New World Order
See other New World Order Articles
Title: Pope Francis warns of destruction of Earth's ecosystem in leaked encyclical
Source:
The Guardian
URL Source: http://www.theguardian.com/world/20 ... on-ecosystem-leaked-encyclical
Published: Jun 16, 2015
Author: Stephanie Kirchgaessner & John Hooper
Post Date: 2015-06-16 14:37:17 by redleghunter
Ping List: *Religious History and Issues* Subscribe to *Religious History and Issues*
Keywords: None
Views: 35283
Comments: 136
Pope Francis will this week call for changes in lifestyles and energy consumption to avert the “unprecedented destruction of the ecosystem” before the end of this century, according to a leaked draft of a papal encyclical. In a document released by an Italian magazine on Monday, the pontiff will warn that failure to act would have “grave consequences for all of us”. Francis also called for a new global political authority tasked with “tackling … the reduction of pollution and the development of poor countries and regions”. His appeal echoed that of his predecessor, pope Benedict XVI, who in a 2009 encyclical proposed a kind of super-UN to deal with the world’s economic problems and injustices. According to the lengthy draft, which was obtained and published by L’Espresso magazine, the Argentinean pope will align himself with the environmental movement and its objectives. While accepting that there may be some natural causes of global warming, the pope will also state that climate change is mostly a man-made problem. Poster Comment: NWO Pope....
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-42) not displayed.
.
.
.
#43. To: CZ82, SOSO (#7)
You're welcome, sir. We've had this discussion before (especially about the judges) but don't remember if it was here or LP, SOSO must have missed it. I believe you're right about having discussed this subject matter. Perhaps SOSO wasn't privy to the discussion.
This is, however, a convenient way to poll-test how far the pope can go in his craven pursuit of mass media approval. "SOME" libs at the Vatican?? The entire palace including it miles of underground dungeons are crawling with liberal subversives. I'm not of the opinion that this Pope is being baited or cornered into contradictory positions, although I can see how his cadre of demonic manipulators are trying to portray the constant stream of "mis-statements" or "misunderstandings" as THE case. This Pope is FULLY on board OPERATION: SUBVERSION. I do concur -- not unlike 0blabla and *his* handlers -- that the Vatican's handlers are shoving the social activism/chaos envelope as far as possible to provide a gauge and degree of push-back (or lack thereof.) No one is "mad as hell and NOT gonna take it anymore." YET. Even as this Pope and 0blabla have long jumped the shark of credibility. In this age of media worship and instant "Thumbs-Up" -- from the Pope to the President...from one world "leader" to another -- there seems to be a craven demand for personal attention, power, and approval. And damn principle and virtue.
Were it that this Pope were merely "lousy." He's more "anti-Christ" than lousy. And yes, I am serious. (Has it ever been fully explained yet why THIS Pontiff suddenly replaced the former before his demise? OR are we all supposed to ignore *that* elephant in the room?)
HEH!
Go over to FR sometime and see what Catholics think of their own Pope. You know the Pope they are supposed to be obeying:) Truly my soul waiteth upon God: from him cometh my salvation. He only is my rock and my salvation; he is my defence; I shall not be greatly moved. (Psalm 62:1-2)
Come on, Hondo. Comparing McStain to Cruz is insane.
ARE they...ticked off?? REALLY??
Gotcha, Hondo. Lol
You don't get to be Pope, without being a REAL Catholic. OK? Well, in both cases you have a hijacking of the original item. The GOP is jacked. The Vatican hijacked Christ's Gospel AND good name ("Vicar of Christ"?? I don't think so. Never was.)
+1 Yup. This crusade of this Pope (and political hand-off from AlGore) is stranger than fiction.
OMG they only got the names and the flood right in that movie! Everything else was made up out of thin air! What a waste of resources that went into that movie! Clever observations :-) The pope should have been upset about the movie not "God's" global weather change! Proving that when you're an anti-Christ masquerading as "Pope," the fidelity of Scripture doesn't even register.
Unlike JP I who died within 30 days or so of his office, Benedict did not get the poison tea. I think the movie godfather III tried to link all the Vatican bankster stuff and the death of JP I. Or as in the movie we have this: Maybe Benedict knew the deal on that and avoided his evening tea and just stepped down. I could not find a good youtube link for the part of gF III where the Pope dies 'in his sleep.' Truly my soul waiteth upon God: from him cometh my salvation. He only is my rock and my salvation; he is my defence; I shall not be greatly moved. (Psalm 62:1-2)
Have you a source for your In-Name-Only stats? Listen -- ALL that matters is ALL that affect us is RIGHT NOW. As well as the decisions made by SCOTUS and this corrupt globalist-hijacked gubmint since 1965. NO real Christian has been part of those decisions to destroy this republic and run God out of Dodge. Can you tell me how in the world a nation whose majority identify as "Protestant" have ZERO Protestants out of NINE on SCOTUS?? Right -- SCOTUS is NOT an elected body but the only one of three bodies of government that aren't, but raqther assigned by the behind-the-scene POWER BROKERS and Puppetmeisters. About 92% of COngress is Christian. Catholics represent about 30% of the U.S. population, Pressies about 60%. Both Pressies and Catholics are slightly over represented in Congress vis-vis their respective makeup of the U.S. population. The only truly over represented religous group in Congress are Jews, with only about 2% of the U.S. population over 7% of Congress is Jewish. You know who's actually "over-represented"?? Socialists; "Catholics-IN-Name-Only"; Pro-Abortionists; Secular Humanist elites; Lesbo & Sodomites; Atheists; New Age freaks; and those who hate the USA and God.
Have you a source for your In-Name-Only stats? ping #29 потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
So...Pope Benny was made "an offer" he couldn't refuse. No cup of tea; No magic bullet aimed at the Pope-Mobile from a grassy knoll. Funny -- I never knew the position as "Vicar of Christ" was so closely related to the role of "Godfather" or JFK.
Scrolling in sequence...thanks.
Agree. There is NO way (even IF there are stats that support that "92%" number.) Actions speak louder than words.
I have no reasonable explanation for that other than perhaps by chance. "Right -- SCOTUS is NOT an elected body but the only one of three bodies of government that aren't, but raqther assigned by the behind-the-scene POWER BROKERS and Puppetmeisters." Are you saying that the U.S. is controlled by a cabal of Catholics and Jews? потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
Frankly it's the same strategy used over at DU and other leftist sites. Just saying... Ditto. On every observation you've made. I don't see Hondo launching any vigorous offensive against the Left. OR 0blabla. Instead he saves his salvos for Cruz. (Chyeah -- THAT'll save the Republic.)
Thank you, God. потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
I also agree with this assessment... It's 100% spot on. Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy
Come on, SOSO -- "chance"?? Coincidence?? NO such thing exists at that level of influence and power. Are you saying that the U.S. is controlled by a cabal of Catholics and Jews? Yes, ostensibly -- although, these ghouls are "Catholic and Jews" IN NAME ONLY; The reality: They are Secular Humanists wearing masks. Moreover, these political allies (who join Atheists, New Agers, and Greens) have been allies of convenience with a shared agenda. Their goal (since post WWII) has ALWAYS been to remove fundamental Christianity (disciples of Sola Scriptura) and its tenets from positions of power in order to usher in their globalist One World Gvt.
Let me clarify; "There is NO way (even IF there are stats that support that "92%" number ARE "CHRISTIAN.") Now MY definition of "Christian" is probably NOT going to coincide with yours, SOSO.
Bible revisionism. And yet how many naive and well-intended fall for it? This stuff isn't Cecil B. DeMille; It's fouled contrived garbage belched out of the perverted boweled of militant homosexual, atheist Hollywood. Yes indeed the Pope should know man did not create this world. We are subject to the laws established by our Creator. To think we have 'climate change' all figured out with about 100 years of data is insane. Amen! THIS Pope is as much an authority on science -- as well as the word of God -- as 0blabla is an authority on the Constitution. Coincidence?? The day BOTH these frauds are dismissed is a blessed day.
Be mindful of THIS disclaimer noted by the polling company and "religion" statistics: So in other words, politicians most likely lie about their "religious affiliation " and pencil in "Christian" when they are NOT. No big surprise there.
No they don't. So are they lying to themselves? Their constituents? God? Or...ALL of us??
No, SC Justices are appointed by PRESIDENTS and their respective cabals and staffs based on nothing BUT shameless potential corruptible principles. Congress is then bribed, coerced, or otherwise shamed into approving said appointments. You're welcome.
Amen. On the position of abortion, its support provides a telling litmus test of "Christian/NON-Christian."
"Mainstream" Christianity is a compromised river of polluted Christianity diverted to Hell. Christian traditionalism is all but dead save in small enclaves. Agree.
I'm pretty sure we had the discussion before the 2014 elections so I know the numbers have changed somewhat, just not sure by how many. Just because someone claims to be Catholic, Baptist etc, etc, doesn't mean they actually are, most of them probably pick/say what they think their constituency will vote for. I remember that when you enlisted in the military and they asked you what religion you were and you didn't know or didn't care to share, you automatically became a PROTESTANT and that is what went on your Dog Tags!!! So I guess my question is would a truly religious person do the things our politicians do with legislation that only benefit themselves and their ambition for power??? (They're knowingly screwing their constituency/fellow man all so they can feel good about themselves). I was under the impression that the word of God meant you are supposed to act in a way that benefits everyone?? If this isn't true then there are a lot of people ignoring their faith by voting for these jokers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! “Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”
Bruce Jenner "identifies" as a "woman"; There's white NAACP leader who now "identifies" as "black." Suddenly down is up and wrong is right? Congress (as a group) is demonstratively un-"Christian." You unilateally changed the discussion by introducing yor biases and beliefs. "Biases and beliefs" based upon scriptural truths are what traditionally have guided us to discerned right from wrong in THIS country. Am I wrong? Now that the truth is blurred by personal "identification," and truth as well as "right and wrong" is now relative. No wonder this nation swirls us down the john like yesterday's morning deuce.
Just because someone claims to be Catholic, Baptist etc, etc, doesn't mean they actually are, most of them probably pick/say what they think their constituency will vote for. Yup, I think you're right on the content of that discussion. On the subject of "religious affiliation," it means NOTHING these days. Any "Christians" who voted for 0blabla, Klinton, or Pelosi are only kidding/lying to themselves. I remember that when you enlisted in the military and they asked you what religion you were and you didn't know or didn't care to share, you automatically became a PROTESTANT and that is what went on your Dog Tags!!! Hmmm....You've seen those crosses at the cemetery at Normandy? Naturally, you think, "Wow -- sooo many Christians!" Well...God only knows. I guess my question is would a truly religious person do the things our politicians do with legislation that only benefit themselves and their ambition for power??? Great, simple question and litmus test for integrity. Answer: NO. (They're knowingly screwing their constituency/fellow man all so they can feel good about themselves). I was under the impression that the word of God meant you are supposed to act in a way that benefits everyone?? Yep. demonstrate a "love of fellow man." NOT betrayal. But again -- since these days people shamelessly redefine reality, "good" can be redefined." This as they who lord over us sell us out in broad daylight. Arrogantly. Spitefully. WITH malice and dishonorably. (Now whether by 11:59 they've repented, again, God only knows.)
Like Obama, they're both foreign born and ineligible to be president of the US. At least McCain had two US citizen parents, whereas Rafael only had an American mother. Raffie Sr. didn't bother to become a US citizen until around 2005. He was in no hurry to renounce his allegiance to Fidel and the Communist party. Teddy Cruz is doubly ineligible like Obama, foreign parent and foreign born. Don't worry the Democrats don't give a damn about the Constitution either, so that old thing won't stop anyone from becoming president of this NWO banana republic. According to Hondopey, not the constitution. A Servicemember who is stationed overseas and has a kid. That kid isn't eligible to be President. But a wetback who comes here and squats a kid out. That kid is eligible in your twisted mind. According to the constitution. McCain is certainly eligible. His parents were both Americans you moron.
McCain's birth certificate says "Panama" because he was born there. Duhh! George Romney's BC says "Mexico" because he was born there, of two US citizen parents. Even the GOP wouldn't let him run for president in '68, Nixon won instead. Yawn. Hillary loves you.
I notice this as top item on Drudge now, suggesting a daft old commie pope in craven pursuit of the world's approval but with the wool getting pulled over his eyes by liberal cardinals at the Vatican.
Liberator asked a good question... why was the other Pope replaced while he's still alive? Something fishy, for sure.
That may have just been a convenient excuse. Remember,Romney is the guy that bankrupted American Motors. Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
He claimed failing health and feeling unable to lead the church. It does happen, has happened many times in history. You notice he's not very visible these days outside a rare sighting at a mass. My guess is that he got an Alzheimers diagnoses and stepped down.
"Suddenly down is up and wrong is right?" {as a result of biases and beliefs} Are you wrong? To which of your statements are you referring? потому что Бог хочет это тот путь
Comments (84 - 136) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#44. To: TooConservative, redleghunter (#8)
I've seen some reports that some libs at the Vatican released a few select quotes from a very preliminary draft of the encylical and they are daring the pope to contradict it much in the final document.
#45. To: TooConservative, redleghunter (#8)
A truly lousy pope, all around.
#46. To: redleghunter (#9)
LOL, those are mighty big mercury laden bulbs:)
#47. To: Liberator, TooConservative (#44)
No one is "mad as hell and NOT gonna take it anymore." YET.
#48. To: hondo68 (#10)
Now we know, the Pope is a Republican at heart. If Panamanian McCain can run for US president, why not the Argentine pontiff and the Canadian Cruz?
#49. To: redleghunter (#47)
#50. To: redleghunter, hondo68 (#11)
McCain is a Republican? Didn't notice that.
#51. To: hondo68, redleghunter (#12)
You don't get to be the GOP presidential candidate, without being a REAL Republican.
#52. To: tomder55 (#18)
Pope Goracle I
#53. To: Justified (#21)
Now we know who wrote the scripted for the movie "NOAH"!
#54. To: Liberator, TooConservative (#45)
Has it ever been fully explained yet why THIS Pontiff suddenly replaced the former before his demise?
#55. To: SOSO (#22)
(Edited)
Almost 60% of Congress is Protestant. There has only been one Catholic POTUS. You are correct about SCOTUS, it has six Catholics and three Jews. But SCOTUS is not an elected body, at least not directly so.
#56. To: Liberator (#55)
Almost 60% of Congress is Protestant. There has only been one Catholic POTUS. You are correct about SCOTUS, it has six Catholics and three Jews. But SCOTUS is not an elected body, at least not directly so.
#57. To: redleghunter (#54)
Unlike JP I who died within 30 days or so of his office, Benedict did not get the poison tea. I think the movie godfather III tried to link all the Vatican bankster stuff and the death of JP I.
#58. To: SOSO (#56)
#59. To: A K A Stone, SOSO (#23)
Not even close my friend.
#60. To: Liberator (#55)
Can you tell me how in the world a nation whose majority identify as "Protestant" have ZERO Protestants out of NINE on SCOTUS??
#61. To: redleghunter, hondo68 (#24)
Sometimes I do disagree with your statements. You spend 95% of your posts telling us that all the GOP candidates are bunk; 4% of the time telling us the GOP is just like the Dims; and about a mere 1% of the time mentioning Obolo and the Clintoons and the other overt Marxists.
#62. To: Liberator, A K A Stone (#59)
There is NO way (even IF there are stats that support that "92%" number.)
#63. To: redleghunter, hondo68, liberator (#24)
I do disagree with your statements. You spend 95% of your posts telling us that all the GOP candidates are bunk; 4% of the time telling us the GOP is just like the Dims; and about a mere 1% of the time mentioning Obolo and the Clintoons and the other overt Marxists.
#64. To: SOSO, redleghunter, A K A Stone, CZ82, Stoner, Bob Celeste (#60)
I have no reasonable explanation for that other than perhaps by chance.
#65. To: SOSO, A K A Stone (#62)
#66. To: redleghunter, Justified, tomder55 (#25)
Did not waste my money on that movie. Another Hollyweird hack job.
#67. To: SOSO, A K A Stone (#29)
Although identifying as religiously unaffiliated does not necessarily mean one is atheist, politicians may be wary about such an association. About half of Americans (53%) say they would be less likely to support an atheist for president.
#68. To: redleghunter, SOSO, A K A Stone (#30)
They sure don't legislate according to their Christian ideals/worldview.
#69. To: SOSO, CZ82 (#31)
(Edited)
As I stated, the justices of the Supreme Court are not elected but appointed by elected representatives of We The People (POTUS propose, Congress disposes).
#70. To: A K A Stone, SOSO, redleghunter (#32)
Every democrat that is in favor of abortion is not a christian.
#71. To: SOSO, redleghunter (#33)
You fail to realize that "THEY" are what pass for mainstream Christians these days and have a different view of the tenets of Christianity than you or I. I include the Pope in the current mainstream category.
#72. To: Liberator, SOSO, redleghunter (#43)
#73. To: SOSO, A K A Stone (#36)
The fact is that over 90% of Congress identify themself as Christian.
#74. To: CZ82 (#72)
I'm pretty sure we had the discussion before the 2014 elections so I know the numbers have changed somewhat, just not sure by how many.
#75. To: Liberator, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#48)
Comparing McStain to Cruz is insane.
The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#76. To: hondo68 (#75)
Like Obama, they're both foreign born and ineligible to be president of the US.
#77. To: A K A Stone, what a maroon (#76)
(Edited)
you moron
The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#78. To: hondo68 (#77)
#79. To: Liberator, hondo68, redleghunter, A K A Stone (#74)
CONFIDENCE IN RELIGION HITS NEW LOW 
#80. To: TooConservative, Liberator (#79)
The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#81. To: hondo68 (#77)
George Romney's BC says "Mexico" because he was born there, of two US citizen parents. Even the GOP wouldn't let him run for president in '68, Nixon won instead.
#82. To: hondo68, Liberator (#80)
Liberator asked a good question... why was the other Pope replaced while he's still alive? Something fishy, for sure.
#83. To: Liberator, A K A Stone (#73)
"Biases and beliefs" based upon scriptural truths are what traditionally have guided us to discerned right from wrong in THIS country. Am I wrong?
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]