[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

New World Order
See other New World Order Articles

Title: The President Of France Wants Eurozone Members To Transfer Their Sovereignty To A United States Of Europe
Source: prophecynewswatch.com
URL Source: http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2015/July21/212.html
Published: Jul 21, 2015
Author: Michael Snyder
Post Date: 2015-07-21 11:26:08 by Don
Keywords: None
Views: 538
Comments: 7

The President Of France Wants Eurozone Members To Transfer Their Sovereignty To A United States Of Europe

July 21, 2015 | Michael Snyder Share this article

The President of France has come up with a very creative way of solving the European debt crisis. On Sunday, a piece authored by French President Francois Hollande suggested that the ultimate solution to the problems currently plaguing Europe would be for every member of the eurozone to transfer all of their sovereignty to a newly created federal government.

In other words, it would essentially be a “United States of Europe”. This federal government would have a prime minister, a parliament, a federal budget and a federal treasury. Presumably, the current national governments in Europe would continue to function much like state governments in the U.S. do. In the end, there may be some benefits to such a union – particularly for the weaker members of the eurozone. But at what cost would those benefits come?

When I first learned that French President Francois Hollande had proposed that the members of the eurozone should create their own version of a federal government, I was quite stunned. But I shouldn’t have been surprised. For the global elite, the answer to just about any problem is more centralization. The following comes from a Bloomberg article that was posted on Sunday…

French President Francois Hollande said that the 19 countries using the euro need their own government complete with a budget and parliament to cooperate better and overcome the Greek crisis.

“Circumstances are leading us to accelerate,” Hollande said in an opinion piece published by the Journal du Dimanche on Sunday. “What threatens us is not too much Europe, but a lack of it.”

So precisely what would “more Europe” look like?

Hollande envisions a central government that has both a parliament and a federal budget…

“I have proposed taking up Jacques Delors’ idea about euro government, with the addition of a specific budget and a parliament to ensure democratic control,” Hollande said.

His remarks touched on what analysts have seen as a major flaw in the euro.

Under the 1992 Treaty of Maastricht, countries which share a common currency must obey rules on borrowing and deficit spending.

But the Greek crisis saw one of the 19 eurozone members notch up successive worsening deficits and amass a mountain of debt. The problems were only addressed by bailouts from the European institutions and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Critics say the problem stems from a lack of centralised control over national fiscal policies, which today are jealously guarded areas of sovereignty.

In addition, this eurozone government would have its own prime minister. In essence, he would be the European version of the president of the United States. The following comes from the Independent…

There would be a eurozone government with its own prime minister, the officials said. This government would have its own budget – separate from the EU budget – to aid and invest in more fragile countries, It would try to harmonise corporation and pay-roll taxes to ensure fair competition in the eurozone.

Of course Hollande is not the only one calling for more centralization. Last month, European Central Bank President Mario Draghi, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and Eurogroup President Jeroen Dijsselbloem proposed a plan that would create a shared European treasury…

Draghi called for the creation of a shared treasury within 10 years in a joint proposal with politicians including European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and Eurogroup President Jeroen Dijsselbloem last month.

I don’t anticipate that we will see any of these things implemented immediately.

However, what is important is the fact that this is where the European elite plan to take Europe. And when the next great European financial crisis erupts, these proposals will be offered as the “solutions” necessary to end the crisis.

During times of emergency, the elite are often able to push things through that they would never be able to accomplish under normal circumstances. At the moment, it would be extremely difficult to get everyone to agree to a full-blown “United States of Europe”. But if things were to start spinning wildly out of control and people were suddenly desperately clamoring for solutions, the environment would be quite different.

What that time arrives, the key will be to get Germany and France to agree on what a “United States of Europe” should look like. If Germany and France can agree, it is inevitable that most of the other members of the eurozone would ultimately fall in line.

One potential hurdle for the creation of this new government would be the euro. The current treaty agreements concerning the euro are quite complicated and quite restrictive. If Germany and France decided that they did want to create a “United States of Europe”, they might have to create an entirely new currency in order to accomplish that.

I know that sounds kind of crazy right now, but at one time the concept of “the euro” sounded really crazy too.

For the moment, the debt crisis in Europe just continues to get even worse. Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Belgium and France are all drowning in debt. Whether or not we see a “Grexit” in the short-term, I fully expect that European bond yields will continue to rise and European stocks will take quite a tumble in the months ahead.

I believe that we are right on the verge of a very significant European financial crisis. In particular, keep on eye on the big banks. Just like in the United States, the “too big to fail” banks in Europe are massively overleveraged and are tremendously exposed to derivatives.

In fact, the bank with the most exposure to derivatives on the entire planet is Deutsche Bank. It has been reported that Deutsche Bank has a whopping 75 trillion dollars worth of exposure to derivatives, their co-CEOs were recently forced to resign, and there are all sorts of rumblings about troubles going on behind the scenes at the bank.

What do you think would happen if the biggest and most important bank in Germany suddenly became the next Lehman Brothers?

That is something to think about.

Meanwhile, the euro continues to fall. For a long time, I have been repeating my prediction that the euro would fall to parity with the U.S. dollar.

One year ago, the EUR/USD was sitting at 1.35.

Today, it has come all the way down to 1.08.

There will be more ups and downs, but we are almost there.

A time of great chaos is coming to Europe, and the eurozone will be deeply shaken.

But whether or not there is a break up of the eurozone in the short-term, in the long-term the goal of the European elite is even more integration and even more centralization.

So even though there will be significant bumps in the road, I fully expect to see the “United States of Europe” that French President Francois Hollande has proposed.

Do you agree?

What do you think the future holds for Europe? Read more at http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2015/July21/212.html#3wsMhXifPy4gsBAH.99

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Don (#0)

I am against it but this is from some religious web source and they put an antichrist spin to this. And I have to ask - if Europe does this - thanks to some long ago failed prophets that declared the EU was the new Roman empire and the land of the antichrist (and naturally the USA was the land of Jesus) why is the EU becoming a federated state (it is not) evil but the already long ago federated states of the USA are the land of Jesus?

New Roman empire? The symbols of the USA are all derived from the Romans. We even have the Roman fasces carved into the capital buildings and DC was built on seven hills like Roma was (Capital Hill, etc). So why is the USA always missed as the seat of the antichrist by American prophesy watchers and they target those dysfunctional Europeans?

Pericles  posted on  2015-07-21   11:33:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Don (#0)

It is the logical next step. Europe right now is in its "Articles of Confederation" phase. Many things worked under the Articles of us, but the things that didn't, didn't work bad enough that it drove us towards a federal Constitution. The same forces are at work in Europe, with the same likely result.

A key difference, though, is that in America the question of secession was never worked out, and with slavery in the mix to divide the country, it came to a bloody test.

In Europe, the bloody tests are over: 1500 years of ever-more-destructive war. The Europeans are done with war. They won't go that path again on a major scale.

The most warlike of all of the powers over time, Britain and France, are joined together like an old squabbling couple. And they both have nuclear weapons, which ends any thought of the oldest rivals going back to the bad old days.

As the song "Flower of Scotland" says "Those days are past now, and in the past they must remain."

European nationalism expresses itself as a desire for local autonomy, but in the secularized, modern West, it does not, and cannot, express itself militarily any longer. France, Germany, England, Benelux, Scandinavia, Italy, Iberia - they have left behind their last battlefield forever, until the breaking and renewal of the world, or the disappearance of these nations into Dar es Islam.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-21   14:57:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Vicomte13 (#2)

As the song "Flower of Scotland" says "Those days are past now, and in the past they must remain."

And then, the Scots keep singing. Reminds me of my years in Scotland.

Flower of Scotland

O flower of Scotland
When will we see, your like again
That fought and died for
Your wee bit hill, and glen
And stood against them
Proud Edward's army
And sent him homeward, Tae think again

The hills are bare now
And Autumn leaves, lie thick and still
For land that is lost now
But oh so dearly held
We stood against him
Proud Edward's army
And sent him homeward, Tae think again

Those days are passed now
And in the past they must remain
But we can still rise now
And be that nation again
That stood against him
Proud Edward's army
And sent him homeward, Tae think again

Flower of Scotland Rugby v England 1990

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-21   17:02:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: nolu chan (#3)

Rise, yes. But not as before, not in violent rebellion, but as a people, voting, constitutionally.

The days of fighting are past now. (Formerly) Catholic Europe will not go to war with itself again. In Western Europe, Christianity and militarism are spent forces. Nationalism is about culture, and people will not kill over that. They may, or may not, defend it with force.

Personally, I think Europe's future is to become Dar es Islam. However, I warrant that it is possible that European secularism will cause Muslim women, specifically, and smart young men, to embrace secularism and marginalize aggressive Muslim men into the European equivalent of the black ghetto. In that case, secularism will defeat Islam just as it did traditional and militant Christianity.

Tough to say how that will turn out.

Not hard at all to see that Europe won't fight.

The Scots, with their national anthem and all, voted heavily to remain part of the UK. The force of European nationalism is spent. Nobody is going to fight for nation against other Western nation. Rather, they will seek the economically rational outcome, that preserves their own individual economic security.

Which is of greater value, a Scottish flag and notions of sovereignty, or universal public education through college, health insurance, pensions, and a well-functioning job and trade and commerce system? Easy, the latter. THat's why Scottish independence went down in flames.

Those days ARE past now. The Scots "can still rise now" in the song. But in reality no they cannot. In the days of Robert the Bruce, nobody voted. Today, women vote. The poor vote. Retirees, people who rely upon a functioning state vote. Such people do not find sufficient value in waving a flag to be worth the price of grinding poverty.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-21   17:49:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Vicomte13 (#4)

Uniting Europe under a single sovereign will be like herding cats. Economically, it will be like a meeting of the banks that are too big to fail, and those that aren't.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-07-21   19:24:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Pericles (#1)

The main point that I'm getting from this is the world is slated to be divided into ten regions under the Anti-Christ and this would be a step in that direction. The North America Trading Zone is another of these regions.

Don  posted on  2015-07-21   22:03:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: nolu chan (#5)

Europe is already far along towards integration.

The key, really, is the Franco-German axis. Those two economies are so massive relative to the others, and the populations so large (and France's is growing while other countries' shrink), that as long as France and Germany move together, as they have since 1949, the rest of Europe will follow. Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg have no choice, and don't feel dragooned in any event, because they pretty much ARE France or Germany. So's Switzeland, for that matter, and Austria.

Put together France and Germany and the French and German satellites, and Scandinavia, which is aligned with it, and you've got a dominant bloc. The rest of Europe is less functional, but needs that bloc. The South and the East and Ireland would be poor without it. The UK is sort of hapless, but ultimately gets dragged along because they have no choice.

The "single sovereign" is not for tomorrow. But it's eventual.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-07-21   23:33:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com