United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Why #BlueLivesMatter & Cop Apologists Are ....
Source:
The Anti-Media
URL Source: http://theantimedia.org/why-blueliv ... er-cop-apologists-fcking-joke/
Published: Jul 15, 2015
Author: Claire Bernish
Post Date: 2015-07-17 11:24:22 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 44000
Comments: 128
Title Shortened by A K A Stone
Rationalization. Willful denial. Cognitive dissonance. Whatever term you prefer, it boils down to irrational mental gymnastics in order to avoid the uncomfortability that arises when encountering a contradiction to a firmly held belief. But a particularly vitriolic faction of Americans—who apparently have the wool surgically implanted over their eyes—has taken this flawed reasoning and turned it into a laughable case of Stockholm Syndrome: cop apologists.
Funny thing about denial: it’s absurdly predictable.
As if on cue, rationalization commenced from the moment Gardena Police dash cam footage of the shooting death of Diaz Zeferino on June 2, 2013 (posted below) finally began circulating on social media after a lengthy legal battle for its release. While countless people’s jaws dropped in horror witnessing seven cops gun down the unarmed and non-threatening man, others were occupied creating mental notes for their version of the reason he deserved to die.
It could easily be a checklist:
The group of three precisely matched the unbelievably vague and overbroad description of the suspects? Check.
Zeferino presented himself in a threatening manner? Check.
He didn’t follow the officers’ orders with exacting precision? Check.
They thought he had a gun, right? Of course!
Every cop on the scene feared for their life? No question!
And a death sentence is appropriate punishment given these questionable circumstances? Absolutely!
This has become quite the tiresome pattern. An alarming video surfaces that every sane person views as yet more evidence of appalling abuse of police power and dwindling civil rights—and is immediately followed by logic-defying, mind-bending, utterly unreasonable explanations for why yet another person “deserved” execution by cop. In fact, this pattern is so typical, it necessitated the creation of a meme: “I’m just here to see who’s gonna try to justify this shit.”
***
How incredibly apt.
Such inexplicable excuses for the explicitly inexplicable are more offensive to common sense and logical deduction than pig shit in August. Without the hindrance of coherent dialectic even attempting to enter the thought process, justifying State violence is easier than phonics. Simple, yes. But it’s still uninformed nonsense.
Nonsense because the go-to argument is wholly devoid of fact—the notion that “police have such a dangerous job.” Sorry to burst that soapbox bubble, but police officer didn’t even rank in the top ten most dangerous jobs in the U.S. After the 2013 Bureau of Labor Statistics fatal occupational injuries list was thoroughly updated in late April of this year, a total of 35 police officers had been killed by people (or animals) in the line of duty. That might seem like a high number on its own. However, the argument that cops work in an atmosphere of constant danger is fundamentally flawed—even by the most cursory comparison.
Considering 37 food preparation workers, 40 construction workers, 53 retail salespeople, and 67 sales supervisors died at work in the same manner as the 35 aforementioned cops . . . it’s arguable we’re arming the wrong occupation entirely. Though statistics for the number of people killed by salespeople on the clock aren’t readily available, it’s safe to say there weren’t many—if there were any at all.
Yet police officers—whose job is slightly less risky than preparing food—literally kill people by the hundreds.
To date, American cops have killed at least 613 people. This is tragic for countless reasons, not the most minor of which is the imperative need to use the qualifier “at least”—necessary because that figure was yesterday’s estimate; and on average, police in the U.S. have taken a life every 7½ hours in 2015. It’s also necessary because the alarming lack of a national requirement to report these killings means that responsibility transposes to a diffuse but committed network of concerned citizens, journalists, civil rights advocates, and the families and friends of the victims. Thus, estimates must be aggregated from a mix of voluntarily offered and publicly available information—which means the numbers are consequently inaccurate on the low side.
Similar countries just do not have this problem. Icelandic police have fatally shot one person in the nation’s entire 71 years in existence. Police in England and Wales, combined, shot 55 people to death—in the past 24 years. Germany has been given a violent reputation in America, but their police “only” killed 15 people over a period of two years. For Australian police, that number was 94 over nine years. Even Canada—a nation many believe is the most logical comparison to the U.S.—averages 25 fatalities by police per year.
One more time for the sake of emphasis: this is the 195th day in 2015—and American police have already killed no less than 613 people.
That many killings by police is not a problem—it is the entire ship engulfed in flames on the open ocean without a single life preserver.
It’s simply no longer accurate to describe indiscriminate brutality of this scale as an epidemic—not when lack of accountability also equates virtual impunity.
No. This is institutionalized, systematic violence by the State—normalized.
America has become a police state.
Your argument is invalid.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 99.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Punk, give us your opinion on the Muslim scumbag who killed the 4 Marines yesterday. Show the forum your Muslim sympathetic side.
I have no sympathy for him.
Well then you certainly agree with this:
Muhammad McCain Academy of Jihad The Chattanooga shooter was an Arizona Muslim, likely trained, equipped, and funded as some point in his career by Senator John Muhammad McCain(R).
Careful - ole Percy will call you a kook for pointing out that documented fact.
That's factual?
That's factual? “Al Qaeda R Us”: John McCain’s “Moderate Rebels” in Syria are ISIS McCain Wants More Weapons Delivered to Al Qaeda Rebels; How Do Warmongers Get Elected? John McCain Admits he wanted to Support ISIS in Syria...
What hondo posted and you confirmed in your response was NOT factual. Document that Abdulazeez "was an Arizona Muslim."
From Gateway Pundit: Islamist Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez was identified by CBS News as the gunman who fatally shot four Marines and wounded a police officer on Thursdayin Chattanooga. Four Marines were shot dead Thursday morning. The suspect drove up to two locations in a Mustang, according to CBS News, and used a “high-powered” weapon to fire into both facilities. Officials say it was domestic terrorism. SHOOTER’S NAME: Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez
He's a pig from Kuwait & had no business in this country, and what does this nonsense have to do with your inclination to defend these Islamic animals?
Not too bright, are ya sparky. Seems to me that McCain is the one defending (and posing for pictures with them I might add). You and the other short bus rider Gatlin should probably direct your faux outrage at him and the other neo-con scum.
Yet another BS reply with no acknowledgement that the STINKING MUSLIMS who live among US pose a deadly threat. Speak up PUNK, tell this forum how wickedly EVIL these subhumans are.
Nah - your shrieking, pants-wetting hysteria really doesn't warrant a reply. There are plenty of other things to be concerned about. Terrorism - not so much. Not to mention this: You’re 55 Times More Likely to be Killed by a Police Officer than a Terrorist
Terrorism - not so much. Since you fit the typical KooK profile THAT was the answer I expected, PUNK. Your sympathy toward these anti-Semitic, anti-American animals is duly noted.
Nah - I just don't have an attack of the vapors and wet my pants at the thought of being killed by a terrorist. Question - how do you even get up the courage to crawl out from under the covers since your life is so consumed by fear?
No sale PUNK. You are part of a special strain of KooK who feels sympathy for Muslims, much like Obama does. The fact that you wheel out contorted conspiracy theories when they attack Americans is part of the Infowar psychosis you and a handful of other hold. You've been exposed, own it PUNK.
Nah - but your hyper-ventilating rants are becoming amusing. The fact that you wheel out contorted conspiracy theories when they attack Americans is part of the Infowar psychosis you and a handful of other hold. Oh- you meant the fact about the FBI "creating" terrorists? Interesting that you use the pejorative term "conspiracy theories". Conspiracy theory’s acutely negative connotations may be traced to liberal historian Richard Hofstadter’s well-known fusillades against the “New Right.” Yet it was the Central Intelligence Agency that likely played the greatest role in effectively “weaponizing” the term. In the groundswell of public skepticism toward the Warren Commission’s findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the CIA sent a detailed directive to all of its bureaus. Titled “Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report,” the dispatch played a definitive role in making the “conspiracy theory” term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question. This important memorandum and its broad implications for American politics and public discourse are detailed in a forthcoming book by Florida State University political scientist Lance de-Haven-Smith, Conspiracy Theory in America. Dr. de-Haven-Smith devised the state crimes against democracy concept to interpret and explain potential government complicity in events such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the major political assassinations of the 1960s, and 9/11. “CIA Document 1035-960” was released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by the New York Times. The directive is especially significant because it outlines the CIA’s concern regarding “the whole reputation of the American government” vis-à-vis the Warren Commission Report. The agency was especially interested in maintaining its own image and role as it “contributed information to the [Warren] investigation.” The memorandum lays out a detailed series of actions and techniques for “countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries.” For example, approaching “friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors)” to remind them of the Warren Commission’s integrity and soundness should be prioritized. “[T]he charges of the critics are without serious foundation,” the document reads, and “further speculative discussion only plays in to the hands of the [Communist] opposition.”
PUNK, when beta males like yourself advance the notion that both the Boston bombing and Sandy Hooky were staged events conducted by crisis actors, anything else you post is suspect. This is why you are a tinfoil capped KooK and not to be taken seriously by experienced men and women.
Project much? I'm not the one wetting my diapers over the fed.gov hyped threat of terrorism. ...not to be taken seriously by experienced men and women. Oh - you are an amusing little man! Pray tell what are you "experienced" in? Besides mindlessly ranting that is.
You are the one crapping in your pants with excitement waiting to post your next article in your deliberate attempt to arouse public fear or cause alarm. You are a FEAR MONGER!
I'm surprised Deckard can type the above bullshit all while monitoring his 25 property cameras for those mean nasty "FULLY armed uniformed" police state thugs, he worries about 24/7. You'd think the man has a meth lab in his basement. In 50 years, I've never had my door kicked in the middle of the night, stopped for no reason, any assets forfeited... or been arrested or wrongfully arrested. Why is that? lol
Why is that? lol Because you inform on your neighbors and buy all the cops donuts?
#107. To: sneakypete (#99)
I've never in my life done either of those examples. Like Deckard, most of what you post is assumptions, bias and ignorance.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#6. To: Percy Misanthrope (#1)
Punk, give us your opinion on the Muslim scumbag who killed the 4 Marines yesterday.
#17. To: Deckard (#6)
I have no sympathy for him.
#21. To: Percy Misanthrope, Deckard, *Arab Spring Jihad* (#17)
#30. To: hondo68 (#21)
The Chattanooga shooter was an Arizona Muslim, likely trained, equipped, and funded as some point in his career by Senator John Muhammad McCain(R).
#31. To: Deckard (#30)
trained, equipped, and funded as some point in his career by Senator John Muhammad McCain(R).
#34. To: yukon, hondo68 (#31)
trained, equipped, and funded as some point in his career by Senator John Muhammad McCain(R).
#35. To: Deckard, hondo68 (#34)
(Edited)
That's factual?
#38. To: Gatlin, hondo68, Percy Misanthrope, idiot canary clan members (#35)
(Edited)
Document that Abdulazeez "was an Arizona Muslim."
The shooter attacked two different military facilities in Chattanooga.
FOUR MARINES ARE DEAD!
He is from Arizona.
#40. To: Deckard (#38)
#42. To: Percy Misanthrope, Gatlin (#40)
He's a pig from Kuwait & had no business in this country, and what does this nonsense have to do with your inclination to defend these Islamic animals?
#43. To: Deckard (#42)
#52. To: Percy Misanthrope (#43)
Yet another BS reply with no acknowledgement that the STINKING MUSLIMS who live among US pose a deadly threat.
#56. To: Deckard (#52)
There are plenty of other things to be concerned about.
#67. To: Percy Misanthrope (#56)
Your sympathy toward these anti-Semitic, anti-American animals is duly noted.
#70. To: Deckard (#67)
Nah - I just don't have an attack of the vapors and wet my pants at the thought of being killed by a terrorist.
#71. To: Percy Misanthrope (#70)
You are part of a special strain of KooK who feels sympathy for Muslims, much like Obama does
#83. To: Deckard (#71)
Conspiracy theory’s
#86. To: Percy Misanthrope (#83)
...beta males
#87. To: Deckard, Percy Misanthrope (#86)
I'm not the one wetting my diapers over the fed.gov hyped threat of terrorism.
#88. To: Gatlin (#87)
(Edited)
I'm not the one wetting my diapers over the fed.gov hyped threat of terrorism.
#99. To: GrandIsland (#88)
In 50 years, I've never had my door kicked in the middle of the night, stopped for no reason, any assets forfeited... or been arrested or wrongfully arrested.
Replies to Comment # 99. Because you inform on your neighbors and buy all the cops donuts?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 99.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]