United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Family Raided by SWAT and their Dog Shot, for Being Unable to Pay Utility Bill
Source:
Free Thought Project
URL Source: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/fa ... -shot-unable-pay-utility-bill/
Published: Jun 5, 2015
Author: Matt Agorist
Post Date: 2015-06-30 08:52:11 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 1027
Comments: 8
St. Louis, MO — Nothing says Police State USA quite like a SWAT team raiding a family home and killing their dog because they are unable to pay their natural gas bill. The woman whose dog was killed and home destroyed by SWAT officers is Angela Zorich, and her story about her police state experience will shock the conscious. According to a federal lawsuit filed this month, Zorich was the victim of a massive military-style raid and subsequent puppycide. The raid was carried out because police said they needed “to check if her home had electricity and natural gas service.” “This is an example of police overreaching and using excessive force to get a family out of their house,” said Kenneth Chackes to the Riverfront Times, the attorney who represents Zorich. According to the lawsuit, on April 25, 2014, St. Louis County Police officers came to her house. Her son cussed at them. They inspected the home’s exterior and placed a “Problem Properties” sticker on the front window. Days after being publicly shamed and labeled by the St. Louis Police Department as a “Problem,” on April 28, Zorich called them to follow up. She was told by police that she was being investigated for failing to have natural gas or electric service; two violations against city code. Zorich admitted to the police that she did not have gas, but said that she did have electricity. Zorich asked for another inspection to prove that she had the utilities. The officer told her that was fine, but that the investigation would continue. The next day, on April 29, 2014, the home of Angela Zorich was raided by multiple officers from the St. Louis County Police Tactical Response Unit. The Riverfront Times outlines the details of the lawsuit: Zorich was at home with several family members and her pit bull, Kiya, when a St. Louis County Police Tactical Response Unit burst through the door without knocking, according to her suit. The unit had at least five officers with M-4 rifles, supported by at least eight uniformed officers. The officers entered so quickly, Zorich’s suit alleges, that Kiya didn’t even have time to bark. A tactical officer fired three shots into the dog, and the dog’s “bladder and bowels released and she fell to the floor.” The dog “was laying on the floor in her own waste and blood struggling to breathe. She had a gaping hole in her chest.” Zorich claims the officers kept trying to talk to her about the natural gas, but she was focused on her dog, whom she’d raised as a puppy and who (she says) had “never shown agression to any person.” At one point in the raid, Zorich alleges, an officer pointed his firearm at her son’s head and said “One word, motherfucker, and I’ll put three in you.” Zorich was subsequently taken into custody at the police station. When she was finally let go and allowed to return to her home, she found to be completely trashed. Beds had been overturned, and items that were once on shelves had been thrown to the floor. The citations issued to Zorich, which had allegedly justified the heavily militarized raid on her home, were for substandard siding, guard rail, screens, window glass and deck. A dozen armed men dressed for war, were dispatched to a woman’s home, killed her dog, and kidnapped her because of some moldy wood and her inability to pay her gas bill. In what world is this considered “justice”? The apologists will say that Angela Zorich provoked police into this action against her. If she didn’t want to be raided, they will say, she should have just paid her gas bill. The thought of the raid being retaliatory in nature won’t enter their minds. Named in the lawsuit is the county of St. Louis and two officers, Corey Zavorka and Robert M. Rinck. Her allegations include unlawful seizure and unlawful infliction of emotional distress (for the killing of the dog) and unlawful retaliation. Hopefully, with her legal team, Zorich gets the actual justice she deserves. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Serfs and inner city welfare slaves deserve no better.
Come shoot my deadbeat dog too, it never pays my utilities either. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dailyrft/2015/06/swat_dog_zorich_police_report.php By Nicholas Phillips Here's an update on the lawsuit filed last week by Angela Zorich, the South County woman who claims tactical police killed her dog when they raided her home in 2014 to investigate building code violations. Daily RFT has obtained documents that appear to be the police's own incident reports. They tell the cops' side of the story, which boils down to this: The family was considered "a nuisance" by neighbors, and during the raid, Kiya, the four-year-old pit bull, was "charging to attack" as they shot her. See also: St. Louis County SWAT Team Killed Family Dog Over Code Violation, Suit Says Zorich insists in her suit that, on the contrary, Kiya didn't even have time to bark before being killed. And interestingly, by the cops' own telling, the dog was 12 feet from the officers when they opened fire and killed her. They also acknowledge in the report that they'd entered the home without knocking, even though they were investigating code violations. Their justification: They believed the residents had "extensive violent history" and were known to be armed. The police narrative goes like this: On April 23, 2014, an anonymous tipster called in to complain that the folks living at a house on 3000 block of Caprock Court "frequently cause disturbances" and allow a dog to "run at large" and "stay out all night and day, barking non-stop." Plus, the tipster said, the house's gas had been shut off. An officer checked the logs and saw that, in 2014 alone, police had already fielded several calls for service vis-a-vis the Zorich residence, including "disturbances" and "vicious animals." Per the report: "There is a hazard/alert on the property that was entered in 2012 indicating that two cars be dispatched as the residents do not like the police and can become violent." At that time, according to the report, Angela Zorich had outstanding warrants for traffic and motor vehicle violations; a Joseph M. Zorich was wanted for several offenses including assault; and Zachariah D. Zorich was wanted for several offenses as well, including two counts of assault. (Our search of Missouri's online court records did not reveal any actual charges or convictions of assault against either of those two men.) On April 25, two problem property inspectors drove out to investigate the house, accompanied by three police officers. When they approached the front door, someone shut it, locked it and said, "fuck you!" But the inspectors took notes on the exterior, which showed that Laclede Gas had indeed shut off service. And in the backyard, tied to a deck that looked like "a collapse hazard," was a "large aggressive dog." They placed a "Problem Property" sticker on the front window. Here's a Google Maps photo from 2013, the year prior to all these incidents: After placing the sticker, the police received e-mails from neighbors complaining about underage drinking on site, profanity, young people coming and going, and the noisy, unleashed pit bull, according to the report. On April 28, police received a call from Angela Zorich, who was "yelling and cursing" (she admits to cursing in her lawsuit). She demanded to know what was going on. An officer told her that police needed to check the inside of the house. She said she wanted to talk to her husband and her attorney first. An officer said the investigation would continue anyway. The next day, at around 12:30 pm, the tactical unit set up position outside the house. From the report: They moved in: The report's author names four other officers who "were inside the residence when shots were fired and they relayed to me that they also believed the dog was charging to attack." Zorich and two of her sons were arrested. Zorich was arrested for those traffic warrants -- failure to register a vehicle, for speeding and for violating electric signal. One son was arrested on warrants for violation of financial responsibility, interfering with duties of a police office, peace disturbance, and assault. A second son was arrested for failing to appear in a previous traffic case. And here's where things get really weird: At one point during the SWAT raid, according to the report, a neighbor exited his his house, began "giving 'Heil Hitler' type salutes" and "shouting racist remarks at a member of the Tactical Unit....he was pointing to a 'swastika' tattoo on his person." This guy "ran inside his residence when officers started to walk towards him." The report contained no additional information on the man's connection to the case. Not all neighbors acted this way toward the cops. Some neighbors, reportedly, felt grateful: According to Stephen Deere at the Post-Dispatch, who followed the story Saturday, the house has been sitting empty for almost a year. The case has also drawn the attention of Kristin Hoffmann, founder of 4KOPS, which stands for "Keeping Our Pets Safe." 4KOPS is a national, informal network of attorneys and advocates who aim to hold police accountable for killing domestic animals without cause. While her grassroots network is national, Hoffman happens to be a resident of South St. Louis. She says city police fatally shot two of her dogs in 2012, an experience so disturbing it led her to advocacy. Hoffman says that many people whose pets get killed by police grow upset because when they complain, they don't feel like they're being heard. "Compassion goes such a long way," she says. Perhaps, but wouldn't a compassionate word from an officer expose his/her police department to costly lawsuits like the one Angela Zorich filed? "If we're not evolved enough as a society to have a common way to express compassion without it being an admission of guilt," Hoffman said, "we have a serious problem."
One day, Karma will pay those cops a visit. It will be ugly!
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Interesting neighbor. The kind only Deckard should live next too. Thank you for the fair and balanced, non YELLA research. I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح
Hey - people wanted "hope and change" right?!!!
I read some of those articles and can't help thinking of Paul Harvey and the rest of the story.
It has just gotten to the point where it is hard to believe the police about anything.
#2. To: Deckard (#0)
Dog Shot, for Being Unable to Pay Utility Bill
#3. To: Deckard, BobCeleste, GrandIsland (#0)
Dog Killed in South County SWAT Raid Was "Charging to Attack," Police Report Claims
Mon., Jun. 8 2015 at 6:00 AM
Riverfront Times Due to intelligence that two occupants of the residence had extensive violent history and were known to be armed and violent, the decision was made to execute the search warrant by NO Knock exception
Upon approach to the front door, Officer Taylor, who was running as the second officer position, attempted the door knob and found it unsecure. The door was opened while loud verbal anouncements were given of "County Police Search Warrant!" Upon entry into the living room, Officer Zavorka, who was running at the point position, observed a white pit bull terrier, running full speed toward him and the team, who were entering the living room behind him. Officer Zavorka initially observed the dog at approximately 22 feet, which closed the distanch to approximately 12 feet. Officer Zavorka, believing that the dog would attack him or another membver of the team, fired two, two round bursts from his department issued Rock River Ars, M-4 rifle (SN CM221851) into the dog, killing it. The dog exspired approsimately 6 feet from the front door of the residence.
Prior to departing the residence, several residents walked down and thanked the police for taking action at the residence. The neighbors feared retaliation from the residents at [redacted] Caprock Court. The neighbors all stated that the Zorich's had been terrorizing the neighborhood, causing disturbances, urinating in the front yard, and allowing a dog to attack another dog in the neighborhood. The neighbors stated that they believe numerous people are residing at the residence as they see a lot of traffic at the residence.
#4. To: Deckard (#0)
#5. To: nolu chan (#3)
(Edited)
Prior to departing the residence, several residents walked down and thanked the police for taking action at the residence. The neighbors feared retaliation from the residents at [redacted] Caprock Court. The neighbors all stated that the Zorich's had been terrorizing the neighborhood, causing disturbances, urinating in the front yard, and allowing a dog to attack another dog in the neighborhood. The neighbors stated that they believe numerous people are residing at the residence as they see a lot of traffic at the residence.
#6. To: Deckard (#0)
#7. To: GrandIsland (#5)
Thank you for the fair and balanced, non YELLA research.
#8. To: nolu chan (#3)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]