[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"The Uncomfortable Truth About Trans Violence and Political Radicalization"

"AOC’s Risible Performance"

"Why the Outrage Over the Cuts at the Washington Post Is So Annoying"

"New Poll Crushes Dem, Media Narrative: Americans Demand Mass Deportations, Back ICE Overwhelmingly"

"Democratic Overreach on Immigration Beckons"

How to negotiate to buy a car

Trump warns of a 'massive Armada' headed towards Iran

End Times Prophecy: Trump Says Board of Peace Will Override Every Government & Law – 10 Kings Rising

Maine's legendary 'Lobster Lady' dies after working until she was 103 and waking up at 3am every day

Hannity Says Immigration Raids at Home Depot Are Not ‘A Good Idea’

TREASON: Their PRIVATE CHAT just got LEAKED.

"Homan Plans to Defy Spanberger After ‘Bond Villain’ Blocks ICE Cooperation in VA: ‘Not Going to Stop’"

"DemocRATZ Radical Left-Wing Vision for Virginia"

"Tim Walz Wants the Worst"

Border Patrol Agents SMASH Window and Drag Man from Car in Minnesota Chaos

"Dear White Liberals: Blacks and Hispanics Want No Part of Your Anti-ICE Protests"

"The Silliest Venezuela Take You Will Read Today"

Michael Reagan, Son of Ronald Reagan, Dies at 80

Patel: "Minnesota Fraud Probes 'Buried' Under Biden"

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Fox News: Senator Ted Cruz Declares Himself A "Natural Born Citizen" And Eligible To Be President
Source: Birther Report
URL Source: http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/0 ... senator-ted-cruz-declares.html
Published: Mar 23, 2015
Author: Article II News
Post Date: 2015-06-18 10:49:44 by Hondo68
Keywords: None
Views: 15756
Comments: 34

Canadian-Born Senator Ted Cruz Declares Himself 

A "Natural Born Citizen" And Eligible To Be President


Senator Ted Cruz just told Fox News' Sean Hannity that he's a "natural born Citizen" and is eligible...

VIDEO HERE:
( Video via Fox News )

CDR Kerchner educates:

No matter what one thinks of his politics, Ted Cruz is NOT constitutionally eligible. And the two major political party lawyers Katyal and Clement can spin and put out disinformation to lend support to constitutionally ineligible people in both major parties, but they cannot change the original intent, meaning, and understanding of who is a "natural born Citizen" which comes from Natural Law and not man-made laws or acts of Congress. Both major political parties are out to dilute and abrogate the original intent, meaning, and understanding of the term “natural born Citizen” in Article II of our Constitution and why it was put there. Being simply ‘born a Citizen’ was proposed and not accepted. The founders and framers added the adjective “natural”. And that adjective comes from Natural Law. Adjectives mean something. Look up the meaning of the adjective "natural" when it comes to legal meaning in front of a noun.

See section 212 of this legal treatise on the Principles of Natural Law which was written in 1758 Vattel, the 1775 edition which was edited and published by Dumas and was much used by the founders and framers: http://lonang.com/library/reference/vattel-law-of-nations/vatt-119/

Read: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

and http://jimsjustsayin.blogspot.com/2015/03/ina-post-on-harvard-law-review-forum.html

and http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/03/a-response-to-neil-katyal-and-paul.html

CDR Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org 


FLASHBACK:





REALITY CHECK:




Poster Comment:

Natural Born Canadian. (2 images)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

#3. To: hondo68 (#0)

See section 212 of this legal treatise on the Principles of Natural Law which was written in 1758 Vattel, the 1775 edition

your quoting a text from 1775 ? How about the US code ?

Title 8 of the U.S. code, section 1401 (section g ) says he is natural born. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401

tomder55  posted on  2015-06-18   12:16:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: All, Redleghunter (#3) (Edited)

Title 8 of the U.S. code, section 1401 (section g ) says he is natural born. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401

ping

tomder55  posted on  2015-06-18   12:18:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: tomder55 (#4)

Thanks. Good reference. Here it is:

8 U.S. Code § 1401 - Nationals and citizens of United States at birth

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

(a)a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;

(b)a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;

(c)a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;

(d)a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;

(e)a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;

(f)a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;

(g)a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or

(B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and

(h)a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.

redleghunter  posted on  2015-06-18   14:07:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: redleghunter, tomder55, Gatlin (#10)

(g)a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or

Care must be taken to ensure the law cited was applicable at the date of birth. In 1970 the provision underlined cited "ten years, at least five" and was amended in 1986 to "five years, at least two."

In the case of Ted Cruz, this imprecision makes no difference as he still met the 1970 requirement and qualifies as a natural born citizen. The birth citizenship of John McCain is a fascinating conundrum.

Ted Cruz
b. December 22, 1970

= = = = =

http://law.justia.com/codes/us/2012/title-8/chapter-12/subchapter-iii/part-i/section-1401/

[excerpt]

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 1, §301, 66 Stat. 235; Pub. L. 89–770, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1322; Pub. L. 92–584, §§1, 3, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1289; Pub. L. 95–432, §§1, 3, Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1046; Pub. L. 99–653, §12, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3657; Pub. L. 103–416, title I, §101(a), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4306.)

Amendments

1994—Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 103–416 added subsec. (h).

1986—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 99–653 substituted “five years, at least two” for “ten years, at least five”.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-19   1:47:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: nolu chan, redleghunter, Gatlin (#20)

The birth citizenship of John McCain is a fascinating conundrum

The US Navy posted his father in the Panama Canal Zone;a sovereign U.S. territory at the time of McCain's birth. If John McCain was disqualified on a technicality like that ....

Now if we want to use original intent arguments then the 1st Congress made it clear . The 'Naturalization Act of 1790' (Sec3) states that if both parents are American ,anyone "born beyond the sea or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens" http://www.indiana.edu/~kdhist/H105-documents-web/week08/naturalization1790.html

I dislike this whole birther issue . I did not like it when the attacks were on the emperor and I certainly don't like them being used as cheap shots at Cruz ;and an American hero like John McCain (I don't care what people think about his politics ...he's earned the title 'American hero'. )Are we going to do the same Kabuki dance for Marco Rubio, Nikki Haley, and Bobby Jindal ?

tomder55  posted on  2015-06-19   12:55:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: tomder55 (#21)

I dislike this whole birther issue.

It's brain dead nonsense, but it helped get Obama elected - twice.

I thought it was going to die after the first inauguration.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-19   18:27:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 26.

        There are no replies to Comment # 26.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com