[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: The Myth of Black Confederates
Source: las.illinois.edu
URL Source: http://www.las.illinois.edu/news/2013/confederates/
Published: Sep 1, 2013
Author: Doug Peterson
Post Date: 2015-06-23 16:10:38 by Pericles
Keywords: None
Views: 12004
Comments: 55

The Myth of Black Confederates

LAS professor rejects myth that blacks fought for rebels in large numbers.

Patrick R. Cleburne, a prominent general in the Confederate Army of Tennessee, could see what was happening in the South in late 1863. Southern troops were outnumbered, soldiers were demoralized, and the institution of slavery was collapsing. So on January 2, 1864, Cleburne rode through a sleet-driven night in northern Georgia to present an audacious proposal to nearly a dozen Confederate generals.

He proposed that the Confederate States of America offer freedom to military age male slaves who were willing to fight for the South.

“Most of the generals denounced him,” says Bruce Levine, University of Illinois history professor and author of Confederate Emancipation and The Fall of the House of Dixie.

Cleburne’s proposal was overwhelmingly rejected, for secessionist states were not about to undermine the system of slavery that they were fighting to defend. But despite this clear disdain for the idea of arming African Americans, Levine says that over the past 30 years there has arisen a myth that black soldiers did fight for the Confederacy in massive numbers—tens of thousands and even hundreds of thousands, according to some accounts propagated online.

According to Levine, “The claims among modern romanticizers of the Confederacy are intended to bolster more fundamental claims—that African Americans identified with the Confederacy, that slaves were content with being slaves, and that the war had nothing to do with slavery.”

The problem is that the accounts of massive involvement of blacks in the Southern army are false, he says.

Levine says the Confederate army had a strict policy that if you were not certifiably white, you could not be a soldier in its ranks. However, in the early years of the Civil War, many slave owners did bring their servants into the Confederate army to carry equipment for them, and clean and take care of their clothes and horses. In addition, the Confederacy forced many slaves and free blacks in the South to labor for the war effort, building rail breastworks, driving wagons, burying the dead, and serving as nurses.

“On occasion, a slave might have even picked up a gun and taken a shot at the Yankees, proving how loyal and dependable he was,” Levine says. But this level of involvement is a far cry from tens of thousands of armed black soldiers marching in defense of the Confederacy.

What’s more, Confederates discovered that if they placed black laborers too close to Union lines, they ran the risk of African Americans fleeing to the other side; therefore, many slave owners stopped bringing along their black servants during the second half of the war.

Levine notes that there were two militias in the South made up of free African American soldiers—one in Mobile, Ala., and the other in New Orleans. But these were state militias, not part of the regular army, and they did not see serious action on behalf of the South. And numerous members of the “Native Guards” of New Orleans immediately switched allegiance to the Union when the Yankees occupied the city.

The Myth of the Black Confederates is a relatively new phenomenon, arising after the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s, Levine says. The notion of African Americans fighting in large numbers for the South was never suggested in the immediate aftermath of the war because white veterans would have been still alive to shoot down the idea. “White Confederate soldiers would have taken it as an insult to have served in the same army with the same status as a black soldier,” he says.

As evidence that black men fought heroically for the South, neo-Confederates today will sometimes dig up photos of black servants dressed in military uniforms. But according to Levine, “Some servants were dressed in military uniforms because that was the kind of clothing available in the army.” It didn’t mean they were real members of those army units, he says.

Levine says that when the Confederacy was on its last legs, in March of 1865, the Confederate congress did pass an eleventh-hour law by a razor-thin margin, allowing for the enlistment of black soldiers. But even that law freed no one.

“The Southern government invited masters to volunteer their slaves for the army, but first they would have to emancipate them because Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee knew that still-enslaved black men would certainly not fight for the South,” he says. “The overwhelming majority of masters declined that invitation.”

In the final weeks of the war, the South tried to recruit black soldiers in a handful of states, he says, “but nothing happened anywhere, except Richmond and Petersburg, where they apparently raised about 60 black soldiers in the Confederate army, who then saw virtually no action.”

In contrast, once black soldiers were accepted into the Union army in 1863, roughly 190,000 to 200,000 fought for the North. Even more telling, he adds, an estimated 80 percent of those soldiers were slaves and free blacks recruited by the Union army in slave states.

Editor’s note: We have included a new image and caption at the top of the story and an updated caption for the second image—February 2014

By Doug Peterson

September 2013

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

#1. To: Pericles (#0)

The Civil War was fought over slavery.

The South seceded and proclaimed, in its articles of secession and constitution, that it was about slavery. The leaders said so.

Lincoln said it wasn't, but when the war got rough and recruitment lagged, he issued the Emancipation Proclamation for foreign policy and domestic political reasons. Northern recruitment became much brisker once the war WAS about slavery, and large numbers - a couple of hundred thousand - of Union troops were black.

The Confederacy was about slavery, and never had any intention of freeing any slaves.

States rights? Sure: the "right" of states to have slaves, and to extend slavery westward.

Of course the North wasn't innocent at all either. After all, for four score and seven years before that, the Northerners were mostly willing to tolerate slavery, and in the decade before the war, the North enforced the Fugitive Slave Act.

Truth is, America was founded on the principle of equality, and slavery stood out as an increasingly intolerable cancer on that principle.

Why Americans still need to fight over this TODAY is a bit of a mystery. Slavery was bad, the South stood up for it, lost, was defeated, slavery ended. Move on.

Of course the slavery story had a bookend: segregation. In truth, the "badges" of slavery didn't really start to disappear until the forced end of segregation in the 1960s, and the "incidents" - the massive economic differential of coming from the impoverished black slave class - still have not disappeared. Economic segregation remains.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-06-23   16:36:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Vicomte13, Pericles (#1)

The Civil War was fought over slavery.

Had the Union won a total victory on day one, how would that have enabled the Union to free the slaves?

If a total victory in one day could not enable freeing the slaves, what was the goal of the war when it started?

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-23   19:38:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: nolu chan (#9)

Had the Union won the battle on day one, the slaves would not have been freed.

The South seceded over the issue of slavery. They believed that Lincoln was going to trample their rights to slavery, so they went for the door. That was their motivation.

Lincoln's motivation at the start of the war was to preserve the Union. He rejected any notion of a unilateral right to secede, and refused to pull forces out of the South.

The Southerners fired on Fort Sumter, starting the armed rebellion. Lincoln responded in kind by sending in the forces to suppress the rebellion.

Bull Run was a terrible shock, followed by others.

America itself was not a good country. It had slavery and fugitive slave laws.

God saw to it that the war was prolonged sufficiently to exhaust the original purpose. To maintain the momentum to win the war, it had to be broadened to the issue of slavery. That, then, caused the end result that neither party intended at the outset of the war.

The South, in its own declarations, seceded to preserve slavery as the pillar of Southern society. Besides land, slaves were the single greatest property value in America.

The North's goals changed as the war progressed and deepened. Lincoln's simple suppression of rebellion became immensely complicated because the Southerners were full of fire and ready, willing and eager to fight for their country and its slave culture. "Preserving the Union" wasn't enough. To really harm the South, the slaves had to be freed, so they were as those lands were liberated, or conquered (depending on your perspective).

By the end of the war, it was about abolition. Lincoln made the point of refusing to negotiate with the Southern peace feelers until he got his amendment.

Once it came to the end and it was clear that the Union would win, Lincoln went all-in to formally abolish slavery, and succeeded in doing so. His war aims increased as the war went on.

So, the South started wrong and stayed wrong and was destroyed. The North started wrong and gradually found its way to the right answer, which was to destroy slavery completely and for good, and to change the Constitution itself to end the debate.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-06-23   22:13:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 13.

#21. To: Vicomte13 (#13)

Had the Union won the battle on day one, the slaves would not have been freed.

How can the alleged purpose of a war not be achieved by immediate and total victory? The alleged purpose is not possible.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-24 00:58:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com