International News
See other International News Articles
Title: Saudi Arabia may go broke before the US oil industry buckles
Source:
The Telegraph
URL Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ ... e-US-oil-industry-buckles.html
Published: Aug 6, 2015
Author: Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
Post Date: 2015-08-06 12:13:39 by nativist nationalist
Keywords: None
Views: 5774
Comments: 39
It is too late for OPEC to stop the shale revolution. The cartel faces the prospect of surging US output whenever oil prices rise If the oil futures market is correct, Saudi Arabia will start running into trouble within two years. It will be in existential crisis by the end of the decade. The contract price of US crude oil for delivery in December 2020 is currently $62.05, implying a drastic change in the economic landscape for the Middle East and the petro-rentier states. The Saudis took a huge gamble last November when they stopped supporting prices and opted instead to flood the market and drive out rivals, boosting their own output to 10.6m barrels a day (b/d) into the teeth of the downturn. Bank of America says OPEC is now "effectively dissolved". The cartel might as well shut down its offices in Vienna to save money. If the aim was to choke the US shale industry, the Saudis have misjudged badly, just as they misjudged the growing shale threat at every stage for eight years. "It is becoming apparent that non-OPEC producers are not as responsive to low oil prices as had been thought, at least in the short- run," said the Saudi central bank in its latest stability report. "The main impact has been to cut back on developmental drilling of new oil wells, rather than slowing the flow of oil from existing wells. This requires more patience," it said. One Saudi expert was blunter. "The policy hasn't worked and it will never work," he said. By causing the oil price to crash, the Saudis and their Gulf allies have certainly killed off prospects for a raft of high-cost ventures in the Russian Arctic, the Gulf of Mexico, the deep waters of the mid-Atlantic, and the Canadian tar sands. Consultants Wood Mackenzie say the major oil and gas companies have shelved 46 large projects, deferring $200bn of investments. The problem for the Saudis is that US shale frackers are not high-cost. They are mostly mid-cost, and as I reported from the CERAWeek energy forum in Houston, experts at IHS think shale companies may be able to shave those costs by 45pc this year - and not only by switching tactically to high- yielding wells. Advanced pad drilling techniques allow frackers to launch five or ten wells in different directions from the same site. Smart drill-bits with computer chips can seek out cracks in the rock. New dissolvable plugs promise to save $300,000 a well. "We've driven down drilling costs by 50pc, and we can see another 30pc ahead," said John Hess, head of the Hess Corporation. It was the same story from Scott Sheffield, head of Pioneer Natural Resources. "We have just drilled an 18,000 ft well in 16 days in the Permian Basin. Last year it took 30 days," he said. The North American rig-count has dropped to 664 from 1,608 in October but output still rose to a 43-year high of 9.6m b/d June. It has only just begun to roll over. "The freight train of North American tight oil has kept on coming," said Rex Tillerson, head of Exxon Mobil. He said the resilience of the sister industry of shale gas should be a cautionary warning to those reading too much into the rig-count. Gas prices have collapsed from $8 to $2.78 since 2009, and the number of gas rigs has dropped 1,200 to 209. Yet output has risen by 30pc over that period. Until now, shale drillers have been cushioned by hedging contracts. The stress test will come over coming months as these expire. But even if scores of over-leveraged wild-catters go bankrupt as funding dries up, it will not do OPEC any good. The wells will still be there. The technology and infrastructure will still be there. Stronger companies will mop up on the cheap, taking over the operations. Once oil climbs back to $60 or even $55 - since the threshold keeps falling - they will crank up production almost instantly. OPEC now faces a permanent headwind. Each rise in price will be capped by a surge in US output. The only constraint is the scale of US reserves that can be extracted at mid-cost, and these may be bigger than originally supposed, not to mention the parallel possibilities in Argentina and Australia, or the possibility for "clean fracking" in China as plasma pulse technology cuts water needs. Mr Sheffield said the Permian Basin in Texas could alone produce 5-6m b/d in the long-term, more than Saudi Arabia's giant Ghawar field, the biggest in the world. Saudi Arabia is effectively beached. It relies on oil for 90pc of its budget revenues. There is no other industry to speak of, a full fifty years after the oil bonanza began. Citizens pay no tax on income, interest, or stock dividends. Subsidized petrol costs twelve cents a litre at the pump. Electricity is given away for 1.3 cents a kilowatt-hour. Spending on patronage exploded after the Arab Spring as the kingdom sought to smother dissent. The International Monetary Fund estimates that the budget deficit will reach 20pc of GDP this year, or roughly $140bn. The 'fiscal break-even price' is $106. Far from retrenching, King Salman is spraying money around, giving away $32bn in a coronation bonus for all workers and pensioners. He has launched a costly war against the Houthis in Yemen and is engaged in a massive military build-up - entirely reliant on imported weapons - that will propel Saudi Arabia to fifth place in the world defence ranking. The Saudi royal family is leading the Sunni cause against a resurgent Iran, battling for dominance in a bitter struggle between Sunni and Shia across the Middle East. "Right now, the Saudis have only one thing on their mind and that is the Iranians. They have a very serious problem. Iranian proxies are running Yemen, Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon," said Jim Woolsey, the former head of the US Central Intelligence Agency. Money began to leak out of Saudi Arabia after the Arab Spring, with net capital outflows reaching 8pc of GDP annually even before the oil price crash. The country has since been burning through its foreign reserves at a vertiginous pace. The reserves peaked at $737bn in August of 2014. They dropped to $672 in May. At current prices they are falling by at least $12bn a month. Khalid Alsweilem, a former official at the Saudi central bank and now at Harvard University, said the fiscal deficit must be covered almost dollar for dollar by drawing down reserves. The Saudi buffer is not particularly large given the country's fixed exchange system. Kuwait, Qatar, and Abu Dhabi all have three times greater reserves per capita. "We are much more vulnerable. That is why we are the fourth rated sovereign in the Gulf at AA-. We cannot afford to lose our cushion over the next two years," he said. Standard & Poor's lowered its outlook to "negative" in February. "We view Saudi Arabia's economy as undiversified and vulnerable to a steep and sustained decline in oil prices," it said. Mr Alsweilem wrote in a Harvard report that Saudi Arabia would have an extra trillion of assets by now if it had adopted the Norwegian model of a sovereign wealth fund to recyle the money instead of treating it as a piggy bank for the finance ministry. The report has caused storm in Riyadh. "We were lucky before because the oil price recovered in time. But we can't count on that again," he said. OPEC have left matters too late, though perhaps there is little they could have done to combat the advances of American technology. In hindsight, it was a strategic error to hold prices so high, for so long, allowing shale frackers - and the solar industry - to come of age. The genie cannot be put back in the bottle. The Saudis are now trapped. Even if they could do a deal with Russia and orchestrate a cut in output to boost prices - far from clear - they might merely gain a few more years of high income at the cost of bringing forward more shale production later on. Yet on the current course their reserves may be down to $200bn by the end of 2018. The markets will react long before this, seeing the writing on the wall. Capital flight will accelerate. The government can slash investment spending for a while - as it did in the mid-1980s - but in the end it must face draconian austerity. It cannot afford to prop up Egypt and maintain an exorbitant political patronage machine across the Sunni world. Social spending is the glue that holds together a medieval Wahhabi regime at a time of fermenting unrest among the Shia minority of the Eastern Province, pin-prick terrorist attacks from ISIS, and blowback from the invasion of Yemen. Diplomatic spending is what underpins the Saudi sphere of influence caught in a Middle East version of Europe's Thirty Year War, and still reeling from the after-shocks of a crushed democratic revolt. We may yet find that the US oil industry has greater staying power than the rickety political edifice behind OPEC. 
> 
> 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
#1. To: nativist nationalist, Pericles (#0)
One Saudi expert was blunter. "The policy hasn't worked and it will never work," he said. The Saudis thought America would cap its wells but they are continuing on, even as every oil depot and pipeline and refinery in America is at capacity. The American oil industry called the Saudi bluff. The Saudis were losing $40 billion a year initially. But those losses will accelerate as soon as they raises their oil prices, making American and Russian oil quite profitable. The Saudis waited about 5 years longer than they should have to drop prices to kill of American shale. And now they can't put the genie back in the bottle. And it couldn't come at a worse time as the Saudis and emirates ramp up to face the Iranian challenge and that posed by ISIS/al-Qaeda/al-Nusra, all of them violent Sunni factions who want to depose the Saudi royal family. At the same time, the Obama deal with Iran means that the Saudis must now fund their own nukes program fully, an expensive undertaking. Back when the Saudis were flush, they funded the Paki nuke program, possibly receiving warheads/missiles in exchange (which have been stored in Pakistan). But to meet the threat of a full-blown Iranian nuke program and their emerging ICBM threat in ten years from now, the Saudis will have to spend very heavily on nukes and everything that goes along with such a program.
Plus their war in Yemen; that's got to be a drain on the wallet. I love to see the House of Saud in this type of bind, even better if Saudi gets closer to China. A Sunni-Shia version of the Thirty Year War, with Russia and China backing opposite sides, and America on the sidelines; that is the stuff dreams are made of.
It has been expensive but the Saudis have a tremendous arsenal for a country and military of small size. No matter how rich you are, you can only fire so many missiles and tank shells and use your jets. And the Saudis lack real expertise in occupying and controlling hostile territory. You can't ever finally win from the air or with missiles or artillery. That is their real weakness, not any lack of arms or jets that we've sold them like hotcakes. Early in the Obama years, Congress approved a $50 billion purchase of jets and helicopters and missiles and all kinds of military hardware. One of the largest single orders ever placed and approved, outside of our NATO allies. It was an astonishing purchase. And yet, the Houthi are resisting with some success against the Saudis unleashing a good dose from that arsenal. Lack of a real ground military, IMO. And they are quaking in their boots at the thought of a nuclear Iran. On top of that, the Yankees are spoiling their oil monopoly and crushing their economic power.
Goes back to a few conversations we had in the recent past. No matter how much technology or superior weapons a nation procures, the leadership behind it all from Platoon level to Corps level is what matters most. I would put in the thousands, the number of military and/or civilian contract advisors the US and other Western nations have in Saudi Arabia to help train on and maintain (maintenance) the equipment we sold them. Add to that a pampered officer corps which has connections (even shirt tail) at the very lowest levels to the royal family and oil barons. I have a retired Army LTC buddy over there now and his job is to advise mid to senior level officers on tactics and the operational art. Well that is what his job description says, but what he really does is write operations orders for these officers, prepare their planning documents, and presentation slides. The pampered officer corps in SA don't want to do any staff work or get involved in the details like our officer corps will do in the US Army. So either SA decides it needs to send in their own ground troops to do their job or they 'hire out' Palestinians to do the dirty work, much like Iran hires out Hezbollah.
It never works. When things hit the fan, you have to do your own grunt work. And you have to be prepared for it all along. Our military and the Brits have always excelled at this. You can't hire foreigners to do real fighting for you. It doesn't work.
It works against press ganged rebel armies like the South African mercs used against the Liberian rebel armies. But against a dedicated fanatical religious based home grown movement like the Houthis? That won't work.
#12. To: Pericles (#11)
Especially when they are already hardened to the cruelties of war, as all the Yemenis are over the last decade.
But against a dedicated fanatical religious based home grown movement like the Houthis? That won't work. A lot of places over there use Yemenis as mercenaries already. I'm not sure which ones (I'd guess Sunni), but these folks are no strangers to war. Isolated clannish mountain peoples often tend to excel at war, the British employed the Gurkhas; and where the rubber met the road the highland Scots were indispensable in building their empire. Today we see the mountain Kurds cleaning ISIS's clock, where flatland Arab Shia drop rifles and run from a force a tenth their size. Saudi opened a can of worms, and they'll need someone to bail them out. I hope it is not us; President Trump will be able to tell them to pound sand; but cuckservatives like JEB will be happy to spill American blood on their behalf. And cuckservatives mouthpieces like Kevin D. Williamson will weave fanciful stories of how the Saudi-Yemini border is the "frontline of freedom!"
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest "The main impact has been to cut back on developmental drilling of new oil wells, rather than slowing the flow of oil from existing wells. This requires more patience," it said.
Social spending is the glue that holds together a medieval Wahhabi regime at a time of fermenting unrest among the Shia minority of the Eastern Province, pin-prick terrorist attacks from ISIS, and blowback from the invasion of Yemen.
#3. To: TooConservative (#1)
At the same time, the Obama deal with Iran means that the Saudis must now fund their own nukes program fully, an expensive undertaking. Back when the Saudis were flush, they funded the Paki nuke program, possibly receiving warheads/missiles in exchange (which have been stored in Pakistan). But to meet the threat of a full-blown Iranian nuke program and their emerging ICBM threat in ten years from now, the Saudis will have to spend very heavily on nukes and everything that goes along with such a program.
#5. To: nativist nationalist, redleghunter (#3)
Plus their war in Yemen; that's got to be a drain on the wallet.
#9. To: TooConservative, nativist nationalist, CZ82, tomder55, GarySpFc, *Military or Vets Affairs* (#5)
It has been expensive but the Saudis have a tremendous arsenal for a country and military of small size. No matter how rich you are, you can only fire so many missiles and tank shells and use your jets. And the Saudis lack real expertise in occupying and controlling hostile territory. You can't ever finally win from the air or with missiles or artillery. That is their real weakness, not any lack of arms or jets that we've sold them like hotcakes. Early in the Obama years, Congress approved a $50 billion purchase of jets and helicopters and missiles and all kinds of military hardware. One of the largest single orders ever placed and approved, outside of our NATO allies. It was an astonishing purchase. And yet, the Houthi are resisting with some success against the Saudis unleashing a good dose from that arsenal. Lack of a real ground military, IMO.
#10. To: redleghunter (#9)
I would put in the thousands, the number of military and/or civilian contract advisors the US and other Western nations have in Saudi Arabia to help train on and maintain (maintenance) the equipment we sold them. Add to that a pampered officer corps which has connections (even shirt tail) at the very lowest levels to the royal family and oil barons.
So either SA decides it needs to send in their own ground troops to do their job or they 'hire out' Palestinians to do the dirty work, much like Iran hires out Hezbollah.
#11. To: TooConservative, redleghunter (#10)
You can't hire foreigners to do real fighting for you. It doesn't work.
Replies to Comment # 11. But against a dedicated fanatical religious based home grown movement like the Houthis? That won't work.
#15. To: Pericles (#11)
It works against press ganged rebel armies like the South African mercs used against the Liberian rebel armies.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]