[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse" "Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD" "Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy" Woodworking and Construction Hacks "CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination" "NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law" "Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing" Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn. After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending. Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar” "Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny" "Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is" Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner. Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally "It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive' (Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl "Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race" He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom! "Kamala’s Inane Talking Points" "The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics" Easy Drywall Patch Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind" Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’ Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer? hurricanes and heat waves are Worse 'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA. Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence. Status: Not Logged In; Sign In United States News See other United States News Articles Title: Good citizen invites police into his home to help them, they shoot his dog four times Source: Signs of The Times URL Source: http://www.sott.net/article/297715- ... -they-shoot-his-dog-four-times Published: Jun 13, 2015 Author: Jean Strong Post Date: 2015-06-13 18:11:15 by Deckard Keywords: None Views: 7711 Comments: 49 © KWES NewsWest 9      Yet another family pet has been ruthlessly brutalized by the cops. In Odessa, Texas, U.S. Marshals shot Spot, a 15 year old dog, multiple times while attempting to serve an arrest warrant. CBS 7 News says that the cops were swarming a neighborhood looking for Austin Dawson, who had "violated his parole." Homeowner Anthony McDowell allowed police to search his property. "I said you can come in the house and look. I'm giving you permission", said McDowell. The cops were warned that there was a dog in the back yard. Despite the warning, they shot Spot multiple times, claiming that he "came towards them in an aggressive manner." Spot is fighting for his life at a vet clinic in Odessa. Although the vet believes he will survive, he will never walk again. "That's the reason he said hey he ain't here, why didn't we just leave? But he made it his business to let us know that he's serious come back here and kill our dog. He put two slugs into my dog for no apparent reason and we asked him why and he couldn't give us no justification. He didn't run charging barking or nothing. My dog was scared of the police officers," said a distraught McDowell. This man tried to be a good citizen. He gave the cops permission to search his place and they rewarded his honesty and cooperation by tearing his house apart and trying to kill his dog. They knew there was a dog present, there was absolutely no excuse for such an action. The homeowner was present; all they had to do was have him secure the dog. As usual, the lame old "I felt threatened" excuse was trotted out. It appears that by simply existing, dogs threaten law enforcement. It is baffling why heavily armed and armored "brave" men are so incredibly terrified of dogs. It is horrifying that so many cold-blooded killers are given guns and badges and allowed to slaughter dogs with impunity. It is obvious that these cops kill because they like to kill. It is crystal clear that they have declared war on us and our dogs. Nothing has stopped them; they have no regard for life in any form. We are under siege by an enemy we are not allowed to repel. This is America, people, how long are we going to allow this to continue? Watch the video. Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread   Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 46. #1. To: Deckard (#0) A 15yo pitbull. Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-13   18:40:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #20. To: TooConservative (#1) I got a neighbor who lets her dogs bark in her fenced backyard, its very annoying, and rude. TrappedInMd  posted on  2015-06-13   23:49:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #22. To: TrappedInMd, Deckard, nolu chan (#20) (Edited) The owner apparently didn't realize the number of rights he surrendered by allowing a voluntary search. The police can intrude, snoop, collect evidence, and shoot a dog or cat. The homeowner will have no recourse because he invited them onto the premises. Whatever happened to "You can't search my property without a search warrant"? You'd think that a black man would know better than to consent to a police search. Apparently not. If the police have any reasonable cause to search your house, they can go to a judge for a warrant. The reason they asked for a voluntary search is that their desire to search this guy's house was inherently unreasonable. Now his 15yo dog is shot up and he's got a big vet bill to pay. Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-14   0:35:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #27. To: TooConservative, Deckard, nolu chan (#22) The owner apparently didn't realize the number of rights he surrendered by allowing a voluntary search. The police can intrude, snoop, collect evidence, and shoot a dog or cat. The homeowner will have no recourse because he invited them onto the premises. Whatever happened to "You can't search my property without a search warrant"? They can search without one but they cant use what they find as evidence against you. I agree with your premise though, its illegal for us to lie to a police officer in an investigation, yet its perfectly legal for them to lie to us to get a confession or agree to a plea. Personally police have ALWAYS been polite and professional to me here, but if anything they say or ask indicates you are a possible suspect, tell them you want to wait to consult a lawyer, TrappedInMd  posted on  2015-06-14   1:36:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #29. To: TrappedInMd (#27) They can search without one but they cant use what they find as evidence against you. They can't search without permission or a warrant. That's the only reason they asked this guy's permission to begin with. I agree with your premise though, its illegal for us to lie to a police officer in an investigation, yet its perfectly legal for them to lie to us to get a confession or agree to a plea. AFAIK, it is legal to lie to local cops in every jurisdiction in the country. And it is legal for cops to lie to you. It is, however, illegal to lie to FBI and federal authorities. Notice that Dennis Hastert is now being prosecuted for lying to FBI even though he committed no crimes while paying off his blackmailer. Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-14   2:03:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #33. To: TooConservative, GrandIsland (#29) (Edited) AFAIK, it is legal to lie to local cops in every jurisdiction in the country. Interesting. I thought that making false statements to police officers is a crime in and of itself in many jurisdictions and filing a false police report can lead to multiple criminal consequences. I believed the charge "false report to a peace officer" is one of the few types of speech that is not constitutionally protected. Lying to a law enforcement officer can result in a criminal conviction, depending on where you live and the extent of the deception….the criminal charge of filing a false police report can either be a misdemeanor or a felony. OTOH: Police officers allowed to lie to you. They can lie to you when they are questioning you. GrandIsland? Gatlin  posted on  2015-06-14   7:21:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #37. To: Gatlin (#33) To: TooConservative, GrandIsland AFAIK, it is legal to lie to local cops in every jurisdiction in the country. Interesting. I thought that making false statements to police officers is a crime in and of itself in many jurisdictions and filing a false police report can lead to multiple criminal consequences. I believed the charge "false report to a peace officer" is one of the few types of speech that is not constitutionally protected. Lying to a law enforcement officer can result in a criminal conviction, depending on where you live and the extent of the deception….the criminal charge of filing a false police report can either be a misdemeanor or a felony. OTOH: Police officers allowed to lie to you. They can lie to you when they are questioning you. GrandIsland? I can speak for NYS. I'll give you the short answer. Verbally lying to the police is just as legal as not speaking to them at all. It's your right. Verbally lying on a police report or statement YOU SIGN is a misdemeanor. Police lying, in the course of an investigation, for the purpose of solving a crime, is called deception and IS ALLOWED. Cops are allowed to lie, verbally, just like civilians are. Now, depending on how great the deception is could lead to a judge throwing out any evidence that the deception caused to be discovered. As far as the Feds, I'm not sure about them. They are the most official fuckers they know... so there probably is a federal law that makes verbally lying to an agent illegal. GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-14   8:34:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #44. To: GrandIsland, Gatlin, TooConservative (#37) As far as the Feds, I'm not sure about them. They are the most official fuckers they know... so there probably is a federal law that makes verbally lying to an agent illegal. Federally, making an oral lie to the FBI can get you time in the slammer. Martha Stewart was not sent away for the underlying crime they were investigating but for making false statements in interviews. http://coveringbusiness.com/2012/05/15/what-martha-stewart-did- wrong/ For the SEC to build an insider trading case against Stewart, it also would have to show that her transaction violated some duty to refrain from trading on the information in question. Stewart did not have such a duty herself. She wasn’t on the Imclone board of directors and had no official ties to other insiders like Waksal. She had merely traded on a tip. However, she knew Bacanovic had breached his duty as a broker when he told her about Waksal’s trades. The nuances in Stewart’s case ultimately drove the government to back down from charging her with insider trading. Instead, it focused its case on the lies she told to cover the trade. When questioned by the SEC and the FBI in the months following her trade, Stewart said she had no knowledge of Waksal’s trade and that she had sold on a standing agreement with her broker to sell if shares traded below $60. Bacanovic corroborated the story, but his assistant Faneuil eventually came forward and revealed the truth, furthering the case against Stewart. Later, Stewart’s own assistant, Annie Armstrong, testified that Stewart had tried to change a record of Bacanovic’s phone message to her about ImClone. To the jury in Stewart’s trial, it seemed clear she had lied. “This is a woman who pays attention to details… I mean that’s her life, to pay attention to a lot of details. And she knew what was going on with her portfolio,” jury member Rosemary McMahon said in an interview with “Dateline” in 2004. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001 18 U.S. Code § 1001 - Statements or entries generally (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully— (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years. (b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding. (c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to— (1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or (2) any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate. nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-15   19:24:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #46. To: nolu chan, A K A Stone (#44) I think you enjoy presenting researched data and that is why you do it. I should have said this long before, but it is not too late for me to tell you now. I deeply appreciate reading and learning from your posts and I would like to say thank you for your excellent work....THANK YOU. Gatlin  posted on  2015-06-15   19:45:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   Replies to Comment # 46. #47. To: Gatlin (#46) I deeply appreciate reading and learning from your posts and I would like to say thank you for your excellent work....THANK YOU. You're welcome. Sometimes it is just old research that is dug back up again. I do enjoy researching stuff I'm curious about. Much of it is just for myself and does not get posted. nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-15 20:07:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   End Trace Mode for Comment # 46. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]  Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com