[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Humor
See other Humor Articles

Title: Housing Subsidies: A Play in One Act
Source: Weekly Standard
URL Source: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs ... idies-play-one-act_934046.html
Published: Apr 29, 2015
Author: Ike Brannon
Post Date: 2015-04-30 07:06:16 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 2637
Comments: 4

Bob: I've got an idea for a new government program to help homeowners.

Ray: Alright, what'd you have in mind? 

Bob: Hear me out. The government should send people a check every year to people who own a home--you know, to help them cover their costs a bit.

Ray: I’m not saying no, but why would we do that?

Bob: Home ownership is GOOD! Mom, apple pie, American flag, all that. People owning their own homes is good for America--people behave better when they own a home, right?

Ray: I thought it was the other way around, that people who behave better are more likely to have the wherewithal to buy a house. 

Bob: Tomato, tomahto, right? We’re talking about the same thing, essentially.

Ray: No one says "tomahto," Bob.

Bob: Whatever. What about my idea? 

Ray: The thing is, we don’t have a lot of money at the moment--if you hadn't noticed we’re running a $600 billion deficit, and that’s only going up the next few years. 

Bob: We don’t have to give it to all homeowners, just a select group.

Ray: Oh. Well, maybe if it could be done in an affordable... 

Bob: The wealthiest ones. 

Ray: Pardon?

Bob: The checks should go mainly to the wealthiest homeowners, and the subsidy should increase with income and home value so that the richest people in the priciest houses get the biggest benefit. 

Ray: You lost me.

Bob: Oh, I wasn't aware you were against home ownership.

Ray: Of course I'm for home ownership! Don't you dare question my fidelity to the importance of home ownership!  It’s just that your plan sounds like it will cost a lot of money.

Bob: The way we keep costs down in my plan is to not give anything to the middle-class folks.

Ray: What?

Bob: Okay, we can give a few middle class folks a token sum, but most of the money would go to the wealthy people in big houses. I’m very insistent on this.

Ray: I don’t follow, but tell me how much you think this'll cost.

Bob: Seventy-five billion dollars next year, and about a trillion dollars over the next decade.

Ray: Gee, that sounds like a lot, Bob. You know, we have a lot of other things we can do with that kind of money. I’m not saying that increasing home ownership isn’t worth doing...

Bob: Oh, my plan won’t help anyone actually buy a home--all it will do is increase property values and help people buy bigger homes than what they've got now.

Ray: Come again?

Bob: Under my plan, people who are on the cusp of being able to afford a home would get nothing. 

Ray: Uh huh.

Bob: The subsidy won’t kick in until we get to the income levels at which people can already afford a home.

Ray: How, precisely, would your homeownership subsidy formula work?

Bob:  A middle-class family in Peoria buying a $200,000 house would get maybe $2,000 a year.

Ray: Okay...

Bob:  Families earning less than that, or buying cheaper houses, wouldn’t get a subsidy at all.

Ray: But…

Bob: And rich people living in a mansion in Greenwich would get $25,000 a year.

Ray: ...

Bob: I know. It’s great, isn’t it?

Ray: ...

Bob: Ray?

Ray: WHY ON EARTH WOULD WE DO SUCH A THING? THIS IS LUNACY!

Bob: This is the mortgage interest deduction in a nutshell.

Ray: ...

Bob: Ray?

Ray: We must protect it at all costs.

END SCENE

Ike Brannon is an economist in Washington DC.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: TooConservative (#0)

getting rid of this:Amendment XVI.

    The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

will resolve the problem!

BobCeleste  posted on  2015-04-30   7:53:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: BobCeleste (#1)

Repealing an amendment is much bigger than merely changing or abolishing the mortgage deduction.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-30   8:01:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: TooConservative (#2)

"Repealing an amendment is much bigger than merely changing or abolishing the mortgage deduction."

Now's not the time to be debating the mortgage deduction, not with home prices and interest rates as low as they are.

In 1991, the middle class was responsible for 50% of all mortgage deductions. Today it's 25%.

misterwhite  posted on  2015-04-30   10:10:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: misterwhite (#3)

Amid increasing signs (like the shocking 0.2% GDP growth) that any "recovery" is solely caused by loose money policy by the Fed and primarily benefits the 1% at the cost of increasing the debt load which is directly responsible for much of the economic stagnation, getting rid of the mortgage deduction will prevent the ultra-rich from funding more McMansions on the public treasury.

If we can't cut welfare to the rich, we can't cut it at all.

The same goes for ag subsidies like ethanol and other Big Ag policies, for solar-wind subsidies, for the federal flood insurance program and the many other welfare-for-the-rich schemes invented by Big Gooberment.

Tooconservative  posted on  2015-04-30   10:20:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com