911
See other 911 Articles
Title: Do these recently released, then disappeared, images show a missile hitting the Pentagon on 9/11?
Source:
Intellihub
URL Source: https://www.intellihub.com/do-these ... e-hitting-the-pentagon-on-911/
Published: Jun 1, 2015
Author: Intellihub
Post Date: 2015-06-01 22:21:27 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 10383
Comments: 39
Source: unkown (INTELLIHUB) — Still images captured from a recently leaked then disappeared video may show some type of missile, rather than an airplane, hitting the Pentagon building on Sept. 11, 2001 during the ‘attacks’. If so, the U.S. Government has some explaining to do. You be the judge.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 26.
#4. To: Deckard (#0)
No wings on the ground, no seats, no bodies, no released videos from the most surveilled building on the Continental US. I never believed it was a plane and have never seen evidence that proves it was. Maybe the wreckage was put into the crack in the Earth in PA also.
The plane's engine and other parts of the aircraft were found both inside and outside the building. I've come to the conclusion a couple of posters in this forum receive monies from ISIS.
How does a known hijacked airplane fly for over 25 minutes towards the defense headquarters of the "biggest superpower on earth"? Does the Pentagon not have anti aircraft batteries ready to fire? No one during the cold war anticipated a direct attack? Why are there no pictures? The Pentagon only had one camera trained on the entire side of the building? Why is the date on the released video from the heliport incorrect? Here's a smoking gun- an explosion THEN jet noise. In this video Porter Goss (co-author of the Patriot Act) had to have been speaking sometime between the first strikes and 9:37- the official time of impact. Watch the reactions of the other people in the video. Any idea what's in the 28 censored pages?
I was a demolitions expert on a Special Forces A-Team for several years. I have listened to so many lies, mis-information and stupid remarks regarding the WTC collapse on 9/11 I honestly believe the 9/11 Truthers are simpletons seeking glory for themselves. By the way, one of my friends investigates airplane accidents, and another was the head chemist for a major explosives company. Both agree with me.
The Most Outrageous 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Deckard, telling lies is a psychological and theological departure from reality. The end results for all such individuals is known as insanity.
#28. To: GarySpFC (#26)
You effort is noble, and I have read you attempts over a period of years where you try to deal rationally with conspiracy theorists (CT). That is an impossible task since a CT has the absolute, irrefutable and completely unshakable conviction on what he knows the truth is….and there is absolutely no doubt in his mind that when he believes is the truth. There is absolutely nothing you can possibly ever say that will in any way convince the CT that he is wrong. You can spend forever attempting to refute each and every claim he makes and blow it to absolute smithereens with hard scientific easy-to-understand facts, and you will not sway him one bit or even move his predetermined conviction a fraction of an inch.
Gary, where did Deck lie? What he is doing is posting things of interest that others wrote. Just like everyone else does. Why are you calling him a liar?
I stand by the article. If you had read it you would have seen that all of the statements made were documented with links to MSM, government and other sources. The government lies every second - maybe you should focus your attention on the real liars. Luckily, the news anchors knew who did it within minutes, the pundits knew within hours, the Administration knew within the day, and the evidence literally fell into the FBI’s lap. But for some reason a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists demanded an investigation into the greatest attack on American soil in history. It was lied to by the Pentagon, the CIA, the Bush Administration and as for Bush and Cheney…well, no one knows what they told it because they testified in secret, off the record, not under oath and behind closed doors. It didn’t bother to look at who funded the attacks because that question is of “little practical significance“. Still, the 9/11 Commission did brilliantly, answering all of the questions the public had (except most of the victims’ family members’ questions) and pinned blame on all the people responsible (although no one so much as lost their job), determining the attacks were “a failure of imagination” because “I don’t think anyone could envision flying airplanes into buildings ” except the Pentagon and FEMA and NORAD and the NRO.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#8. To: jeremiad, Deckard (#4)
No wings on the ground, no seats, no bodies, no released videos from the most surveilled building on the Continental US. I never believed it was a plane and have never seen evidence that proves it was. Maybe the wreckage was put into the crack in the Earth in PA also.
#14. To: GarySpFC, 911 truth deniers, Massimo Mazzucco, Benito Mussolini, Boudica, (#8)
#23. To: Operation 40, ALL (#14)
#24. To: GarySpFC, Operation 40, Pinguinite, jeremiad, BobCeleste (#23)
#26. To: Deckard (#24)
(Edited)
Replies to Comment # 26. Deckard, telling lies is a psychological and theological departure from reality.
The end results for all such individuals is known as insanity.
#29. To: GarySpFC (#26)
Deckard, telling lies is a psychological and theological departure from reality. The end results for all such individuals is known as insanity.
#31. To: GarySpFC (#26)
Deckard, telling lies is a psychological and theological departure from reality.
The investigation was delayed, underfunded, set up to fail, a conflict of interest and a cover up from start to finish. It was based on testimony extracted through torture, the records of which were destroyed. It failed to mention the existence of WTC7, Able Danger, Ptech, Sibel Edmonds, OBL and the CIA, and the drills of hijacked aircraft being flown into buildings that were being simulated at the precise same time that those events were actually happening.
The DIA destroyed 2.5 TB of data on Able Danger, but that’s OK because it probably wasn’t important.
The SEC destroyed their records on the investigation into the insider trading before the attacks, but that’s OK because destroying the records of the largest investigation in SEC history is just part of routine record keeping.
NIST has classified the data that they used for their model of WTC7′s collapse, but that’s OK because knowing how they made their model of that collapse would “jeopardize public safety“.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 26.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]