that to overcome Giuliani in Florida.

Trump but not Giuliani? Are you kidding me? It's insane. Even Pataki looks not so dismal compared to Trump. I'm talking about their basic character as a person, not just policy (well, if Trump has any policy other than some calculated pandering to the Right who are pretending to ignore his long liberal record as a typical Manhattan tycoon).

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-08-09   12:57:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: misterwhite (#75)

I wouldn't be surprised to read, years from now, that Bush was given an ultimatum by Congress -- invade somebody or you will be thrown out of office for inaction. The people want blood and they will get it.

I doubt it.

If you recall the early Bush years and the domestic politics, Bush let Teddy The Swimmer write his hallmark bill, No Child Left Behind. Then played hardball, especially in the House, to force Republicans to support it. Recall how they held the vote open for hours on the floor of the House while they openly twisted arms to pass the Pill Bill, threatening to primary conservatives and/or take their chairmanships and more.

So, no, I don't think the tail was wagging the dog, with Congress forcing Bush into war.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-08-09   13:08:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: Pericles (#76)

Like I said my own support of Trump surprises me. he literally is horrible at it but I fucking like the guy.

Obviously The Donald appeals to your better angels, to paraphrase Lincoln's old quote.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-08-09   13:10:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: TooConservative (#79)

Obviously The Donald appeals to your better angels, to paraphrase Lincoln's old quote.

LOL

Pericles  posted on  2015-08-09   13:21:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: TooConservative, GrandIsland (#77)

he bizarre thing to me is that Giuliani was considered by the base as too liberal and McStain was able to consolidate his NH win (with a lot of Dem votes in their open primary) and build on that to overcome Giuliani in Florida.

Trump but not Giuliani? Are you kidding me? It's insane.

Trump is a businessman who is willing to fight for the base rather than Giuliani who was a govt employee and talked down to the base.

There is a difference. Trump is saying he sucks as a politician but he built a net worth in the billions.

Trump is running on his competency as a mega business man. He can build stuff.

Pericles  posted on  2015-08-09   13:26:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: Pericles (#76)

Like I said my own support of Trump surprises me. he literally is horrible at it but I fucking like the guy.

I think Trump's appeal to 'every man' right now is that he gets to say things to media folks, other candidates and speak bluntly about issues - which often reflect our own feelings and perceptions. Even if he is a socialite and elitist.

That's what I think. Personally, I don't care for him as a presidential candidate. But I sure as heck am enjoying the clown show called the election process because of him.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-08-09   13:29:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: Pericles (#80)

LOL

I'll indulge your guilty pleasure for a while. At least you know better.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-08-09   13:30:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: Pericles (#81)

Trump is a businessman who is willing to fight for the base rather than Giuliani who was a govt employee and talked down to the base.

There is a difference. Trump is saying he sucks as a politician but he built a net worth in the billions.

Maybe he can just declare the country bankrupt. He's had some practice.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-08-09   13:33:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: TooConservative (#83)

Oh, thank you for allowing me to indulge myself, oh great one!

I actually am not a Republican any longer and my state does not allow cross over votes from independents so I am a bemused spectator at the moment.

Pericles  posted on  2015-08-09   13:33:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: Pericles (#85)

I actually am not a Republican any longer and my state does not allow cross over votes from independents so I am a bemused spectator at the moment.

Good. I don't like open primaries or last-minute registration switches.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-08-09   13:34:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: TooConservative (#84)

"Maybe he can just declare the country bankrupt. He's had some practice."

Okay, Chris Wallace.

"Out of hundreds of deals that I've done — hundreds! — on four occasions, I've taken advantage of the laws of this country like other people," Trump said."

Four bankruptcies out of hundreds of investments? Well, forget it. If he can't be perfect, I'm not voting for him.

Who should I vote for, Too Conservative? Who has a 100% record of decision- making?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-08-09   14:12:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: misterwhite (#87)

Who should I vote for, Too Conservative? Who has a 100% record of decision- making?

How about a candidate who isn't well-known for going bankrupt?

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-08-09   14:17:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: TooConservative (#88)

I finally looked into his bankruptcies and found this from two days ago:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/what-trump-didnt-say-about-his-four-big-business-bankruptcies/2015/08/07/bc054e64-3d12-11e5-9c2d-ed991d848c48_story.html

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-08-09   14:25:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: Fred Mertz (#89)

I finally looked into his bankruptcies and found this from two days ago:

People are going to think differently as more about these bankruptcies surfaces. Just like his refusal to pledge not to run third-party even as he bids for the GOP nomination.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-08-09   14:31:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: TooConservative, misterwhite (#88)

How about a candidate who isn't well-known for going bankrupt?

As Trump said, he never went bankrupt. He protected his assets by incorporating different companies for different ventures. A company declaring bankruptcy only affects the assets of that company. The poor banksters lost money.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-08-09   19:03:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#92. To: TooConservative (#90)

Just like his refusal to pledge not to run third-party even as he bids for the GOP nomination.

You can be such a moron. Do you think Bush would support Trump if he gets the nomi nomination?

Do you think Graham would?

No one gives a shit if he doesn't support the Republican nominee if he is a piece of shit like Bush etc. I didn't say she because that cunt Fiorina or however you spell her name has zero chance. She is a stupid person. No charisma. No ideas. She shouldn't even be on the stage. Not even the kiddie debate.

In fact if he said he would he would lose votes.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-08-09   19:25:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: TooConservative (#21)

f you intend to stop Bush,

If Bush is the nominee, Biden will stop him.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-09   19:27:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#94. To: Vicomte13 (#93)

Biden will stop him.

Biden is a piece of shit that favors abortion.

BIDEN: The next president will get one or two Supreme Court nominees. That's how cl close Roe v. Wade is. Just ask yourself: With Robert Bork being the chief ad adviser on the court for Mr. Romney, who do you think he's likely to appoint? Do yo you think he's likely to appoint someone far right, that would outlaw abortion? I I suspect that would happen. I guarantee you that will not happen [with Obama]. We We picked people who are open-minded. They've been good justices.

www.ontheissues.org/2016/Joe_Biden_Abortion.htm

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-08-09   19:37:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: All, pinguinite, tooconservative (#94)

BIDEN: The next president will get one or two Supreme Court nominees. That's how cl close Roe v. Wade is

Notice the "cl close". I noticed some of my posts today were kind of like that that. Having the first two letters of a word followed by the actual word. I thou thought I made a typo.

This was a cut and paste. It added the cl.

I've been trying out this edge browser. I kind of like it but I think it has some kind of but in it. I don't recall that happening when I use firefox or ch chrome.

Weird

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-08-09   19:40:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#96. To: pinguinite, tooconservative (#95)

I thou thought I

There it is again.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-08-09   19:41:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#97. To: A K A Stone (#92) (Edited)

You can be such a moron. Do you think Bush would support Trump if he gets the nomi nomination?

It isn't refusing to support the nominee or to endorse the nominee. It's the threat to run third party.

Even Ron Paul never threatened to run third party if he wasn't the nominee. They grumbled when he didn't endorse Stain or Romney but that's all. They were peeved when he threw his own post-campaign Ron Paul convention in another arena across town from the GOP convention while they were coronating the loathsome Stain. Real peeved. LOL.

But RP never so much as threatened to run third party, let alone set himself up to do it. And RP had offers for a dual-nomination for the CP and LP nomination. He certainly could have done it.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-08-09   21:03:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#98. To: A K A Stone (#95)

Notice the "cl close". I noticed some of my posts today were kind of like that that. Having the first two letters of a word followed by the actual word. I thou thought I made a typo.

Is it trying to guess the word you're typing? You sometimes get that on Apple devices (and Android) when they are trying to anticipate your words to autocomplete the typing for you.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-08-09   21:05:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: TooConservative (#97)

But RP never so much as threatened to run third party

Ron Paul never could have run third party successfully.

Trump can. There is nothing immoral about exhausting every avenue possible.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-08-09   21:36:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#100. To: TooConservative (#98)

I don't think that is it. It adds the letters after I type them.

Even in a cut and paste it added letters. I'm proofreading this and there are no errors of that type. I'll see how it posts.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-08-09   21:37:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#101. To: A K A Stone (#99)

In seven months this will be over after Super Tuesday. Then we'll be handed whatever candidates are left standing on the ballot in the General Election nine months after that.

Did you donate to Trump yet?

Believe it or not, I used to donate a few bucks to various candidates of my liking and thinking it made a difference. Boy was I dumb.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-08-09   21:40:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: Fred Mertz (#101)

Did you donate to Trump yet?

I've never donated to anyone.

I did pass out Ross Perot literature though.

Met with some grass roots people.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-08-09   21:42:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#103. To: A K A Stone (#94)

Biden is a piece of shit that favors abortion.

Biden favors abortion. And so does the GOP Establishment.

If abortion is the issue - then the field of candidates is winnowed.

If consistency on abortion over time is the issue, then even I myself am eliminated as a pro-lifer.

I do not look to see where people stood their entire lives. People can change their minds. I look to see the quality of the thinking on the matter today.

For me, abortion is not the only issue pertaining to the same matter. The CORE of the matter is the sanctity of life. And that means that I don't like war-mongers. I don't like people who boast about the death penalty. (Mind you, the death penalty COULD BE just, but the way they do it in Texas, for example, does not safeguard well enough against executing the innocent. To execute the innocent is murder). And I look at euthanasia issues.

Jeb Bush is unacceptable to me because of what he did in the Terri Schiavo case. I've heard all of the jawboning back and forth, but I formed my own opinion on the matter based on firm principles regarding the sanctity of life. And I am unwilling to give anybody supreme power who does not believe as I do on the matter of life.

My view on Biden, and Democrats in general, is that they are better on economics in general. Their view of social welfare is Christian. Republican economic beliefs are aggressively idolatrous about money and quite evil. So, if it were not for the matter of the sanctity of life, I would favor Democrats.

Unfortunately, Democrats are babykillers, and they do not believe in the sanctity of life. Republican war mongers and death-penalty enthusiasts don't believe in the sanctity of life either, but there are Republicans who are not war mongers, who are cautious about wars.

I cannot overlook that. And therefore I cannot vote for a Joe Biden. I don't do the "worst of two evils" approach in voting. Voting is not in itself so important as it is to not affirmatively choose evil.

In recent years, this has left me without a party. Democrats are babykillers, and Republicans are idolators who all too often are also warmongers.

Trump used to be pro-choice, but he seems to have changed his mind. His stance regarding a health insurance common market and more effective redistributive taxation at the top are right. His style makes him amusing.

Assuming he will be rejected by the Republicans, that leaves a field that is so lackluster I don't believe any of them will win against the Democrats.

Which means that a Democrat will be President. When that happens, I think that Biden is a much better person to have the job than Hillary. I still won't vote for him: he's a babykiller, but I would prefer to see him get the office.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-09   21:44:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#104. To: Fred Mertz (#101)

Believe it or not, I used to donate a few bucks to various candidates of my liking and thinking it made a difference. Boy was I dumb.

Did you donate to Reagan? If you did you made a difference.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-08-09   21:44:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#105. To: Fred Mertz (#101)

Believe it or not, I used to donate a few bucks to various candidates of my liking and thinking it made a difference. Boy was I dumb.

The only difference it made is that now people can look at the public records and see who you politically supported. And we have not yet enacted laws to make it illegal to fire people based on their political affiliation.

If we are going to have involuntary disclosure of private political contributions, then we need to make it illegal for employers to fire people based on their politics, as a First Amendment matter.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-09   21:45:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#106. To: Vicomte13 (#103)

Their view of social welfare is Christian.

It is anti Christian. Everything about the democrats is anti christian.

The fruit of your labor is yours.

The Bible teaches a tithe of 10 percent. Not a tax of 50 plus percent for some people.

You're surely wrong on this one. No doubt.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-08-09   21:49:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#107. To: A K A Stone (#104)

Did you donate to Reagan? If you did you made a difference.

I think so, but it is so long ago I can't be certain. I think I have one of those Ronald Reagan signed pictures - mass reproduced for donors - somewhere in one of those basement boxes. It could have been for donating to the RNC. Like I said, boy was I dumb.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2015-08-09   21:56:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#108. To: A K A Stone (#106)

It is anti Christian. Everything about the democrats is anti christian.

The fruit of your labor is yours.

The Bible teaches a tithe of 10 percent. Not a tax of 50 plus percent for some people.

You're surely wrong on this one. No doubt.

Social welfare is mandated by God throughout Scripture. It was always the state and the King's responsibility and it still is.

Republican beliefs about money are idolatrous, and they abandon God's commandment of social welfare to serve their idol.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-08-09   22:09:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#109. To: Vicomte13, A K A Stone (#108)

Don't want to jump in but will add a couple of mites:)

The 10% tithe should be seen within the context of the Jubilees every 7 years.

I am not one to advocate a Mosaic theocracy to run the US. But we learn a lot from the OT and NT on how God expects His ekklesia to treat one another and non-believers in need.

I will add there is strong evidence that we are all to work for a living and provide for ourselves and our families. No free rides in the Bible for those who are able of body and mind to work.

"When Americans reach out for values of faith, family, and caring for the needy, they're saying, "We want the word of God. We want to face the future with the Bible.'"---Ronald Reagan

redleghunter  posted on  2015-08-09   22:25:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#110. To: Vicomte13 (#108)

Social welfare is mandated by God throughout Scripture.

As individuals we are supposed to help those in need.

But when the government taxes you so much. You can't always do that.

Why should someone who is struggling to make ends meet for their own family. Have to support someone who is able to provide for themselves. Because that is what the democrats are for. They are thieves.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-08-09   22:38:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#111. To: Vicomte13 (#108)

Republican beliefs about money are idolatrous

What beliefs that Republicans have are idolatrous?

What scripture are you referring to to make your "point"?

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-08-09   22:40:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#112. To: Vicomte13, A K A Stone (#103)

My view on Biden, and Democrats in general, is that they are better on economics in general. Their view of social welfare is Christian.

I disagree. In both the OT and NT working to support self and family is a bedrock principle. Biden and the Dems support welfare for able bodied people who can work. Welfare in the US is abused and corrupt. There are millions of Americans on welfare while we have immigrants flowing in to take jobs the Americans won't do.

In OT Israel people who could not support their families sold themselves to servitude for six years to pay off debt and gain some income. Basically they worked to get food and clothing for their family. They did not sit in homes refusing to work and collecting income.

That's the brutal truth of the situation. There are Americans who need assistance who cannot physically or mentally work. That is the focus of the Jewish and Christian charity. Not someone who bought a $500K home and could only afford a $100k home, then foreclosed and is destitute. As with the prodigal son, such should return home to family for restitution.

So the Bible does not support able bodied people from not working and receive income from others.

It is rather easy for the government to sort out who is in need. But they won't do so because the able of body vote.

2 Thessalonians 3:

6 In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, we command you, brothers and sisters, to keep away from every believer who is idle and disruptive and does not live according to the teaching you received from us. 7 For you yourselves know how you ought to follow our example. We were not idle when we were with you, 8 nor did we eat anyone’s food without paying for it. On the contrary, we worked night and day, laboring and toiling so that we would not be a burden to any of you. 9 We did this, not because we do not have the right to such help, but in order to offer ourselves as a model for you to imitate. 10 For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: “The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.”

11 We hear that some among you are idle and disruptive. They are not busy; they are busybodies. 12 Such people we command and urge in the Lord Jesus Christ to settle down and earn the food they eat. 13 And as for you, brothers and sisters, never tire of doing what is good.

14 Take special note of anyone who does not obey our instruction in this letter. Do not associate with them, in order that they may feel ashamed. 15 Yet do not regard them as an enemy, but warn them as you would a fellow believer.

"When Americans reach out for values of faith, family, and caring for the needy, they're saying, "We want the word of God. We want to face the future with the Bible.'"---Ronald Reagan

redleghunter  posted on  2015-08-09   22:51:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (113 - 174) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com