United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Criminal Inquiry Is Sought in Clinton Email Account
Source:
CNBC
URL Source: http://www.cnbc.com/2015/07/23/crim ... ary-clintons-use-of-email.html
Published: Jul 24, 2015
Author: Michael S. Schmidt and Matt Apuzzo
Post Date: 2015-07-24 13:54:29 by redleghunter
Ping List: *2016 The Likely Suspects* Subscribe to *2016 The Likely Suspects*
Keywords: None
Views: 12542
Comments: 111
WASHINGTON — Two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state, senior government officials said Thursday. The request follows an assessment in a June 29 memo by the inspectors general for the State Department and the intelligence agencies that Mrs. Clinton's private account contained "hundreds of potentially classified emails." The memo was written to Patrick F. Kennedy, the under secretary of state for management. It is not clear if any of the information in the emails was marked as classified by the State Department when Mrs. Clinton sent or received them. But since her use of a private email account for official State Department business was revealed in March, she has repeatedly said that she had no classified information on the account. The initial revelation has been an issue in the early stages of her presidential campaign. Poster Comment: 
Subscribe to *2016 The Likely Suspects*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-71) not displayed.
.
.
.
#72. To: sneakypete (#71)
He already got the first sanctuary cityu legislation passed. He isn't even President yet. He will use the bully pulpit better then anyone has. He will call them stupid and dumb then they will cave when he is President. He is going to win Pete. You can thank me in a few years when you realize you were wrong.
Just so you know, Stone drinks the cup of water for his opinions fron some far off planet called "bullshite"; it isn't all his fault; he was brought up by CIA propaganda. Give the poor man a bit of tyme to fall off his roof again. Sonner or later he will "get it."
You and the other kooks keep bitching about how evil both the RNC and DNC is... and now you're bragging about how they won't play nice with Trump. Seems like anything the RNC & DNC hates, you should endorse. You are more confused that Bruce Jenner. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Talk about yourself about being a socialist living off the fat o' the land, such as yourself; it would be more apropos. I know, it is not all your fault ... you didn't plan your path as a free American; you weren't educated; you were trained like a dawg. You allowed the government to grab your balls to restrain your existence.
Ha ha... let the libtards boil in anger. No more socialist Dems, no more weak filthy RINO's. Now they gotta a real problem... A RICH INDEPENDENT THAT CANT BE BOUGHT.
I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Is Rand still your first choice? He seems to have disappeared. He is fighting to defund planned parenthood, which is good in my view.
Is Rand still your first choice? He seems to have disappeared. He is fighting to defund planned parenthood, which is good in my view. I like Rand... and if Rand and Trump were equally viable, I'd probably vote Rand because I'm a little more confident in his desire to never shit on the bill of rights, more so than Trump. However, if Trump is the best chance at a non (D) win, I'll gladly vote for him in a New York second. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Sorry, Charlie - Of this, $612,083 are to candidates or parties identifiable either as Republican or Democratic. Of that amount, $320,300 of that have been to the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates; $291,783 to Republican committees and candidates. That’s 52% of his giving to identifiable political giving to Democrats. Perhaps more illuminating: In 2010, he made $102,200 in political donations, $83,400 were to Republicans, including a $50,000 check in October to American Crossroads, a PAC cofounded by Karl Rove. Before 2010, when we could infer he was less serious about running for the Republican nomination, 59% of his political donations were to Democrats (again, setting aside donations not identifiable with either party). Who are his favorites? On the left side of the aisle: $20,350 to Charles Rangel, the Harlem-based Congressman $9,900 to Chuck Schumer $9,400 to Harry Reid $9,000 to various Kennedys, mainly Ted. $5,500 to John Kerry On the right side of the aisle: $13,200 to John McCain (excluding any McCain affiliated PACs) $8,300 Arlen Specter, former Republican Senator who eventually turned Democratic to salvage his career. $9,500 to Mark Foley, the disgraced former Florida politician $8,250 to south Jersey Congressman Frank LoBiondo $6,500 to Sue Kelly, a former congressperson from upstate New York. Of the $131,950 donations to organizations not identified as affiliated with a party by OpenSecrets and non-affiliated candidates: $4,800 went to Charlie Crist, the former Florida governor who ran for Senate as an independent. $1,000 to independent candidate Joe Lieberman (who also received Trump donations when a Democrat) $50,000 went to the Trump NY Delegate Committee in 1999, presumably in connection with the effort to draw a political convention to New York City. See the data yourself at OpenSecrets.org Trump certainly appears to be drawing unusual backers. As I previously reported, a left-leaning PAC that previously backed Obama, John Kerry and Howard Dean is mulling back a candidate Trump. GrandIsland - you have too much tyme on your hands ... why not go out and be that street crossing guard that you once were? You were best at that sort of thing.
That is one thing I like about Rand. I was all in for Rand at one point. Then in my view he went a little squishy on a few things and started sounding more calculating in his answers instead of the unvarnished truth.
Buck. That line of attack is not working. Trump gets a pass on it because he was just doing business. Making everyone like him as he puts it. I'm serious Buck. That line of attack will not work against Trump. It would probably against any other candidate, but not Trump. Maybe it isn' fair but it is accurate.
Ohh, I see ... he was bribing elected officials. Thats pretty cool.
Quit wasting your breath. Your post proves only two things. 1) Trump used both sides to make money. Donate to a campaign and expect that politician to help Trump make millions as he builds them. 2) Trump obviously knows what's wrong with our political choices over the last 100 years... THEY CAN BE BOUGHT because they need money to run for office. So, you should figure out that since Trump isn't asking for shit in donations, he'll be the only candidate that doesn't owe once he wins... AND he will use BOTH sides to get the job done. So, suck it up. If you hate both sides as much as you CLAIM... you should like Trump since both sides hate Trump, especially the DEMS. What's that leave you, Bucky? lol I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Maybe bucky is just afraid Trump will make it hard to defraud the government. If you know what I mean.
The fact that you can't even understand such a simple thing as the different meanings of the words "brag" and "recognize" is why you were a cop. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Agreed. Trump is a *FLIP-FLOPPER* on a scale this nation has never seen before.
Bucky doesn't understand that Trumps ability to use both sides is what's made the man so rich. That's why Bucky isn't a billionaire. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Ahhh,I guess you are also going to give the same pass to his good friends,the Clintons? After all,they were just doing business,too. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
I'd disagree with that point. But it does bring up the fact that you don't know what the word "nobody" means.
You also don't know what the word "friends" means. They were acquaintences. But to answer your question. No I wouldn't give the Clintons a pass on anything. Just Teflon Don.
You're not just drinking the Kool-Ade,you're shooting it up,ain't ya? Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
I like that moniker you just made up for the Donald. Maybe it will stick. Nah.
lol. No I just know as a developer developing multi million dollar buildings. They would be held up if he didn't have some kind of access. Maybe someone who makes minimum wage should have the same access as Trump. But it is just never going to be so. It just isn't Pete. Trump never broke any laws that I'm aware of. And you being a respector of the constitution that you claim to be. I know you believe in innocent until proven guilty. Especially to someone who has never been accused of any wrong doing. You're going all Bernie anti capitalist on us. Like earlier when you were complaining Trump didn't give you anything.
Please quit being such a dick head, mr. web site owner.
I agree that isn't the way things are,but that is the way things are supposed to be,and we should all be working towards that goal. American is supposed to be a Republic,not a Monarchy. Trump never broke any laws that I'm aware of. Of course he has. He has bribed public officials,and who knows what else he has done? We will never know because he hides behind a platoon of lawyers on retainer and public officials on his payroll that can kill any investigation that would cause him harm. Haven't you said yourself that he has had to buy political favor to do business in NYC? I know you believe in innocent until proven guilty. Especially to someone who has never been accused of any wrong doing. Trump has never been accussed of doing any wrongdoing? Have you been living in a freaking cave? You're going all Bernie anti capitalist on us. Do yourself a favor and learn about unfettered capitalism versus the moderated form of capitalism our laws were designed to protect. Unfettered capitalism is nothing more than fascism,which is the evolved,adult form of communism. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
There is no longer any reason,if there ever was,for you and I to discuss this. Frankly,you are too stupid to understand reason because you live off of emotion and superstition. You are a groupie,and Trump is your Boy Band. You are due to take a big emotional hit when he finally drops out and you see what the payoff was. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
I think he has staying power. I don't know for how long - I'll guess a year. Then he'll be buried on the political trail and add another billion to his wallet.
No we shouldn't.
No we shouldn't. Ok,so you are pro-Royalty instead of pro-American. That explains your idolization of the carney geek that is Donald Trump. You love him because he is rich,and couldn't care less about how he got rich or how he stays rich. It's all irrelevant because you worship men you consider to be better than yourself. You are a natural serf. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
True,and BY DEFINITION anything she did not classify was not classified information. Remember when that shithead Jim-mah Carter exposed Top Secret Code Word intelligence about the Stealth fighters and bombers ready to come online in order to try to pump up is re-election chances and absolutely nothing happened to him for doing so despite the FACT that anyone below him doing that would have received life in prison? It wasn't classified if the president says it wasn't classified. Same thing is going to happen here. She didn't classify it so it wasn't classified. Can't we just MOVE ON? Anything not yet officially classified is not officially classified. That does not change the responsibility to classify national security information, or the culpability for failing one's responsibility to properly classify it. For any qualifying national security information which came across her non-secure email system: HILLARY CLINTON was RESPONSIBLE to properly classify the document, and every paragraph of the document, upon her initial review of the document. A document is not unclassified because Hillary Clinton did not classify it. See the IG statement below. If information within falls under derived classification, it is classified whether it is marked or not. HILLARY CLINTON was RESPONSIBLE to NOT keep the national security information on her non-secure server. HILLARY CLINTON was RESPONSIBLE to file a compromise report for each such document. Information does not automatically become unclassified or delcassified because it has been compromised, even if published in newspapers or hacked off a non-secure server. HILLARY CLINTON was RESPONSIBLE to take immediate measures to prevent further transmission of national security information to her non-secure email system. Instead, HILLARY CLINTON maintained an unlawful non-secure back channel intelligence system, compromising all national security information she permitted and enabled to be handled on her non-secure system. The President did not declare any of the national security information held on the non-secure system of HILLARY CLINTON to be unclassified or declassified. Jimmy Carter or other presidents may declassify and release whatever they choose. What the president may do today (but has not done) is not relevant to a determination of what HILLARY CLINTON wrongfully did, or failed to do. National Security Information, wrongfully present on HILLARY CLINTON's email server, was not properly classified, AS REQUIRED. She could not ignore information that qualified for SECRET or TOP SECRET classification and treat it as unclassified until one of her subordinates told her different. www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-01-05/pdf/E9-31418.pdf Title 3—The President, Executive Order 13526 of December 29, 2009 Classified National Security Information Federal Register, Vol. 75, No. 2, Tuesday, January 5, 2010, pp. 707-708 Sec. 1.3. Classification Authority. [snip] Statement from the Inspectors General of the Intelligence Community and the Department of State Regarding the Review of Former Secretary Clinton's Emails Yesterday the Office ofthe Inspector General ofthe Intelligence Community (IC IG} sent a congressional notification to intelligence oversight committees updating them of the IC IG support to the State Department IG (attached). The IC IG found four emails containing classified IC-derived information in a limited sample of 40 emails of the 30,000 emails provided by former Secretary Clinton. The four emails, which have not been released through the State FOIA process, did not contain classification markings and/or dissemination controls. These emails were not retroactively classified by the State Department; rather these emails contained classified information when they were generated and, according to IC classification officials, that information remains classified today. This classified information should never have been transmitted via an unclassified personal system. IC IG made a referral detailing the potential compromise of classified information to security officials within the Executive Branch. The main purpose of the referral was to notify security officials that classified information may exist on at least one private server and thumb drive that are not in the government's possession. An important distinction is that the IC IG did not make a criminal referral – it was a security referral made for counterintelligence purposes. The IC IG is statutorily required to refer potential compromises of national security information to the appropriate IC security officials. /s/ I. Charles McCullough, III Inspector General, Department of State Hillary stored INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY (IC) DERIVED INFORMATION on her non-secure server and she transmitted the same. This material held derived classification, as opposed to requiring original classification. Orignal classification of the information already existed. As the IG said, the information was classified when generated and remains classified today. The IG filed the potential compromise report as required by law. As the IG noted, "This classified information should never have been transmitted via an unclassified personal system."
For any qualifying national security information which came across her non-secure email system: HILLARY CLINTON was RESPONSIBLE Technically you are correct,and that would make a solid case in a court of law. The problem is this is Bubbette! we are speaking of,and she is never going to be charged with anything in a court of law. She is a protected species,and only has to worry about the "court of public opinion" and there is nobody better than the Clinton's when it comes to shading the facts and confusing issues. Does the sentence "That all depends on what the meaning of the word "is",is." bring back any memories. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
She is a protected species,and only has to worry about the "court of public opinion" and there is nobody better than the Clinton's when it comes to shading the facts and confusing issues. Does the sentence "That all depends on what the meaning of the word "is",is." bring back any memories. Hillary is not in a court of law but is in the court of public opinion and in a very bright spotlight. Escaping criminal prosecution is not the same as getting elected president. Hillary trying to sound like Bill gives me an impression of Tricky Dick saying "I am not a crook."
Not really. It only seems that way to those of us on the right because we have spent so long waiting for her to be called to accounts. The truth is the typical Dim voters,and especially the Why-men feminist voters never hear about any of this,and if they do hear about it they never bother to pay attention or do any research because she's "their man!" IF the mainstream media mentions it all all on local teebee where most dolts get their news,it's just a speaking point mentioning how radical right-wingers and anti-women forces are trying to damage her reputation. And for the vast amount of voters that get interested in politics for 30 days ever 4 years,they never heard of it and will never hear of it. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Not really. It only seems that way to those of us on the right because we have spent so long waiting for her to be called to accounts. Hillary is in a spotlight and her inability to to get stories such as her security blunders out of the news cycle are having a toll on her polling numbers. I still doubt Hillary can stumble all the way to the convention. Only time will tell. By Michael Gerson WAPO Source: no text provided.
True,but we both know that Bubbette! can absolutely count on the Dim Party People to vote for her because she has a D behind her name,just like the Republican Party People will vote for any sack of shit you put a R on that wins the alleged Republican nomination. In the end it seems like the people that are really responsible for putting a president into the WH are the dummies that get interested in politics for 30 days every 4 years,and base their vote on who looks the best,has the nicest looking children,whose "turn" it is,or any other factor that has absolutely nothing to do with reason. Which is why the Founding Fathers set up a system where only property owners were allowed to vote because they had a vested interest in knowing who was running and what they were for and against. Now we let anybody with a drivers license vote,and they always vote for the candidate that promises to give them the most "free stuff". Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
That would be Bernie. Who is one of two people you said you would vote for. The other is another democrat who gives out free stuff. You're just hot air.
His name please.
Jim Web. You know the open border moron, who thinks it is ok to replace chopped up American babies with wetbacks.
True enough for the general election but that is not the same folks who turn out for the primaries. The party PTB greatly influence the primaries and the nomination.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2189751/hillary-clinton-emails-7-31-15.pdf The new batch of emails can be viewed or downloaded as one big PDF at the link. Just paging through it shows that there is one redaction after another. I would guess there are over a thousand redactions in 1,618 pages. It is also about 1,000 emails short of satisfying the court order. Hillary wants to slow walk it so she can testify to Congress while some of it has yet to be released. Congress could delay the hearing until 2016. http://www.foiadvocates.com/exemptions.html 6. Documents which are "personnel and medical and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy." 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6).
No,I am telling you he will never be elected,and even if he is,he won't have the authority
#73. To: sneakypete, A K A Stone (#71)
(Edited)
#74. To: sneakypete (#71)
he will never be elected,and even if he is,he won't have the authority to any of that on his own and nobody in either the DNC or the RNC is going to back him if he tries.
#75. To: GrandIsland (#74)
#76. To: GrandIsland (#74)
#77. To: A K A Stone (#76)
#78. To: GrandIsland (#77)
#79. To: A K A Stone (#78)
#80. To: GrandIsland (#77)
No more socialist Dems, no more weak filthy RINO's. Now they gotta a real problem... A RICH INDEPENDENT THAT CANT BE BOUGHT.
According to electoral cycle donations via OpenSecrets.org which I examined this morning, Trump has donated a net $744,033 to political candidates and committees since 1989 (the extent of the online database).
#81. To: GrandIsland (#79)
more confident in his desire to never shit on the bill of rights
#82. To: buckeroo (#80)
#83. To: A K A Stone (#82)
Trump gets a pass on it because he was just doing business.
#84. To: buckeroo (#80)
#85. To: GrandIsland, buckeroo (#84)
#86. To: GrandIsland (#74)
You and the other kooks keep bitching about how evil both the RNC and DNC is... and now you're bragging about how they won't play nice with Trump.
#87. To: GrandIsland (#84)
... AND he will use BOTH sides to get the job done.
#88. To: A K A Stone (#82)
Trump gets a pass on it because he was just doing business.
#89. To: A K A Stone (#82)
Trump gets a pass on it because he was just doing business.
#90. To: sneakypete (#86)
The fact that you can't even understand such a simple thing as the different meanings of the words "brag" and "recognize" is why you were a cop.
#91. To: sneakypete (#89)
Ahhh,I guess you are also going to give the same pass to his good friends,the Clintons?
#92. To: A K A Stone (#91)
They were acquaintences. But to answer your question. No I wouldn't give the Clintons a pass on anything. Just Teflon Don.
#93. To: A K A Stone (#91)
Just Teflon Don.
#94. To: sneakypete (#92)
You're not just drinking the Kool-Ade,you're shooting it up,ain't ya?
#95. To: A K A Stone (#67)
You're talking out of both sides of your sperm receptor.
#96. To: A K A Stone (#94)
Maybe someone who makes minimum wage should have the same access as Trump. But it is just never going to be so. It just isn't Pete.
#97. To: A K A Stone (#67)
(Edited)
So it includes it but doesn't include it. You're talking out of both sides of your sperm receptor.
#98. To: sneakypete (#97)
You are due to take a big emotional hit when he [Trump] finally drops out and you see what the payoff was.
#99. To: sneakypete (#96)
I agree that isn't the way things are,but that is the way things are supposed to be,and we should all be working towards that goal.
#100. To: A K A Stone (#99)
I agree that isn't the way things are,but that is the way things are supposed to be,and we should all be working towards that goal.
#101. To: sneakypete (#20)
The Agency head is responsible for the protection of classified information within her agency.
(d) All original classification authorities must receive training in proper classification (including the avoidance of over-classification) and declassification as provided in this order and its implementing directives at least once a calendar year. Such training must include instruction on the proper safeguarding of classified information and on the sanctions in section 5.5 of this order that may be brought against an individual who fails to classify information properly or protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure.
July 24, 2015
Inspector General of the Intelligence Community
Steve Linick
#102. To: nolu chan (#101)
Anything not yet officially classified is not officially classified. That does not change the responsibility to classify national security information, or the culpability for failing one's responsibility to properly classify it.
#103. To: sneakypete (#102)
The problem is this is Bubbette! we are speaking of,and she is never going to be charged with anything in a court of law.
#104. To: nolu chan (#103)
Hillary is not in a court of law but is in the court of public opinion and in a very bright spotlight.
#105. To: sneakypete (#104)
Hillary is not in a court of law but is in the court of public opinion and in a very bright spotlight.
Hillary Clinton, the Democrats’ wounded queen?
Washington Post
Opinion writer
July 27, 2015
#106. To: nolu chan (#105)
I still doubt Hillary can stumble all the way to the convention. Only time will tell.
#107. To: sneakypete (#106)
Now we let anybody with a drivers license vote,and they always vote for the candidate that promises to give them the most "free stuff".
#108. To: A K A Stone (#107)
The other is another democrat who gives out free stuff.
#109. To: Fred Mertz (#108)
His name please.
#110. To: sneakypete (#106)
In the end it seems like the people that are really responsible for putting a president into the WH are the dummies that get interested in politics for 30 days every 4 years,and base their vote on who looks the best,has the nicest looking children,whose "turn" it is,or any other factor that has absolutely nothing to do with reason.
#111. To: redleghunter (#16)
5. Documents which are "inter-agency or intra-agency memorandum or letters" which would be privileged in civil litigation. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5).
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]