[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

The taboo that could break america.

Trump Impeachment DOA in Senate

Seattle Sure Waited a Long Time to Implement This New Policy on Rioting

Prostitute-Amber

Warden/Executioner interview-Charlie Jones

He Reveals What 1950s Men Thought & Did

7 Black Americans Express Their Rage In The 1960s

Jackie Kennedy on MLK: 'That man's terrible' - theGrio

World Mourns Nehru

STaTes Eye ... Allowing Concealed Carry of Guns --- WiThouT a PermiT

FEC Filing of the "Patriot Party"

NYC ouT of conTrol ... 12 sub humans beaT man - sTrip him naked - sTeal everyThing --- in broad daylighT on major inTersectTon

It's This Simple: Liz Cheney Must Go

Rand Paul Wipes the floor with pedophile lover George Stephanopoulos

Worst Fishing Day Ever (Winter Fishing) ***Bad Idea***

Pelosi Wanted Machines Guns

They're Coming to America

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Skipped Biden's Inauguration...And The Reason Is Beyond Idiotic

Bernie Sanders predicts the Democratic Party could be 'wiped out' in the 2022 midterm elections

Larry King ... Television legend --- dies aT age 87

OuTrage over U.S. flag flown upside down ... aT half sTaff at SouTh Maui posT office --- InauguraTion Day

Biden won’t stop them, and neither will cops, until Portland is burned down

SALUTE THE MARINE!!!!!

Trump's greatest legacy: The GOP now represents America's workers

Joe’s ... firsT 17 AcTs --- Of DesTructTon

google is evil

Now wiTh The UniTed StaTes Taken ouT --- They have a glide paTh To “build iT back beTTer” / “susTainabiliTy” / “social justTce” us --- inTo “The GreaT ReseT

DAY ONE: Beijing Biden Kills Keystone Pipeline and Thousands of Jobs, Rejoins Paris Climate Accord, Removed 1776 Project, Vows to Restart Iran’s Nuclear Program, Fed Mask Mandates

Republicans Block Swift Approval of Biden's DHS Pick

President Donald J. Trump Departure Ceremony

Stop the Steal

Feds ArresT Pennsylvania Woman ... Accused of STealing --- Pelosi’s LapTop

Enter the Dumbest Administration on Earth

How Joe Biden Will Open The Floodgates To Transgendering Public Schools

CNN Pushes to Close Down Newsmax TV

tax and regulate

Supreme CourT Deals DemocraTs A Major DefeaT In Texas ... They JusT Ruled ---To RejecT Universal Mail-In BalloTing

EYEWITNESS' ACCOUNT DC

Biden’s party seeks to divide and destroy, not unite and heal

“If You Need All This To Protect Your Inauguration from the People, Maybe the F-ing People Didn’t F-ing Elect You!” – DC Worker Shows Video of Military Checkpoints in City (VIDEO)

Illegal crossing

How Soon Will the Social Security Trust Fund Be Depleted and How Should People Protect Their Retirement Income?

With These Figures, It's No Shock Why Republicans Got Swept by Democrats in Georgia

Domestic Terrorist?" - Leftist BLM Activist Who Stormed Capitol On Jan. 6 Arrested, Charged - John Earle Sullivan

The Republican Party Killed Itself

Australia to kill pigeon that crossed Pacific from Oregon

communism

Could Joe Biden face impeachment?

Democrats Are Using The Recent Capitol Riot To Consolidate Power

Hold Twitter To Account


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Left's War On Christians
See other The Left's War On Christians Articles

Title: Nevada GOP moves to dump caucuses in favor of 2016 primary (easier to rig)
Source: The Washington Examiner
URL Source: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n ... le/2563576#.VTrNjXdK_IB.mailto
Published: Apr 26, 2015
Author: David M. Drucker
Post Date: 2015-04-26 21:31:12 by Hondo68
Keywords: the 2012 caucuses, a total disaster, embarrassment for the state
Views: 523
Comments: 1

There are two bills pending in the Republican-controlled legislature. If passed and signed by GOP Gov. Brian Sandoval, Nevada Republicans voting in the 2016 primary would pull the lever at the polls as they do in a general election. (AP Photo)

LAS VEGAS — Republican leaders in Nevada are moving to junk their presidential caucuses and re-implement a standard primary election for 2016.

There are two bills pending in the Republican-controlled legislature, including one in the Assembly carried by Speaker John Hambrick. If passed and signed by GOP Gov. Brian Sandoval, Nevada Republicans voting in the 2016 primary would pull the lever at the polls as they do in a general election, rather than caucusing in groups similar to how the primary is conducted in Iowa. Republican insiders supportive of the legislation are expressing confidence that it will be enacted.

"There are pros and cons to everything," Nevada GOP Chairman Michael McDonald told the Washington Examiner on Friday. But McDonald said he is pushing for a normal primary because he and many other Silver State Republicans are unhappy with how the 2012 caucuses went down.

"It was a total disaster the way it was handled. It was an embarrassment for the state," said McDonald, a veteran state GOP activist now in his second term as chairman.

Nevada hosts the fourth nominating contest of the 2016 GOP primary and the first out west, making any change to how the contest is conducted potentially significant. Libertarian folk hero and former Texas Rep. Ron Paul finished a close third in the 2012 caucuses, a method of competing for delegates to the GOP presidential nominating convention deemed advantageous to Paul because his band of liberty activist supporters are small but intensely loyal. Paul garnered 19 percent of the tally, compared to 21 percent for second-place finisher Newt Gingrich and 50 percent for eventual GOP nominee Mitt Romney.

That's why the move by Nevada Republicans to go back to a standard primary could be interpreted as a shot at Paul's son, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who is running for president in 2016 and whose base of support here consists of the same community of activists who boosted his father to victory in the caucuses three years ago.

Rand Paul, 52, is popular among Nevada Republicans and considered a strong contender for Nevada's 2016 nominating delegates at this early stage. Moving to a regular primary could deal a blow to Paul by diminishing the influence of his unique activist base in next year's primary contest, although Republicans in Nevada said they didn't see that as a necessary outcome. Paul has moved to broaden his support among Republicans in a way that his father never bothered to.

McDonald and other GOP insiders emphasized that the purpose of going back to a standard primary, the system employed in prior elections, was to open the process to more voters and generate interest that can lead to more activism in the general election against presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, the former secretary of state.

"Our hope is that it will drive more people out and get more Republicans involved," McDonald said.


Poster Comment:

Governor Romney and the Harry Reid Republicans had a tough time cheating, being as far behind as they were. So they're streamlining the voting fraud for Jeb. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#0)

Nevada Republican Party Chairman Signals Support for Presidential Primary Over Caucuses in 2016

David Drucker at The Washington Examiner:
Republican leaders in Nevada are moving to junk their presidential caucuses and re-implement a standard primary election for 2016. 
There are two bills pending in the Republican-controlled legislature, including one in the Assembly carried by Speaker John Hambrick. If passed and signed by GOP Gov. Brian Sandoval, Nevada Republicans voting in the 2016 primary would pull the lever at the polls as they do in a general election, rather than caucusing in groups similar to how the primary is conducted in Iowa. Republican insiders supportive of the legislation are expressing confidence that it will be enacted. 
"There are pros and cons to everything," Nevada GOP Chairman Michael McDonald told the Washington Examiner on Friday. But McDonald said he is pushing for a normal primary because he and many other Silver State Republicans are unhappy with how the 2012 caucuses went down.
This is interesting.

It is interesting because it represents a reversal either at the top of the Nevada Republican Party or within the Nevada Republican Party. Drucker mentions that the chairman of the Republican Party in the Silver state supports the change and obviously the speaker of the state Assembly, who sponsored the Assembly legislation cited (AB 302), supports the change. Yet, the party vice chair, Jim DeGraffenreid, is on record (on behalf of the party) in opposition to that bill at its original hearing. Yes, that written testimony was against the original version of the legislation. At the time it called for a non-compliant January presidential primary (consolidated with the primaries for state and local offices). In his spoken testimony before the Assembly Legislative Operations and Elections Committee, DeGraffenreid, as FHQ described it at the time, rejected the primary idea outright, saying that the state party could and would make the decision on its own and that the taxpayer expenditure for a presidential primary was not necessary.

When the same bill was introduced in the state Senate and later heard in committee, another representative from the Nevada Republican Party -- this time James Hindle, chairman of the Storey County Republican Party and like DeGraffenreid speaking on behalf of the state party -- voiced opposition to the presidential primary idea in the bill. This time the comments were more ominous with regard to how the Nevada Republican Party viewed the idea of trading in caucuses for a primary.  Hindle indicated that the Nevada Republican Party Central Committee had voted the previous weekend to hold caucuses (after having debated the two options).

Again, the Nevada Republican Party has already voted -- and quite recently -- to hold caucuses in 2016 instead of a primary. Now, that does not mean that the party cannot change its mind. Under different leadership during the 2012 cycle, the Nevada Republican Party set its caucuses date for February 18, 2012, then January 14 and then settled on February 4 after a showdown with New Hampshire.1

Nevada Republicans may pull the trigger on a switch, but that does raise a number of questions.
  1. Which version of the presidential primary legislation will make it through the legislature? One version -- the Assembly version -- now calls for a state party to request the secretary of state to call for a presidential primary. It only takes one party. If both make that request, then the state central committees have to confer on a working day in February. Absent an agreement, the secretary of state makes the decision. The state Senate bill calls for a consolidated presidential primary (with primaries for other state and local offices) on the last Tuesday in February. The date issue is not much of a conflict, but the consolidated primary means cost savings that a separate presidential primary cannot match. However, that consolidated primary means much earlier filing deadlines and general election campaigns for all other state and local candidates. In other words, there is still much to iron out on this one.
  2. If the Assembly bill cited by Drucker is the preferred option for Silver state Republicans, how receptive will Senate bill sponsor, Senator James Settlemeyer (R-17th, Minden), be to that option? He held quite a lot of sway over his bill getting out of committee.
  3. Speaking of parties opting into or requesting the presidential primary, Nevada Democrats, at least those on the committees hearing these two bills, continue to say that Nevada was originally chosen as a carve-out state specifically as a caucuses state. Those Democratic committee members have also voiced opposition to the primary measures because the DNC rules specify that Nevada is a caucuses state. Changing that would jeopardize carve-out status, they argue. [FHQ thinks that concern is perhaps overblown. Those same Democratic rules have called for specific dates on which Nevada's caucuses were to occur during the last two cycles. Nevada has yet to actually conduct a delegate selection event on those dates (because of the actions of other states). That has not led to a loss of the state party's privileged position on the calendar, much less a loss of any delegates. Yet, if the Nevada Democratic Party thinks there is a problem there, it affects how they approach these bills (and ultimately how willing they are to pick a primary over the caucuses the party tends to have.).]
  4. Is there disagreement in the Nevada Republican Party over the primary versus caucuses question?
  5. Finally, FHQ semi-jokingly said in response to a Jon Ralston tweet about the Nevada Republican Party having difficulty raising money that Nevada Republicans might be motivated to switch to a primary so that the state would pick up the tab for the election. That would save the party the trouble of having to raise the money necessary to pull of a caucuses/convention process that has already been rocky the last two cycles. How much is the fundraising shortfall affect the decision-making here?
Nevada Republicans may "junk" their embattled caucuses, but there is a lot of nuance to this situation that may make such a switch more difficult to achieve.

Thanks to Richard Winger at Ballot Access News for bringing Drucker's story to FHQ's attention.

--
1 The typical protocol for the carve-out states has been to wait every other state out, setting the dates of their primaries and caucuses later and only after other states had chosen dates. Nevada Republicans did not follow that blueprint in 2010-11.


The D&R terrorists hate us because we're free, to vote second party

"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul

Hondo68  posted on  2015-04-26   21:50:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com