Wondering About Carly Fiorina on the 2nd Amendment? Wonder No More…
Carly Fiorina has seen a huge surge since the GOP debates on Thursday. So big in fact, that many people who’d never even heard of her are now rushing to catch up on research. You can peruse this site, as I’ve talked about her for a long, long time. It seems that a lot of gun owners are now asking about where she stands on the 2nd amendment. Truth is, she addressed this back in April… but nobody was listening. Probably because they were too busy salivating over Trump’s next gaffe.
Well, she’s Carly Fiorina, the ‘honey badger’, so what did you think she was going to say?
Every time I hear some politician spout weasel words claiming that "I am a hunter" when asked about gun control,I grit my teeth. The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with the right to hunt,and never has. Now we finally have a political candidate that says this in front of cameras,and explains why in simple and precise language.
She also said a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT,and I suspect she got them both from the writing of the people who wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
IN CONTEXT,it means "A right that all humans possessed prior to the establishment of any government,and one that no government has the right to take away."
IN CONTEXT,it means "A right that all humans possessed prior to the establishment of any government,and one that no government has the right to take away."
Firearms existed prior to the establishment of any government?
IN CONTEXT,it means "A right that all humans possessed prior to the establishment of any government,and one that no government has the right to take away."
Firearms existed prior to the establishment of any government?
WEAPONS existed prior to the establishment of any government,and firearms are also weapons.
You can't possibly be that fucking ignorant of history.
Firearms existed prior to the establishment of any government?
The right to keep and bear arms was used in the classic sense and was not restricted to firearms.
The colonial militias required men to own a sword at minimum. You might look up the laws requiring them to do so and the inspections carried out to ensure they did, the fines that could be levied for failure to comply.
It was yet another radical innovation of the early Republic. Enlightenment era stuff.
