[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
New World Order Title: The President Of France Wants Eurozone Members To Transfer Their Sovereignty To A United States Of Europe The President Of France Wants Eurozone Members To Transfer Their Sovereignty To A United States Of Europe July 21, 2015 | Michael Snyder Share this article The President of France has come up with a very creative way of solving the European debt crisis. On Sunday, a piece authored by French President Francois Hollande suggested that the ultimate solution to the problems currently plaguing Europe would be for every member of the eurozone to transfer all of their sovereignty to a newly created federal government. In other words, it would essentially be a “United States of Europe”. This federal government would have a prime minister, a parliament, a federal budget and a federal treasury. Presumably, the current national governments in Europe would continue to function much like state governments in the U.S. do. In the end, there may be some benefits to such a union – particularly for the weaker members of the eurozone. But at what cost would those benefits come? When I first learned that French President Francois Hollande had proposed that the members of the eurozone should create their own version of a federal government, I was quite stunned. But I shouldn’t have been surprised. For the global elite, the answer to just about any problem is more centralization. The following comes from a Bloomberg article that was posted on Sunday… French President Francois Hollande said that the 19 countries using the euro need their own government complete with a budget and parliament to cooperate better and overcome the Greek crisis. “Circumstances are leading us to accelerate,” Hollande said in an opinion piece published by the Journal du Dimanche on Sunday. “What threatens us is not too much Europe, but a lack of it.” So precisely what would “more Europe” look like? Hollande envisions a central government that has both a parliament and a federal budget… “I have proposed taking up Jacques Delors’ idea about euro government, with the addition of a specific budget and a parliament to ensure democratic control,” Hollande said. His remarks touched on what analysts have seen as a major flaw in the euro. Under the 1992 Treaty of Maastricht, countries which share a common currency must obey rules on borrowing and deficit spending. But the Greek crisis saw one of the 19 eurozone members notch up successive worsening deficits and amass a mountain of debt. The problems were only addressed by bailouts from the European institutions and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Critics say the problem stems from a lack of centralised control over national fiscal policies, which today are jealously guarded areas of sovereignty. In addition, this eurozone government would have its own prime minister. In essence, he would be the European version of the president of the United States. The following comes from the Independent… There would be a eurozone government with its own prime minister, the officials said. This government would have its own budget – separate from the EU budget – to aid and invest in more fragile countries, It would try to harmonise corporation and pay-roll taxes to ensure fair competition in the eurozone. Of course Hollande is not the only one calling for more centralization. Last month, European Central Bank President Mario Draghi, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and Eurogroup President Jeroen Dijsselbloem proposed a plan that would create a shared European treasury… Draghi called for the creation of a shared treasury within 10 years in a joint proposal with politicians including European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and Eurogroup President Jeroen Dijsselbloem last month. I don’t anticipate that we will see any of these things implemented immediately. However, what is important is the fact that this is where the European elite plan to take Europe. And when the next great European financial crisis erupts, these proposals will be offered as the “solutions” necessary to end the crisis. During times of emergency, the elite are often able to push things through that they would never be able to accomplish under normal circumstances. At the moment, it would be extremely difficult to get everyone to agree to a full-blown “United States of Europe”. But if things were to start spinning wildly out of control and people were suddenly desperately clamoring for solutions, the environment would be quite different. What that time arrives, the key will be to get Germany and France to agree on what a “United States of Europe” should look like. If Germany and France can agree, it is inevitable that most of the other members of the eurozone would ultimately fall in line. One potential hurdle for the creation of this new government would be the euro. The current treaty agreements concerning the euro are quite complicated and quite restrictive. If Germany and France decided that they did want to create a “United States of Europe”, they might have to create an entirely new currency in order to accomplish that. I know that sounds kind of crazy right now, but at one time the concept of “the euro” sounded really crazy too. For the moment, the debt crisis in Europe just continues to get even worse. Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Belgium and France are all drowning in debt. Whether or not we see a “Grexit” in the short-term, I fully expect that European bond yields will continue to rise and European stocks will take quite a tumble in the months ahead. I believe that we are right on the verge of a very significant European financial crisis. In particular, keep on eye on the big banks. Just like in the United States, the “too big to fail” banks in Europe are massively overleveraged and are tremendously exposed to derivatives. In fact, the bank with the most exposure to derivatives on the entire planet is Deutsche Bank. It has been reported that Deutsche Bank has a whopping 75 trillion dollars worth of exposure to derivatives, their co-CEOs were recently forced to resign, and there are all sorts of rumblings about troubles going on behind the scenes at the bank. What do you think would happen if the biggest and most important bank in Germany suddenly became the next Lehman Brothers? That is something to think about. Meanwhile, the euro continues to fall. For a long time, I have been repeating my prediction that the euro would fall to parity with the U.S. dollar. One year ago, the EUR/USD was sitting at 1.35. Today, it has come all the way down to 1.08. There will be more ups and downs, but we are almost there. A time of great chaos is coming to Europe, and the eurozone will be deeply shaken. But whether or not there is a break up of the eurozone in the short-term, in the long-term the goal of the European elite is even more integration and even more centralization. So even though there will be significant bumps in the road, I fully expect to see the “United States of Europe” that French President Francois Hollande has proposed. Do you agree? What do you think the future holds for Europe? Read more at http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2015/July21/212.html#c9FsTmUSeFYC765s.99 Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#1. To: Don (#0)
Europe is in the "Articles of Confederation" phase. The weaknesses of the "Articles of Confederation" will lead logically to the "Federal Constitution" phase. It's an inevitability. The threat of war and concepts of religious and cultural chauvinism that kept Europe divided throughout history are weaker than ever. The forces of convergence are very strong. As always, it will be France/Germany first, followed by Benelux, followed by the rest. England will hold out for awhile longer, but in the end will join also; the logic of union is too strong to prevent it.
Europe is in the "Articles of Confederation" phase. The weaknesses of the "Articles of Confederation" will lead logically to the "Federal Constitution" phase. It's an inevitability. A la U.S. history?
Pretty much, yes. The economic and political forces that drove the US together in an unhappy union are driving Europe together too. Missing from Europe, that was present in the US, was the military NEED to remain united. Had the US disunited, the British or French, or perhaps the Spanish imperials, would have swooped in to grab territory. Alone, no American state had a prayer against Britain or France. It was only in unity that there was military security against the most powerful European states. So, external threat forced the Americans together in a way that they otherwise may not have been willing to endure. That doesn't exist in Europe. None of the EU countries is a military threat to any of the others. Russia isn't really a threat to Europe either. The USA isn't. China is far away. There is no overriding NEED for unity in the face of any real military threat. Europe's unity comes from common economic goals in a sphere of recognized common culture - Western Christendom. It's on the eastern edge that things become problematic. The states that were Catholic after the East/West Schism form a cultural unit from a common legal and philosophical heritage. The Orthodox East is like a first cousin - but was historically distant enough to really be different. With the rise of secularism and collapse of widespread real belief, Eastern Europe moves closer to the West. But Russia is farther still. Russia is, and will remain, a separate entity. It won't be joining Europe.
#5. To: Vicomte13 (#3)
That's not what your original comment was about. The U.S. was initially formed under the Articles of Confederation. You claimed that is was inevitable that the AoC would give way to a Consitution. Why was that inevitable for the U.S. and why is it, as you claim, inevitable for Europe?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|