[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets

Kamala Harris Touts Mass Amnesty Offering Fast-Tracked Citizenship to Nearly Every Illegal Alien in U.S.

Migration Crisis Fueled Rise in Tuberculosis Cases Study Finds

"They’re Going to Try to Kill Trump Again"

"Dems' Attempts at Power Grab Losing Their Grip"

"Restoring a ‘Great Moderation’ in Fiscal Policy"

"As attacks intensify, Trump becomes more popular"

Posting Articles Now Working Here

Another Test

Testing

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bible Study
See other Bible Study Articles

Title: First Slave Owner in America was Black
Source: Wikipedia
URL Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Johnson_(colonist)
Published: Jun 23, 2015
Author: Wikipedia
Post Date: 2015-06-23 14:28:57 by cranko
Keywords: None
Views: 14069
Comments: 50

I love actual history. Not the stuff the left makes up, but real, actual history.


Anthony Johnson was an Angolan who achieved freedom in the early 17th century Colony of Virginia, where he became one of the first black property owners and slaveholders. Held as an indentured servant in 1621, he earned his freedom after several years, which was accompanied by a grant of land. He later became a successful tobacco farmer. Notably, he is recognized for attaining great wealth after having been an indentured servant and has been referred to as “'the black patriarch' of the first community of Negro property owners in America".

Johnson was captured in his native Angola by an enemy tribe and sold to Arab slave traders. He was eventually sold as an indentured servant to a merchant working for the Virginia Company.

Johnson was sold to a white planter named Bennet as an indentured servant to work on his Virginia tobacco farm. Servants typically worked under an indenture contract for four to seven years to pay off their passage, room, board, lodging and freedom dues. In the early colonial years, most Africans in the Thirteen Colonies were held under such contracts of indentured servitude.

When Anthony Johnson was released from servitude, he was legally recognized as a "free Negro." He developed a successful farm. In 1651 he owned 250 acres, and the services of four white and one black indentured servants.

In 1653, John Casor, a black indentured servant whose contract Johnson appeared to have bought in the early 1640s, approached Captain Goldsmith, claiming his indenture had expired seven years earlier and that he was being held illegally by Johnson. A neighbor, Robert Parker, intervened and persuaded Johnson to free Casor.

Parker offered Casor work, and he signed a term of indenture to the planter. Johnson sued Parker in the Northampton Court in 1654 for the return of Casor. The court initially found in favor of Parker, but Johnson appealed. In 1655, the court reversed its ruling.[10] Finding that Anthony Johnson still "owned" John Casor, the court ordered that he be returned with the court dues paid by Robert Parker.

This was the first instance of a judicial determination in the Thirteen Colonies holding that a person who had committed no crime could be held in servitude for life.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-10) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#11. To: cranko (#9) (Edited)

And the Civil War over slavery which killed like 10-30% of the MALE American population. Your feeble attempts to make America look great comparing it to Rowan aside. Britain freed her slaves and not one death.............

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-23   19:08:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Justified (#1)

In fact I believe Anthony Johnson was an indentured slave before he became a slave owner.

He was.

IIRC,he was a wealthy owner of a horse farm in Pa or Md when he died.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   19:13:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Pericles (#5)

If the USA was such a great nation it would have outlawed slavery before the British did between 1833 and 1843.

Still playing the victim card 300 years later,are you?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   19:14:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Pericles (#8)

And the Civil War over slavery which killed like 10-30% of the American population.

The War of Northern Aggression was NOT fought over slavery,and none other than Abraham Lincoln,the man that declared the war,is on record as saying it wasn't.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   19:16:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: nolu chan (#10)

Illinois was a slave state, and when it purportedly "eliminated" slavery, it implemented 99-year indentured servitude.

But the good news was that they became free after working for 99 years!

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   19:19:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Pericles (#11)

Britain freed her slaves and not one death.............

We know your mind is feeble,but you are seriously claiming there was not ONE death?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   19:20:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: sneakypete (#14) (Edited)

Shut up, Pete. You are Greek. These people are beneath your half blood to take up their racial cause.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-23   19:20:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Pericles (#17)

Shut up, Pete.

ESAD,

You are Greek.

No,my father was Greek. *I* am an American.

These people are beneath your half blood to take up their racial cause.

I don't play "racial cause" games,and Greeks are not my brothers. Or even half-brothers.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   19:43:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: cranko, Pericles (#9)

Nope. The American Civil War resulted in 620,000 dead Americans, which was less than 2% of a population of 32 million. NOT 10% to 30%. Less than 2%.

At the time of the civil war I believe that was the percentage of slave owners in America. 2-3%

The poor white farms wanted slavery so they could compete with slave labor from the big slave farms! Yes slavery was the reason we had the civil war!/s

States rights was just a ruse to get the poor dumb white people to die in mass for the big slave farms.

Justified  posted on  2015-06-23   19:56:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Pericles (#11) (Edited)

And the Civil War over slavery which killed like 10-30% of the MALE American population. Your feeble attempts...

Less than 2% of the population. If everyone who died was male, it would have been approximately 4% of the population.

It's simple arithmetic (except for dimwitted leftists):

620,000 dead / 32,000,000 population = 0.019375. That's 1.9375% of the population dead.

It's 3rd grade math, bozo.

Perhaps this is why Greece is in so much trouble -- they can't add, subtract, multiply or divide!

cranko  posted on  2015-06-23   20:05:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: cranko (#20)

10% of military-age Northern men, 30% of military-age Southern men.

http://pjmedia.com/spengler/

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-23   20:13:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: nolu chan (#10)

Illinois was a slave state, and when it purportedly "eliminated" slavery, it implemented 99-year indentured servitude.

Okay, so instead of just posting it here, go update Wikipedia. They would love you because you have references to cite.

cranko  posted on  2015-06-23   20:14:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Justified (#19)

The poor white farms wanted slavery so they could compete with slave labor from the big slave farms! Yes slavery was the reason we had the civil war!/s

States rights was just a ruse to get the poor dumb white people to die in mass for the big slave farms.

The South fought for the dream of a slave empire stretching southwards, and the 90% of Southern soldiers who owed no slaves hoped to get them–like Wallenstein’s mercenaries or Napoleon’s foot-soldiers with field marshall’s batons in their rucksacks. Like Wallenstein’s and Napoleon’s armies, the Confederates fought with desperate courage, but for rapine rather than right. Crushing them was the noblest thing the United States ever did.

http://pjmedia.com/spengler/

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-23   20:15:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: sneakypete (#18)

American is not an ethnicity and the confederates were traitors.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-23   20:16:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Pericles (#21) (Edited)

http://pjmedia.com/spengler/

If you are going to quote lunatics from the Lyndon LaRouche cult, then you are much, much sicker in the head than I originally thought.

In all honesty, I've had a hard time pegging who you really are. At times you sound like a disgruntled American black. Other times you sound like a lazy anti-American Greek. Now we know who you are -- a crazy Lyndon LaRouche cultist.

God help you.

cranko  posted on  2015-06-23   20:26:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Pericles (#23)

the Confederates fought with desperate courage, but for rapine rather than right. Crushing them was the noblest thing the United States ever did.

The only reason the north won is that it could sacrifice the Irish who just want to become Americans. North was all about controlling the country and the south was just suppose to shut up and agree. The north was damn lucky there were hundreds of thousand of Irish human waste to be spent on keeping the north in power. If they could have only seen what their death made!

The south could have given up slavery and the north would still have fought to keep the power structure the way it was. The north really did not give a rats ass about slavery and hated when the slaves head north to be with them.

Justified  posted on  2015-06-23   20:26:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: cranko (#25) (Edited)

All Americans look the same to me and Goldman worked for Ronald St. Reagan administration.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-23   20:35:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Pericles (#27) (Edited)

Goldman worked for Ronald St. Reagan administration.

Utter nonsense. There is a self-serving reference on Wikipedia that he "consulted" for the Reagan administration. The reference points to a list of articles that have nothing to do with him.

I don't know if this is possible, but can you engage your brain just for 30 seconds?

Who do Presidents appoint to their administrations? Long term donors and activists. Goldman was part of the LaRouche cult until at least 1982. So, the Reagan administration was going to appoint him to what???

ROTFLMAO...

You are much sicker in the head than I originally thought. Much sicker.

cranko  posted on  2015-06-23   21:03:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Pericles (#24)

American is not an ethnicity

So what? Neither is Greek.

and the confederates were traitors.

"Learn" that in Black History class,did ya?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   21:08:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: cranko, Pericles (#25)

In all honesty, I've had a hard time pegging who you really are.

Confused,fearful,jealous,and the owner of a PC AA education.

I'd almost be willing to bet one of his parents was black and the other Greek,and he claims to be a Greek because he doesn't want to self-identify or be identified as as a black because he secretly identifies blacks as inferior.

It ain't PC to say so,but that's why so many blacks convert to Islam. They want to self-identify and be identified as Arabs instead of slaves that came from Africa. Better to be the slavemaster than the slave.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   21:15:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: cranko (#28)

that he "consulted" for the Reagan administration.

Yea, he worked for Reagan. I did not claim he was a cabinet member. And Reagan was an ex new dealer in his youth also.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-23   21:16:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: cranko, sneakypete (#30) (Edited)

I'd almost be willing to bet one of his parents was black and the other Greek,and he claims to be a Greek because he doesn't want to self- identify or be identified as as a black because he secretly identifies blacks as inferior.

It ain't PC to say so,but that's why so many blacks convert to Islam. They want to self-identify and be identified as Arabs instead of slaves that came from Africa. Better to be the slavemaster than the slave.

Or I am a black Russian - Which is why I have a history of posting pro Serbian anti NATO posts - I think the stupid part of Pete is his "American" heritage. He is half Greek so we can't be too harsh. LOL

Pete, you justify everything I say about Americans.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-23   21:18:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Pericles (#32)

Or I am a black Russian

In one respect,yes,you are. Russians are closely identified with communism,and you are at heart a communist.

The main thing you are is a man with a (well deserved) inferiority complex,a 3rd rate PC education, and a hatred for America.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   21:38:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Pericles (#31)

Yea, he worked for Reagan

Do you also believe that LaRouche was innocent of credit card fraud and instead was a political prisoner?

cranko  posted on  2015-06-23   21:55:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Pericles (#31)

David Goldman is not telling the full truth about his years in the LaRouche movement

Goldman writes that he "spent some years--from 1976 to 1986--in a gnostic cult under the leadership of a man named Lyndon LaRouche."

When did he really join?

The picture and caption/article here show Goldman at a Labor Committee (LaRouche cadre org) demonstration at Columbia University in 1969--seven years prior to when he now says he joined up.

When did he really leave?

Goldman writes that "[LaRouche] cashiered me as economics editor for his publications in 1982." He claims that he then moved to Europe,[FN 1] pursued "musical research under the auspices of [LaRouche's] Schiller Institute," and worked for former National Security Council aide Norman Bailey's consulting business before finally severing his emotional ties with the LaRouche group in 1986.

However, the masthead of LaRouche's EIR shows Goldman continuing in his job as economics intelligence director (essentially an editorial post) during 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987 and 1988 (see mastheads from each of these years here), while ex-members say he was a member of the org's National Committee throughout this period until the day he left.

Goldman's name was removed from the EIR masthead sometime in the first half of 1988--two years after the "Confessions" narrative says he severed his ties to the LaRouche movement, and six years after the narrative says he was removed from his editorial post.

Essentially what Goldman has done is take the period of at least 19 years he spent as an active LaRouche follower and condense it down to six years--and then tack on four more years in which he supposedly was pursuing his own interests while continuing to have an ambiguous relationship with the LaRouche org involving harmless musical pursuits.

So, when did he work for the Reagan Administration??? LOL!!!!!

cranko  posted on  2015-06-23   22:03:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: sneakypete, Pericles (#16)

We know your mind is feeble,but you are seriously claiming there was not ONE death?

You have to read carefully, Pete. The ended slavery in England. The British slaves were not in England, but almost entirely in British colonies.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-24   2:15:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: cranko (#35)

So, when did he work for the Reagan Administration??? LOL!!!!!

How does that disprove his claim that 10-30% of the fighting age males lost their lives?

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-24   3:20:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Pericles (#37)

How does that disprove his claim that 10-30% of the fighting age males lost their lives?

You have made three contradictory claims on this thread:

First, you said that upwards of 30% of the American population lost their lives in the Civil War. I showed you that it was less than 2%.

Second, you said that upwards of 30% of American males lost their lives in the civil war. No, it was 4%.

Third, you said that upwards of 30% of "fighting age" American males lost their lives in the Civil War. The figure accepted by historians is that 1 in 13 (7.7%) of military age men lost their lives in the Civil War.

What claim would you like to make now? That the British secretly control the world and that the Queen of England is a drug dealer? That is what you LaRouchers believe isn't it?

cranko  posted on  2015-06-24   6:27:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: cranko (#38)

I did not make three contradictory claims - I remembered it was 10-30% casualties but I did not clarify what % of the population was being talked about - 10% for Union and - 30% for Confederate casualties of fight age males. So I found you a source. You attack the source but not the %.

All because I said that the USA was INFERIOR because of how it freed its slaves - through a bloody war that depopulated the South. Even Czar freed the Serfs there was no war and those Russians love a drunken fight.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-24   8:47:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Justified, cranko, Pericles (#19)

UNIONCONFEDERACYUNIONCONFEDERACY

At the time of the civil war I believe that was the percentage of slave owners in America. 2-3%

It sort of depends on what numbers, or subset of numbers are used. Below as some of the Census numbers.

http://mapserver.lib.virginia.edu/php/start.php?year=V1860

1860 census

393,975 TOTAL slaveholders (8 in KS & NE territories)

UNION

SlaveholdersNumber
Delaware587
Kansas (T) 2
Kentucky 38,645
Maryland 13,783
Missouri 24,320
Nebraska (T) 6
TOTAL77,343

77,343 = 2.4% of total population of these states.

CONFEDERACY

SlaveholdersNumber
Alabama33,730
Arkansas11,481
Georgia41,084
Florida5,152
Louisiana22,033
Mississippi30,943
North Carolina34,658
South Carolina26,701
Tennessee36,844
Texas21,878
Virginia52,128
TOTAL316,632

316,632 = 3.5% of total population of these states.

The Confederacy had 4.1 times as many slaveholders as the Union states.

TOTAL POPULATION OF SLAVE STATES/Territories

UNION

StatePopulation
Delaware112,216
Kansas (T)107,206
Kentucky1,155,684
Maryland687,049
Missouri1,182,012
Nebraska (T)28,841
TOTAL3,273,008

CONFEDERACY

StatePopulation
Alabama964,201
Arkansas435,450
Florida140,424
Georgia1,057,286
Louisiana708,002
Mississippi791,305
North Carolina992,622
South Carolina703,708
Tennessee1,109,801
Texas604,215
Virginia1,596,318
TOTAL9,103,332

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-24   13:55:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: nolu chan (#36)

You have to read carefully, Pete. The ended slavery in England. The British slaves were not in England, but almost entirely in British colonies.

Ahhhh! Thanks for clearing up the mystery.

Pericles is completely shameless,isn't he?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-24   14:43:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Pericles, cranko (#21)

[Pericles #8] And the Civil War over slavery which killed like 10-30% of the American population.

[Pericles #11] And the Civil War over slavery which killed like 10-30% of the MALE American population.

[Pericles #21] 10% of military-age Northern men, 30% of military-age Southern men.

http://pjmedia.com/spengler/

620,000 dead

http://www.history.com/news/civil-war-deadlier-than-previously-thought

Often referred to as the bloodiest conflict in U.S. history, the Civil War claimed more American lives than any other military action in which the country has taken part. Now, a professor at Binghamton University in New York has used 19th-century census data to show that the most commonly cited death toll—620,000—may significantly underestimate the true human cost, and that the real number of Civil War dead could be upwards of 20 percent higher.

Goldman's claims appear absurd. Civil War statistics are arguable and argued, but Goldman's unsourced statistics appear to be pulled out of his ass and not supported by the most inflated sources.

http://pjmedia.com/spengler/

America never recovered from its Civil War, which killed nearly a million combatants on both sides.

[...]

Protestantism in America shifted from saving souls to social engineering. The sin of the South was too great to acknowledge; after the sacrifice of nearly 30% of its military-age man and the reduction of its standard of living by half, the defeated white South could not admit to itself that it had gotten precisely what was coming to it for wickedness of slavery. It is revolting to read Southern writers’ rationalizations for Southern wickedness, for example, David French last week in The National Review.

[...]

“Americans decided that they would rather not have a God who demanded sacrifice from them on this scale – 10% of military-age Northern men, 30% of military-age Southern men.

620K is not "nearly a million," and David P. Goldman cites nothing as the source of his inflated claim. It is revolting to read Goldman's horseshit.

If 10 to 30% of a subset of the population was killed, 10 times the alleged dead yields the higher limit. 10/3 times the alleged dead yields the lower limit.

The total population was 31,443,321. That would indicate the total male population was somewhere around 15 million.

Total civil war deaths from disease was about double the amount from combat. About 90% of Black soldier deaths were from disease, largely due to discriminatory medical care.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/death-numbers/http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/death-numbers/

[excerpts of stats]

From 1861 to 1865, the Civil War ravaged America. It still holds several notorious records, such as the highest number of average deaths per day (504). Read more of the shocking statistics from the War that divided our nation.

2.5 -- Approximate percentage of the American population that died in the Civil War

2.1 mil -- Number of Northerners mobilized to fight for the Union army

880,000 -- Number of Southerners mobilized for the Confederacy

2 out of 3 -- Number of Civil War deaths that occurred from disease rather than battle

180,000 -- Number of African American soldiers that served in the Civil War

1 in 5 -- Average death rate for all Civil War soldiers

9:1 -- Ratio of African American Civil War troops who died of disease to those that died on the battlefield, largely due to discriminatory medical care

3:1 -- Ratio of Confederate deaths to Union deaths

9:1 -- Ratio of African American Civil War troops who died of disease to those that died on the battlefield, largely due to discriminatory medical care

303,356 -- Number of Union soldiers who were reinterred in 74 congressionally-mandated national cemeteries by 1871

0 -- Number of Confederate soldiers buried in those national cemeteries

58 -- Number of Confederate bodies thrown down a local farmer's well on a federal burial detail in 1862

10% of 2.1M union soldiers is 210,000. There were nearly 400,000 such deaths.

30% of 880K confederate soldiers is 264,000. This is within reality.

Total deaths, per Goldman, would be 474,000. This stat should be 620,000 or higher, including non-combat deaths due to disease, accident, or unknown as POW, etc.

STATISTICS WITH A SOURCE

https://www.phil.muni.cz/~vndrzl/amstudies/civilwar_stats.htm

[excerpt of stats]

Federal army deaths: 389,753

110,100 Killed or mortally wounded in battle.
224,580 Died of disease
30,192 Died as POW
24,881 Misc non-battle deaths

Confederate deaths: 289,000

94,000 Killed or mortally wounded in battle.
164,000 Died of disease
31,000 Died as POW

...

(All statistics gathered from Time-Life Books: The Civil War series)

Total deaths would be: 678,753, including non-battle deaths.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_casualties_of_war

Union & Confederate:
Combat: 214,938
Other: 4-500,000
Total: 750,000~

Union:
Combat: 140,414
Other: 224,097
Total: 364,511

Confederate:
Combat: 74,524-94,000
Other: 225,000~
Total: 299,524~

...

c. Civil War: All Union casualty figures, and Confederate killed in action, from The Oxford Companion to American Military History except where noted (NPS figures). estimate of total Confederate dead from James M. McPherson, Battle Cry of Freedom (Oxford University Press, 1988), 854. Newer estimates place the total death toll at 650,000 to 850,000. See: Guy Gugliotta, "New Estimate Raises Civil War Death Toll", New York Times, April 2, 2012. Retrieved November 19, 2013.

http://civilwarhome.com/casualties.htm

At least 618,000 Americans died in the Civil War, and some experts say the toll reached 700,000. The number that is most often quoted is 620,000. At any rate, these casualties exceed the nation's loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam.

The Union armies had from 2,500,000 to 2,750,000 men. Their losses, by the best estimates:

Battle deaths: 110,070
Disease, etc.: 250,152
Total: 360,222

The Confederate strength, known less accurately because of missing records, was from 750,000 to 1,250,000. Its estimated losses:

Battle deaths: 94,000
Disease, etc.: 164,000
Total: 258,000

. . .

Source: "The Civil War, Strange and Fascinating Facts," by Burke Davis

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-24   16:16:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: sneakypete (#41)

Pericles is completely shameless,isn't he?

Well, see my #42.

I have argued for years with Pericles (Destro, et. al). We tend to keep it relatively civil. Way back, I spent about 5 years in the FR Smoky Backroom on the North-South foodfight threads. That was educational, if not very civil.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-24   16:40:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: nolu chan (#42)

The issue was sourcing and I provided the ref.

Also:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/science/civil-war-toll-up-by-20-percent-in- new-estimate.html?_r=0

For 110 years, the numbers stood as gospel: 618,222 men died in the Civil War, 360,222 from the North and 258,000 from the South — by far the greatest toll of any war in American history.

But new research shows that the numbers were far too low.

By combing through newly digitized census data from the 19th century, J. David Hacker, a demographic historian from Binghamton University in New York, has recalculated the death toll and increased it by more than 20 percent — to 750,000.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-24   17:21:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Pericles (#44) (Edited)

cranko  posted on  2015-06-24   17:31:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: nolu chan (#43)

have argued for years with Pericles (Destro, et. al). We tend to keep it relatively civil. Way back, I spent about 5 years in the FR Smoky Backroom on the North-South foodfight threads. That was educational, if not very civil.

We have never argued except when I called Ted Cruze a grifter. I am also not a 9/11 place explosives in the building truther but I cna't remember if you are a truther on that or not. I am more of a let it happen on purpose if thats how it went down kind of thinker.

Pericles  posted on  2015-06-24   17:37:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Pericles (#44)

The issue was sourcing and I provided the ref.

The ref just puked up claims from out of his butt. There is no source there for his outrageous, impossible claims.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-24   18:30:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Pericles (#44)

Also:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/science/civil-war-toll-up-by-20-percent-in- new-estimate.html?_r=0

For 110 years, the numbers stood as gospel: 618,222 men died in the Civil War, 360,222 from the North and 258,000 from the South — by far the greatest toll of any war in American history.

But new research shows that the numbers were far too low.

By combing through newly digitized census data from the 19th century, J. David Hacker, a demographic historian from Binghamton University in New York, has recalculated the death toll and increased it by more than 20 percent — to 750,000.

Your newest link is for an article about J. David Hacker's report (J. David Hacker. "A Census-Based Count of the Civil War Dead." Civil War History 57.4 (2011): 307-348. Project MUSE. Web. 24 Jun. 2015). Hacker's report is obviously not the source of David P. Goldman's spurious figures. Goldman's figures appear to have been conjured up from a magic eight ball.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/science/civil-war-toll-up-by-20-percent-in-new-estimate.html

New Estimate Raises Civil War Death Toll
By Guy Gugliotta
April 2, 2012

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/recounting-the-dead/#more-105317

Hacker's article is at the above link.

Recounting the Dead
By J. David Hacker
September 20, 2011 9:38 PM

The battlefield deaths are reported after battles. The deaths from illness and accidents, suicides, and whatnot are difficult to quantify.

If someone is not included on a census report of 1870, it does not mean he died in the war, or that a death was attributable to the war.

It is a SWAG.

http://www.civilwar.org/education/higher-number.html

Should the number be higher?

THE CHANGING COST OF WAR

A recent paper written by Binghamton University professor Dr. J. David Hacker argues that the true cost of the Civil War is somewhere between 650,000 and 850,000 lives. This is an increase from the traditional figure of 620,000 put forward by Union veterans William F. Fox and Thomas Leonard Livermore in 1889 after an exhaustive study of the army documents and pension records available at the time.

Dr. Hacker used census records from 1850-1880 to construct a pattern of survival rates throughout the troubled decades. His research revealed that the period of 1860-1870 was approximately 750,000 men and women short of the normal survival pattern in the non-war years.

Applying the tools of modern demographic and statistical analysis is immensely valuable to furthering our understanding of the Civil War--we are always striving to add new threads to the tapestry of our shared historical experience. Dr. Hacker provides important insight into the tragic loss of life from 1860-1870. However, his final estimate is very broad, includes civilian casualties, and is not directly linked to the war years of 1861-1865. The Civil War Trust will continue to use Fox's and Livermore's calculation of 620,000 military deaths in the Civil War. We look forward to continued research from Dr. Hacker and others.

http://www.historynet.com/civil-war-casualties

War by the numbers

By Harold Holzer

Eyebrows were conspicuously raised recently when a “demographic historian” from New York’s State University at Binghamton convincingly recalibrated the long-accepted Civil War death toll—boosting the grisly statistic by an astounding 20 percent.

According to Dr. J. David Hacker, the traditional death toll of 620,000—which historians have accepted for more than a century—failed properly to account for several key factors, including the influx of immigrants into the armed forces, not to mention casualties among black women who found themselves victims of the onrush of war. Hacker employed a new range of statistical accounting to determine mortality, including a system called the “two-census method.” To measure deaths, he counts the number of 20- to 30-year-olds in the 1860 census, and the number of 30- to 40-year-olds who turn up in—or, more important, disappear from—the next count, 10 years later. The difference represents the number of young people who died in the intervening decade, and Hacker took an educated stab, based on a shrewd reading of regional loyalties, at determining how many of them likely perished on the battlefield and not home peacefully in bed.

It’s useful to keep in mind that the long-accepted 620,000 tally was the work of two energetic but amateur historians, William F. Fox and Thomas Leonard Livermore, Union veterans who read every pension record, battlefield report and muster roll they could put their hands on. Fox published his Regimental Losses in the American Civil War in 1889—and through their extraordinary research we learned that the average Federal soldier weighed 143.5 pounds.

[...]

Inevitably, the new death-counting process proved more complicated than even this. For one thing, apparently, the reunited country’s 1870 census was something of a hash, with a level of undercounting that made the complaints around our recent 2010 census seem mild by comparison. Hacker admits it also remains difficult to count civilians who died in wartime.

[...]

The new Civil War death toll numbers have stirred the pot afresh. In reporting the new statistics, the Times, for example, took an unexpected pot shot at veteran historian James M. McPherson, one among countless scholars who have long accepted the earlier 620,000 number. The article called out the dean of the field for using that number “without citing the source in Battle Cry of Freedom, his Pulitzer-winning 1988 history of the war.” The fact that no one else has ever “sourced” the figures did not seem to matter in the new rush to up the gruesome ante.

Harold Holzer is chairman of the Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Foundation.

As Holzer notes, the 1870 census was a hash. In addition, the census difference from 1860 to 1870 does not represent dead people. It represents people not in the 1870 census for whatever reason. There was a large swath of sparsely populated territory to the West that they could have moved to.

The Lincoln and civil war mythologists would swoon over "helpful" studies if based on the output of a magic eight ball.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-24   19:59:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Pericles (#46)

We have never argued except when I called Ted Cruze a grifter.

We engaged in vigorous discussion.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-24   20:00:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Pericles (#44)

By combing through newly digitized census data from the 19th century, J. David Hacker, a demographic historian from Binghamton University in New York, has recalculated the death toll and increased it by more than 20 percent — to 750,000.

I've read the same.

I've also seen estimates of over 800,000.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-30   18:27:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com