[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

Rare Van Halen Leicestershire, Donnington Park August 18, 1984 Valerie Bertinelli Cameo

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: McKinney chief: Eric Casebolt was 'out of control'
Source: WFAA
URL Source: http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/loca ... signs-from-the-force/28760035/
Published: Jun 9, 2015
Author: Rebecca Lopez
Post Date: 2015-06-09 19:15:24 by nolu chan
Keywords: None
Views: 18159
Comments: 89

McKinney chief: Eric Casebolt was 'out of control'

Rebecca Lopez
WFAA
5:50 p.m. CDT June 9, 2015

McKINNEY — The McKinney police officer whose actions at a pool party disturbance last Friday went viral in a YouTube video resigned from the force on Tuesday.

"The actions of Eric Casebolt are indefensible," police Chief Greg Conley told reporters at a news conference late Tuesday afternoon, saying the officer was "out of control during the incident."

"I had 12 officers on the scene, and 11 of them performed according to their training," Conley added.

Casebolt's resignation was confirmed about one hour earlier by attorney Jane Bishkin, who told WFAA that the decision was made after a meeting with the department's internal affairs unit to review possible charges her client could face.

Casebolt, a 10-year veteran of the McKinney Police Department, was placed on administrative leave Sunday after a 7-minute video of the incident at a Craig Ranch community pool gained traction on the Internet. That clip has now been viewed almost 9.5 million times.

The footage shows Cpl. Casebolt, who is white, aggressively responding to the disturbance call, using profane language with black teenagers, unholstering his service weapon and pointing it toward the unarmed teens, and restraining a 15-year-old girl in a swimsuit by forcing her to the ground and placing his knee on her back.

Casebolt has not made any public statements since Friday's incident. His lawyer said he has been in hiding with his wife and family at an undisclosed location after they allegedly received death threats.

Chief Conley said he was encouraged by community support in the wake of what happened.

"McKinney is a wonderful city," he said. "It is a great place in which to live, work and visit. We are committed to keeping it that way."

Casebolt's attorney said she would have more to say about why her client resigned at a news conference on Wednesday afternoon.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-16) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#17. To: misterwhite, GrandIsland (#14)

The 7-minute video gives a pretty complete picture.

You don't see every bit of his interaction with this girl or with the crowd. He was kinda running all over. Like he thought he could corral the whole mob of kids by himself which seems in retrospect kind of a dubious proposition. I think many cops would say he should have waited for some backup before trying to do so much. Still, it raises questions. Maybe a single cop is expected to control a small group like up to five trespassers or people disturbing the peace but who are not armed. At what point is a cop expected to wait for backup to enforce the peace on an unruly group? 5? 15? 25? 50? 200? 1,000?

Perhaps we'll find out whether this PD has clear crowd control guidelines to govern police in these situations. Certainly, the chief threw this guy under the bus with his statement that 12 officers were dispatched and 11 followed the PD policy governing a disturbance like this.

The chief threw the cop under the bus, saying he overreacted. There was some implication here that the now-resigned cop had also received the training (or been responsible to read the PD policy) and that he didn't follow it and the other 11 cops did.

I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for any reporters to directly ask the chief of police exactly what the policy for crowd control is, whether all his officers (including the resigned cop) had received it, whether there was a written PD policy to govern cops on the street in these situations. The media is awfully indifferent to any actual reporting on facts these days.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-10   13:17:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: misterwhite (#16)

It was advertised as a cookout with a DJ (who never showed).

The DJ did show and played loud music from nearby the poolhouse fenced area. Apparently, there were some complaints and the irritation to residents toward this party probably played a part in events.

Supposedly, it was the DJ who tweeted out "pool party". I don't recall seeing any mention of that on the young woman's ads promoting this party.

Also, the party was originally organized to sell tickets for $5-$8 in advance for another party the 20yo woman was planning to throw soon. But there were reports of people showing up for this promotional party and being asked to pay $15 to attend this party.

Again, the lazy libmedia never bothers to ask questions or establish the facts.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-10   13:21:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: TooConservative (#15)

"So far, it seems most of these kids were from the subdivision or nearby."

I think I read 70 teens. I don't know how many were non-residents. But I did read that they were "dropped off by the carload".

"It was a stupid thing for that woman to say. She should have challenged whether they were one of two allowed guests of a resident who had paid the $15 pool privilege fee."

Yes, it would be a mistake to assume the person wasn't a guest. I'm thinking, however, that she confirmed the person's status before letting loose.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-10   13:24:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: TooConservative, misterwhite, GrandIsland (#11)

It does seem poor judgment overall to cuff the only girl he was detaining but we don't see video of all that happened.

I did a complete time line analysis on the video in one post where I showed that the bikini girl ran towards the "melee" at the beginning of the 7-minute video. And then….judging from her posture and facial expressions, she appeared to be yelling at the cop a couple of times.

Later on, she was moving away from the cop and action center….she was moving towards the right side of the picture while he went left for more crowd control. She definitely stopped and "apparently" yelled something back as him. he leaves the scene he is working to the left and heads towards her slowly and then picks up his pace.

He apparently grabs her arm off screen and then is seen entering the picture with her. She later said something like: "He must have thought I was being disrespectful." That’s bullshit….she KNEW what she was doing, and saying was disrespectful.

On The Five (Fox News)….there was a video on a young lady who was standing nearby but did not want her face shown. She said that the cop took the girl’s arm and was placing it behind her to arrest her and if the girl had just let the cop quietly arrest her, then there would have been no problem at that particular moment. (That is the best I remember from the video)

I said it before, and I say it again….the more I look at the video and study the situation, the more I am beginning to think the chief was completely wrong to either force, or to accept, the cop’s resignation. A letter of reprimand to tell him what, if any, departmental procedures were violated and remedial training, if any appropriate or deemed necessary. Of course, all this should wait until after the investigation is completed later this week.

The leaderships keep “fracking” with the officers like they have been doing recently, and their poor guidance and assigning blame will not only come back to bit them in the ass….it will continue to destroy communities.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-06-10   13:24:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: misterwhite (#12)

Was she the one who told them to go back to their Section 8 housing? I would have loved to have been there to see that.

It had to have been. That was in one article and the video in another.

Apparently, the daughter (who threw the party) mouthed off back at her and the lady slapped the shite out of the daughter.

The daughter said a friend defended her....so, maybe that is the friend in fighting in the video. No captions were posted.

The asshole taking the video could have moved closer....right?

Gatlin  posted on  2015-06-10   13:29:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: TooConservative (#18)

"The DJ did show and played loud music from nearby the poolhouse fenced area."

Roger that. I got my (mis)information from this:

"According to Twitchy, someone posting from DJ Reign’s account noted that he wasn’t near the event when it took place and that he didn’t make the fliers. In addition, posts noted that he was paid to deejay the event and nothing more."

From that I assumed he didn't attend. Maybe they meant he wasn't near the fracas that broke out.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-10   13:31:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: TooConservative, misterwhite, GrandIsland, Out Damned Spot (#13)

The actual advertised party was across a walkway or street from the poolhouse, as I understand the situation. The party itself was never a pool party at all. But it was near the fenced pool area.

This is vague, so that it FWIW. One article tied the daughter who gave the party in with the "DJ" having his thing on public property next to the pool. It say that this was the second promotion they worked together. I think ODS posted something along this line also. The one article said it was the "DJ" who was charging $15. So many stories floating around....too few facts known.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-06-10   13:34:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: TooConservative (#15)

...the $15 pool privilege fee.

I don't understand who had to pay whom a $15 fee?

Can you help me?

Gatlin  posted on  2015-06-10   13:38:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Gatlin (#20)

"The leaderships keep “fracking” with the officers like they have been doing recently, and their poor guidance and assigning blame will not only come back to bit them in the ass….it will continue to destroy communities."

Exactly. If the cops can't count on their superiors backing them up, why suit up in the morning.

As I stated earlier, running around and being a one-man crowd control is unprofessional and possibly dangerous. Some might defend that as simply being overzealous.

So maybe he deserves a reprimand, maybe some further training, but nothing more than that.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-10   13:38:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: misterwhite (#19)

Yes, it would be a mistake to assume the person wasn't a guest.

Maybe. The 20yo woman and her mother were allowed 2 guests. If more than that were inside the pool area, they were violating the rules. And we have reports of an unspecified number of teens who jumped the fence to get in. Again, reporting is pretty shabby here. Was it 3 teens or 25 teens who were in the fenced pool area against the rules? It makes a big difference. And several legit residents and members of the poolhouse were being mistreated by the teens, including a mother and her 3 young kids.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-10   13:38:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: misterwhite, TooConservative (#16)

It was advertised as a cookout with a DJ (who never showed).

Again, information is all over the place on this.

He did show, according to a couple of articles. He was on the public proerty next to the pool and the homeowners who were int he pool area and in their homes around the pool area were complainint about the extremely loud "F-Bombs" int he music he was playing.

I "think" the daughter made the arrangement for him to show.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-06-10   13:42:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: TooConservative (#17)

Definitely.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-06-10   13:43:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: TooConservative (#26)

"The 20yo woman and her mother were allowed 2 guests."

Were they INSIDE the pool area? If their "cookout" and DJ were outside the pool area, what were they doing inside?

And if they were inside, you can see how their guests would assume they could be inside, too.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-10   13:45:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: TooConservative, misterwhite (#18)

Again, the lazy libmedia never bothers to ask questions or establish the facts.

The DJ refused to make ANY comment.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-06-10   13:45:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Gatlin (#24)

I don't understand who had to pay whom a $15 fee?

Apparently, the homeowner's association (or its equivalent) in this subdivision.

I read about their prices and rules elsewhere. The upshot was that you could get free WiFi for $5. WiFi and access to the community center for $10, and WiFi/center/pool access for $15. Apparently, all one-time fees.

I was thinking we had these details in one of the articles here at LF but maybe I saw this elsewhere. They were quoting from the homeowners' association website. I recall them bragging about how popular the $5 WiFi access card was. BTW, the pool area gate appeared to also have a magnetic card access too. So it wasn't just wide open to the public. It was gated with controlled access and signs warning off intruders who were not one of two guests of a resident with pool rights. I think the resident has to actually accompany the guest(s), not be at some party hundreds of yards away and outside the fenced pool area entirely.

This Craig Ranch subdivision in McKinney is a 400 acre layout with various paid facilities like fitness centers and a beach facility and other stuff, including this poolhouse area. It's a master-planned community from the get-go and is supposedly highly rated as these planned communities go. However, you read stuff that Craig Ranch forces all residents to pay for AT&T cable/internet whether they use it or not. Just part of the HOA agreement. Seems outrageous.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-10   13:58:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: misterwhite (#25)

Exactly. If the cops can't count on their superiors backing them up, why suit up in the morning.

Or why work past your pension date?

Pay me WELL for the hardships I had to endure between scheduling, on call, civilian abuse, false complaints and lack of appreciation from admistration and sheep

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-10   14:11:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Gatlin, GrandIsland, GrandIsland (#20)

I said it before, and I say it again….the more I look at the video and study the situation, the more I am beginning to think the chief was completely wrong to either force, or to accept, the cop’s resignation. A letter of reprimand to tell him what, if any, departmental procedures were violated and remedial training, if any appropriate or deemed necessary. Of course, all this should wait until after the investigation is completed later this week.

Here's where we don't get the full picture.

Maybe there was a prominent change in policy. Maybe this officer missed his training. Or maybe he had a history of charging in and not observing the written policy guidelines for cops in this PD.

There could be and probably is more to this cop's story and his resignation. Normally, a chief won't throw a good cop with a good record under the bus like this. Maybe there were some other incidents or other times when this cop didn't follow policy he was expected to know and implement on the streets.

There is always a problem of missing facts in these cases. We read the outline of facts but there are a lot of things we just don't know that would have bearing on understanding the situation and outcome.

I kinda think a cop with a very good record wouldn't have gotten dumped like this and dissed by his former chief. The way the cop rushed around, a little hysterical, was a little over the top IMO. He didn't look in control, wasn't really calming the crowd, etc. I still don't really fault him for pulling his gun on that punk though. I think maybe this incident might have been the chief's final straw with this particular cop.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-10   14:11:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Gatlin (#30)

The DJ refused to make ANY comment.

Apparently, one of those who was trying to sanitize his Twitter/Facebook trail.

There were many reports of a DJ with loud music and I've seen nothing to contradict those reports.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-10   14:13:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: misterwhite (#29)

Were they INSIDE the pool area? If their "cookout" and DJ were outside the pool area, what were they doing inside?

Apparently, that is what the spat that started the brouhaha was about. That, and some teens were reported to be jumping the pool fence to get in and then harass legit residents.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-10   14:15:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: TooConservative, GrandIsland (#33) (Edited)

I kinda think a cop with a very good record wouldn't have gotten dumped like this and dissed by his former chief. The way the cop rushed around, a little hysterical, was a little over the top IMO. He didn't look in control, wasn't really calming the crowd, etc. I still don't really fault him for pulling his gun on that punk though. I think maybe this incident might have been the chief's final straw with this particular cop.

Possibly. Everything is possible.

But the cop was a 10-year veteran on the McKinney Police Force.

One would think that he would not have been promoted to corporal or would have been weeded out a long time before the 10-year mark....if he were a marginally performing officer or bad cop.

GrandIsland?

Gatlin  posted on  2015-06-10   14:19:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Gatlin (#36) (Edited)

One would think that he would not have been promoted to corporal or would have been weeded out a long time before the 10-year mark....if he were a marginally performing officer or bad cop.

GrandIsland?

If the promotions are based on civil service exam scores, then yes, administration can be forced to promote a marginal officer. Most times the highest IQ isn't the best officer. Don't tell this to Deckard, his head will pop).

In smaller departments, that don't follow civil service type rules, sometimes favortism or nepotism also plays a part.

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-10   15:05:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: GrandIsland (#37)

In smaller departments, that don't follow civil service type rules, sometimes favortism or nepotism also plays a part.

That's the problem with so much news reporting. All the unknown unknowables. The shabbiness and laziness of the media is partly to blame. They won't even ask the questions, let alone dig out the answers. The coverage is skin-deep and mostly related toward the most inflammatory aspects of the event.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-10   15:33:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: misterwhite (#7)

"Apparently, the pool was hosting an end-of-the-school- year party for teenagers in the subdivision, when dozens of uninvited guests showed up. The pool is semi- private as it is only open to residents of the subdivision and guests."...

All consistent with what I've read on the background of the incident.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-10   15:45:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: TooConservative (#35)

Here we have carloads of non-resident, underage teens, trespassing, getting in fights with the residents, drinking, smoking dope and generally ruining fun for everyone. They were all invited by another teen and her mother to a pool party without clearing it with the HOA.

So the story is about ... the cop.

We have gutless city officials and a gutless press.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-10   15:47:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: misterwhite (#40)

This is also a showpiece developer with a big brand-name franchised subdivision. It wouldn't surprise me if they demand certain "enlightened" policing policies.

It's much more than your average HMA or management company. At first, I made the mistake of thinking it was another run-of-the-mill HMA. This is a very big, very modern HMA and it seems big enough (at 400 acres) that it may basically own the entire town and the local pols and PD.

Look at the HMA website and promotionals. It is a very ambitious planned community. It is also kind of nasty, as with the forced AT&T cable/internet service and some other franchised sweetheart deals they pulled off as a partnership deal. Look at the private beach club they built. Not your average HMA.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-10   15:59:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: TooConservative (#3)

I'm glad they arrested the punk and charged him.

The kid was visibly pushed in the back. The cop perceived a threat that was not actually there.

The one kid who fled was the only arrest of the day.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-10   16:01:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: nolu chan (#42) (Edited)

The kid was visibly pushed in the back.

I watched it repeatedly and I saw no shoving. I saw the punk dancing around, trashtalking the cop, and reaching behind him in a move consistent with pulling a concealed knife or gun.

You should never get within 10' of an arrest being made. I would say 20' is the safe minimum. Any closer than that and the cop has legit reason to fear you.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-10   16:06:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: TooConservative (#43) (Edited)

You should never get within 10' of an arrest being made. I would say 20' is the safe minimum. Any closer than that and the cop has legit reason to fear you.

I've been kicked in the face, arresting college students, at out if control parties, while wrestling with resistors and out numbered. I'm sure this officer has been assaulted the same way. I don't expect Deckard and his ilk to understand, but I feel him drawing his gun was appropriate.

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-10   16:29:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: GrandIsland (#44) (Edited)

If I got within 3' of a cop making an arrest, I'd kind of expect the cop to draw on me.

You don't interfere with an arrest being carried out under apparent lawful auspices. Which was the case here, even if bystanders didn't agree the girl should be arrested or detained. Once the cop makes his move to arrest, your only venue to contest that is in a court of law. This is not a matter for a cop to debate with a mob.

People are going to regret all this mob-coddling that is going on. It will have very real consequences for the general public and almost certainly a rise in further flash-mob violence, mayhem and looting.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-06-10   16:50:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: TooConservative (#43)

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/10/us/mckinney-texas-pool-party-video/

Casebolt's lawyer:

"With all that happened that day, he allowed his emotions to get the better of him," Bishkin said. "Eric regrets that his conduct portrayed him and his department in a negative light. He never intended to mistreat anyone, but was only reacting to a situation and the challenges it presented. He apologizes to all who are offended.

The Police union:

"He was a dedicated and decorated officer who in this instance was placed in a high-stress environment that he was not fully prepared for," Daniel Malenfant of the McKinney Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #107 told reporters, noting that Casebolt had won an "officer of the year" award in the past for his service.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-10   16:57:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: TooConservative (#45)

People are going to regret all this mob-coddling that is going on. It will have very real consequences for the general public and almost certainly a rise in further flash-mob violence, mayhem and looting.

I agree.

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-10   17:05:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: TooConservative (#43)

I watched it repeatedly and I saw no shoving.

I see the shoving or bumping clearly. All charges have been dropped.

http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Charges-Dropped-Against-Teen-Arrested-at-McKinney-Pool-Party-306754411.html

Charges Dropped Against Teen Arrested at McKinney Pool Party

By Todd L. Davis
Published at 6:08 AM CDT on Jun 10, 2015

An 18-year-old who was arrested at a pool party where video captured a McKinney police officer manhandling a teen and pointing a gun at two others said Tuesday that he won't sue.

McKinney officers responded to a call about a disturbance involving several teens hosting a party at the Craig Ranch North Community Pool June 6. A witness captured one of the responding officers throwing 15-year-old Dajerria Becton to the ground.

In an interview with MSNBC, Adrian Martin said he was trying to calm Becton when a friend bumped into him, giving the appearance that he was lunging at the officer.

"When got bumped towards him, I backed up quite a bit," Martin said. "After I back up, [Casebolt] stands up and looks at me and pulls his pistol out. So that's what kind of made me run away."

Two McKinney police officers ran after Martin. Once he realized it was two different officer chasing him, he stopped and complied with their orders. He said those officers did their jobs properly.

"This could have been yet another tragedy involving a young black male, and we're just thankful that those other officers were out there," Martin's attorney Heath Harris said.

Harris said Martin will not sue the department. Instead, they hope to work with McKinney police and teach youths how to respond to police during an encounter.

NBC 5's Ellen Bryan contributed to this report.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-10   17:06:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: nolu chan (#46)

"He was a dedicated and decorated officer who in this instance was placed in a high-stress environment that he was not fully prepared for," Daniel Malenfant of the McKinney Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #107 told reporters, noting that Casebolt had won an "officer of the year" award in the past for his service.

If you understand and respect the job... this is very true. The people that are ignorant and have no respect FOR ANYTHING, will disagree with this. We have a few posters here that will fit that bill.

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-10   17:07:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: nolu chan (#42)

"The kid was visibly pushed in the back."

And the cop knew "the 6'2" child" was pushed and wasn't lunging at him?

You and your 20-20 hindsight.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-10   17:27:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: nolu chan (#48)

"... said Tuesday that he won't sue."

After he lawyers up, by Wednesday he'll sue.

"Once he realized it was two different officer chasing him, he stopped and complied with their orders."

Yeah. That's why he stopped.

"When got bumped towards him, I backed up quite a bit ..."

Bullshit. He was jumping left and right, lunging forwards and backwards like an agitated gorilla circling a wounded kill.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-06-10   17:33:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: GrandIsland (#49)

If you understand and respect the job... this is very true. The people that are ignorant and have no respect FOR ANYTHING, will disagree with this.

He could be a good officer who meant to do nothing wrong. It seems to me that there were a few errors of judgment, beginning with not waiting for the eleven backups to arrive, when the scene could have been secured in a safer manner.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-10   17:42:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: misterwhite (#51)

After he lawyers up, by Wednesday he'll sue.

That was his lawyer speaking.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-10   17:44:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: misterwhite (#50)

And the cop knew "the 6'2" child" was pushed and wasn't lunging at him?

You and your 20-20 hindsight.

No. Casebolt quite reasonably perceived a threat in that situation.

As I commented on another thread, yesterday,

http://www2.libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=40093&Disp=13#C13

Any of Casebolt's actions might be justified as legal. Legal but problematic.

He should have waited for the other eleven officers to arrive so that the scene could be secured in a safer manner. Upon their arrival, the other eleven proved they could defuse Casebolt's situation, and secure the scene safely, without further incident.

nolu chan  posted on  2015-06-10   18:06:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: nolu chan, GrandIsland (#52)

If you understand and respect the job... this is very true. The people that are ignorant and have no respect FOR ANYTHING, will disagree with this.

He could be a good officer who meant to do nothing wrong. It seems to me that there were a few errors of judgment, beginning with not waiting for the eleven backups to arrive, when the scene could have been secured in a safer manner.

Nice job of after the event quarterbacking. It is also nice that an “if” has two-sides.

A resident called 911 to report group fighting in progress. The officer knew he was responding to a call about a fight in progress. He was, therefore, pumped and probably thought he was on his way to save a life or a number of lives. That would easily explain why he hit the ground literally running.

Let’s now look at the other side of your “if” wait and see scenario.

Surely you can imagine how loudly the black community would still be shouting today if a white officer stood around while one, two, three or more black folks were killed….because he was a coward and would not do their job. He wanted to wait for his buddies.

It is easy for everyone to say that the officer should have exercised more self control….but everyone who says this was not there trying to do his job.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-06-10   18:07:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: nolu chan, misterwhite (#54)

He should have waited for the other eleven officers to arrive so that the scene could be secured in a safer manner. Upon their arrival, the other eleven proved they could defuse Casebolt's situation, and secure the scene safely, without further incident.

You are making a supposition from the basis of having resultant information already established for you. You are second guessing. The officer did not have your after the fact vantage position.

Information just released shows that Casebolt was responding to the fight in progress call after he had just finished responding to a couple of attempting suicide calls.

Gatlin  posted on  2015-06-10   18:24:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: Gatlin (#56)

He should have waited for the other eleven officers to arrive so that the scene

Imagine the liability suit the department would get if officers waited for back-up. Imagine how YELLA the Free Thought Project article would read... FULLY ARMED UNIFORM THUG WAITS FOR BACK-UP WHILE INNOCENT, CUTE AND CUDDLY HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS KILL EACH OTHER. Worse yet, imagine the filthy names Deckard would call the officers. lol

Columbine changed all that.... huge civil lawsuit for waiting for back-up. Training NATIONWIDE changed after Columbine, for ANY call were a death could be occurring... like two people assaulting each other around a pool full of animals.

Every society gets the kind of criminal it deserves. What is equally true is that every community gets the kind of law enforcement it insists on. Robert Kennedy

GrandIsland  posted on  2015-06-10   22:12:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (58 - 89) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com