[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Science-Technology Title: Solar Professional: Elon Musk's 3-Biggest Powerwall Whoppers Elon Musk's 3-Biggest Powerwall Whoppers Elon Musk is a visionary (ROFL) and a showman, but occasionally his enthusiasm for his vision gets way out ahead of reality. Nowhere was that disconnect more on display than this past week when he made his much talked about announcement of the Tesla Powerwall battery storage system. While we share the vision for the potential of battery systems (such as the one Enphase Energy is set to release later this year, albeit in a far more understated fashion), when 38,000 people go online to order a product that doesnt yet exist, it is time to debunk some of the more exorbitant claims made by Musk. Here are the three biggest whoppers that Musk made during his Powerwall presentation (video below). Whopper #3 - Power for an ice storm or other significant grid failure event Musk touted the peace of mind that would come from having the Powerwall, and said, if theres a cut in the utilities youre always gonna have power, particularly if youre in a place thats very cold, now you dont have to worry about being out of power if theres an ice storm. (See video at 8:35.) The Powerwall unit that Musk was talking about that was designed for daily cycling was a 7 kWh unit that is priced at $3,000. The average home in the Run on Sun service area uses 25 kWh/day. So a single Powerwall unit provides roughly one quarter of the energy demand of an average home. If your desire for peace of mind means running your home for a full day in normal fashion, you will need to purchase 4 Powerwall units (assuming you have the wall space to mount them) and that will cost you $12,000. Of course, many outages last longer than a day. The longer you want to stay powered, the more units you will need. Whopper #2 - Powerwall will work with existing solar systems Musk insisted that Powerwall has been designed to work with solar systems, right out of the box." (See video at 8:25.) Except
that the Powerwall is designed to fit between existing solar panels and the DC-AC inverter(s) in the system (i.e., on the DC side of the system). But heres the thing - the vast majority of inverters are what are known as grid-tied, which means if the grid goes down, the inverter shuts off, and stays off until the grid comes back. If the Powerwall is on the DC side, there is no way for it to mimic the grid (which, of course, is on the AC side), and so the inverter will shut off. While the inverter could certainly be replaced with a hybrid inverter (that can work both independently and tied to the grid) such a replacement is a pricey undertaking and certainly not a plug-and-play installation. But Musk, like the true showman that he is, saved his biggest Whopper for the end
Whopper #1 - You can go off grid
for $3,500! Warming to his subject, Musk really brought down the house with his most outrageous claim of all: No. No you cannot. Lets unpack his statement. Theres two major claims here, neither of which is true. The first is that you could go completely off-grid, and the second is that it would cost you $3,500. So lets start with the easy one to disprove, indeed, we already did above: this wont cost $3,500. The Powerwall provides 7 kWh of storage. The average house uses 25 kWh/day. If the battery has to run your house for just one day, you would need 4 Powerwall units at a cost of $12,000. (The 7 kWh unit is the one designed for daily cycling - what you need to go off-grid, and it costs $3,000 - if you could actually purchase one, which you cant.) So thats easy to debunk. But what about the second, more fundamental question. Can I use this Powerwall system to go off-grid without changing my middle-class, suburban lifestyle? For most folks the answer is simply, no. Heres why. When you go off-grid you need to be able to meet all of your energy needs all the time without assistance from your local utility. To do that, you need a battery system large enough to last you during the longest typical shortfall of available energy (i.e., how many stormy/cloudy days in a row will you see), plus a solar array large enough to charge that battery on sunny days while meeting the household needs. Turns out, that is quite a lot of both. Folks who design off-grid systems (very few of which are found in areas like Pasadena), typically design for three (or more) days of self-sufficiency (or autonomy, as they put it). For our typical, 25 kWh/day home, that would require storage of a minimum of 75 kWh. But according to Tesla, you can only stack a maximum of nine Powerwall units, which limits you to 63 kWh. Sometime around noon on that third day without sun, your house will shut down. Oh, and that much storage will cost you $27,000. What about the solar array side of the equation? Lets start by asking how big an array can you fit on an average house? House sizes have trended bigger in the past couple of decades, so more recently built houses are an overstatement of the average house out there. Still, to have a starting point (and to give Musk the benefit of the doubt), lets assume that our average house is 2,400 square feet (a fair estimate based on US Census data), and that it is optimally designed to maximize solar production: a near perfect square with a true south face, pitched at latitude (34° here in Pasadena), with no shading. Of course, we still have to give the Fire Marshall the desired setoffs so that gets us to 1,115 square feet of roof space (math available upon request), enough for 62 LG 305 solar modules, but because we need to use a hybrid inverter with fixed string sizes, we will drop that down to 60 solar modules. That yields an 18.3 kW system which at $3.50/Watt would cost a cool $64,000 - and be bigger than our biggest ever residential installation. So the Sixty-four Thousand Dollar question becomes: How well will that do on meeting our needs? Per the CSI calculator, this maximal system will produce roughly 29,000 kWh in Year 1, or an average daily output of 79.5 kWh. (Less in the winter, of course, when you are most likely to see those cloudy days.) After providing for my daily needs of 25 kWh, I have 54.5 kWh to spare, not quite enough to fully charge my batteries (which require 63 kWh). A scenario where I have two cloudy days, followed by one partly sunny day, followed by two more cloudy days could easily leave you in the lurch. And for this you paid a total of $91,000! If you live somewhere with poorer weather than what we find in the Run on Sun service area (i.e., pretty much the entire rest of the country!) your performance will be even more dismal. The true value of storage The sad part of this whole thing is that battery storage combined with solar is going to be huge, but not for the reasons Musk alluded to in his speech... SNIP Continue: http://runonsun.com/~runons5/blogs/blog1.php/ranting/elon-musk-s-3-biggest-powerwall-whoppers Told ya- MuskRat is a Con Artist. A shyster. Related: The Tesla battery swap is the hoax of the year The fundamental reason this blog exists is to tell the world about the fraud Tesla is committing. This has resulted in tens of millions dollars worth of fraudulent carbon credits being received by the company, and if nothing is done the tally will get into the hundreds of millions. This blog exists not to tell people about EV incentives, but about the illegal incentives a particular EV company is getting. I covered much of the same ground in my first post, but here Ill give Californias own regulations as sources...snip Taking tax money from the poor and middle class to subsidize $100,000 cars for the rich. Inflating stock prices with outright fraud and lies. It's a good job if you can get it. (Until the SEC knocks on your door) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Operation 40 (#0)
Meanwhile these guys seem to be continuously producing working functional solutions...
You don't need batteries to store electrical charge for your home irrespective of anyone's efficient assumptions. You need to hope (or pray) that energy markets continue to supply you a few moments of NetFlix or VUDU or Amazon Prime. Just ask the government regulated markets by a simple Google query.
Some eight years ago, I decided to ensure my home was energy efficient and conducive to my families quality of life. I don't pay a dime for my energy requirements.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|