[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes

"Greg Gutfeld Cooks Jessica Tarlov and Liberal Media in Brilliant Take on Trump's First Day"

"They Gave Trump the Center, and He Took It"

French doors

America THEN and NOW in 65 FASCINATING Photos

"CNN pundit Scott Jennings goes absolutely nuclear on Biden’s ‘farce’ of a farewell speech — and he’s not alone"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Business
See other Business Articles

Title: CEO Raises Salaries to $70K for EVERY Employee, Now has to Rent Out his Own Home to Make Ends Meet
Source: The Young Conservative
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 2, 2015
Author: John S. Roberts
Post Date: 2015-08-02 10:40:45 by GrandIsland
Keywords: None
Views: 9652
Comments: 63

Back in April we told you about Dan Price, CEO of Gravity Payments, who said he would pay every single one of his employees $70,000 annually.

Every single one, from the lowest skilled workers on up.

Now, as expected, Price has fallen on hard times financially, even having to rent out his own home.

Employees who work for Gravity are now leaving the company, “spurred in part by their view that it was unfair to double the pay of some new hires while the longest-serving staff members got small or no raises.”

This was always going to be the outcome.

If everyone hits the jackpot, does anybody really win the lottery?

When Dan Price, founder and CEO of the Seattle-based credit-card-payment processing firm Gravity Payments, announced he was raising the company’s minimum salary to $70,000 a year, he was met with overwhelming enthusiasm.

“Everyone start[ed] screaming and cheering and just going crazy,” Price told Business Insider shortly after he broke the news in April.

But in the weeks since then, it’s become clear that not everyone is equally pleased. Among the critics? Some of Price’s own employees.

Maisey McMaster — once a big supporter of the plan — is one of the employees that quit. McMaster, 26, joined the company five years ago, eventually working her way up to financial manager. She put in long hours that “left little time for her husband and extended family,” The Times says, but she loved the “special culture” of the place.

But while she was initially on board, helping to calculate whether the company could afford to raise salaries so drastically (the plan is a minimum of $70,000 over the course of three years), McMaster later began to have doubts.

“He gave raises to people who have the least skills and are the least equipped to do the job, and the ones who were taking on the most didn’t get much of a bump,” she told The Times. A fairer plan, she told the paper, would give newer employees smaller increases, along with the chance to earn a more substantial raise with more experience.

Back in April we told you about Dan Price, CEO of Gravity Payments, who said he would pay every single one of his employees $70,000 annually.

Every single one, from the lowest skilled workers on up.

Now, as expected, Price has fallen on hard times financially, even having to rent out his own home.

Employees who work for Gravity are now leaving the company, “spurred in part by their view that it was unfair to double the pay of some new hires while the longest-serving staff members got small or no raises.”

This was always going to be the outcome.

If everyone hits the jackpot, does anybody really win the lottery?

From BI:

When Dan Price, founder and CEO of the Seattle-based credit-card-payment processing firm Gravity Payments, announced he was raising the company’s minimum salary to $70,000 a year, he was met with overwhelming enthusiasm.

“Everyone start[ed] screaming and cheering and just going crazy,” Price told Business Insider shortly after he broke the news in April.

But in the weeks since then, it’s become clear that not everyone is equally pleased. Among the critics? Some of Price’s own employees.

Maisey McMaster — once a big supporter of the plan — is one of the employees that quit. McMaster, 26, joined the company five years ago, eventually working her way up to financial manager. She put in long hours that “left little time for her husband and extended family,” The Times says, but she loved the “special culture” of the place.

But while she was initially on board, helping to calculate whether the company could afford to raise salaries so drastically (the plan is a minimum of $70,000 over the course of three years), McMaster later began to have doubts.

“He gave raises to people who have the least skills and are the least equipped to do the job, and the ones who were taking on the most didn’t get much of a bump,” she told The Times. A fairer plan, she told the paper, would give newer employees smaller increases, along with the chance to earn a more substantial raise with more experience. From Fox News:

Dan Price, 31, tells the New York Times that things have gotten so bad he’s been forced to rent out his house.

“I’m working as hard as I ever worked to make it work,” he told the Times in a video that shows him sitting on a plastic bucket in the garage of his house. “I’m renting out my house right now to try and make ends meet myself.”

The Times article said Price’s decision ended up costing him a few customers and two of his “most valued” employees, who quit after newer employees ended up with bigger salary hikes than older ones.

Grant Moran, 29, also quit, saying the new pay-scale was disconcerting

“Now the people who were just clocking in and out were making the same as me,” he told the paper. “It shackles high performers to less motivated team members.”

The Times said customers who left were dismayed at what Price did, viewing it as a political statement. Others left fearful Gravity would soon hike fees to pay for salary increases.

Brian Canlis, co-owner of a family restaurant, already worried about how to deal with Seattle’s new minimum wage, told Price the pay raise at Gravity “makes it harder for the rest of us.” And to think, all of this came about within a few short months.

Liberal logic, for ya. One man with good intentions loses so much because he doesn’t understand how economics work.

Socialism: We all fail together!


Poster Comment:

Grant Moran, 29, also quit, saying the new pay-scale was disconcerting “Now the people who were just clocking in and out were making the same as me,” he told the paper. “It shackles high performers to less motivated team members.” SOCIALISTIC INCOME EQUALITY WILL DO THIS EVERY TIME... WE ARE NOT EQUAL.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 48.

#7. To: GrandIsland (#0)

"McMaster, 26, joined the company five years ago, eventually working her way up to financial manager."

The same thing will happen with the $15 minimum wage. Employees who have been there five years and worked their way up to $15 an hour see a new hire being paid that.

Now what?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-08-02   12:35:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: misterwhite (#7)

The same thing will happen with the $15 minimum wage. Employees who have been there five years and worked their way up to $15 an hour see a new hire being paid that.

Sure. Why not dump your $15/hour job putting up dry wall and just take $15/hour to flip burgers instead?

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-08-02   18:46:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: TooConservative, misterwhite (#15)

Sure. Why not dump your $15/hour job putting up dry wall and just take $15/hour to flip burgers instead?

Neither job is a skilled tradesman job.

In any case, cities that have a high cost in housing should adopt socialist measures and build low cost community housing that will allow minimum wage workers to afford care.

That is a better solution than raising wages to try and match some sort of fair living wage.

The thing is most jobs are in big cities and this forces people to commute up to 2 hours a day and more. This applies to middle class people and poor people.

It is not a case of them trying to find work nearby - there is no work in rural or suburban areas in these quantities.

Public transportation can't hack it either and roads are clogged.

And I am not talking about 'projects' style housing either. small 2 to 4 family style homes built in a lot of the unused city land and rented or sold cheap to working class families within 30 minutes of downtown is doable and cheap. It is something that would not cost a lot to do and would pay off in tax revenue, increases in quality of life (families may divorce less, parents near schools, more involved in child rearing, etc).

Pericles  posted on  2015-08-02   19:02:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Pericles (#16)

Sure. Why not dump your $15/hour job putting up dry wall and just take $15/hour to flip burgers instead?

Neither job is a skilled tradesman job.

Ever tried to explain that to someone that puts up drywall?

n any case, cities that have a high cost in housing should adopt socialist measures and build low cost community housing that will allow minimum wage workers to afford care.

ROFLMAO! "Socialism" described as being "low cost"!

Good one,comrade!

sneakypete  posted on  2015-08-03   0:26:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: sneakypete (#28)

n any case, cities that have a high cost in housing should adopt socialist measures and build low cost community housing that will allow minimum wage workers to afford care.

ROFLMAO! "Socialism" described as being "low cost"!

Good one,comrade!

I call it socialism to tweak you guys.

The proposals I have read and liked have to do with cities handing over land they own (so I guess that is socialism) and giving it away to a developer with the condition they produce housing that will be sold or rented at predetermined rates. Bloomberg, the past billionaire mayor of New York wanted to do something like that. The housing is built by a private contractor and since they got the land for free they can charge less money for rent and sales costs if a condo or co-op.

Like it or not, the majority of workers in this country live in teh suburbs and commute to the city and many are on the road for 2 to 3 hours one way every day - all because they can't afford to live in the city limits near their jobs. If I was a mayor I would want to make it possible these workers live in the city where they can be taxed and where they can live and spend their money on the local economy. After 5pm many cities become ghost towns.

Pericles  posted on  2015-08-03   9:19:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Pericles (#40)

The proposals I have read and liked have to do with cities handing over land they own (so I guess that is socialism) and giving it away to a developer with the condition they produce housing that will be sold or rented at predetermined rates.

ROFLMAO!

All theory,no experience.

In the REAL world,the way those schemes always work out is that the contracts ALWAYS go out to someone politically connected (like Trump,for example)in exchange for kickbacks,and then the projects are delayed due to rising costs and the payouts get upped in order for the politicians to brag about finishing them. Everybody knows going in that unless the contractor is black or some other minority including a member of the majority female population,the bid is so low it would be impossible to complete for the stated budget,and that "adjustments will be made down the road".

In the case of AA no-bid government contracts,the sky is the roof. I know of a local black guy that got the contract to pave a new 4 lany highway going through this area,and he didn't even own a dump truck and had not only never worked any paving jobs before,but had never been known to work ANY jobs other then pimping and running an illegal gaming house for gamblers he sold moonshine and pizza's to.

After getting the contract the first thing he did was "sub it out" to probably the largest paving company in the state,and a company with Dim Party connections going back to the 30's. He got enough cash out of that one to buy a dump truck,and then they hired him to use the truck to haul gravel,asphalt,and dirt. Or more correctly they hired one of his sons,because he had no intention of working.

He also managed to find 3 white whores in their late teens or early 20's to work in his nop join/gambling den house,and that halped push his income up considerably,too.

In fact,he made so much money out of this he just disappeared about 2 years later and nobody will admit to knowing where he went. I may be wrong,but I suspect back child care payments had a lot to do with that. Last I heard,he had over a dozen children with different women.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-08-03   10:55:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 48.

#49. To: sneakypete (#48)

In the REAL world,the way those schemes always work out is that the contracts ALWAYS go out to someone politically connected (like Trump,for example)in exchange for kickbacks,and then the projects are delayed due to rising costs and the payouts get upped in order for the politicians to brag about finishing them. Everybody knows going in that unless the contractor is black or some other minority including a member of the majority female population,the bid is so low it would be impossible to complete for the stated budget,and that "adjustments will be made down the road".

It does not matter - the cost is borne by the real estate developer. The city does not pay for anything regarding construction. Since they don't get govt money the incentive is to build ontime and onbudget.

Pericles  posted on  2015-08-03 11:54:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 48.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com