[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded" Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR! British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames "Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe. "The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent" CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino) Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting! POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25 2026 in Bible Prophecy 2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat 🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025 Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong England is on the Brink of Civil War! Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE "Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’" Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024 Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization. The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with What the fagots LGBTQ really means I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience. Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson) "Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’" "Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon" Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time! Ok this is Funny Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232 Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need "How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America" How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos. Reagan JOKE On The Homeless Status: Not Logged In; Sign In Bible Study See other Bible Study Articles Title: Because to two accusatons, I will answer questions Source: [None] URL Source: [None] Published: May 7, 2015 Author: Pastor Bob Celeste ACP Post Date: 2015-05-07 13:16:39 by BobCeleste Keywords: ACP Views: 33057 Comments: 103 Biff Tannen made this accusation: “Many things, probably most, of the things you claim about God and Christianity are not in the bible.” A Pole made this accusation: “Because you make things up that are not in the Scriptures.” In both instances I replied to them asking them to show even one example of the accusation, neither has done so, but, because of the accusation, I have opened a thirty day email account with HushMail.com I will answer any question dealing with my theology or any non prophecy question regarding the Bible. The email address is biblequestions@hushmail.com Don’t believe Biff Tannen or A Pole, ask your own questions and judge for yourself. Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread   Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39. #15. To: BobCeleste (#0) I will answer questions. I have a question for you. Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online? Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-07   18:37:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #17. To: Gatlin (#15) Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online? email the question to: biblequestions@hushmail.com BobCeleste  posted on  2015-05-07   19:36:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #19. To: BobCeleste (#17) Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online? email the question to: biblequestions@hushmail.com What is your reason for not answering my questin on the forum here? Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-07   20:24:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #21. To: Gatlin, y'all (#19) What is your reason for not answering my questin on the forum here? True chutzpah from a guy that hides behind the bozo function, to avoid answering uncomfortable questions. tpaine  posted on  2015-05-07   20:35:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #22. To: tpaine (#21) True chutzpah ... Absolutely! Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-07   20:45:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #23. To: Gatlin (#22) Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online? I do not see any problem in the supposed 'legality' of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online, seeing that the Fed, State, or local govt should have NO business making a religious ceremony either 'legal or illegal'. What's your opinion? tpaine  posted on  2015-05-07   20:58:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #26. To: tpaine (#23) Do you see any problem in the legality of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online? I do not see any problem in the supposed 'legality' of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online, seeing that the Fed, State, or local govt should have NO business making a religious ceremony either 'legal or illegal'. What's your opinion? I don't have an opinion, but I do have a fact. Marriages performed by ministers ordained online are not recognized in some states and jurisdictions. If a legal dispute comes up over a will or another important matter, the marriage would be set aside by a court. Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-07   21:11:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #34. To: Gatlin (#26) I do not see any problem in the supposed 'legality' of a wedding that was performed by a friend of someone who was ordained online, seeing that the Fed, State, or local govt should have NO business making a religious ceremony either 'legal or illegal'. What's your opinion? I don't have an opinion, --- The why did you pose the question? I'd bet you have an agenda, -- correct? --- but I do have a fact. Marriages performed by ministers ordained online are not recognized in some states and jurisdictions. If a legal dispute comes up over a will or another important matter, the marriage would be set aside by a court. So? Our rule of law provides for the settlement of disputes between people, regardless of their religious bonds. tpaine  posted on  2015-05-07   22:47:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #37. To: tpaine (#34) So? Our rule of law provides for the settlement of disputes between people, regardless of their religious bonds. And our rule of law also provides for the settlement of disputes between people based on a legal contract. Marriage is a legal contract. If there is no legal marriage, then there is no legal contract to establish rights and obligations between spouses, between them and their children, and between them and their in-laws. So, our rule of law must then provide for settlement of disputes between people who believe there is a legal contract when there is no legal contract. And that settlement may then be contrary to all prior legal entitlements and agreements set forth in any and all legal documents that were based on a legal marriage contract. Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-08   0:07:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #38. To: BobCeleste (#37) I see that you are back on forum. I have not received your reply to my email. While I am waiting for your reply to my email, I will ask you another question. In James 1:26... Does this:      If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his heart, this person's religion is worthless. Mean this:      If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue (fully control bitterness or anger) but deceives his heart (believes something that is not true), this person's religion is worthless (has no good qualities and deserves contempt). Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-08   0:35:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #39. To: Gatlin, BobCeleste (#38) I will ask you another question. In James 1:26... Does this: If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his heart, this person's religion is worthless. Mean this: If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue (fully control bitterness or anger) but deceives his heart (believes something that is not true), this person's religion is worthless (has no good qualities and deserves contempt). Are you REALLY interested in the interpretations of scripture? And are your ad libs really your own interpretation? Or... are you just playing a game of "GOTCHA!"? Pastor Gatlin, as in the past, you've happened to cherry-pick a single verse (suspiciously like all liberals do when they play "GOTCHA!".) Except I wonder why you found it unnecessary to bother including the context of verses sandwiching James 1:26 (James, 1:21-1:25) as well as James 1:27? YOUR homework before Bob answers you is to read James 1:21-1:27 (without cheating) and see if your very same ad libs apply. You second assignment is reading James 3:13-17 (since you seem to be fascinated by James.) I'd be curious in your interpretation (or further ad libbing) in that case as well. Thanks. Liberator  posted on  2015-05-08   2:09:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   Replies to Comment # 39. #46. To: Liberator, BobCeleste, Biff Tanner (#39) Are you REALLY interested in the interpretations of scripture? I am REALLY interested in what Bob has to say about this, not you. And are your ad libs really your own interpretation? The ad libs are not my own interpretation, they are dictionary definitions of the words….really. Or... are you just playing a game of "GOTCHA!"? Play is defined as engaging in activity for enjoyment and recreation rather than a serious or practical purpose. I am not playing, I am engaged in a serious or practical purpose. Pastor Gatlin… A pastor is defined as a minister in charge of a Christian church or congregation. Ergo, I am no pastor since I am not in charge of a Christian church or congregation. And I feel that going on the internet and filling out a form would not make me an ordained minister, as some folks feel it does. In fact, quite a number of folks feel it does. The Universal Life Church alone has pronounced more than 18 million pastors since it was founded. The organization ordains 10,000 people a month as pastors….free online. There are many others organizations such as the Church of Spiritual Humanism, the Rose Ministries….just to name a couple. Even the Temple of Earth which describes itself as a “religion-free religion” and “The World’s First Religion for Atheists” offers instant ordination online for free. Wow….just WOW! Biff Tanner said: “Just because someone says they’re a preacher it doesn’t mean they are.” Other folks will say that in their eyes, just because someone is legally ordained (in some states and jurisdictions) as a minister (pastor or preacher) instantly on the internet doesn’t make them a minister (pastor or preacher). Some will agree with these other folks. As in the past, you've happened to cherry-pick a single verse (suspiciously like all liberals do when they play "GOTCHA!".) “Shit happens” according to Forrest Gump. Nothing just happens with me. Furthermore, I do nothing suspiciously. Except I wonder why you found it unnecessary to bother including the context of verses sandwiching James 1:26 (James, 1:21-1:25) as well as James 1:27? There can be a wonderful feeling when your wonder, curiosity or strong desire to know or learn something is satisfied….especially if is about a question you found interesting or important, or have spent a lot of time and energy trying to answer. But as there can be sickness, misery, loneliness, suffering, devastation and heartache in life….there can also be disappointment. A disappointment in life can be a bitch. YOUR homework … The effects of frustration, exhaustion, lack of time for other activities, and loss of interest are the negative effects of homework. Assigning unnecessary homework with the absence of its value is an increased burden where the evidence of positive effects isn’t just dubious; it’s nonexistent. Homework is defined as a task assigned to students by their teachers to be completed outside the class. You are not my teacher, I am not a student and I never do anything without class. As has been said: “Disappointments in life can be a bitch.” Thanks. You have my most sincere welcome. Gatlin  posted on  2015-05-08 09:25:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   End Trace Mode for Comment # 39. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]  Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com