[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bang / Guns
See other Bang / Guns Articles

Title: Senate Bill Forces Gun Owners to Buy “Smart Guns”
Source: freedomoutpost.com
URL Source: http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/06/s ... -gun-owners-to-buy-smart-guns/
Published: Jun 22, 2015
Author: Tim Brown
Post Date: 2015-06-22 07:11:15 by CZ82
Ping List: *Bang List*     Subscribe to *Bang List*
Keywords: None
Views: 3602
Comments: 28

Senate Bill Forces Gun Owners to Buy “Smart Guns”

Tim Brown June 15, 2015

Communist Gun Grabbing Massachusetts Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren introduced legislation last week which is not only unconstitutional, but also a very dumb idea (pun intended). According to the bill, "anyone selling a handgun must retrofit it with personalization technology before that sale can be completed."

The "Handgun Trigger Safety Act" is touted as a means of gun safety. However, at its root, it is a bill that is unconstitutional due to the fact that the government has been given specific instructions not to infringe on the rights of the people when it comes to arms.

The legislation would mandate that within ten years, "anyone selling a handgun must retrofit it with personalization technology before that sale can be completed."

Furthermore, within five years of the bill becoming law, it would ban the "manufacture in the United States a handgun that is not a personalized handgun."

Senator Markey issues a press release in which he stated, "The epidemic of gun violence in America is not preordained, it is preventable. In the 21st century, we should use research and advances in technology to our advantage and save lives from tragic and needless gun violence. These bills will keep guns out of the hands that of those who shouldn't have them and provide better information about what is causing gun violence and what can be done to prevent it. These are sensible proposals that everyone, regardless of political party or affiliation, should be able to support. I thank Rep. Maloney for her partnership on this effort, and I recommit to stopping the hemorrhaging of lives and spirit that gun violence causes for families in Massachusetts and across the country."

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) said, "Some would have us believe that the laws currently on the books are sufficient to address the tens of thousands of gun related deaths that occur each year. A few extremists even oppose basic public health research to help us understand why gun violence has reached epidemic proportions. They also oppose implementing new smart gun technologies that can help reduce the tragic number of accidental shooting deaths each year, many of which have taken the lives of young children. The majority of Americans support sensible steps to reduce the bloodshed in our streets, schools, churches and other public spaces. The bills I am introducing with Senator Markey today would help save lives and make our communities safer."

Maloney has no idea what she is talking about, or perhaps she does and this is just her sales pitch. However such actions will not result in safety, but probably will result in more dead people like Carol Bowne, who was stabbed to death in cold blood because New Jersey couldn't get her a gun permit within the allotted 30 days.

However, speaking of Maloney, she helped advance The Firearms Risk Protection Act, which would require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. Again, this is unconstitutional and does nothing to stop criminals. All of these measures are attempts at gun confiscation.

The legislation is absolutely ridiculous given a recent report about the chapter 11 restructuring of a smart gun company, which gun grabbing politicians, like Markey and Warren have endorsed.

Part of the issue is the cost and a lack of actually keeping criminals from obtaining weapons that can be used in the commission of a crime. As I have written previously:

To make matters worse, what criminal will acquire a gun that they have to deal with such restrictions? None, and that's the point. These guns will be marketed to law-abiding citizens, not criminals.

While the iP1 is a .22 caliber with a ridiculous price of $1,800 (one of many really, really bad marketing moves), the company is also attempting to produce the iP9, a 9mm version.

These types of guns are simply gun control in another form. I'm glad the company has had to file chapter 11. Now, let's hope they have to file chapter 13 bankruptcy.

There is not doubt in my mind that the American people will not stand for this in the same manner they didn't stand for Obama's gun grab following Sandy Hook, nor the backdoor attempt at violating the Second Amendment when the unconstitutional ATF sought to ban AR-15 ammunition.

Smart guns are a bad idea. Forcing people to buy smart guns is a really dumb idea.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/06/senate-bill-forces-gun-owners-to-buy-smart-guns/#7A7RtztHRgQseciH.99 Subscribe to *Bang List*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: CZ82 (#0)

If they were seriously interested in passing legislation to reduce the murder rate,they could eliminate at least 80 percent of the murders nationwide by outlawing black males between the ages of 14 and 40.

Odd how you never hear the Dims talking about this option,ain't it?

The truth is none of them really give a damn about murders or who gets murdered as long as it isn't anyone in their family or social circle. They only promote this crap for publicity purposes. It's advertising to their "customer base"/voter base that "I truly care about your safety and want to protect you". They do this in order to keep getting elected and because they know their voter base really IS stupid enough to take it at face value.

In some respects a gun confiscation scheme becoming law would be their worse nightmare come true because then they would have to find something else to whine about.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-22   9:01:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: CZ82 (#0)

" Smart guns are a bad idea. " Yes they are !

"Forcing people to buy smart guns is a really dumb idea. " Yes it is, and it is not going to happen. I will not buy one, and I do not know anyone that would. Would you? I didn't think so

We need to ban the idiots that come up with these goof ball ideas!

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-06-22   13:59:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Stoner (#2)

" Smart guns are a bad idea. " Yes they are !

I can see instances where they might be useful.

For instance, a cop or security guard (or a citizen) would worry less that an assailant might take his gun and then shoot him with it, as in the Zimmerman case against Traybon. If the handgun security was tight enough, it would give robbers less incentive to steal guns (which are a top target for burglaries at present).

So...not entirely useless.

We have a lot of new tech coming online. You might be able to build a basic interlock very small and lightweight with a palm print reader built-in so others couldn't shoot your gun.

I'm not saying we must have them or force people to get them. And this current law is just stupid. But they could be useful. And tech is moving very quickly these days.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-22   20:35:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: TooConservative (#3)

" I can see instances where they might be useful. "

Well, maybe. But I am very confident with mine, and I damn sure do not want some idiot bureaucrat causing me to have to spend a big sum of money for some theoretical gizmo. If they want it, let them spend THEIR money.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-06-22   21:43:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Stoner (#4)

I was only speaking to whether some gun users might benefit from or want personalized guns. And whether we might see such guns in the next decade or so. Just because the current "smart guns" are insanely expensive and unworkable doesn't mean that will always be the case.

You would have some parents that would want them so as to preclude the kiddies from shooting themselves or each other. Also, you wouldn't need trigger locks or gun safes or whatnot to secure the weapons if they were personalized.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-23   1:10:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: sneakypete (#1)

If they were seriously interested in passing legislation to reduce the murder rate,they could eliminate at least 80 percent of the murders nationwide by outlawing black males between the ages of 14 and 40.

Har!

rlk  posted on  2015-06-23   1:16:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: TooConservative (#3)

For instance, a cop or security guard (or a citizen) would worry less that an assailant might take his gun and then shoot him with it

In all honestly,that has never been a worry of mine.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   7:53:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Palmdale, also, sneakypete, GrandIsland (#7)

In all honestly,that has never been a worry of mine.

In the Zimmerman case, he said he pulled the gun and shot because he thought Traybon was going for his gun, intending to take it and shoot him with it.

In the Ferguson incident, the officer was initially struggling with Michael Brown for control of his own gun.

So, regardless of what you might worry about as a civvy, there may be reasons why other people might need or want a gun. And other reasons why PDs and others might want such a gun for their employees.

For instance, we have a lot of cop-shoots-some-schmo articles here. In how many of these was the risk of the perp grabbing the cop's gun a factor in their decision to shoot-before-the-assailant-grabs-your-gun? I'm not sure how we determine that but it has to play some role in a cop's decision making, especially if he is up against a physically capable assailant.

Even if "smart guns" were pricey, I think a lot of PDs might want this kind of gun for their officers. Because it only takes a fraction of a second and a little luck for a perp to make a play for a cop's gun.

Think about the case the Court just rejected on San Fran's requirement that handguns have to be kept in a lockbox or have a trigger lock when not in use. With smart guns, that case changes entirely because you're no longer pitting security against safety in gun possession.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-23   8:32:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: TooConservative, Stone (#8) (Edited)

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-23   8:43:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: TooConservative, Stone (#8)

I'd rather chance my gun being taken from me than trust a "smart gun". I just don't trust them to go BANG, every time I pull the trigger.

I'm with Stone, bad idea and a slippery slope.

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-23   8:43:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: GrandIsland (#10)

I'd rather chance my gun being taken from me than trust a "smart gun". I just don't trust them to go BANG, every time I pull the trigger.

I think there are PDs that would like the idea.

Of course, the technology would have to improve considerably and be pretty fool-proof.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-23   8:51:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: TooConservative (#11) (Edited)

I think there are PDs that would like the idea.

TC, there are many PD Adminstrations that would equip their officers with a rubberband over the thumb and index finger to eliminate liability and to satisfy the scared libtard sheep... doesn't mean it's a good idea.

A smart gun would have to work on some kind of electricity source or battery... one more thing to fail or be compromised by some sort of device that will be made by some criminal asshole type ... like an EMP to disable guns.

Bad bad bad idea. It comes from the liberal crowd who often think bad deeds can be legislated away.... or solved. None of that will EVER be true.

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-23   9:06:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: GrandIsland (#12)

A smart gun would have to work on some kind of electricity source or battery... one more thing to fail or be compromised by some sort of device that will be made by some criminal asshole type ... like an EMP to disable guns.

We'll see. Such guns are 5-10 years away.

The current crop of smart guns is a failure but they will eventually succeed. Only a matter of time.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-23   9:26:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: TooConservative (#8)

In how many of these was the risk of the perp grabbing the cop's gun a factor in their decision to shoot-before-the-assailant-grabs-your-gun?

Beats me,but I do know that unlike the typical citizen,cops also have tazers and pepper spray they can resort to instead of just shooting.

I personally think police administrators and city mayors would want smart guns to help them avoid law suits. I have no idea why anyone else would want them.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   9:38:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: TooConservative (#11)

I think there are PDs that would like the idea.

I think there are PD administrators and city fathers who would like the idea.

I'm not so sure rank and file cops would be all that crazy about it,though.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   9:39:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: TooConservative (#13)

My Glocks or my revolvers scattered around my house and in my armory, never fail me... and if well maintained, never will fail me.

I'll stick with my plastic striker fired weapons. They seem to be very effective on those diaper head wearing, urine colored, 3rd world shitbag Muslim's that have started shit on our soil. WE AIN'T FRANCE. lol

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-23   9:47:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: GrandIsland (#16)

Okay. I guess my efforts to sell you a smart gun will be in vain.

I'm not terribly invested in the idea. Even so, technology has changed the world a lot but done little for the fundamental designs of firearms. Something new will come along in the next decade, whether you want to own it or not. Ten years ago, we wouldn't have anticipated the recent rise of 3d printed guns and components but now we have them all over the place.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-23   10:01:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: sneakypete (#15)

I think there are PD administrators and city fathers who would like the idea.

I'm not so sure rank and file cops would be all that crazy about it,though.

I agree on both.

The PD leaders and city councils will recognize that fewer lawsuits will mean they have more money to put actual cops on the street.

I think the PDs will be the first to adopt. The prices will be high and the manufacturers will have to convince the public that the smart guns are reliable. Equipping PDs with them will settle a lot of misgivings.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-23   10:03:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: TooConservative (#18)

I think the PDs will be the first to adopt. The prices will be high and the manufacturers will have to convince the public that the smart guns are reliable. Equipping PDs with them will settle a lot of misgivings.

Just remember, many PD's don't have the budgets to issue individual car carrying shotguns and AR's to each officer. So many departments just assign two long guns to each patrol car and officers share the cars through different shifts... potentially causing a car carried gun to be patrolled with by every officer in the department. So, program them all to EVERY officer?

You won't see this bullshit in your lifetime.... and forcing this ideal on LE as a "good idea" is a pathway for cocksuckers like Andrew Cuomo to push it on the general public.

As always, be wary about what you wish for.

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-23   10:16:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: GrandIsland (#19)

forcing this ideal on LE as a "good idea" is a pathway for cocksuckers like Andrew Cuomo to push it on the general public.

Why do you think they are pushing it?

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   10:46:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: GrandIsland (#19)

So, program them all to EVERY officer?

I think you could.

You might use an encrypted Bluetooth on a very high-gigahertz frequency that can only travel a matter of inches. Have a wristband to enable the handgun when it is less than 6 inches from the owner's wrist.

Even that much would eliminate a lot of mischief and it would be pretty jam-proof.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-23   10:53:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: sneakypete (#20) (Edited)

Why do you think they are pushing it?

Well, I'm a little concerned that TC might think this is a good idea for LE... and what does the average American think about this abomination, if TC himself is intrigued?

My point was, all you people that are constitutional minded, but think this is a swell idea for cops because you have disdain towards LE... are slicing your own throats. If it's a poor idea for the public, it's a poor idea for LE

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-23   10:56:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: TooConservative (#21)

Well, another reason I'm retired and no longer responsible training my people, ordering the ammo and armoring the vehicles.

I'll stick with my trustworthy guns... and if anyone thinks they will force me to swap them out with a libtarded abortion... they'll get all my bullets first. (And I have enough supplies to send a shit ton down range).

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-23   11:03:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: TooConservative, is PALMDALE back? (#8)

To: Palmdale

??????

tpaine  posted on  2015-06-23   11:23:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: GrandIsland (#22)

My point was, all you people that are constitutional minded, but think this is a swell idea for cops because you have disdain towards LE.

*I* don't think it is a "swell idea" for anyone. It adds another level of complication to gun handling for people who aren't used to handling guns,and the end result is going to be more accidental shootings and more shootings of innocent crime victims who MAY have been able to defend themselves if their gun hadn't malfunctioned.

Remember "magazine safeties"? They are probably responsible for more accidental shootings than any other factor because people who have only handled guns with them think semi-autos are unloaded when you pull the magazine out,and these bozos WILL pull the trigger to "prove it's unloaded".

NOTHING beats proper training and handling the same firearm every day.

I have less than zero interest in your beloved Glocks because I grew up shooting the Browning systems with thumb safeties,and don't even have to think about taking a safety off. In fact,under stress I might not be able to get a shot off with a Glock because I would be too busy searching for the safety with my thumb to pull the trigger.

Yeah,I do sometimes carry a DAO handgun for self-defense,but if I have to go into a questionable area for some reason,one of my 1911A1's is going to be on my belt,and you do NOT want me shooting at you with one of my old friends.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

sneakypete  posted on  2015-06-23   11:58:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: TooConservative, GrandIsland (#21)

" You might use an encrypted Bluetooth on a very high-gigahertz frequency that can only travel a matter of inches. Have a wristband to enable the handgun when it is less than 6 inches from the owner's wrist.

Even that much would eliminate a lot of mischief and it would be pretty jam-proof. "

TC, your plan for a "smart gun" is a disaster waiting to happen. It violates the KISS principle.

I'll keep my "dumb guns", you can have the " smart guns "

Si vis pacem, para bellum

Stoner  posted on  2015-06-23   15:03:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Stoner, TooConservative (#26)

TC, your plan for a "smart gun" is a disaster waiting to happen. It violates the KISS principle.

I'll keep my "dumb guns", you can have the " smart guns "

^^^^^^^^ What he said ^^^^^^^^

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-23   15:11:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: GrandIsland, Stoner (#27)

Darn, my dastardly plan to disarm 'Murica is foiled again. Darn you, Dudley Dolittle!

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-23   18:36:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com