[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Humor
See other Humor Articles

Title: Housing Subsidies: A Play in One Act
Source: Weekly Standard
URL Source: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs ... idies-play-one-act_934046.html
Published: Apr 29, 2015
Author: Ike Brannon
Post Date: 2015-04-30 07:06:16 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 2614
Comments: 4

Bob: I've got an idea for a new government program to help homeowners.

Ray: Alright, what'd you have in mind? 

Bob: Hear me out. The government should send people a check every year to people who own a home--you know, to help them cover their costs a bit.

Ray: I’m not saying no, but why would we do that?

Bob: Home ownership is GOOD! Mom, apple pie, American flag, all that. People owning their own homes is good for America--people behave better when they own a home, right?

Ray: I thought it was the other way around, that people who behave better are more likely to have the wherewithal to buy a house. 

Bob: Tomato, tomahto, right? We’re talking about the same thing, essentially.

Ray: No one says "tomahto," Bob.

Bob: Whatever. What about my idea? 

Ray: The thing is, we don’t have a lot of money at the moment--if you hadn't noticed we’re running a $600 billion deficit, and that’s only going up the next few years. 

Bob: We don’t have to give it to all homeowners, just a select group.

Ray: Oh. Well, maybe if it could be done in an affordable... 

Bob: The wealthiest ones. 

Ray: Pardon?

Bob: The checks should go mainly to the wealthiest homeowners, and the subsidy should increase with income and home value so that the richest people in the priciest houses get the biggest benefit. 

Ray: You lost me.

Bob: Oh, I wasn't aware you were against home ownership.

Ray: Of course I'm for home ownership! Don't you dare question my fidelity to the importance of home ownership!  It’s just that your plan sounds like it will cost a lot of money.

Bob: The way we keep costs down in my plan is to not give anything to the middle-class folks.

Ray: What?

Bob: Okay, we can give a few middle class folks a token sum, but most of the money would go to the wealthy people in big houses. I’m very insistent on this.

Ray: I don’t follow, but tell me how much you think this'll cost.

Bob: Seventy-five billion dollars next year, and about a trillion dollars over the next decade.

Ray: Gee, that sounds like a lot, Bob. You know, we have a lot of other things we can do with that kind of money. I’m not saying that increasing home ownership isn’t worth doing...

Bob: Oh, my plan won’t help anyone actually buy a home--all it will do is increase property values and help people buy bigger homes than what they've got now.

Ray: Come again?

Bob: Under my plan, people who are on the cusp of being able to afford a home would get nothing. 

Ray: Uh huh.

Bob: The subsidy won’t kick in until we get to the income levels at which people can already afford a home.

Ray: How, precisely, would your homeownership subsidy formula work?

Bob:  A middle-class family in Peoria buying a $200,000 house would get maybe $2,000 a year.

Ray: Okay...

Bob:  Families earning less than that, or buying cheaper houses, wouldn’t get a subsidy at all.

Ray: But…

Bob: And rich people living in a mansion in Greenwich would get $25,000 a year.

Ray: ...

Bob: I know. It’s great, isn’t it?

Ray: ...

Bob: Ray?

Ray: WHY ON EARTH WOULD WE DO SUCH A THING? THIS IS LUNACY!

Bob: This is the mortgage interest deduction in a nutshell.

Ray: ...

Bob: Ray?

Ray: We must protect it at all costs.

END SCENE

Ike Brannon is an economist in Washington DC.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: TooConservative (#0)

getting rid of this:Amendment XVI.

    The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

will resolve the problem!

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-30   7:53:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: BobCeleste (#1)

Repealing an amendment is much bigger than merely changing or abolishing the mortgage deduction.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-30   8:01:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: TooConservative (#2)

"Repealing an amendment is much bigger than merely changing or abolishing the mortgage deduction."

Now's not the time to be debating the mortgage deduction, not with home prices and interest rates as low as they are.

In 1991, the middle class was responsible for 50% of all mortgage deductions. Today it's 25%.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-04-30   10:10:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite (#3)

Amid increasing signs (like the shocking 0.2% GDP growth) that any "recovery" is solely caused by loose money policy by the Fed and primarily benefits the 1% at the cost of increasing the debt load which is directly responsible for much of the economic stagnation, getting rid of the mortgage deduction will prevent the ultra-rich from funding more McMansions on the public treasury.

If we can't cut welfare to the rich, we can't cut it at all.

The same goes for ag subsidies like ethanol and other Big Ag policies, for solar-wind subsidies, for the federal flood insurance program and the many other welfare-for-the-rich schemes invented by Big Gooberment.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-30   10:20:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com