[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: New Legislation Would Place Breathalyzers in All New Cars
Source: Activist Post
URL Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2015/07/new-legislation-would-place.html
Published: Jul 27, 2015
Author: Joshua Krause
Post Date: 2015-07-28 10:49:40 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 4614
Comments: 27

By Joshua Krause

As time goes on, cars are becoming less of a symbol of freedom and status, and more like automated golf carts that coddle their drivers.

Every other year they add more features that take the driver’s ability out of the loop, and track the whereabouts of said driver, with the ultimate endgame being a car that simply drives itself, that can be stopped remotely, that you can’t modify, and you probably won’t even own.

In the name of “safety,” these machines are no longer being built as an expression of your freedom to travel and your standard of living.

So perhaps this new piece of legislation being proposed by New York Congresswoman, Kathleen Rice, isn’t very surprising. What was once the punishment for delinquent drivers, may soon become a new standard. She wants to force car manufactures to install ignition interlock devices, also known as a breathalyzer, on all new vehicles. If your blood alcohol content is higher than the legal limit, your car won’t start. She explained her reasoning in a recent press release. “Advancing the progress we’ve made combating drunk driving demands bold action…that’s why I’m working on legislation to require ignition interlock devices in all new cars. This technology saves lives, it saves money, and I’m going to fight to make it standard equipment in American cars.”

Gone are the days when a car was synonymous with freedom. Now they’re just another shackle in the open air prison we call America. And soon, you won’t even be able to start your car without being treated like a criminal.

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger .

(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

#3. To: Deckard (#0)

She wants to force car manufactures to install ignition interlock devices, also known as a breathalyzer, on all new vehicles.

A Breathalyzer is an old, outdated scientific instrument that requires the use of chemicals (ampules) and is in no way also known as an ignition interlock device.

This bill will never pass... it's a "feel good" attempt to appease the agenda driven libtards that feel no amount of money is enough money for the illusion of safety.

Agenda driven activists should be wood chipped, regardless of their cause. The ignition interlock device was a retarded idea that has zero impact on curbing or reducing DWI's. The only way to reduce DWI's is to incarcerate for a full 10 years for the 2nd conviction and 20 years for the 3rd... 30 years for the 4th should just about leave them dead in prison.

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-07-28   12:44:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: GrandIsland (#3)

"The ignition interlock device was a retarded idea that has zero impact on curbing or reducing DWI's."

True, as they're applied today. Their sole function is to allow the driver (after a DWI conviction and after serving the imposed sentence) to use the vehicle only for work.

The driver makes this decision, which avoids constitutional conflict.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-07-28   13:19:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: misterwhite (#5) (Edited)

And when a Convicted drunk driver is ordered to install an ignition interlock device on his/her primary vehicle, and they can't afford it, who do you think pays for it?

The tax payers. The idiots that passed the ignition interlock legislation should be stood back to back and shot through the mouth.

I couldn't wait to leave that libtarded fucked up state.

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-07-28   13:48:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: GrandIsland (#7)

"And when a Convicted drunk driver is ordered to install an ignition interlock device on his/her primary vehicle, and they can't afford it, who do you think pays for it?"

If the car is used to go to work, then he has a job. If he can afford car payments, car insurance, parking, tolls, gas, oil, and repairs ... then he can afford $50-$100 per month for the ignition interlock device lease.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-07-28   16:28:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: misterwhite (#8)

If the car is used to go to work, then he has a job. If he can afford car payments, car insurance, parking, tolls, gas, oil, and repairs ... then he can afford $50-$100 per month for the ignition interlock device lease.

It doesn't work like that. The shitbags lawyer petitions the court with a "hardship". Then the court looks at his income, financial responsibilities... and decides. It's like 2K to get one installed. The shitbags even petition hardship for fines and fees... and the court eliminated most of them too.

The agenda posters have no clue what really happens after their peers shit all over society... but they are quick to defend them.

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-07-28   17:48:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: GrandIsland (#9)

I certainly do not have ANY sympathy for anyone that drives while drunk. I only know of one case where I felt sympathy for the driver. Long story, but as a rule, no one should get behind the wheel after having a drink. Personally, I will not even get behind the wheel here on the farm if I have had a drink. If everyone would do that, it would be great. But we know that is not going to happen. Shame.

Stoner  posted on  2015-07-28   18:59:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Stoner (#10)

"I certainly do not have ANY sympathy for anyone that drives while drunk."

Oh, I don't know. Destroying someone's life for something bad they might do doesn't bother you a little bit?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-07-29   9:51:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: misterwhite, Stoner (#11) (Edited)

Oh, I don't know. Destroying someone's life for something bad they might do doesn't bother you a little bit?

When they repeatedly drive drunk, why wait until they kill someone. Fuck them, lock'um up. It's a two fold purpose. First it's the ONLY way to keep a habitual offender from repeat offending... and a 10 year sentence for a 3rd DWI WILL SEND A MESSAGE TO THE SHEEP... you best call a taxi or walk.

I realize Deckard would cry because he probably considers drunk driving, generally, a "non violent" offense, like his beloved drug possessions... but I'm willing to bet Eugene Stoner has no problem with the concept.

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-07-29   10:18:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: GrandIsland, Misterwhite (#13)

" I'm willing to bet Eugene Stoner has no problem with the concept."

Well GI, that would depend on what your definition of "the concept" is.

Boys, Let me make this simple. I have no problem whatsoever with locking up drunk drivers! They are a danger to the public, and even themselves. I and my wife & children travel on the same roads.

Lock them up, heavy fine. I do not want to hear the crap about their job, etc. 2nd Offense, prison, forfeit car, etc. Third offense, exile to deserted island for life. Also use the island for all with a Death Sentence, & Life Prison sentence. Save the taxpayers money. Screw the lawyers!

Simple / Clear enough?

Stoner  posted on  2015-07-29   10:55:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 16.

#17. To: Stoner (#16)

"I and my wife & children travel on the same roads."

There are old people on the road also who can't see too well, hear too well, have slow reaction times and are sometimes confused.

How about teens -- statistically horrible drivers?

There are people who talk on cellphones, listen to the radio, have distracting infants in the car, and eat fast food while driving?

How about all the unsafe vehicles out there with bald tires, no shocks, barely functioning brakes and even bad wipers?

Not all accidents are caused by "drunk" drivers. Where does someone like you draw the line when it comes to road safety?

misterwhite  posted on  2015-07-29 11:38:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Stoner (#16)

Lock them up, heavy fine. I do not want to hear the crap about their job, etc. 2nd Offense, prison, forfeit car, etc. Third offense, exile to deserted island for life. Also use the island for all with a Death Sentence, & Life Prison sentence. Save the taxpayers money. Screw the lawyers!

Simple / Clear enough?

I'm on board.... and I agree.

As far as Whites claim of "your kind".... he's showing his libtard, sympathetic side along with a touch of Deckard paranoia... suggesting that "your kind" would start imprisoning "old" drivers for being dangerous. I'll suggest that "old" drivers, driving sober but driving while old (DWO)... and are no longer safe, have their license pulled by a review board. Big difference than breaking the law, repeatedly, driving drunk.

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-07-29 12:59:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com