How To
See other How To Articles
Title: Finnish Politician Openly Opposes Multiculturalism, Gov’t Goes Nuts
Source:
VDare
URL Source: http://www.vdare.com/posts/finnish- ... ulticulturalism-govt-goes-nuts
Published: Jul 28, 2015
Author: James Kirkpatrick
Post Date: 2015-07-28 13:31:35 by nativist nationalist
Keywords: None
Views: 4369
Comments: 23
The Finns Party, which gained ground in the most recent elections, has thrown the Nordic nation into turmoil after one of its MP’s openly denounced multiculturalism. A Finnish member of parliament has come under fire for a comment he made over the weekend decrying the “nightmare called multiculturalism” and rallying his compatriots to fight for “one true Finnish nation.” The MP, Olli Immonen, is a member of the populist and nationalist Finns Party, which is part of the country’s governing coalition. In a posting on his Facebook page late Friday night, Immonen said he is “dreaming of a strong, brave nation that will defeat this nightmare called multiculturalism. This ugly bubble that our enemies live in, will soon enough burst into a million little pieces.” [Finnish politician declares war on multiculturalism, by Craig Winneker, Politico, July 27, 2015] Apparently, this is a Very Bad Thing and the government, including some people in his own party, are not to happy about Immonen’s comments. Over the weekend centrist Prime Minister Juha Sipila disassociated himself in strong terms from a social media article written by Finns Party’s MP Olli Immonen… It took another day until the Finns Party chairman and Foreign Minister Timo Soini commented on the issue. He said to the newspaper Ilta-Sanoma on Monday that the view “did no good to the reputation of the party” but any decision to oust the MP from the caucus would be subject to parliamentary decision. Prime Minister Juha Sipila wrote in a tweet on Sunday that he wants to develop Finland as “an open and international country that is rich in its languages and culture”. The chairman of the National Coalition Party and Finance Minister Alexander Stubb described multiculturalism as an asset. He said he backs freedom of speech, but does not accept instigation of hatred. [Ultranationalist statement causes image problem to Finnish government, by Juhani Niinistro, ShanghaiDaily, July 28, 2015] So why should we care? As the True Finns are part of the governing coalition, this is a real test for the party. Will they put loyalty to their own members over the complaints of the other parties in the governing coalition? Or will they jettison their own MP in order to stop the attacks on them? Immonen’s comments may have been calucated to force the leader of the party to make a decision about whether to embrace the nationalist wing or the party or try to purge it. Erkka Railo, a political scientist at the University of Turku, said [True Finns leader and Finnish Foreign Minister] Mr [Timo] Soini had striven to make his party respectable and fit for government, while maintaining its opposition to immigration and multiculturalism… However, Mr Soini has allowed a hardline wing to remain inside the party, which came second in April’s general election with almost 18 per cent of the vote. “Immonen is more or less pushing Soini to take a stand and make a decision whether he wants to subscribe to this anti-immigration ideology,” Mr Railo said. “Soini, in contrast, wants desperately not to make this final call. His silence is deafening.” [Rightwing rant exposes tensions in Finnish governing coalition, by David Crouch, Financial Times, July 27, 2015] As European nationalist parties continue to gain in power, they will be forced to confront the same choice. Is it better to be in government and have a chance to “do something?” Or is it better to stay out of government, maintain your credibility, and only enter office totally on your own terms? The future of Europe may depend on how different parties answer this question.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
You really have to wonder how people who are supposed to be intelligent and educated can be such colossal fools as to follow political correctness without question. The chairman of the National Coalition Party and Finance Minister Alexander Stubb described multiculturalism as an asset. Spoken like a man that owns rental housing under government contract. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Destructive poetry containing words like "rich" and "vibrant" rolls off leftist's tongues without effort. The effect of richness, vibrance, and diversity is inevitabltly disasterous and suicidal for those who are required to live in it.
Thanks to the efforts of pollutionists like Cameron and Sipila, Europe has no future except as a feeding trough for vibrant parasites and primitives that add supposed diversity and richness to their moribund culture.
To be precise, Finns are not Nordic: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finno- Ugric_languages
What is the evidence that multiculturalism as preached and praciticed in Europe and the U.S. or anywhere results in a better economic, social, moral, political outcomes over an open society that is more homogeneous in ethnical, moral and cultural makeup?
потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
Because book smarts don't always translate into common sense smarts. I work with many academia types who can not even tie their own shoes. Can quote a book verse and page but don't understand lions are not cute kittens but extreme killers. They have been brought up to believe its our fault bad people exist and if we only help them out of the gutter they will become product citizens. Well you and I know that its sacrifice and hard work that make you a product part of society.
Didn't lucysmom and mininggold used to post here all the time about how great life was in these northern European socialist countries?? LOL...what trips they were. Swedenstan's Commie-Sharia situation must have them in their glory.
Ya know I'm kinda curious as to why they don't post here anymore?? Oh wait, never mind... :) Maybe,but it doesn't matter because it seems like all my life I have heard talking faces on teebee talking about the Scandinavian countries as paradises on Earth because they made socialism work,and how they were a model for us. What they never mentioned was at that time immigration to them was strictly limited and they had a very small population of people that shared a culture as well as most of their DNA. Nor did they mention all the foreign dollars coming in from oil sales paid for most of the social programs,or how the small population of united people with a culture that valued hard work were what make it possible. Now they have foreign DNA and foreign cultures coming in and breeding like rabbits to suck up their wealth,and nothing but crime and more welfare babies in return. Truth to tell,I am kind of enjoying this because I grew up reading and hearing about how Americans were selfish and brutal because most blacks didn't succeed at the same level as most whites. This was naturally the fault of the whites,and not the blacks themselves. My response to Scandinavia now is "SUCK IT,YOU POMPOUS ASSES! What goes around,comes around". Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Sweden, Norawy and Finland have offshore oil expansion plans that created their boondoggle. America has phucked upped Congress and Presidency that goes back to Ronald Reagan.
Just exactly how is Reagan to blame for crap that started under FDR? Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Ineffective implementation via the Presidency: The Act required employers to attest to their employees' immigration status; made it illegal to hire or recruit illegal immigrants knowingly; legalized certain seasonal agricultural illegal immigrants, and; legalized illegal immigrants who entered the United States before January 1, 1982 and had resided there continuously with the penalty of a fine, back taxes due, and admission of guilt; candidates were required to prove that they were not guilty of crimes, that they were in the country before January 1, 1982, and that they possessed minimal knowledge about U.S. history, government, and the English language. That is how, pal. It never happened other than importing MORE illegal aliens to the point that America is saturated with the folks that are now affectionately called "immigrants."
At BEST,you have half the story. CONGRESS wrote and passed those laws,and Reagan signed it into law because there was an agreement that it would be a one-time deal. Of course the Dims lied,and thanks to the leftist press Reagan got the blame instead of the Dims. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
So the US President did NOT execute the law of the land. Reagan was derilict about his duties THAT HE SIGNED INTO LAW.
That's all he wants for purposes of cococting anti-Reagan propaganda. Being President is a thankless job with all the psychotic assholes with personal missions that you need to put up with.
You are not stupid. You know that Congress writes and passes the laws,and presidents sign them into law. You also have to know that Reagan singed this into law after reciving promises from the Dims that it would never happen again. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
You would have thought that he would have known they weren't going to keep their promise (all Leftards lie). Cause lying is the quickest way for them to get what they want, just like Muzzies... You would have thought that he would have known they weren't going to keep their promise We have three branches of federal government: legislative, executive, and judicial. Like it or not, the president must make agreements or contracts with congress on the assumption that those agreements are between gentlemen and will be carried out in good faith. A satisfactory agreement was made. Tip O'neal & company chose not to abide by their obligations of the contract. Don't try to blame Reagan for that.
A little over a year ago I received the following E-mail from Finland. I gave an online course in political psychology that was popular in a number of foreign countries and apparently the material is still being circulated in a European underground which is how it fell into Ragnar's hands. The e-mail I first received reads as Follows: Dear Mr. Kocher Please allow me to introduce myself, My name is Ragnar xxxxxxxxx, and my profession is that of an Christian minister for The Church of St. Thomas in Helsinki, Finland. I was first introduced to your work by an friend of mine, who suggested I read, in full, your writings on Spoiled Blacks, What We Don't Dare Discuss. As you may or may not know, In Finland, there is a coming problem within the community from West African Migrants, While we are openly friendly to them there are some in my congregation who are experiencing particular problems, with the young male "thugs". I was hoping that you may send me an link or an copy of your book titled the The American Mind in Denial and any other works that you may hav lying around, as I would like to read these and share them with my congregation. Sincerely Mr. xxxxxxxxx _____________________________ Apparently the people are getting the sh!t knocked out of them by African immigrants including black muslim immigrants. Ragnar is trying to sound nice like a man of the cloth should sound. In addition to thug and gang activity there is and enormous problem with the raping of Scandanavian women by these characters and they migrate back and forth across borders to do it. The politicians won't touch the subject and the people are getting angry about it. All they get is glorifying speeches about multiculturalism and unconditional love of your fellow man. Ragnar asked me what I thought should be done and I said, "Throw them the hell out and back to that from which the came," which was a little raw for his disposition and not fit to be thundered from the pulpit. Euphemism and sweetness has never been one of the strongest facets of my personality. Tough approach to problem solving and retribution is. I haven't heard from him again since that time.
That is what produces positive results. Not all the PC namby pamby. Si vis pacem, para bellum
Prime Minister Juha Sipila wrote in a tweet on Sunday that he wants to develop Finland as “an open and international country that is rich in its languages and culture”.
#2. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
Prime Minister Juha Sipila wrote in a tweet on Sunday that he wants to develop Finland as “an open and international country that is rich in its languages and culture”.
#3. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
(Edited)
The future of Europe may depend on how different parties answer this question.
#4. To: nativist nationalist (#0)
the Nordic nation
#5. To: nativist nationalist, All (#0)
#6. To: sneakypete (#1)
You really have to wonder how people who are supposed to be intelligent and educated can be such colossal fools as to follow political correctness without question.
#7. To: nativist nationalist, Liberator, sneakypete, redleghunter (#0)
Finnish Politician Openly Opposes Multiculturalism, Gov’t Goes Nuts
“Let me see which pig "DON'T" I want to vote for, the one with or without lipstick??" Hmmmmm...
#8. To: CZ82 (#7)
Didn't lucysmom and mininggold used to post here all the time about how great life was in these northern European socialist countries??
#9. To: Liberator (#8)
“Let me see which pig "DON'T" I want to vote for, the one with or without lipstick??" Hmmmmm...
#10. To: CZ82 (#7)
Didn't lucysmom and mininggold used to post here all the time about how great life was in these northern European socialist countries??
#11. To: sneakypete (#10)
Now they have foreign DNA and foreign cultures coming in and breeding like rabbits to suck up their wealth,and nothing but crime and more welfare babies in return.
#12. To: buckeroo (#11)
America has phucked upped Congress and Presidency that goes back to Ronald Reagan.
#13. To: sneakypete (#12)
(Edited)
The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), Pub.L. 99–603, 100 Stat. 3445, enacted November 6, 1986, also known as the Simpson-Mazzoli Act, signed into law by Ronald Reagan on November 6, 1986, is an Act of Congress which reformed United States immigration law.
#14. To: buckeroo (#13)
(Edited)
#15. To: sneakypete (#14)
#16. To: buckeroo (#15)
At BEST,you have half the story.
#17. To: rlk, sneakypete (#16)
#18. To: buckeroo (#15)
So the US President did NOT execute the law of the land. Reagan was derilict about his duties THAT HE SIGNED INTO LAW.
#19. To: sneakypete (#18)
#20. To: sneakypete (#18)
You also have to know that Reagan singed this into law after reciving promises from the Dims that it would never happen again.
“Let me see which pig "DON'T" I want to vote for, the one with or without lipstick??" Hmmmmm...
#21. To: CZ82 (#20)
You also have to know that Reagan singed this into law after reciving promises from the Dims that it would never happen again.
#22. To: nativist nationalist, stoner (#0)
(Edited)
Finnish Politician Openly Opposes Multiculturalism, Gov’t Goes Nuts
#23. To: rlk (#22)
" Tough approach to problem solving and retribution "
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]