[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Why the Left is Triggered by Western Culture"

"The Uncomfortable Truth About Trans Violence and Political Radicalization"

"AOC’s Risible Performance"

"Why the Outrage Over the Cuts at the Washington Post Is So Annoying"

"New Poll Crushes Dem, Media Narrative: Americans Demand Mass Deportations, Back ICE Overwhelmingly"

"Democratic Overreach on Immigration Beckons"

How to negotiate to buy a car

Trump warns of a 'massive Armada' headed towards Iran

End Times Prophecy: Trump Says Board of Peace Will Override Every Government & Law – 10 Kings Rising

Maine's legendary 'Lobster Lady' dies after working until she was 103 and waking up at 3am every day

Hannity Says Immigration Raids at Home Depot Are Not ‘A Good Idea’

TREASON: Their PRIVATE CHAT just got LEAKED.

"Homan Plans to Defy Spanberger After ‘Bond Villain’ Blocks ICE Cooperation in VA: ‘Not Going to Stop’"

"DemocRATZ Radical Left-Wing Vision for Virginia"

"Tim Walz Wants the Worst"

Border Patrol Agents SMASH Window and Drag Man from Car in Minnesota Chaos

"Dear White Liberals: Blacks and Hispanics Want No Part of Your Anti-ICE Protests"

"The Silliest Venezuela Take You Will Read Today"

Michael Reagan, Son of Ronald Reagan, Dies at 80

Patel: "Minnesota Fraud Probes 'Buried' Under Biden"

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Humor
See other Humor Articles

Title: Housing Subsidies: A Play in One Act
Source: Weekly Standard
URL Source: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs ... idies-play-one-act_934046.html
Published: Apr 29, 2015
Author: Ike Brannon
Post Date: 2015-04-30 07:06:16 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 3084
Comments: 4

Bob: I've got an idea for a new government program to help homeowners.

Ray: Alright, what'd you have in mind? 

Bob: Hear me out. The government should send people a check every year to people who own a home--you know, to help them cover their costs a bit.

Ray: I’m not saying no, but why would we do that?

Bob: Home ownership is GOOD! Mom, apple pie, American flag, all that. People owning their own homes is good for America--people behave better when they own a home, right?

Ray: I thought it was the other way around, that people who behave better are more likely to have the wherewithal to buy a house. 

Bob: Tomato, tomahto, right? We’re talking about the same thing, essentially.

Ray: No one says "tomahto," Bob.

Bob: Whatever. What about my idea? 

Ray: The thing is, we don’t have a lot of money at the moment--if you hadn't noticed we’re running a $600 billion deficit, and that’s only going up the next few years. 

Bob: We don’t have to give it to all homeowners, just a select group.

Ray: Oh. Well, maybe if it could be done in an affordable... 

Bob: The wealthiest ones. 

Ray: Pardon?

Bob: The checks should go mainly to the wealthiest homeowners, and the subsidy should increase with income and home value so that the richest people in the priciest houses get the biggest benefit. 

Ray: You lost me.

Bob: Oh, I wasn't aware you were against home ownership.

Ray: Of course I'm for home ownership! Don't you dare question my fidelity to the importance of home ownership!  It’s just that your plan sounds like it will cost a lot of money.

Bob: The way we keep costs down in my plan is to not give anything to the middle-class folks.

Ray: What?

Bob: Okay, we can give a few middle class folks a token sum, but most of the money would go to the wealthy people in big houses. I’m very insistent on this.

Ray: I don’t follow, but tell me how much you think this'll cost.

Bob: Seventy-five billion dollars next year, and about a trillion dollars over the next decade.

Ray: Gee, that sounds like a lot, Bob. You know, we have a lot of other things we can do with that kind of money. I’m not saying that increasing home ownership isn’t worth doing...

Bob: Oh, my plan won’t help anyone actually buy a home--all it will do is increase property values and help people buy bigger homes than what they've got now.

Ray: Come again?

Bob: Under my plan, people who are on the cusp of being able to afford a home would get nothing. 

Ray: Uh huh.

Bob: The subsidy won’t kick in until we get to the income levels at which people can already afford a home.

Ray: How, precisely, would your homeownership subsidy formula work?

Bob:  A middle-class family in Peoria buying a $200,000 house would get maybe $2,000 a year.

Ray: Okay...

Bob:  Families earning less than that, or buying cheaper houses, wouldn’t get a subsidy at all.

Ray: But…

Bob: And rich people living in a mansion in Greenwich would get $25,000 a year.

Ray: ...

Bob: I know. It’s great, isn’t it?

Ray: ...

Bob: Ray?

Ray: WHY ON EARTH WOULD WE DO SUCH A THING? THIS IS LUNACY!

Bob: This is the mortgage interest deduction in a nutshell.

Ray: ...

Bob: Ray?

Ray: We must protect it at all costs.

END SCENE

Ike Brannon is an economist in Washington DC.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: TooConservative (#0)

getting rid of this:Amendment XVI.

    The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

will resolve the problem!

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-30   7:53:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: BobCeleste (#1)

Repealing an amendment is much bigger than merely changing or abolishing the mortgage deduction.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-30   8:01:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: TooConservative (#2)

"Repealing an amendment is much bigger than merely changing or abolishing the mortgage deduction."

Now's not the time to be debating the mortgage deduction, not with home prices and interest rates as low as they are.

In 1991, the middle class was responsible for 50% of all mortgage deductions. Today it's 25%.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-04-30   10:10:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite (#3)

Amid increasing signs (like the shocking 0.2% GDP growth) that any "recovery" is solely caused by loose money policy by the Fed and primarily benefits the 1% at the cost of increasing the debt load which is directly responsible for much of the economic stagnation, getting rid of the mortgage deduction will prevent the ultra-rich from funding more McMansions on the public treasury.

If we can't cut welfare to the rich, we can't cut it at all.

The same goes for ag subsidies like ethanol and other Big Ag policies, for solar-wind subsidies, for the federal flood insurance program and the many other welfare-for-the-rich schemes invented by Big Gooberment.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-30   10:20:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com