United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Why #BlueLivesMatter & Cop Apologists Are ....
Source:
The Anti-Media
URL Source: http://theantimedia.org/why-blueliv ... er-cop-apologists-fcking-joke/
Published: Jul 15, 2015
Author: Claire Bernish
Post Date: 2015-07-17 11:24:22 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 40560
Comments: 128
Title Shortened by A K A Stone
Rationalization. Willful denial. Cognitive dissonance. Whatever term you prefer, it boils down to irrational mental gymnastics in order to avoid the uncomfortability that arises when encountering a contradiction to a firmly held belief. But a particularly vitriolic faction of Americans—who apparently have the wool surgically implanted over their eyes—has taken this flawed reasoning and turned it into a laughable case of Stockholm Syndrome: cop apologists.
Funny thing about denial: it’s absurdly predictable.
As if on cue, rationalization commenced from the moment Gardena Police dash cam footage of the shooting death of Diaz Zeferino on June 2, 2013 (posted below) finally began circulating on social media after a lengthy legal battle for its release. While countless people’s jaws dropped in horror witnessing seven cops gun down the unarmed and non-threatening man, others were occupied creating mental notes for their version of the reason he deserved to die.
It could easily be a checklist:
The group of three precisely matched the unbelievably vague and overbroad description of the suspects? Check.
Zeferino presented himself in a threatening manner? Check.
He didn’t follow the officers’ orders with exacting precision? Check.
They thought he had a gun, right? Of course!
Every cop on the scene feared for their life? No question!
And a death sentence is appropriate punishment given these questionable circumstances? Absolutely!
This has become quite the tiresome pattern. An alarming video surfaces that every sane person views as yet more evidence of appalling abuse of police power and dwindling civil rights—and is immediately followed by logic-defying, mind-bending, utterly unreasonable explanations for why yet another person “deserved” execution by cop. In fact, this pattern is so typical, it necessitated the creation of a meme: “I’m just here to see who’s gonna try to justify this shit.”
***
How incredibly apt.
Such inexplicable excuses for the explicitly inexplicable are more offensive to common sense and logical deduction than pig shit in August. Without the hindrance of coherent dialectic even attempting to enter the thought process, justifying State violence is easier than phonics. Simple, yes. But it’s still uninformed nonsense.
Nonsense because the go-to argument is wholly devoid of fact—the notion that “police have such a dangerous job.” Sorry to burst that soapbox bubble, but police officer didn’t even rank in the top ten most dangerous jobs in the U.S. After the 2013 Bureau of Labor Statistics fatal occupational injuries list was thoroughly updated in late April of this year, a total of 35 police officers had been killed by people (or animals) in the line of duty. That might seem like a high number on its own. However, the argument that cops work in an atmosphere of constant danger is fundamentally flawed—even by the most cursory comparison.
Considering 37 food preparation workers, 40 construction workers, 53 retail salespeople, and 67 sales supervisors died at work in the same manner as the 35 aforementioned cops . . . it’s arguable we’re arming the wrong occupation entirely. Though statistics for the number of people killed by salespeople on the clock aren’t readily available, it’s safe to say there weren’t many—if there were any at all.
Yet police officers—whose job is slightly less risky than preparing food—literally kill people by the hundreds.
To date, American cops have killed at least 613 people. This is tragic for countless reasons, not the most minor of which is the imperative need to use the qualifier “at least”—necessary because that figure was yesterday’s estimate; and on average, police in the U.S. have taken a life every 7˝ hours in 2015. It’s also necessary because the alarming lack of a national requirement to report these killings means that responsibility transposes to a diffuse but committed network of concerned citizens, journalists, civil rights advocates, and the families and friends of the victims. Thus, estimates must be aggregated from a mix of voluntarily offered and publicly available information—which means the numbers are consequently inaccurate on the low side.
Similar countries just do not have this problem. Icelandic police have fatally shot one person in the nation’s entire 71 years in existence. Police in England and Wales, combined, shot 55 people to death—in the past 24 years. Germany has been given a violent reputation in America, but their police “only” killed 15 people over a period of two years. For Australian police, that number was 94 over nine years. Even Canada—a nation many believe is the most logical comparison to the U.S.—averages 25 fatalities by police per year.
One more time for the sake of emphasis: this is the 195th day in 2015—and American police have already killed no less than 613 people.
That many killings by police is not a problem—it is the entire ship engulfed in flames on the open ocean without a single life preserver.
It’s simply no longer accurate to describe indiscriminate brutality of this scale as an epidemic—not when lack of accountability also equates virtual impunity.
No. This is institutionalized, systematic violence by the State—normalized.
America has become a police state.
Your argument is invalid.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-70) not displayed.
.
.
.
#71. To: Percy Misanthrope (#70)
Nah - but your hyper-ventilating rants are becoming amusing. The fact that you wheel out contorted conspiracy theories when they attack Americans is part of the Infowar psychosis you and a handful of other hold. Oh- you meant the fact about the FBI "creating" terrorists? Interesting that you use the pejorative term "conspiracy theories". Conspiracy theory’s acutely negative connotations may be traced to liberal historian Richard Hofstadter’s well-known fusillades against the “New Right.” Yet it was the Central Intelligence Agency that likely played the greatest role in effectively “weaponizing” the term. In the groundswell of public skepticism toward the Warren Commission’s findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the CIA sent a detailed directive to all of its bureaus. Titled “Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report,” the dispatch played a definitive role in making the “conspiracy theory” term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question. This important memorandum and its broad implications for American politics and public discourse are detailed in a forthcoming book by Florida State University political scientist Lance de-Haven-Smith, Conspiracy Theory in America. Dr. de-Haven-Smith devised the state crimes against democracy concept to interpret and explain potential government complicity in events such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the major political assassinations of the 1960s, and 9/11. “CIA Document 1035-960” was released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by the New York Times. The directive is especially significant because it outlines the CIA’s concern regarding “the whole reputation of the American government” vis-à-vis the Warren Commission Report. The agency was especially interested in maintaining its own image and role as it “contributed information to the [Warren] investigation.” The memorandum lays out a detailed series of actions and techniques for “countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries.” For example, approaching “friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors)” to remind them of the Warren Commission’s integrity and soundness should be prioritized. “[T]he charges of the critics are without serious foundation,” the document reads, and “further speculative discussion only plays in to the hands of the [Communist] opposition.” In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much Where's your verification that he WAS from Arizona?
The threat to dogs by cops is being hyped by you.
Oh - I forgot. You're one of those sociopaths who cheers when a cop kills a 10 pound puppy because the poor widdle copper "feared for his life". Does it make you feel like a big man when they deprive a family of their beloved pet? Do you live your life vicariously through the dastardly exploits of these oh-so-brave men in blue? Or is it because with your submissive personality you find them oh-so manly. Is your man-crush on cops a secret you keep from your wife? I bet you loved torturing small animals as a child - come on, fess up. In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much I have absolutely no problem with a cop killing a dog that threatens him....none whatsoever. Officer shoots, kills dog that attacked him in San Francisco. Now prove that Abdualzeez "was from Arizona."
Yeah - I'm sure you don't. Texas cop shoots tail-wagging pit bull puppy Police in Blue Ash, Ohio have shot dead a Chihuahua cross dog, but only after first tasing it. 5 year old Jack was the pet of the Bullock family, who bought the dog several years ago for their now 12 year old son. While the Bullock’s were out, Jack got out, and that’s where the police became involved. If tasing and shooting a small 5 pound dog isn’t bad enough, the way the family found out about it was worse again. On returning home, they found three bullets and blood splattered over their front porch, along with a note to call the police about their dog. To keep this is perspective, we’re talking about a chihuahua here with zero history of violence, who lived in a home with a 12 year old child and a 5 year old, and despite coming to the attention of police for getting out, was shot none the less on the front porch of the home it lived in. Cop Shoots Puppy in the Head Despite Owner's Pleas With Police Now as I see it - there are only two options. 1. Cops who "fear for their lives" at the sight of a puppy are cowards, or 2. They are sociopaths. You make the call. In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much You post: Police shoot dead a chihuahua, but only after tasing it first. I say: GREAT! A cop can shoot a Chihuahua or any other dog that threatens or attacks them and they usually do. You try to make a point by showing a Chihuahua….lol! A Chihuahua can be vicious and inflict severe injury when they attack. It was supposed to be a great day for family photos. Three-year-old Kennedy and two-year-old Morgan Schwalbe were all dressed up at their favorite spot in Balboa Park. Mother Courtney Schwalbe says it was near the lily pond where her two girls crouched down to get a closer look at the fish when a Chihuahua came out of nowhere and attacked Kennedy, biting her face. "I knew something had happened because I heard a dog and I heard her scream. I ran to see her condition and what had happened," father Ken Schwalbe said. Little Kennedy was covered in blood. […] Furthermore, the Chihuahua is listed as one of most aggressive small dog breeds in the world. I know the mental picture of those teeth in a cop’s leg will sexually excite you. But when I see the picture, I think: Little doggie threatens cop…BAM-BAM… little doggie is gonna be dead doggie! So, don’t post a picture of a small Chihuahua to me that a cop shot and expect a change. I will continue to say: I have absolutely no problem with a cop killing any dog that threatens him! I just did. Now, don’t make me have to come back here again.
Got it - a cop is really the same as a two-year old girl when it comes to being threatened by a Chihuahua. Thanks for making my point. In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much Everyone is the same when threatened by a dog. A dog is an "equal opportunity biter." I have absolutely no problem with a cop killing any dog that threatens him! When any dog threatens a cop...BAM BAM...dog goes bye bye.
“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”
Question - how do you even get up the courage to crawl out from under the covers since your life is so consumed by fear? That's real rich coming from a drug lover who shits himself at the sight of a cop. lol I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Even this one:
PUNK, when beta males like yourself advance the notion that both the Boston bombing and Sandy Hooky were staged events conducted by crisis actors, anything else you post is suspect. This is why you are a tinfoil capped KooK and not to be taken seriously by experienced men and women. "There are plenty of other things to be concerned about. Terrorism - not so much." - Deckart
I don't think anyone takes seriously anything he posts, but they can seriously believe that he is a "tinfoil capped KooK."
That's the difference between you and me - a grown man, much less a police officer should not be deathly afraid of a ten pound dog. He has other options to choose from besides gunning the critter down. So, as I said before - he's either a sociopath or a coward. In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much Project much? I'm not the one wetting my diapers over the fed.gov hyped threat of terrorism. ...not to be taken seriously by experienced men and women. Oh - you are an amusing little man! Pray tell what are you "experienced" in? Besides mindlessly ranting that is. In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much You are the one crapping in your pants with excitement waiting to post your next article in your deliberate attempt to arouse public fear or cause alarm. You are a FEAR MONGER!
I'm surprised Deckard can type the above bullshit all while monitoring his 25 property cameras for those mean nasty "FULLY armed uniformed" police state thugs, he worries about 24/7. You'd think the man has a meth lab in his basement. In 50 years, I've never had my door kicked in the middle of the night, stopped for no reason, any assets forfeited... or been arrested or wrongfully arrested. Why is that? lol I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
I'm surprised Deckard can type the above bullshit all while monitoring his 25 property cameras for those mean nasty "FULLY armed uniformed" police state thugs, he worries about 24/7. You'd think the man has a meth lab in his basement. In 50 years, I've never had my door kicked in the middle of the night, stopped for no reason, any assets forfeited... or been arrested or wrongfully arrested. Why is that? lol I have never been stopped in my vehicle by a LEO at any time in my life. No cop has ever knocked on my door, much less kicked it in. I received a parking meter time expired ticket in Biloxi in 1960. I know the meter was off, because I deposited coins for one hour and I was watching the time and returned in 45 minutes. I was in court only one time as a witness. I was in the police station only once, and that was to get fingerprinted for my CC permit. Yet, Deckard has all the trouble with LE0s.Yea, "why is that?"
If there was only one thing I learned from 20 years of LE, shit birds are chronically victimized more often then a civil, law abiding citizen. Scumbags victimize each other and are ways around the cops as a suspect, arrestee or victim. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Nah - I post them to expose the statists and shills. Like you for instance. In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much Yet you and Gatslime both cheer when a civil law-abiding citizen is brutalized by cops. Why is that I wonder? In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much I don't fear the police state. However, I am fully aware of it and am concerned. You two asswipes have your heads in the sand thinking we live in a free country and that cops are there to "protect and serve". In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much 2) However, I am fully aware of it and am concerned. 3) You two asswipes have your heads in the sand thinking we live in a free country and that cops are there to "protect and serve". 1) You aren't scared? You post like a policophobic. 2) No, you have a pro drug agenda, which skews your ability to appreciate the need for a lawful society. 3) between Gatlin and I, we have probably 130 years of living. In those 130 years, we've not experienced one mother fucking fear you flap your Alex Jobes lips about. You are a forum joke. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
On the contrary - I don't "fear" the police. However I am fully aware of what they are capable of doing. I avoid them like the plague and shun them if I do see one in public. 2) No, you have a pro drug agenda, which skews your ability to appreciate the need for a lawful society. My belief is that the war on drugs is an abject failure and furthermore, no government has the right to determine what a FREE citizen decides to put into his body. You clowns just can't grasp that philosophy. 3) between Gatlin and I, we have probably 130 years of living. In those 130 years, we've not experienced one mother fucking fear you flap your Alex Jobes lips about. That in itself doesn't negate the fact that cops have become militarized, SWAT raids are out of control, your precious drug war is responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocents citizens in "collateral damage" and you keyboard commandos/punitive populists and police state cheerleaders see nothing wrong with the direction the country is heading. You are a forum joke. I'm sure you pulled that "opinion" out of your ass, just the way you do with all of your other "pearls of wisdom". I'm pretty sure that the sane posters here would say that the canary clan members are the joke of the forum. Should we include you in their statist cabal? In a Cop Culture, the Bill of Rights Doesn’t Amount to Much You are as blind as Ray Charles. LE isn't militarizing because of the "drug war". lol. Yes, they are used to hit a drug house, occasionally... but they are also used to weed out an armed barricaded spouse after a domestic 911. Unfortunately for your drug agenda, as of lately, SWAT has been given a new importance for school shootings, North Hollywood type armed robberies, Navy shipyard incidents and now, coming to a theater near you... Chattanooga type terrorist incidents. ALL OF WHICH YOU WILL SPEND EVERY WAKING MONENT TRYING TO CONVINCE YOUR SHEEP FOLLOWERS THAT EVERY BAD INCIDENT IS A GOVERNMENT FALSE FLAG. lol I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Why is that I wonder? Cut and paste any LF post where I cheered for excessive force against a civil person.... or pay Stone 50.00 for your lie. How much do you owe him? I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
You poor BAY-BAYS! How do you ever stand up to the daily stress of MAYBE getting bitten by a 3 lb dog? Maybe you can get the government to buy motorized armor boots that go to the knees to protect you and the other crime-fighting He roes while you flee in terror and call in the helicopter gun ships to take out the dog? Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Why is that? lol Because you inform on your neighbors and buy all the cops donuts? Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
It makes sense that you can't figure this out,and it is the one thing you are proud of "knowing". Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
I always thought that the best way to deal with ankle biters was to kick the snot out of them with a size 11 boot, not shoot them with a gun. And he also forgets that a lot of kids get bit by dogs because of what "THEY'VE DONE TO THE DOG" in the first place. “Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”
No stress, I'll just shoot the little pice of shit if he bites me. BAM-BAM!!
Those tiny little dogs are aggressive because they are scared,and all it takes is to stomp your foot and they will run and hide. You have to watch out for them when you are leaving,though. The one my mother used to have would hide under the couch until strangers left,and then run out and bite them on the ankle as they were going out the door. And he also forgets that a lot of kids get bit by dogs because of what "THEY'VE DONE TO THE DOG" in the first place. Yup,in most respects dog are more civilized than most people,and won't attack you unless you are attacking them or a member of their "pack/family". Thus the term,"Let sleeping dogs lie",and MY personal favorite because I created it,"If you don't want to get bitten,don't be fucking with the dog." Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
BAM-BAM!! I know you would have no stress if you did that to my dog because I would kill you. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
When I was a kid I had a girlfriend that had an ankle biter, it was always sneaking around behind my back trying to bite me. So one day I was waiting on her to come down from her room and her dog tried to sneak attack me. Well I was ready for it and kicked his ass down the steps into the basement and shut the door behind it. She came down a minute or two later and asked what was that "thumping" sound? I said "What thumping sound"? :) Needless to say that dog never came after me again just hid behind something the whole time I was there. “Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”
LOL... I used to tell my kids when they were growing up something to the same effect. “Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”
I've never in my life done either of those examples. Like Deckard, most of what you post is assumptions, bias and ignorance. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
It's a part of life you are ignorant of. I normally understand that most "victims" are victimized because they are generally, shit birds and they put themselves in a position to be victimized... and you, Ba ba ba ba Bucky, Deckard, Hondo and Freddy, like to make excuses for criminals and victims up to no good. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
He's just the lefts version of Archie Bunker. Except he is mostly wrong as Archie was right.
Pete has a rep to uphold... and must stay in line, lockstep, with the other agenda posters, Deckard, Hondo and Freddy. They only have themselves to protect each other with their pro narcotic, pro queer marriage... anything goes anarchic agenda. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Shortstack, you're a 5'5" diseased riddled old man. Nobody is afraid of you. "There are plenty of other things to be concerned about. Terrorism - not so much." - Deckart
Comments (112 - 128) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestYou are part of a special strain of KooK who feels sympathy for Muslims, much like Obama does
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#72. To: Deckard (#68)
Where's your verification that he NEVER took a trip to Arizona?
#73. To: Deckard (#69)
The threat of terrorism is hyped ...
#74. To: Gatlin (#73)
The threat to dogs by cops is being hyped by you.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#75. To: Deckard (#74)
(Edited)
#76. To: Gatlin (#75)
I have absolutely no problem with a cop killing a dog that threatens him.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#77. To: Deckard (#76)
(Edited)
I have absolutely no problem with a cop killing a dog that threatens him.
You betcha I don’t….and I never will!
Yeah - I'm sure you don't. SAN DIEGO (CBS 8) - A little girl is recovering from a nasty wound after being bitten by a dog in Balboa Park, but it was what happened next that has her mother angry and concerned.
You make the call.
#78. To: Gatlin (#77)
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#79. To: Deckard (#78)
(Edited)
#80. To: Gatlin (#47)
I focus on the truth
#81. To: Deckard (#67)
(Edited)
#82. To: GrandIsland (#81)
#83. To: Deckard (#71)
Conspiracy theory’s
#84. To: Percy Misanthrope (#83)
#85. To: Gatlin (#79)
I have absolutely no problem with a cop killing any dog that threatens him!
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#86. To: Percy Misanthrope (#83)
...beta males
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#87. To: Deckard, Percy Misanthrope (#86)
I'm not the one wetting my diapers over the fed.gov hyped threat of terrorism.
#88. To: Gatlin (#87)
(Edited)
I'm not the one wetting my diapers over the fed.gov hyped threat of terrorism.
#89. To: GrandIsland (#88)
(Edited)
I'm not the one wetting my diapers over the fed.gov hyped threat of terrorism.
#90. To: Gatlin (#89)
(Edited)
Yet, Deckard has all the trouble with LE0s.Yea, "why is that?"
#91. To: Gatlin (#87)
You are the one crapping in your pants with excitement waiting to post your next article in your deliberate attempt to arouse public fear or cause alarm.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#92. To: GrandIsland (#90)
shit birds are chronically victimized more often then a civil, law abiding citizen.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#93. To: GrandIsland, Gatlin (#88)
I'm surprised Deckard can type the above bullshit all while monitoring his 25 property cameras for those mean nasty "FULLY armed uniformed" police state thugs, he worries about 24/7. You'd think the man has a meth lab in his basement.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#94. To: Deckard (#93)
(Edited)
1) I don't fear the police state.
#95. To: GrandIsland (#94)
(Edited)
1) You aren't scared? You post like a policophobic.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.
Paul Craig Roberts
#96. To: Deckard (#95)
(Edited)
That in itself doesn't negate the fact that cops have become militarized, SWAT raids are out of control, your precious drug war is responsible
#97. To: Deckard, A K A Stone (#92)
(Edited)
Yet you and Gatslime both cheer when a civil law-abiding citizen is brutalized by cops.
#98. To: Gatlin (#77)
(Edited)
A Chihuahua can be vicious and inflict severe injury when they attack.
#99. To: GrandIsland (#88)
In 50 years, I've never had my door kicked in the middle of the night, stopped for no reason, any assets forfeited... or been arrested or wrongfully arrested.
#100. To: GrandIsland (#90)
If there was only one thing I learned from 20 years of LE, shit birds are chronically victimized more often then a civil, law abiding citizen.
#101. To: sneakypete (#98)
You poor BAY-BAYS! How do you ever stand up to the daily stress of MAYBE getting bitten by a 3 lb dog?
#102. To: sneakypete (#98)
You poor BAY-BAYS! How do you ever stand up to the daily stress of MAYBE getting bitten by a 3 lb dog?
#103. To: CZ82 (#101)
I always thought that the best way to deal with ankle biters was to kick the snot out of them with a size 11 boot, not shoot them with a gun.
#104. To: Gatlin (#102)
No stress, I'll just shoot the little pice of shit if he bites me.
#105. To: sneakypete (#103)
Those tiny little dogs are aggressive because they are scared,and all it takes is to stomp your foot and they will run and hide.
#106. To: sneakypete (#103)
and MY personal favorite because I created it,"If you don't want to get bitten,don't be fucking with the dog."
#107. To: sneakypete (#99)
Because you inform on your neighbors and buy all the cops donuts?
#108. To: sneakypete (#100)
(Edited)
It makes sense that you can't figure this out,and it is the one thing you are proud of "knowing".
#109. To: GrandIsland (#107)
most of what you post is assumptions, bias and ignorance.
#110. To: A K A Stone (#109)
He's just the lefts version of Archie Bunker. Except he is mostly wrong as Archie was right.
#111. To: sneakypete (#104)
I know you would have no stress if you did that to my dog because I would kill you.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]