United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Army Refuses To Deny 'House-To-House Gun Confiscation' Part Of Raider Focus Military Training Operation
Source:
All News Pipeline
URL Source: http://allnewspipeline.com/Army_Refuses_To_Deny_Gun_Confiscation.php
Published: Jun 12, 2015
Author: Susan Duclos
Post Date: 2015-06-14 12:19:27 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 3367
Comments: 25
In 2012 a U.S. Army Military Police training manual covering “Civil Disturbance Operations” detailed using military assets domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and possibly kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest. “The manual also describes how prisoners will be processed through temporary internment camps under the guidance of U.S. Army FM 3-19.40 Internment/Resettlement Operations, which as we reported earlier this year, outlines how internees would be ‘re-educated’ into developing an ‘appreciation of U.S. policies’ while detained in prison camps inside the United States,” Paul Joseph Watson wrote on July 6, 2012. 
By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine
Aaron Wilson PhD had the opportunity to send some questions over to Fort Carson Public Affairs Chief of Media Relations, Dani Carson, in relation to the Raider Focus training exercises this summer at the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site, which is a non-contiguous part of Fort Carson, Colorado where the 4th Infantry Division among other units are based.
While the entire question and answer article can be found here, we would like to highlight the most concerning question and answer of the interview.
Question #4: Will there be house to house gun confiscation type training?
Answer: We do not discuss specific types of training however, the 4th Infantry Division and Fort Carson stand ready to deploy mission-trained Soldiers and units whenever and wherever the Army calls us to action.
The refusal to state outright that the U.S. Army will not be training to go door-to-door to confiscate guns should chill every American to the bone, especially after we have heard warnings for years that gun confiscation was the ultimate goal..... disarm Americans before the endgame plans of locking down the nation martial law.
In October 2013 InfoWars published a leaked video of a concerned member of the U.S. Army military police in Arizona who started recording a briefing after being told they would be under the control of FEMA and InfoWars wrote at the time, "you can clearly hear the commander discuss the suspension of the Constitution for martial law and gun confiscations in America."
(Article continued after the video)
More from an August 2014 article shows that these plans, this agenda, has been in the works for quite some time:
Perhaps after seeing the prior warnings, the briefing, the systematic preparations that have been happening for years, those waving away concerns over the scheduled Jade Helm 15, Raider Focus, and other military operations, as well as the massive military movements being documented around the country and other "highly suspicious" activities being photographed and videotaped, should better understand why people are very disturbed over these unprecedented exercises happening on U.S. soil, listing gun friendly states with a large amount of gun owners, as "hostile."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
#6. To: Deckard (#0)
Don't get your panties all in a wad. All armies train to disarm citizens in occupied countries. And house raids and disarming those in the house are SOP on todays deployments. They can't do this in the US because the BoR denies them the authority.
The report that Bush "screamed" those words at Republican congressional leaders in November 2005 is unsubstantiated, to put it charitably. We judge that the odds that the report is accurate hover near zero. It comes from Capitol Hill Blue, a Web site that has a history of relying on phony sources, retracting stories and apologizing to its readers. Update, Feb. 21, 2011: The author of the Capitol Hill Blue story has now withdrawn it. Doug Thompson messaged us to say: www.factcheck.org/2007/12...ion-a-goddamned-piece-of- paper/ Doug Thompson: This is to let you know that the piece on Bush and the Constitution has been changed and reads: "This article was based on sources that we thought, at the time, were reliable. We have since discovered reasons to doubt their veracity. For that reason, this article has been removed from our database." I no longer stand behind that article or its conclusions and have said so in answers to several recent queries. In addition, I have asked that it be removed from a documentary film.
#10. To: Moderator X (#8)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#7. To: sneakypete (#6)
#8. To: buckeroo (#7)
Replies to Comment # 8.
#12. To: Moderator X (#8)
End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]