Cult Watch
See other Cult Watch Articles
Title: New MTV Show Publicly Shames White People For “What They’ve Done in America”
Source:
Infowars
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/new-mtv-sho ... r-what-theyve-done-in-america/
Published: Jul 9, 2015
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2015-07-09 11:16:45 by Hondo68
Keywords: None
Views: 9162
Comments: 38
MTV will air a show later this month entitled White People which shows young white Americans crying on camera over their “white privilege” and publicly shaming them for “what they’ve done in America”. No, this is not a joke. The documentary is hosted by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Jose Antonio Vargas, an illegal immigrant and amnesty activist who has worked for the Washington Post and the Huffington Post. The trailer for the show, which has been widely criticized by YouTube respondents, features white people expressing angst about how they are desperate not to appear “racist” or “offend people.” According to Kimberly Ricci, the documentary forces the participants “to internalize what they’ve done in America” – in other words, this a huge exercise in white guilt tripping for public consumption. An MTV write up of the show also explains how Vargas talks to young Native Americans who feel that European settlers did not ‘save the country’. “They are the ones who invaded. They are the ones who took,” says Vargas. In the interests of balance, when will Vargas be fronting a show called Black People that collectively blames all black people for black crime statistics, including the fact that black people in America commit over half of homicides despite making up only 13 per cent of the population? How about the fact that despite being outnumbered by whites five to one, blacks commit eight times more crimes against whites than vice-versa? How about the fact that interracial rapes are almost exclusively black on white? How about the Barbary slave trade, under which over 1 million white Christian Europeans were enslaved in North Africa until the middle of the 18th century? Are black people going to be shown crying on camera having been shamed into taking responsibility for all of this? No, because that would be racist. But according to MTV and Vargas, subjecting someone to trial by media purely because of their skin color is perfectly acceptable – so long as they are white. This documentary represents the culmination of years of race-baiting and racial division which is being driven by the mass media and the Obama White House, tensions which have rapidly accelerated since the Ferguson and Baltimore riots. Responses to the video trailer on YouTube were savage, with the clip receiving twice as many ‘thumbs down’ in comparison to ‘thumbs up’. “I’m black, even I know this show is straight up racist. Only because it’s stereotyping white people, all white INDIVIDUALS are not like that,” wrote one respondent. “You want an uncomfortable conversation on race? Let’s talk about violent crime stats shall we? No? I get it, you only want white people to feel uncomfortable,” added another. “Fuck you MTV, I will NEVER apologize for the skin I was born with, nor will I apologize for being a male, or for being straight,” another respondent asserted. However, many in the liberal media are celebrating the show, with Kristen Yoonsoo remarking how pleased she is about the fact that, “lots of white people tears lie ahead.” “It’s always a good time poking fun at white people,” she concludes. Poster Comment:
White People documentary hosted by illegal immigrant features young Americans crying over their "white privilege"
(3 images)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 32.
#31. To: hondo68 (#0)
Good thing 1965's Third World Invasion Act "diversified" America's original Christian-Western European stock THAT BUILT THIS NATION, eh? NO coincidence that since this forced jettisoning of Third Word ingrates and riff-raff who share NO "American" values that it would come down to this. Thank you WHITE Christian-hating liberal-leftist misfits and self-loathing guilty mental cases.
President Johnson signs the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 Reagan signing Immigration bill of 1986 We've come a long way since Ike Eisenhower and Operation Wetback.
#33. To: hondo68 (#32)
You desperately need a history lesson. Comparing LBJ's bill to purposely destroy and change the demographics of America FOREVER....with the one bill Reagan signed to punctuate any further illegal invasion is...insane. And dopey. It's propaganda. This ridiculous comparison and analogy of yours is intellectually dishonest. * Required employers to attest to their employees' immigration status (IGNORED) At the time, the Immigration and Naturalization Service knowing AND falsely under-estimated that about four million illegal immigrants would apply for legal status through the act and that roughly half of them would be eligible (Based on this dis-information, Reagan obviously calculated the math would qualify just TWO million for Amnesty. HARDLY the same as the 40 million totally UN-DOCUMENTED criminals of today.) In his diaries, President Ronald Reagan said he deeply regretted signing this bill, signing it based under advisement that it would be a feasible way to regain and reclaim control of our borders once and for all. His two-faced globalist advisers obviously again misled and lied to the Gipper. Again, here are the three simple promises Reagan was assured would remediate any further future, unfettered invasion of America: Since that day, ALL three promises were broken. That Congress, the Judiciary, AND subsequent Presidents made NO serious effort to control our borders. EVER. Employers continue knowingly to flout the law and continue hiring illegal invaders WITHOUT any real fear of punishment. The mostly Dem Congress 1986 LIED the Reagan (as well as the nation) about its intention, its enforcement, the numbers eligible, and promise that this enactment (against the better judgment of Reagan) was supposed to be a one-time FINAL Amnesty. OF FURTHER NOTE: After 9/11, Dubya Bush touted his super-tight national security and Patriot Act as part of his "War of Terror"...yet instead of deporting millions of undocumented illegal invaders as a security risk and cleaning house, Dubya instead STILL rolled out the red carpet to an unknown number and identity of tens of millions of illegal invaders. A Republican House and Senate also did NOTHING to when they held the Presidency, Congress, as well as a majority of conservatives in the SCOTUS.
(Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965) Surrounding LBJ signing away America to the eventual Third World hordes of haters of America, the jewel of Western-Christian Civ, were Hubert Humphrey (D) to the left.... NYC Mayor John Lindsey (D) stand in the back....Uncle Ted Swimmer ...and three liberal broads right behind LBJ (also the destroyer of every Black Family since.) Surrounding an unsure Ronald Reagan (who looks as though he wished he didn't just sign this BS, a bill of tainted goods) were Alan Simpson, Poppy (NWO) Bush, Jesse Helms, etal.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestMTV will air a show later this month entitled White People which shows young white Americans crying on camera over their “white privilege” and publicly shaming them for “what they’ve done in America”.
#32. To: Liberator (#31)
Replies to Comment # 32. The Simpson-Mazzoli Act, signed into law by Ronald Reagan on November 6, 1986, was an Act of Congress which reformed United States immigration law. The supposed ONE-TIME Amnesty Act...
* Made it illegal to hire or recruit illegal immigrants knowingly (IGNORED)
* Legalized certain seasonal agricultural illegal immigrants (IGNORED)
* ONLY legalized illegal immigrants who entered the United States before January 1, 1982 and had resided there continuously with the penalty of a fine, back taxes due, and admission of guilt (IGNORED)
* Candidates were also required to prove that they were not guilty of crimes, that they were in the country before January 1, 1982, AND that they possessed minimal knowledge about U.S. history, government, AND the English language.(IGNORED) 1) The government would guarantee a strong effort to control the borders.(IGNORED)
2) An effective employer verification program would ensure that ONLY legal workers were hired. If not, Employers would be fined and sanctioned by the federal government.(IGNORED)
3) This was a definite One-Time amnesty that would be granted for people illegally in the United States -- but with several conditions applicable.(IGNORED)
#34. To: hondo68 (#32)
End Trace Mode for Comment # 32.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]