United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Criminal Inquiry Is Sought in Clinton Email Account
Source:
CNBC
URL Source: http://www.cnbc.com/2015/07/23/crim ... ary-clintons-use-of-email.html
Published: Jul 24, 2015
Author: Michael S. Schmidt and Matt Apuzzo
Post Date: 2015-07-24 13:54:29 by redleghunter
Ping List: *2016 The Likely Suspects* Subscribe to *2016 The Likely Suspects*
Keywords: None
Views: 12682
Comments: 111
WASHINGTON — Two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state, senior government officials said Thursday. The request follows an assessment in a June 29 memo by the inspectors general for the State Department and the intelligence agencies that Mrs. Clinton's private account contained "hundreds of potentially classified emails." The memo was written to Patrick F. Kennedy, the under secretary of state for management. It is not clear if any of the information in the emails was marked as classified by the State Department when Mrs. Clinton sent or received them. But since her use of a private email account for official State Department business was revealed in March, she has repeatedly said that she had no classified information on the account. The initial revelation has been an issue in the early stages of her presidential campaign. Poster Comment: 
Subscribe to *2016 The Likely Suspects*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-20) not displayed.
.
.
.
#21. To: A K A Stone (#13)
Not unless a deposit is missed,anyway. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Yeah that's the ticket. Trump is spending millions and losing millions so they can give him how much? You're not to bright.
If it came from info classified by other lawful classifiers, her opinion of its classification is irrelevant. A SoS has classification rights over documents they write, but they can't reclassify a classified Pentagon or CIA document on a whim. There is an audit trail of who classifies info and everyone it is transmitted to and each individual has the responsibility to safeguard any classified material. They are not arbitrarily allowed to reclassify documents they have received. Declassification follows other rather strict protocols, as when old government documents from DoE or Pentagon or State get declassified years or decades later. So I think you are overestimating Hitlery's authority to reclassify anything that came into her hands as SoS.
Of course you are correct. I noticed that poster was incorrect too. Didn't want to rub his nose in it at this time though.
Try to spell it right, so that you don't look like a total idiot. It's TOO. Thats a pretty arrogant post on your part; you didn't even notify the poster you were discussing.
To be fair, he is cutting back on Internet costs; he is charged by the keyboard character (ASCII) and he is saving money as a prudent web site owner!
Accidents happen Buckeroo. After all you were born.
I was planned at the beginning of tyme. What is your excuse?
Argument rule # 1: When you've lost an argument or can't defend your position, correct grammar. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
That is true. But your parents still had an accident. I'm happy that you are here Buck. You're a unique individual.
When you've lost an argument or can't defend your position, correct grammar. Your comment above is a perfect example of an idiot POM-POM girl that wasn't even involved but begs to get her nose rubbed in it.
What are you doing Stone? Drivin goff some of our best posters again? What did you do, today? Go to Sunday school and learn "HELL and DAMNATION" once again?
I've said nothing about Grandisland. I was talking about you.
I was referring to your angst about "sneakypete" ... you seem to think he characterizes the word "evil."
I attack all fag lovers that are for Bernie Sanders. Do you agree with your bestest bud Pete, that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate and is a conservative? Do you agree with your good friend Pete that people who support Traditional marriage (marriage) are bigots and discriminate against faggots?
I agree with no politician. After election all of them wipe of their silly grins and put on their clown masks when entering the Washington DC circus. Your question makes no sense. I even looked for an answer in my 8BALL, and it suggests: TRY AGAIN.
That wasn't the question. But reading between the lines I can see you think Pete is full of it on this issue. If you think Pete is correct just say so.
You're not to bright. Yeah,that's true. If there is one thing that can be said about the international bankers that are buying up the world and have enough money to hire him to cut their lawns,it's that they have no money. It is also true that the one thing Trump absolutely hates is money,right? Good thinking! Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Another dodge by you. You're not being honest. You just don't want to hurt your bff's feelings. Pete thinks you're a bigot because you don't support pretend "fag marriage".
Then it will be the fault of some secretary or clerk that retyped it and handed it to her without telling her. NOTHING is EVER going to be her fault. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
In Pete's defense, he has only demonstrated that Sanders is just about as capable of any politician to destroy America. He is correct, too. GWBush was a lamb coming into office and destroyed America while destroying the ME, all for nothing. So, Sanders might just be another good candidate as well.
Not if Hillary or your commie Hero Sanders wins. Trump on the other hand and Hillary is off to jail.
lol. Have a great day Buck.
You have to give him a break. He has spent his whole adult life sucking up to various police chiefs and other authority figures,and now that he is retired he is reduced to sucking up to a web site owner in order to get his "authority fix". If anything we should feel sorry for him. He is rudderless in a sea of confusion without a master to tell him what to think and what to do. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Once again you are lying about me,and I haven't even been back all day. I am NOT a "fag lover". Unlike you,I am a Bill of Rights lover. And I have never once said that Bernie Sanders is the "best candidate" and "a conservative". What I wrote was "Sanders is more conservative than any of the alleged Republicans currently running when it comes to American jobs. If you believe Trump is serious,you HAVE to believe that pro-wrasslin is not fixed. Trump is Randy "Macho Man" savage without the muscles. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Are you going back to Sunday school to pray for us? Don't forget to have some water sprinkled on us and put a good word in for Donald Trump and my dead dawg "scruffy."
What I wrote was "Sanders is more conservative than any of the alleged Republicans currently running when it comes to American jobs. You just added the part about American jobs. You may have thought that but you never said that. You said he was the most consrvative of anyone running. Ted Cruz is pretty much pure conservative. So your statement is incorrect. Despite your new spin (when it comes to American jobs)
Gay marriage isn't in the bill of rights. It was never mentioned by any founder. Ever. Freedom of religion and the free exercise thereof is. Do you like freedom of religion? Since you consider them cults. Let me rephrase in sneakyspeak. Do you support freedom of "cults" and the free exercise of "cults"?
And yet another lie about me on the same thread. Guess what,Bucko? There are plenty of people who support traditional marriages that aren't obsessed with homosexuals as you are,and that have the odd notion that homosexuals have the same rights as every other citizen. And there is no THINK that drones like you discriminate against faggots. You do,and you think doing so makes you holier. I have no problem with that. You,like everyone else in a free country,are free to think anything you want to think. What you are NOT allowed to do is pass laws that discriminate against others that disagree with your superstitious beliefs. After all,nobody died and made YOu God. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
ROFLMAO! Will that be before or after he asks for the money back that he donated to her earlier election campaigns? Will it also mean that he won't invite her to any more parties? Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
You said I and others were bigots and anti American because we didn't support you and the faggots trying to redefint marriage. It isn't a lie. You said that. So you're lying.
No,I did NOT. That was the key reason I made the post I made ON THE THREAD about his speech on bringing manufacturing and jobs back to America. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Before. Because he isn't going to ask for the money back. It was chump change.
No. Several times you just said he is the most conservative. I will give you that that is what you were thinking in your head. You didn't put it in words though. Not the several comments I read.
I don't think Trump will invite Hillary to any parties. I also don't think the owner/ceo of Macys will be invited to any more parties. John McCain is definately off the list.
Are you really THAT simple-minded? Where is heterosexual marriage mentioned in the Bill of Rights? Freedom of religion and the free exercise thereof is. Do you like freedom of religion? Since you consider them cults. Yes,even nutcases have a right to live their lives according to their beliefs,as long as they aren't infringing on the rights of others. Let me rephrase in sneakyspeak. Do you support freedom of "cults" and the free exercise of "cults"? Don't blame ME for designating your cult a cult,Bucko! It was the Catholic Church that first called all non-Catholic forms of Christianity cults,and since then all the Protestant cults have called competing Protestant relgigions cults,also. I didn't create that,I just repeated it to highlight you hypocrisy. But to answer your question,"YES,cults DO have as much right to practice their faith as anyone else in this country. If you needed my approval it wouldn't be a right,it would be a privilege. You just don't have the right to force others to share your views and values against their will,and you damn sure don't have the power to demand that government does it for you. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
It isn't. Marriage isn't a role for the federal government. Unless we the people decide we need the feds to fight the faggots. Then we can have an amendment or legislation. Marriage was already defined prior to the adoption of the constitution. So they saw no need to redefine it. Or they would have done such.
It isn't a lie. You said that. So you're lying. I apologize. I keep forgetting how truly ignorant you really are. "Marriage" is a big word that is defined many ways,but the general sense of the word is defined as "joining two as one". Like in manufacturing,when they join plastic and steel. Or in your world,where you unite male and female as one. Or in the homosexual world,where they unite whatever with whatever as one. Nobody is demanding you marry the man of your dreams,so deal with it. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Are you really THAT simple-minded? Where is heterosexual marriage mentioned in the Bill of Rights? Then why do you say that you aren't a "fag lover" and say that you support the bill or rights and I don't? Implying that fag pretend marriage is in the bill of rigths. That is kind of deceptive and dishonest.
Yeah, a couple of grand here,a couple of grand there,it's almost like it never happened,right? Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Comments (62 - 111) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestShills don't mock the person they are shilling for.
#22. To: sneakypete (#21)
#23. To: sneakypete (#20)
Same thing is going to happen here. She didn't classify it so it wasn't classified.
#24. To: TooConservative (#23)
If it came from info classified by other lawful classifiers, her opinion of its classification is irrelevant.
#25. To: A K A Stone, Fred Mertz (#22)
You're not to bright.
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#26. To: A K A Stone, sneakypete (#24)
I noticed that poster was incorrect too. Didn't want to rub his nose in it at this time though.
#27. To: hondo68, A K A Stone (#25)
Try to spell it right, so that you don't look like a total idiot. It's TOO.
#28. To: buckeroo (#26)
#29. To: A K A Stone (#28)
#30. To: hondo68 (#25)
Try to spell it right
#31. To: buckeroo (#29)
I was planned at the beginning of tyme.
#32. To: GrandIsland (#30)
#33. To: A K A Stone (#31)
#34. To: buckeroo (#33)
Drivin goff some of our best posters again?
#35. To: A K A Stone, sneakypete (#34)
#36. To: buckeroo (#35)
#37. To: A K A Stone (#36)
Do you agree with your bestest bud Pete, that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate and is a conservative?
Do you agree with your good friend Pete that people who support Traditional marriage (marriage) are bigots and discriminate against faggots?
#38. To: buckeroo (#37)
Do you agree with your bestest bud Pete, that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate and is a conservative? I agree with no politician.
#39. To: A K A Stone (#22)
Yeah that's the ticket. Trump is spending millions and losing millions so they can give him how much?
#40. To: buckeroo (#37)
Do you agree with your good friend Pete that people who support Traditional marriage (marriage) are bigots and discriminate against faggots? Your question makes no sense.
#41. To: TooConservative (#23)
A SoS has classification rights over documents they write, but they can't reclassify a classified Pentagon or CIA document on a whim.
#42. To: A K A Stone, sneakypete (#38)
#43. To: sneakypete (#41)
NOTHING is EVER going to be her fault.
#44. To: buckeroo (#42)
In Pete's defense,
#45. To: buckeroo, GrandIsland (#32)
(Edited)
Your comment above is a perfect example of an idiot POM-POM girl that wasn't even involved but begs to get her nose rubbed in it.
#46. To: A K A Stone, buckeroo (#36)
Do you agree with your bestest bud Pete, that Bernie Sanders is the best candidate and is a conservative?
#47. To: A K A Stone (#44)
#48. To: sneakypete (#46)
And I have never once said that Bernie Sanders is the "best candidate" and "a conservative".
#49. To: sneakypete (#46)
I am NOT a "fag lover". Unlike you,I am a Bill of Rights lover.
#50. To: A K A Stone (#36)
Do you agree with your good friend Pete that people who support Traditional marriage (marriage) are bigots and discriminate against faggots?
#51. To: A K A Stone (#43)
Trump on the other hand and Hillary is off to jail.
#52. To: sneakypete (#50)
Do you agree with your good friend Pete that people who support Traditional marriage (marriage) are bigots and discriminate against faggots? And yet another lie about me on the same thread.
#53. To: A K A Stone (#48)
You just added the part about American jobs.
#54. To: sneakypete (#51)
Will that be before or after he asks for the money back that he donated to her earlier election campaigns?
#55. To: sneakypete (#53)
You just added the part about American jobs. No,I did NOT. That was the key reason I made the post I made ON THE THREAD about his speech on bringing manufacturing and jobs back to America.
#56. To: sneakypete (#51)
Will it also mean that he won't invite her to any more parties?
#57. To: A K A Stone (#49)
(Edited)
Gay marriage isn't in the bill of rights. It was never mentioned by any founder. Ever.
#58. To: sneakypete (#57)
Where is heterosexual marriage mentioned in the Bill of Rights?
#59. To: A K A Stone (#52)
You said I and others were bigots and anti American because we didn't support you and the faggots trying to redefint marriage.
#60. To: sneakypete (#57)
(Edited)
Gay marriage isn't in the bill of rights. It was never mentioned by any founder. Ever.
#61. To: A K A Stone (#54)
Before. Because he isn't going to ask for the money back. It was chump change.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]