[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: Unshackled from Coalition partners, Tories get ready to push radical agenda
Source: The Independent via Drudge
URL Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u ... h-radical-agenda-10237611.html
Published: May 9, 2015
Author: Oliver Wright
Post Date: 2015-05-09 07:50:52 by Tooconservative
Keywords: Tories, UKIP
Views: 1257
Comments: 6

David Cameron will use the Conservative Party’s first majority in the House of Commons for nearly 20 years to “deliver” on a radical agenda to cut welfare, shrink the size of the state and re-define Britain’s relationship with Europe.

Conservative insiders said Mr Cameron would move to the right to consolidate support among his backbench MPs after five years of compromise with the Liberal Democrats.

Among Mr Cameron’s first legislative priorities will be to enshrine an EU referendum into law, bring in the so-called ‘snoopers charter’ to give police greater powers to monitor internet communications and give English MPs a veto over legislation only affecting England. The Tories also intend to publish plans to scrap the Human Rights Act within their first 100 days. All proposals had been previously blocked by the Lib Dems.

Downing Street announced the top four Tory jobs in Government will all remain unchanged. Theresa May, Philip Hammond and Michael Fallon will remain in post while George Osborne is re-appointed Chancellor. He also replaces William Hague as Mr Cameron’s de facto deputy and is also expected to have a key role in defining Britain’s stance on renegotiating its position in the EU.

But the first challenge for Mr Cameron and Mr Osborne will be to put together a comprehensive spending review in the next few months to meet the Tory pledge of eliminating the structural deficit by 2018.

As well as deep welfare cuts The Independent understands that the Department of Business and the Department of Energy and Climate Change, previously run by the Lib Dems, will be among the biggest casualties in terms of spending reductions.

Oliver Letwin, the Tories' policy chief, has spent the campaign in Whitehall drawing up proposals to merge quangos and slash Government regulation. These are likely to form a key part of the spending review. The review has been made more difficult by Mr Cameron’s late and unexpected election pledge to find an extra £8bn for the NHS. This has yet to be funded and if the Tories stick to their other tax and spending commitments could require further cuts. Most senior Tories had expected to be negotiating another coalition agreement with the Liberal Democrats, giving them the flexibility to raise taxes to fund their additional spending commitments. As it is they are now bound to implement legislation binding the Government not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT rates for the next five years.

Preparations will get under way in Whitehall to draw up comprehensive demands to be put to other European leaders to form the basis of a renegotiation of Britain’s EU membership. This is unlikely to be easy. Mr Cameron will have to tread a path between what the rest of Europe is prepared to concede in terms of migrant benefit restrictions and reclaiming powers from Brussels, and what is acceptable to his own Eurosceptics.

And Europe will not be the only issue where Mr Cameron will face problems from his own backbenchers.

Paradoxically, despite winning an overall majority, the Prime Minister is far more vulnerable to rebellions than he was in the last Parliament, when the combined strength of the Tory-Lib Dem coalition meant he enjoyed a stronger majority in the Commons.

Then the two parties had a combined majority in the Commons of 76 but now the Conservatives alone have a majority of just 12.

This will severely restrict his ability to introduce legislation that does not command the support of his entire Parliamentary party and make him uniquely vulnerable to rebellions. But these are problems to come, and this was a day for the Tories to celebrate a remarkable and unexpected election victory.

While strategists had been privately confident of doing better than the election polls predicted they were none-the-less taken aback by the size of the swing away from Labour and the Liberal Democrats.

A senior Tory source said private polling carried out by the party’s election supremo Lynton Crosby had them on just over 300 seats “for several weeks” before polling day.

“What we couldn’t understand was the discrepancy. But Lynton was always confident that our polling was correct,” they said.

Another Tory aide added: “The impressive thing about Lynton was that he set the strategy and stuck rigidly to it even when we were in the firing line. He basically said I’m in charge and if this doesn’t work out I’ll shoulder the blame.”

Under the plan set out by Crosby the Conservatives would attempt to squeeze Ukip and Lib Dem votes by playing on fears of the SNP while highlighting David Cameron’s leadership and fears of economic “chaos” under Labour. All the messages had been extensively tested on focus groups in key marginals. But even he was surprised by the extent of the Labour collapse.

“When the exit poll came in there was a huge cheer across the office,” said an aide working in Conservative Central Office. “Then it was a case of ‘OK this is looking pretty good, but let’s not get carried away’.”

The aide said the scale of the Tory gains started to become apparent just after midnight when word came through from Twickenham that Vince Cable was going to lose his seat.

The failure of Mark Reckless to hold on in Rochester and Strood and the return of Jackie Doyle-Price in Thurrock against a strong Ukip challenge were among other highlights. But those who were there insist that the victories were not celebrated with Champagne. “It was beer and pizzas only,” one aide said. “You know we don’t do Champagne these days.”

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: TooConservative (#0)

Over 2/3rds of their budget goes to some kind of Welfare program. Welfare has been going on there for so long it's ingrained into the fabric of their society and most won't want to get away from the "freebies".

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-05-09   7:59:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: TooConservative (#0)

Department of Energy and Climate Change

I'm kinda surprised they have one of these considering the ocean breezes blow all of the coal and wood smoke over to the continent.. :)

“Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rapidly promoted by mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

CZ82  posted on  2015-05-09   8:06:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: CZ82 (#1)

"Welfare" has been going on in England since the Protestant Reformation.

We should be really clear about what happened when Henry VIII took over the Church.

Before that, from the 500s AD until the 1500s, the supplier of welfare in England (and Scotland, and Ireland and Wales, and everywhere else in Europe), the Catholic Church was the supplier of welfare. That was really its job: feed and house the poor (through a combination of soup kitchens and residences for poor brothers and sisters - chantries where they were housed and fed and did agricultural work or spun linens or made beer or what have you, and where they sang every day to God. The chantries, monasteries and convents of medieval Catholic Europe were poverty relief. There were a large number of impoverished men and women thanks to starting with nothing, or disasters such as the death of parents or husbands, or being crippled. And all of that excess of suffering humanity was taken into the Church, housed, clothed, fed and put to work on agriculture and on prayer, on copying books (there was no printing press). All of these things were jobs that needed to be done, and assigned based on the intellectual or physical capacity of the impoverished person.

Most did not take permanent clerical vows. Priests did, of course, and abbots, but it was possible for a poor brother in a chantry, or a poor junior sister in a convent, to leave and seek another life, including married life. The problem, for most of them, is that they had no land, and no money, and no job, no prospects and could not support families or be desirable spouses for anybody. Nobody would arrange a marriage with an impoverished man.

The result was that medieval England had some itinerant beggars who refused to accept the discipline of life in the chantry, monastery or convent. Often these beggars turned to acting or circus-type entertainment, but many also were cutpurses and criminals. The bulk of the poor were taken into the Church and were not homeless or hungry or jobless. Something between 20% and 25% of the population of England was housed in various Church facilities.

Likewise, the Church had the duty of caring for the sick. All of the medieval hospitals were Church organizations. And once again, the people doing the nursing, care, cooking, water gathering, etc. were the poor. This was another way in which the Church employed poor people, and housed and cared for them - both the crippled and the impoverished of compassionate talents.

Then there were the orphanages. In a world without contraception or abortion, and where people died young, there were many children without parents. The church cared for them, raised them, and educated them in orphanages, attached to monasteries, convents and chantries.

Also there were the schools: Oxford, Cambridge and others. These too were operated by the Church.

That is why poor orphans were more likely to be able to read and write than poor, free, landed yeomen, because in the orphanages children were taught to read and write - and many went on to be clergy or scholars.

Such was the circumstance in England, and across Europe, when Henry VIII made himself head of the Church of England.

That ended up changing everything. His move against the religion was unpopular. The motivation - to secure a divorce against a very popular Queen (to go and marry a tramp) was scandalous. Henry bought support of the upper classes by the expedient of using his authority as head of the Church to close the chantries, the monasteries and the convents and hand their lands over to the grandees. That locked in the grandees' support, and made the English Reformation stick. But it also put a quarter of the population out on the street.

The result after that was spiraling crime in England, and various "Poor Laws" to try to deal with it. Under the "Poor Laws" the Crown undertook to do directly what the Church had always done, but with markedly less success. Debtor's Prison was no substitute for the communal living of the chantry. When the Americas were discovered, England was eager to turn their part of it into penal colonies explicitly to get rid of the surplus population that was a burden on the state. Likewise, the Ulster Plantation, proclaimed by King James in 1606, armed up the homeless and desperate of Scotland and hurled them into Ireland to take land "for the Protestants" from the "Papists". Ireland is still living with the consequences of that decision today.

So, in truth, the state took over welfare in the Anglo-Saxon world as part of the Reformation. Get the Church out and put the King in charge. The state never handled welfare very well, being more brutal and less caring than the Church was.

One sees the waves of immigrants into America often following the pattern of there being a large wave of immigrants from European countries as they transitioned off of the old medieval Catholic charity structure onto a modern state structure. The Italians, the Poles, the Hungarians, Russians, other Eastern Europeans, Germans - the pattern repeats itself. States have not traditionally done welfare as well as the Church did.

In contemporary times the Nordic states seem to have worked out a system of government-run social props that works effectively at keeping populations happy, healthy and productive. Of course it costs a lot.

For our part, we're still in the phase of having big, bad ineffective government doing a half-assed job at all social services, whether it's public schools or Veteran's Affairs. It isn't an ACCIDENT that in the inner cities today, for the poor to get a decent education they STILL have to go to the Catholics, 500 years after the Reformation, because the heart of the people just is not in humanizing and really HELPING the poor, but warehousing them at the lowest cost.

That approach ends up very expensive indeed.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-05-09   9:05:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: CZ82, Pericles, Vicomte13 (#2)

I'm kinda surprised they have one of these considering the ocean breezes blow all of the coal and wood smoke over to the continent.. :)

True. But the climate change center in East Umbria has been responsible for a lot of the global warming hysteria, a direct source for much of the misinformation about climate that circulates. So cutting its funding isn't too bad a way curb its influence over commerce.

I notice that Cameron is trying to undercut UKIP by renegotiating Britain's role with the EU. UKIP was a kind of Tea Party org in Britain and it seems the Tories are trying to absorb and placate that faction. Cameron seems prepared to deal with the Scottish nationalists, whatever may come. I think Scottish secession played a very large role in the minds of Brit voters, and given the SMP's rout of Labor in the Scottish delegation, it was overwhelmingly on the minds of Scottish voters.

Ultimately, I think this election turned entirely on Scotland and its future. And with a strong subtext of the future of Britain within the EU.

And the pollsters and pundits all got the outcome dead wrong, with Cameron in arguably at his most powerful in the new Parliament. Time will tell. When the next Scottish referendum surfaces, it will change British politics even more.

Britain is undergoing political shifts. And Labor is almost irrelevant now, done in by their Scottish wing.

I notice that the pollsters and pundits are all wringing their hands over calling the Israeli and now the British elections so badly, completely failing to report any last-minute surge toward the two victorious conservative parties, the Tories and Likud. I see Nate Silver and other polling experts are trying to explain away their recent prediction failures.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-05-09   11:05:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: CZ82 (#1)

Over 2/3rds of their budget goes to some kind of Welfare program.

England has become a mass of sh!t with the worst of degenerate low-lifes from all over the world being encouraged to immigrate and devour what's left.

rlk  posted on  2015-05-09   11:26:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: rlk (#5)

England has become a mass of shit

Become? England was always a mass of shit.

Vicomte13  posted on  2015-05-09   12:53:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com