[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: The Myth of Black Confederates
Source: las.illinois.edu
URL Source: http://www.las.illinois.edu/news/2013/confederates/
Published: Sep 1, 2013
Author: Doug Peterson
Post Date: 2015-06-23 16:10:38 by Pericles
Keywords: None
Views: 11706
Comments: 55

The Myth of Black Confederates

LAS professor rejects myth that blacks fought for rebels in large numbers.

Patrick R. Cleburne, a prominent general in the Confederate Army of Tennessee, could see what was happening in the South in late 1863. Southern troops were outnumbered, soldiers were demoralized, and the institution of slavery was collapsing. So on January 2, 1864, Cleburne rode through a sleet-driven night in northern Georgia to present an audacious proposal to nearly a dozen Confederate generals.

He proposed that the Confederate States of America offer freedom to military age male slaves who were willing to fight for the South.

“Most of the generals denounced him,” says Bruce Levine, University of Illinois history professor and author of Confederate Emancipation and The Fall of the House of Dixie.

Cleburne’s proposal was overwhelmingly rejected, for secessionist states were not about to undermine the system of slavery that they were fighting to defend. But despite this clear disdain for the idea of arming African Americans, Levine says that over the past 30 years there has arisen a myth that black soldiers did fight for the Confederacy in massive numbers—tens of thousands and even hundreds of thousands, according to some accounts propagated online.

According to Levine, “The claims among modern romanticizers of the Confederacy are intended to bolster more fundamental claims—that African Americans identified with the Confederacy, that slaves were content with being slaves, and that the war had nothing to do with slavery.”

The problem is that the accounts of massive involvement of blacks in the Southern army are false, he says.

Levine says the Confederate army had a strict policy that if you were not certifiably white, you could not be a soldier in its ranks. However, in the early years of the Civil War, many slave owners did bring their servants into the Confederate army to carry equipment for them, and clean and take care of their clothes and horses. In addition, the Confederacy forced many slaves and free blacks in the South to labor for the war effort, building rail breastworks, driving wagons, burying the dead, and serving as nurses.

“On occasion, a slave might have even picked up a gun and taken a shot at the Yankees, proving how loyal and dependable he was,” Levine says. But this level of involvement is a far cry from tens of thousands of armed black soldiers marching in defense of the Confederacy.

What’s more, Confederates discovered that if they placed black laborers too close to Union lines, they ran the risk of African Americans fleeing to the other side; therefore, many slave owners stopped bringing along their black servants during the second half of the war.

Levine notes that there were two militias in the South made up of free African American soldiers—one in Mobile, Ala., and the other in New Orleans. But these were state militias, not part of the regular army, and they did not see serious action on behalf of the South. And numerous members of the “Native Guards” of New Orleans immediately switched allegiance to the Union when the Yankees occupied the city.

The Myth of the Black Confederates is a relatively new phenomenon, arising after the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s, Levine says. The notion of African Americans fighting in large numbers for the South was never suggested in the immediate aftermath of the war because white veterans would have been still alive to shoot down the idea. “White Confederate soldiers would have taken it as an insult to have served in the same army with the same status as a black soldier,” he says.

As evidence that black men fought heroically for the South, neo-Confederates today will sometimes dig up photos of black servants dressed in military uniforms. But according to Levine, “Some servants were dressed in military uniforms because that was the kind of clothing available in the army.” It didn’t mean they were real members of those army units, he says.

Levine says that when the Confederacy was on its last legs, in March of 1865, the Confederate congress did pass an eleventh-hour law by a razor-thin margin, allowing for the enlistment of black soldiers. But even that law freed no one.

“The Southern government invited masters to volunteer their slaves for the army, but first they would have to emancipate them because Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee knew that still-enslaved black men would certainly not fight for the South,” he says. “The overwhelming majority of masters declined that invitation.”

In the final weeks of the war, the South tried to recruit black soldiers in a handful of states, he says, “but nothing happened anywhere, except Richmond and Petersburg, where they apparently raised about 60 black soldiers in the Confederate army, who then saw virtually no action.”

In contrast, once black soldiers were accepted into the Union army in 1863, roughly 190,000 to 200,000 fought for the North. Even more telling, he adds, an estimated 80 percent of those soldiers were slaves and free blacks recruited by the Union army in slave states.

Editor’s note: We have included a new image and caption at the top of the story and an updated caption for the second image—February 2014

By Doug Peterson

September 2013

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

#1. To: Pericles (#0)

The Civil War was fought over slavery.

The South seceded and proclaimed, in its articles of secession and constitution, that it was about slavery. The leaders said so.

Lincoln said it wasn't, but when the war got rough and recruitment lagged, he issued the Emancipation Proclamation for foreign policy and domestic political reasons. Northern recruitment became much brisker once the war WAS about slavery, and large numbers - a couple of hundred thousand - of Union troops were black.

The Confederacy was about slavery, and never had any intention of freeing any slaves.

States rights? Sure: the "right" of states to have slaves, and to extend slavery westward.

Of course the North wasn't innocent at all either. After all, for four score and seven years before that, the Northerners were mostly willing to tolerate slavery, and in the decade before the war, the North enforced the Fugitive Slave Act.

Truth is, America was founded on the principle of equality, and slavery stood out as an increasingly intolerable cancer on that principle.

Why Americans still need to fight over this TODAY is a bit of a mystery. Slavery was bad, the South stood up for it, lost, was defeated, slavery ended. Move on.

Of course the slavery story had a bookend: segregation. In truth, the "badges" of slavery didn't really start to disappear until the forced end of segregation in the 1960s, and the "incidents" - the massive economic differential of coming from the impoverished black slave class - still have not disappeared. Economic segregation remains.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-06-23   16:36:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

The Confederacy was about slavery, and never had any intention of freeing any slaves.

Wrong! Nathan Bedford Forrest prior to the war was a slave trader, however he always kind towards his slaves. He would never break up families,or sell one without the approval of the slave.

Forrest enlisted as a private, and rose to the rank of 3 star general. He raised several regiments out of his personal funds, and throughout the process offered freedom to any of his slaves who would serve under him for the duration. They did, and he kept his promise.

Go read the article regarding his speech at the National Pole Bearers association, which later became the NAACP.

After the war Lee was asked who was his best general. He replied, "A man I have never met Nathan Bedford Forrest." Make certain you research his role in founding the KKK.

I have read over 11 biographies regarding Forrest, and the truth is apparent if you seek it. I even had a movie producer convinced into making a film of his life, but the Left makes certain Forrest is demonized, and they let the producer know he would never be allowed to make the film.

GarySpFC  posted on  2015-06-23   17:27:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: GarySpFC (#2)

Wrong!

No, RIGHT. The Confederate States of America was all about slavery. That was its rallying cry. "States Rights"? Sure! The "right" to own and trade in slaves.

Don't take MY word for it. Here is what the Confederate leaders THEMSELVES said in their own founding documents:

The Vice-President of the CSA: "The constitution, it is true, secured every essential guarantee to the institution while it should last, and hence no argument can be justly urged against the constitutional guarantees thus secured, because of the common sentiment of the day. Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the 'storm came and the wind blew.' Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner- stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth..."

"She has heard proclaimed the theory that all men are created free and equal, and this made the basis of an attack upon her social institutions; and the sacred Declaration of Independence has been invoked to maintain the position of the equality of the races." Jefferson Davis, January 1861

We went to war on account of the thing we quarreled with the North about. I never heard of any other cause of quarrel than slavery. Men fight from sentiment. After the fight is over they invent some fanciful theory on which they imagine that they fought." -- CSA Col. John S. Mosby

From the Texas articles of secession: "[I]n this free government all white men are and of right ought to be entitled to equal civil and political rights; that the servitude of the African race, as existing in these States, is mutually beneficial to both bond and free, and is abundantly authorized and justified by the experience of mankind, and the revealed will of the Almighty Creator, as recognized by all Christian nations; while the destruction of the existing relations between the two races, as advocated by our sectional enemies, would bring inevitable calamities upon both and desolation upon the fifteen slave- holding states....

From the Virginia articles of secession: "The people of Virginia in their ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, adopted by them in convention on the twenty-fifth day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty- eight, having declared that the powers granted under said Constitition were derived from the people of the United States and might be resumed whensoever the same should be perverted to their injury and oppression, and the Federal Government having perverted said powers not only to the injury of the people of Virginia, but to the oppression of the Southern slave-holding States."

Mississippi: "Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin..."

South Carolina: "A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. He is to be entrusted with the administration of the common Government, because he has declared that that 'Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free,' and that the public mind must rest in the belief that slavery is in the course of ultimate extinction. This sectional combination for the submersion of the Constitution, has been aided in some of the States by elevating to citizenship, persons who, by the supreme law of the land, are incapable of becoming citizens; and their votes have been used to inaugurate a new policy, hostile to the South, and destructive of its beliefs and safety."

State after state, in their official organs, and the Vice President of the Constitution, and Confederate military leaders, all said the same thing: the war was about slavery.

Problem: slavery is evil. Once the South lost, the efforts to obfuscate the truth and change the subject to anything else other than what the Confederacy actually stood for have gone on and on. But the truth remains in those Confederate Founding Fathers' own words and official pronouncements and enactments of the time: the Confederacy was singularly devoted to the institution of slavery. That's why they seceded. That's what they fought and died for.

And that's why the Confederate Flag is so very divisive today. It's the flag of rebellion against the national government, in a war that left a million dead, fought to secure the independence of a country that seceded from the United States over the "right" to have slavery.

The Stars and Bars are not a swastika, to whites. But they're not the lovely dove symbol of a peaceful republic formed to protect God and apple pie either.

To blacks, the Confederate Flag is like a swastika flag to Jews. And the blacks are not even slightly wrong in this assessment either.

For after slavery came segregation, and that endured to our own lifetimes. The economic overhang of all of that still blights blacks to this day.

Confederate apologists seek to change the subject into something else, something noble. But fundamentally, the Confederacy was not noble at all. It foundation was based upon exactly what the CSA's Vice President said it was: "it's foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth".

That was the moral truth for which the Confederate States of America was formed, for which it seceded, for which it fought, and for which it died. And that is the principle for which the Confederate Flag stands in the mind of every black, and most whites who don't live in the South.

A white racist photographed himself with that flag, went into a Black church, sat there for an hour, and then systematically blew away the people there for the "cause" that flag has come to represent.

Nothing is going to take the taint of slavery out of the Confederate Battle Flag, because that taint is THERE, and it cannot be washed out.

And THAT is the insurmountable problem that those who would defend it face.

My view? Fly it if you want to, but get it off of the state flags and monuments. The Christian Cross may or may not belong on state houses, but the flag of bloody rebellion in the cause of slavery doesn't belong on ANY state emblem. The Confederacy lost. All of its veterans are gone. It's time for that flag to retire to museums, not to remain an active open sore on race relations today.

Strike those colors and put them to bed. They cause was wrong, and it lost, and the flag merely reminds everybody of that.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-06-23   18:20:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Vicomte13, GarySpFC (#3) (Edited)

I don't get why Gary is refuting the scholar's charge that Blacks did not fight for the Confederacy by bringing up how Nathan Bedford Forrest was kind to his slaves? I am sure NBB thought he was a kind slave dealer. The slaves probably thought otherwise.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-23   19:18:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Pericles (#4)

I don't get why Gary is refuting the scholar's charge that Blacks did not fight for the Confederacy

Because there were black Confederate soldiers,and there are even black Confederate graveyards.

There were even blacks fighting for the Americans during the Revolutionary War. One was captured and tortured by the British in an attempt to get him to tell them about his master's battle plans (his master was a General in the Continental Army),and not only did he resist without giving anything away,he even escaped and told his master about the British battle plans he had heard them discussing.

As a reward he was given his freedom,a medal for courage,and farmland with animals and equipment.

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   19:26:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: sneakypete, Pericles (#7)

Because there were black Confederate soldiers,and there are even black Confederate graveyards.

You left out the thousands of documented black confederate pensioners after the war.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-23   19:39:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: nolu chan (#10)

Nolu, you seem like a bright guy. Are you really going down the spider hole of believing that the Civil War was not caused by slavery and wasn't about slavery?

Are you really going to deny what the South was?

Come on. You're smarter than that.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-06-23   22:15:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Vicomte13 (#14)

The Confederate Battle Flag is not the real issue, rather it is being used by the Left for political purposes to demonize conservatives. Removing this flag will not change anything.

GarySpFC  posted on  2015-06-23   23:19:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 15.

#16. To: GarySpFC (#15)

Removing this flag will not change anything.

Yes it will. It will embolden Americas enemies within. They will use it as proof that we white people are racist.

They will say things like you white racists aren't in charge anymore. That racist America doesn't exist anymore.

A K A Stone  posted on  2015-06-23 23:35:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: GarySpFC (#15)

The Confederate Battle Flag is not the real issue, rather it is being used by the Left for political purposes to demonize conservatives. Removing this flag will not change anything.

You are right. And conservatives are rising to the bait like the Southern Fireaters did. And they're going to get destroyed on the issue just like the Southern Fireaters did.

Suppose the historical Southerners did not rise to the bait. Suppose, instead, they had grimly hunkered down, accepted Lincoln as President, and resisted him politically. The country would have remained politically divided, practically paralyzed, and slavery would have rolled on.

But they went nuts over a symbolic office. Lincoln was elected, without a majority, and would have presided, under the old Constitution, as the figurehead of a divided government, with the Supreme Court against him.

The Southerners could not accept the SYMBOL. They could not accept an abolitionist "in charge". They feared that he would do what he could to limit slavery in the Territories - and they were right, he was going to do that, and they were going to lose on that issue.

But then Lincoln would have been out in four years, and somebody more practical would have been in office, and Southern life, Southern cities, and Southern slavery, would have rolled on as before. The eventual end would have been on the hazy horizon.

But instead of settling down, the Southern Fireaters rebelled over a symbol. It was UNACCEPTABLE that the PRESIDENT, symbolic and weak office that it was in 1861, should be in the hands of an abolitionist. THEREFORE, secession. And then, the thought that the government refused to acknowledge their secession, and kept the forts in place and kept the US flag flying over them - that was unacceptable! So at Fort Sumter, they attacked a SYMBOL. They went berserk and fired on a federal fort. And THAT unleashed the power of the federal government on them to destroy them.

Within four years, hundreds of thousands of them were dead, the cities were destroyed, the train tracks torn up, the politicians in chains, the plantations destroyed and all the slaves freed...and all over a SYMBOL.

The Confederate Battle Flag is not the real issue. That is true. It is being used by the Left for political purposes, to demonize conservatives. But removing that flag WILL change something: it will remove a lighting rod. The flag is Fort Sumter - fight over it, and you unleash hell on yourself and lose.

The better answer is to haul down the obnoxious symbol on public ground, relegate it to museums, and focus on the issues.

For many blacks, the flag is a real issue. For people who believe in equal rights, it's a real issue. It's also a real issue for those people who lost family on the Union side in the Civil War. The Union took casualties as heavy as the South did, and the feelings there are as deep and as sore as on the Confederate side.

The Confederate Battle Flag is a foolish symbol to hoist over the conservative movement. Northern conservatives reject the Confederacy and its ideals, and will not become Neo-Confederates. They see the war as having been about slavery, and that flag as the flag of the Confederacy, and of the Ku Klux Klan, and the segregationists. You cannot hold a national conservative movement together on THAT symbol, and Northern conservatives - white ones - will never, ever stand and fight for that flag.

Removing the flag will change something. It will remove a lightning rod of attack on the conservative movement. It will allow Northern and Southern conservatives to see eye to eye, looking forward, and not divide by looking backwards.

The Lost Cause was lost, it should have lost, it's going to stay lost. And if that flag gets hoisted, it's going to be divisive TODAY - and that IS something.

A bunch of black Christians got shut up in a Charleston church by a white racist nut who depicted himself with the flag of the Klan and the Segregationists - for the Stars and Bars is NOT simply the flag of the old Confederacy, it is ALSO the flag of choice of Klansman and segregationists and racists for a century.

The killer used that flag to make a point. And he made his point. Getting that flag on the monument to half mast, at least, or taking it down "for cleaning" to remove the visual irritant, would have been smart.

But people don't seem to want to be smart. They seem to want to be Fireaters. Ok, then, the Flag becomes another Fort Sumter moment, and those who would wave it lose AGAIN.

The Confederate Battle Flag is the flag of one defeated, disastrous, wrongheaded cause after another. It's not a symbol worth sacrificing a movement over. The conservatives are not going to crucify themselves to that rag. The Left is trying to crucify them with it. The answer is to fold it and put it away. It ain't MY symbol. It's not Reagan's symbol. It's not Walker's symbol, or Sarah Palin's. It's a symbol of the Lost Cause, and various lost causes since. It is, itself, a lost cause. Don't go die on that battlefield. You're being lured onto it. Do not fight for that symbol. The Left is right on this one. It needs to go.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-06-24 09:34:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com