[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232

Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need

"How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America"

How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Criminal Inquiry Is Sought in Clinton Email Account
Source: CNBC
URL Source: http://www.cnbc.com/2015/07/23/crim ... ary-clintons-use-of-email.html
Published: Jul 24, 2015
Author: Michael S. Schmidt and Matt Apuzzo
Post Date: 2015-07-24 13:54:29 by redleghunter
Ping List: *2016 The Likely Suspects*     Subscribe to *2016 The Likely Suspects*
Keywords: None
Views: 14347
Comments: 111

WASHINGTON — Two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state, senior government officials said Thursday.

The request follows an assessment in a June 29 memo by the inspectors general for the State Department and the intelligence agencies that Mrs. Clinton's private account contained "hundreds of potentially classified emails." The memo was written to Patrick F. Kennedy, the under secretary of state for management.

It is not clear if any of the information in the emails was marked as classified by the State Department when Mrs. Clinton sent or received them.

But since her use of a private email account for official State Department business was revealed in March, she has repeatedly said that she had no classified information on the account.

The initial revelation has been an issue in the early stages of her presidential campaign.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

(1 image)

Subscribe to *2016 The Likely Suspects*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 77.

#3. To: redleghunter (#0)

It is not clear if any of the information in the emails was marked as classified by the State Department when Mrs. Clinton sent or received them.

Right. The sender sent information which was not yet officially classified. Hillary Clinton received information which had not yet been officially classified. As head of the State Department, did she have a duty to recognize the intelligence reports as highly classified and classify them, and give them the required protection?

As the information was clearly compromised, should it have been so reported?

It would not seem to help if Sidney Blumenthal were to be considered to have acted in some official State Department capacity and to have sufficient clearance and access authorization. It would only make him responsible to have protected it in the first place.

Hillary's server clearly contained intelligence reports with Top Secret information. The Agency head is responsible for the protection of classified information within her agency.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-24   15:50:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: nolu chan (#3)

The Agency head is responsible for the protection of classified information within her agency.

True,and BY DEFINITION anything she did not classify was not classified information.

Remember when that shithead Jim-mah Carter exposed Top Secret Code Word intelligence about the Stealth fighters and bombers ready to come online in order to try to pump up is re-election chances and absolutely nothing happened to him for doing so despite the FACT that anyone below him doing that would have received life in prison?

It wasn't classified if the president says it wasn't classified.

Same thing is going to happen here. She didn't classify it so it wasn't classified.

Can't we just MOVE ON?

sneakypete  posted on  2015-07-26   10:01:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: sneakypete (#20)

Same thing is going to happen here. She didn't classify it so it wasn't classified.

If it came from info classified by other lawful classifiers, her opinion of its classification is irrelevant.

A SoS has classification rights over documents they write, but they can't reclassify a classified Pentagon or CIA document on a whim. There is an audit trail of who classifies info and everyone it is transmitted to and each individual has the responsibility to safeguard any classified material. They are not arbitrarily allowed to reclassify documents they have received. Declassification follows other rather strict protocols, as when old government documents from DoE or Pentagon or State get declassified years or decades later.

So I think you are overestimating Hitlery's authority to reclassify anything that came into her hands as SoS.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-07-26   10:59:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: TooConservative (#23)

A SoS has classification rights over documents they write, but they can't reclassify a classified Pentagon or CIA document on a whim.

Then it will be the fault of some secretary or clerk that retyped it and handed it to her without telling her.

NOTHING is EVER going to be her fault.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-07-26   12:14:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: sneakypete (#41)

NOTHING is EVER going to be her fault.

Not if Hillary or your commie Hero Sanders wins.

Trump on the other hand and Hillary is off to jail.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-07-26   12:15:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: A K A Stone (#43)

Trump on the other hand and Hillary is off to jail.

ROFLMAO!

Will that be before or after he asks for the money back that he donated to her earlier election campaigns?

Will it also mean that he won't invite her to any more parties?

sneakypete  posted on  2015-07-26   12:29:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: sneakypete (#51)

Will that be before or after he asks for the money back that he donated to her earlier election campaigns?

Before. Because he isn't going to ask for the money back. It was chump change.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-07-26   12:32:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: A K A Stone (#54)

Before. Because he isn't going to ask for the money back. It was chump change.

Yeah, a couple of grand here,a couple of grand there,it's almost like it never happened,right?

sneakypete  posted on  2015-07-26   12:44:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: sneakypete (#61)

Yeah, a couple of grand here,a couple of grand there,it's almost like it never happened,right?

I'm not a rich guy. But a couple of grand doesn't seem like that much to me. It must be like a nickel or penny to Trump.

I understand as a business man of his magnitude. You have to play the political game or you will not be able to do business. So he gave them some chump change. It doesn't bother me in the least.

Now if Jeb, or Graham, or Cruz gave her money. There would be hell to pay. Because there giving would be for different reasons.

That is how I see it. I suspect that is how millions of others see it. Am I a bit hypocritical on this? Maybe but I don't think so.

I'm telling you this so you can understand my thinking and perhaps lots of others. Trump is going to be able to get away with stuff others in the field wouldn't. And that is ok with me. Because I and others can see that he isn't a typical politican. He is there to solve serious problems with our debt, border etc.

I won't agree with everything he does. But I respect him. He isn't going to get tied up in the kinds of debates you and I have about gay marriage or abortion. He may not be as against those as I am. But that is ok because unlike a Hillary or typical politican that isn't his main focus. He will be a good President. And like Reagan I expect you to come around. You're just so cynical from your experinces with being lied to for so may years. So your cynicism is to be expected.

Hope that helps you understand where I and I think many others are coming from.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-07-26   12:53:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: A K A Stone (#64)

'm not a rich guy. But a couple of grand doesn't seem like that much to me.

It's not,and I am sure that just like everyone else he found a way around election laws and donated more.

If there is one thing that Trump loves as much as himself,it is money. He is not going to give a dime to anyone unless he thinks he will benefit from it.

Good to see you don't care about him contributing to the Clinton,Kennedy,and NYC manorial campaigns,though.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-07-26   12:59:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: sneakypete (#66)

If there is one thing that Trump loves as much as himself,it is money. He is not going to give a dime to anyone unless he thinks he will benefit from it.

So when we are losing money to China in trade. And to Mexico in trade. Trump will see we are losing money and it is no benefit to us.

Sounds awesome. Thank for making me like Trump even more. :)

You're telling us he will get rid of NAFTA and have better trade deals with China, Japan etc.

Awesome.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-07-26   13:10:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: A K A Stone (#68)

You're telling us he will get rid of NAFTA and have better trade deals with China, Japan etc.

No,I am telling you he will never be elected,and even if he is,he won't have the authority to any of that on his own and nobody in either the DNC or the RNC is going to back him if he tries.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-07-26   15:28:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: sneakypete (#71)

he will never be elected,and even if he is,he won't have the authority to any of that on his own and nobody in either the DNC or the RNC is going to back him if he tries.

You and the other kooks keep bitching about how evil both the RNC and DNC is... and now you're bragging about how they won't play nice with Trump. Seems like anything the RNC & DNC hates, you should endorse.

You are more confused that Bruce Jenner.

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-07-26   15:45:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: GrandIsland (#74)

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-07-26   19:07:54 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: A K A Stone (#76)

Ha ha... let the libtards boil in anger. No more socialist Dems, no more weak filthy RINO's. Now they gotta a real problem... A RICH INDEPENDENT THAT CANT BE BOUGHT.

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-07-26   19:41:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 77.

#78. To: GrandIsland (#77)

Is Rand still your first choice? He seems to have disappeared.

He is fighting to defund planned parenthood, which is good in my view.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-07-26 19:44:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: GrandIsland (#77)

No more socialist Dems, no more weak filthy RINO's. Now they gotta a real problem... A RICH INDEPENDENT THAT CANT BE BOUGHT.

Sorry, Charlie -

According to electoral cycle donations via OpenSecrets.org which I examined this morning, Trump has donated a net $744,033 to political candidates and committees since 1989 (the extent of the online database).

Of this, $612,083 are to candidates or parties identifiable either as Republican or Democratic.

Of that amount, $320,300 of that have been to the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates; $291,783 to Republican committees and candidates. That’s 52% of his giving to identifiable political giving to Democrats.

Perhaps more illuminating: In 2010, he made $102,200 in political donations, $83,400 were to Republicans, including a $50,000 check in October to American Crossroads, a PAC cofounded by Karl Rove.

Before 2010, when we could infer he was less serious about running for the Republican nomination, 59% of his political donations were to Democrats (again, setting aside donations not identifiable with either party).

Who are his favorites?

On the left side of the aisle:

$20,350 to Charles Rangel, the Harlem-based Congressman $9,900 to Chuck Schumer $9,400 to Harry Reid $9,000 to various Kennedys, mainly Ted. $5,500 to John Kerry

On the right side of the aisle:

$13,200 to John McCain (excluding any McCain affiliated PACs) $8,300 Arlen Specter, former Republican Senator who eventually turned Democratic to salvage his career. $9,500 to Mark Foley, the disgraced former Florida politician $8,250 to south Jersey Congressman Frank LoBiondo $6,500 to Sue Kelly, a former congressperson from upstate New York.

Of the $131,950 donations to organizations not identified as affiliated with a party by OpenSecrets and non-affiliated candidates:

$4,800 went to Charlie Crist, the former Florida governor who ran for Senate as an independent. $1,000 to independent candidate Joe Lieberman (who also received Trump donations when a Democrat) $50,000 went to the Trump NY Delegate Committee in 1999, presumably in connection with the effort to draw a political convention to New York City.

See the data yourself at OpenSecrets.org

Trump certainly appears to be drawing unusual backers. As I previously reported, a left-leaning PAC that previously backed Obama, John Kerry and Howard Dean is mulling back a candidate Trump.

GrandIsland - you have too much tyme on your hands ... why not go out and be that street crossing guard that you once were? You were best at that sort of thing.

buckeroo  posted on  2015-07-26 19:56:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 77.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com