Title: Cops Turn into Bullies After they’re Filmed Breaking the Very Laws they are Supposed to Enforce Source:
Free Thought Project URL Source:http://thefreethoughtproject.com/co ... reaking-laws-supposed-enforce/ Published:May 26, 2015 Author:Matt Agorist Post Date:2015-05-26 20:46:41 by Deckard Keywords:None Views:2800 Comments:11
On May 18, the Ramsey County Sheriffs Office conducted a large-scale revenue collection operation masked as concern for public safety.
A post on their Facebook page explains how the revenue collection initiative will be heavily enforced during the last two weeks in May. They describe how in a single four-hour event, 27 officers were able to conduct 227 traffic stops.
In four hours this event resulted in: 227 traffic stops, 159 seatbelt citations issued, 7 child restraint citations, 6 people arrested and brought to jail, 29 drivers cited for Driving After Revocation or Suspension, 49 other citations, and 1 DWI arrest. In the will they ever learn group one driver was cited two times for No Seatbelt Use within 30 minutes by two separate officers. Increased enforcement efforts are going on statewide through the rest of the month. Buckle up!
The resultant revenue generated in that four-hour period is well over $10,000.00.
One would think that the officers who enforce seat belt laws would be hyper-aware of these laws and always buckle up. One would be wrong.
After seeing this wholesale hypocrisy on seatbelt laws, police accountability activist, Andrew Henderson grabbed his camera and went to document officers without their seatbelts on. It was like shooting fish in a barrel.
Henderson explains on a Facebook post what went on that day.
As I have seen many officers drive without seat belts, I found this to be a double standard and an unethical means of revenue generation. On Friday, May 22nd, I decided to stand on a street corner outside of the Ramsey County Law Enforcement Center with a camera to document officer seat belt use.
Henderson was able to catch multiple officers without their seatbelts on. They were completely open about it and made no attempts to buckle up as they were being filmed.
While some of the officers were cordial, he was eventually confronted by St. Paul Police officer A. Abla-Reyes who was anything but. Henderson was unlawfully detained by Abla-Reyes for alleged suspicious activity. He was bullied and harassed for several minutes before being threatened with arrest if he didnt stop practicing his First Amendment right.
This is the behavior that creates a divide between the police and the public. Its bad enough that we can be kidnapped, caged, and killed for supposed crimes with no victim. However, when we see the enforcers of these laws for victimless crimes disobeying the very laws we could be killed over, it is infuriating.
Below is the video of this hypocrisy.
The Free Thought Project asked Henderson his thoughts on this incident. Heres what he had to say:
I think the fact that I have routinely documented police misconduct inside and outside the Saint Paul police department speaks for itself.
There are hundreds of cameras watching the citizens throughout Saint Paul controlled by the SPPD, but for some reason if you watch them engaged in their duties, they seem to think you are a terrorist or have negative intentions.
The public sidewalk is not private property. The officer was most definitely in the wrong, but as it was a Friday on a holiday weekend, I didnt want to spend three-days in jail. Otherwise I would have stood my ground and continued to film on that corner.
Police officers need to realize that people are going to film them due to the historical documentation of misconduct, and police departments need to put policies in place to protect those doing so. As the trust of the internal affairs process falls, I can see more activists, citizen journalists, and members of the public conducting their own investigations such as this.
when we see the enforcers of these laws for victimless crimes disobeying the very laws we could be killed over, it is infuriating. [Boldness Added]
I find this statement not only untrue, but it definitely reeks with hypocrisy, It is counter to fact and reality. If Andrew Henderson had been so infuriated (extremely angry) by this, then he would have taken immediate action and not just stood there continuing to shoot video.
I find this statement not only untrue, but it definitely reeks with hypocrisy
I'd say the only hypocrisy on display here is that of cops refusing to obey the same laws that the average citizen must obey.
Your continual defending of these cops borders on obsession, and your fetish for those in authority would be laughable if it weren't so utterly pathetic.
The cops violated the law, I agree with that. They should not have and action should have been taken against them.
But, Andrew Henderson is a hypocrite. The reason why he is a hypocrite is that he was/is duly authorized under Minnesota Statutes § 629.37 to make a citizens arrest of the police officers without their seatbelts on. Minnesota Statutes: 169.686 SEAT BELT USE REQUIRED; PENALTY. If Henderson were sincere about calling attention to the problem, he would have done that.
He would have become a mega-hero to the anti-cop crowd if he did that. If the cops refused to be arrested, he would own them. If they allowed themselves to be arrested, he would own them even more. By not performing a citizens arrest, he will forever remain a flunky hypocrite with a video camera causing a nuisance.
Cant you just see it .(drum roll, please):
Andrew Henderson Performs a Citizens Arrest Under Minnesota Law on a Cop.
But, Andrew Henderson is a hypocrite. The reason why he is a hypocrite is that he was/is duly authorized under Minnesota Statutes § 629.37 to make a citizens arrest of the police officers without their seatbelts on. Minnesota Statutes: 169.686 SEAT BELT USE REQUIRED; PENALTY. If Henderson were sincere about calling attention to the problem, he would have done that.
He would have become a mega-hero to the anti-cop crowd if he did that. If the cops refused to be arrested, he would own them. If they allowed themselves to be arrested, he would own them even more. By not performing a citizens arrest, he will forever remain a flunky hypocrite with a video camera causing a nuisance.
Cant you just see it .(drum roll, please):
In some states you can't arrest someone for not wearing a seat belt. It has to be a secondary offense. Like if they get you for speeding, and you don't have your seat belt on they get you for both. They can't just pull you over for your seat belt. At least not here.
Also trying to arrest an officer for that would be stupid. If he did it you would be saying the same.
In some states you can't arrest someone for not wearing a seat belt. It has to be a secondary offense. Like if they get you for speeding, and you don't have your seat belt on they get you for both. They can't just pull you over for your seat belt. At least not here. Also trying to arrest an officer for that would be stupid. If he did it you would be saying the same.
MN law says you can perform a citizens arrest under 3 conditions. The one applicable here is if the offense is punishable by fine or jail time. The no seat belt offense is a $25 fine, so that qualifies.
I agree on the stupid part. That was tongue in cheek. I personally think standing around all day video taping cops is stupid.
I fail to see what the kid wanted to prove. Or better still, how what he was doing would change or improve anything. I could not find that it accomplished anything. Oh, sorry .he got his name on the Internet.
Bottom line for me: If it is the law in MN....then the cops should obey it.