[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

New World Order
See other New World Order Articles

Title: The President Of France Wants Eurozone Members To Transfer Their Sovereignty To A United States Of Europe
Source: prophecynewswatch.com
URL Source: http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2015/July21/212.html
Published: Jul 21, 2015
Author: Michael Snyder
Post Date: 2015-07-21 11:37:44 by Don
Keywords: None
Views: 1675
Comments: 18

The President Of France Wants Eurozone Members To Transfer Their Sovereignty To A United States Of Europe

July 21, 2015 | Michael Snyder Share this article

The President of France has come up with a very creative way of solving the European debt crisis. On Sunday, a piece authored by French President Francois Hollande suggested that the ultimate solution to the problems currently plaguing Europe would be for every member of the eurozone to transfer all of their sovereignty to a newly created federal government.

In other words, it would essentially be a “United States of Europe”. This federal government would have a prime minister, a parliament, a federal budget and a federal treasury. Presumably, the current national governments in Europe would continue to function much like state governments in the U.S. do. In the end, there may be some benefits to such a union – particularly for the weaker members of the eurozone. But at what cost would those benefits come?

When I first learned that French President Francois Hollande had proposed that the members of the eurozone should create their own version of a federal government, I was quite stunned. But I shouldn’t have been surprised. For the global elite, the answer to just about any problem is more centralization. The following comes from a Bloomberg article that was posted on Sunday…

French President Francois Hollande said that the 19 countries using the euro need their own government complete with a budget and parliament to cooperate better and overcome the Greek crisis.

“Circumstances are leading us to accelerate,” Hollande said in an opinion piece published by the Journal du Dimanche on Sunday. “What threatens us is not too much Europe, but a lack of it.”

So precisely what would “more Europe” look like?

Hollande envisions a central government that has both a parliament and a federal budget…

“I have proposed taking up Jacques Delors’ idea about euro government, with the addition of a specific budget and a parliament to ensure democratic control,” Hollande said.

His remarks touched on what analysts have seen as a major flaw in the euro.

Under the 1992 Treaty of Maastricht, countries which share a common currency must obey rules on borrowing and deficit spending.

But the Greek crisis saw one of the 19 eurozone members notch up successive worsening deficits and amass a mountain of debt. The problems were only addressed by bailouts from the European institutions and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Critics say the problem stems from a lack of centralised control over national fiscal policies, which today are jealously guarded areas of sovereignty.

In addition, this eurozone government would have its own prime minister. In essence, he would be the European version of the president of the United States. The following comes from the Independent…

There would be a eurozone government with its own prime minister, the officials said. This government would have its own budget – separate from the EU budget – to aid and invest in more fragile countries, It would try to harmonise corporation and pay-roll taxes to ensure fair competition in the eurozone.

Of course Hollande is not the only one calling for more centralization. Last month, European Central Bank President Mario Draghi, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and Eurogroup President Jeroen Dijsselbloem proposed a plan that would create a shared European treasury…

Draghi called for the creation of a shared treasury within 10 years in a joint proposal with politicians including European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and Eurogroup President Jeroen Dijsselbloem last month.

I don’t anticipate that we will see any of these things implemented immediately.

However, what is important is the fact that this is where the European elite plan to take Europe. And when the next great European financial crisis erupts, these proposals will be offered as the “solutions” necessary to end the crisis.

During times of emergency, the elite are often able to push things through that they would never be able to accomplish under normal circumstances. At the moment, it would be extremely difficult to get everyone to agree to a full-blown “United States of Europe”. But if things were to start spinning wildly out of control and people were suddenly desperately clamoring for solutions, the environment would be quite different.

What that time arrives, the key will be to get Germany and France to agree on what a “United States of Europe” should look like. If Germany and France can agree, it is inevitable that most of the other members of the eurozone would ultimately fall in line.

One potential hurdle for the creation of this new government would be the euro. The current treaty agreements concerning the euro are quite complicated and quite restrictive. If Germany and France decided that they did want to create a “United States of Europe”, they might have to create an entirely new currency in order to accomplish that.

I know that sounds kind of crazy right now, but at one time the concept of “the euro” sounded really crazy too.

For the moment, the debt crisis in Europe just continues to get even worse. Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Belgium and France are all drowning in debt. Whether or not we see a “Grexit” in the short-term, I fully expect that European bond yields will continue to rise and European stocks will take quite a tumble in the months ahead.

I believe that we are right on the verge of a very significant European financial crisis. In particular, keep on eye on the big banks. Just like in the United States, the “too big to fail” banks in Europe are massively overleveraged and are tremendously exposed to derivatives.

In fact, the bank with the most exposure to derivatives on the entire planet is Deutsche Bank. It has been reported that Deutsche Bank has a whopping 75 trillion dollars worth of exposure to derivatives, their co-CEOs were recently forced to resign, and there are all sorts of rumblings about troubles going on behind the scenes at the bank.

What do you think would happen if the biggest and most important bank in Germany suddenly became the next Lehman Brothers?

That is something to think about.

Meanwhile, the euro continues to fall. For a long time, I have been repeating my prediction that the euro would fall to parity with the U.S. dollar.

One year ago, the EUR/USD was sitting at 1.35.

Today, it has come all the way down to 1.08.

There will be more ups and downs, but we are almost there.

A time of great chaos is coming to Europe, and the eurozone will be deeply shaken.

But whether or not there is a break up of the eurozone in the short-term, in the long-term the goal of the European elite is even more integration and even more centralization.

So even though there will be significant bumps in the road, I fully expect to see the “United States of Europe” that French President Francois Hollande has proposed.

Do you agree?

What do you think the future holds for Europe?

Read more at http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2015/July21/212.html#c9FsTmUSeFYC765s.99

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

#1. To: Don (#0)

Europe is in the "Articles of Confederation" phase. The weaknesses of the "Articles of Confederation" will lead logically to the "Federal Constitution" phase.

It's an inevitability. The threat of war and concepts of religious and cultural chauvinism that kept Europe divided throughout history are weaker than ever. The forces of convergence are very strong. As always, it will be France/Germany first, followed by Benelux, followed by the rest. England will hold out for awhile longer, but in the end will join also; the logic of union is too strong to prevent it.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-21   13:19:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Vicomte13, Don (#1)

Europe is in the "Articles of Confederation" phase. The weaknesses of the "Articles of Confederation" will lead logically to the "Federal Constitution" phase.

It's an inevitability.

A la U.S. history?

SOSO  posted on  2015-07-21   13:23:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: SOSO (#2)

A la U.S. history?

Pretty much, yes. The economic and political forces that drove the US together in an unhappy union are driving Europe together too.

Missing from Europe, that was present in the US, was the military NEED to remain united. Had the US disunited, the British or French, or perhaps the Spanish imperials, would have swooped in to grab territory. Alone, no American state had a prayer against Britain or France. It was only in unity that there was military security against the most powerful European states. So, external threat forced the Americans together in a way that they otherwise may not have been willing to endure.

That doesn't exist in Europe. None of the EU countries is a military threat to any of the others. Russia isn't really a threat to Europe either. The USA isn't. China is far away. There is no overriding NEED for unity in the face of any real military threat. Europe's unity comes from common economic goals in a sphere of recognized common culture - Western Christendom.

It's on the eastern edge that things become problematic. The states that were Catholic after the East/West Schism form a cultural unit from a common legal and philosophical heritage. The Orthodox East is like a first cousin - but was historically distant enough to really be different.

With the rise of secularism and collapse of widespread real belief, Eastern Europe moves closer to the West. But Russia is farther still. Russia is, and will remain, a separate entity. It won't be joining Europe.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-21   15:15:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Vicomte13 (#3)

Pretty much, yes. The economic and political forces that drove the US together in an unhappy union are driving Europe together too.

That's not what your original comment was about. The U.S. was initially formed under the Articles of Confederation. You claimed that is was inevitable that the AoC would give way to a Consitution. Why was that inevitable for the U.S. and why is it, as you claim, inevitable for Europe?

SOSO  posted on  2015-07-21   20:11:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 5.

#6. To: SOSO (#5)

The US was originally formed by revolution. The Articles of Confederation were not agreed upon and ratified until the shooting war was nearly through.

The problem America faced was overwhelming military threat. America did not have the power, standing alone, to face either England OR France. And though Spain was in her dotage already, the Spanish still could command the American seas if the English or French did not intervene.

America was large, but weak and vulnerable. Individually, the states were doomed. When the Articles were ratified, the English had not yet agreed to withdraw. And even once they withdrew, they could always come back, in force. The French could not be depended upon to leap immediately to America's aid again.

If the states did not stay united, they would fall. There was no prospect of any individual state being able to drive against the Indians either, especially with the English arming them.

America was driven together by military necessity. The Confederation was vital for the survival of independence. From the military necessity arose the ties that made the economic situation unworkable without a greater Constitution. The grandees in every state had a strong economic interest in greater uniformity of trade and money. and they were the ones who led both the Constitutional Convention and the American government. Still do.

In Europe, the military necessity no longer exists. In fact, the beginnings of the European Union was to prevent war from happening again. Two war-ravaged European states - one a "victor" in name but nothing else, the other, conquered and crushed, - bound themselves together. The French reached out to Germany and made an alliance in the original French sense of the word: a marriage. It worked. The economic logic of it led to rapid development, which fed more and more cooperation, and soon, the little countries caught in the middle, BeNeLux, were clamoring to get in.

The logic of economic union has driven everything. Germany and France and BeNeLux were all much better economically in a common market, and the fewer barriers between them, the better of commerce…and the better lives for most of the people.

That's what drives Europe together: an unavoidable economic logic. It's why the Greeks (and everybody else) have been willing to cede so much sovereignty.

Having an ever-bigger field in which to play, Europeans from each country enjoy the prosperity and benefits that come from that. The old borders were a hindrance, then a nuisance. Now they're barely there, other than psychologically. This is very good for Europeans, and they know it.

The English will always be odd-man out, because their geographical situation as an island on the fringe makes them different. Southern Europe, like the Southern USA, is poorer and less well organized. Cold weather leads to clearer thinking.

So, it was inevitable for the US that the AoC would give way to the Constitution, because the AoC left things very economically inefficient. The military need meant that a confederation was necessary, but without better integration, it was a hot mess. Integration was necessary to make the grandees, merchants and traders happy - and they're the ones who control government.

Same basic thing drives Europe: commerce is good, more commerce is better, and the wealthy and major commercial enterprises are the well-connected who run everything. Of course they will act in their own economic self-interest, just as the Founding Fathers did.

That's why it's inevitable.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-21 23:48:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com