[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232

Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need

"How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America"

How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos.

Reagan JOKE On The Homeless


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bang / Guns
See other Bang / Guns Articles

Title: Senate Bill Forces Gun Owners to Buy “Smart Guns”
Source: freedomoutpost.com
URL Source: http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/06/s ... -gun-owners-to-buy-smart-guns/
Published: Jun 22, 2015
Author: Tim Brown
Post Date: 2015-06-22 07:11:15 by CZ82
Ping List: *Bang List*     Subscribe to *Bang List*
Keywords: None
Views: 4215
Comments: 28

Senate Bill Forces Gun Owners to Buy “Smart Guns”

Tim Brown June 15, 2015

Communist Gun Grabbing Massachusetts Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren introduced legislation last week which is not only unconstitutional, but also a very dumb idea (pun intended). According to the bill, "anyone selling a handgun must retrofit it with personalization technology before that sale can be completed."

The "Handgun Trigger Safety Act" is touted as a means of gun safety. However, at its root, it is a bill that is unconstitutional due to the fact that the government has been given specific instructions not to infringe on the rights of the people when it comes to arms.

The legislation would mandate that within ten years, "anyone selling a handgun must retrofit it with personalization technology before that sale can be completed."

Furthermore, within five years of the bill becoming law, it would ban the "manufacture in the United States a handgun that is not a personalized handgun."

Senator Markey issues a press release in which he stated, "The epidemic of gun violence in America is not preordained, it is preventable. In the 21st century, we should use research and advances in technology to our advantage and save lives from tragic and needless gun violence. These bills will keep guns out of the hands that of those who shouldn't have them and provide better information about what is causing gun violence and what can be done to prevent it. These are sensible proposals that everyone, regardless of political party or affiliation, should be able to support. I thank Rep. Maloney for her partnership on this effort, and I recommit to stopping the hemorrhaging of lives and spirit that gun violence causes for families in Massachusetts and across the country."

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) said, "Some would have us believe that the laws currently on the books are sufficient to address the tens of thousands of gun related deaths that occur each year. A few extremists even oppose basic public health research to help us understand why gun violence has reached epidemic proportions. They also oppose implementing new smart gun technologies that can help reduce the tragic number of accidental shooting deaths each year, many of which have taken the lives of young children. The majority of Americans support sensible steps to reduce the bloodshed in our streets, schools, churches and other public spaces. The bills I am introducing with Senator Markey today would help save lives and make our communities safer."

Maloney has no idea what she is talking about, or perhaps she does and this is just her sales pitch. However such actions will not result in safety, but probably will result in more dead people like Carol Bowne, who was stabbed to death in cold blood because New Jersey couldn't get her a gun permit within the allotted 30 days.

However, speaking of Maloney, she helped advance The Firearms Risk Protection Act, which would require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. Again, this is unconstitutional and does nothing to stop criminals. All of these measures are attempts at gun confiscation.

The legislation is absolutely ridiculous given a recent report about the chapter 11 restructuring of a smart gun company, which gun grabbing politicians, like Markey and Warren have endorsed.

Part of the issue is the cost and a lack of actually keeping criminals from obtaining weapons that can be used in the commission of a crime. As I have written previously:

To make matters worse, what criminal will acquire a gun that they have to deal with such restrictions? None, and that's the point. These guns will be marketed to law-abiding citizens, not criminals.

While the iP1 is a .22 caliber with a ridiculous price of $1,800 (one of many really, really bad marketing moves), the company is also attempting to produce the iP9, a 9mm version.

These types of guns are simply gun control in another form. I'm glad the company has had to file chapter 11. Now, let's hope they have to file chapter 13 bankruptcy.

There is not doubt in my mind that the American people will not stand for this in the same manner they didn't stand for Obama's gun grab following Sandy Hook, nor the backdoor attempt at violating the Second Amendment when the unconstitutional ATF sought to ban AR-15 ammunition.

Smart guns are a bad idea. Forcing people to buy smart guns is a really dumb idea.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/06/senate-bill-forces-gun-owners-to-buy-smart-guns/#7A7RtztHRgQseciH.99 Subscribe to *Bang List*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

#2. To: CZ82 (#0)

" Smart guns are a bad idea. " Yes they are !

"Forcing people to buy smart guns is a really dumb idea. " Yes it is, and it is not going to happen. I will not buy one, and I do not know anyone that would. Would you? I didn't think so

We need to ban the idiots that come up with these goof ball ideas!

Stoner  posted on  2015-06-22   13:59:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Stoner (#2)

" Smart guns are a bad idea. " Yes they are !

I can see instances where they might be useful.

For instance, a cop or security guard (or a citizen) would worry less that an assailant might take his gun and then shoot him with it, as in the Zimmerman case against Traybon. If the handgun security was tight enough, it would give robbers less incentive to steal guns (which are a top target for burglaries at present).

So...not entirely useless.

We have a lot of new tech coming online. You might be able to build a basic interlock very small and lightweight with a palm print reader built-in so others couldn't shoot your gun.

I'm not saying we must have them or force people to get them. And this current law is just stupid. But they could be useful. And tech is moving very quickly these days.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-22   20:35:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: TooConservative (#3)

" I can see instances where they might be useful. "

Well, maybe. But I am very confident with mine, and I damn sure do not want some idiot bureaucrat causing me to have to spend a big sum of money for some theoretical gizmo. If they want it, let them spend THEIR money.

Stoner  posted on  2015-06-22   21:43:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Stoner (#4)

I was only speaking to whether some gun users might benefit from or want personalized guns. And whether we might see such guns in the next decade or so. Just because the current "smart guns" are insanely expensive and unworkable doesn't mean that will always be the case.

You would have some parents that would want them so as to preclude the kiddies from shooting themselves or each other. Also, you wouldn't need trigger locks or gun safes or whatnot to secure the weapons if they were personalized.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-23   1:10:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 5.

        There are no replies to Comment # 5.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com