United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: U.S. Army FORCES Cadets to Wear High Heels to Promote Feminist Campaign
Source:
Prison Planet
URL Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/u-s-arm ... promote-feminist-campaign.html
Published: Apr 21, 2015
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2015-04-23 13:17:42 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 22360
Comments: 95
Cadets at Temple University were threatened that their careers would be finished if they refused to participate in a feminist campaign to promote the completely debunked college rape culture myth by wearing red spray painted high heels. Imagine what ISIS or the Russian military is thinking when they see these images. Third wave feminism has poisoned EVERYTHING, even the U.S. Military. UPDATE: Infowars was contacted by a former US Army servicemember who told us that his unit – Delta Company, 1st Battalion, 2nd Infantry Regiment, 172nd Infantry Brigade – was also FORCED to participate in the ‘Walk a Mile in Her Shoes’ event in 2011. “I was deployed in Afghanistan during this time, but my comrades in the rear told me this event was a MANDATORY,” he writes. “As a former medic, I know that the only way out of this was to lie about injuries or pull some form of guard duty at this time.” CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENT.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 44.
#14. To: Deckard, liberator, GarySpFc, sneakypete, BobCeleste, CZ82 (#0)
An unlawful order for a few reasons: First such foot attire while performing military duties is harmful to a Soldier's feet, knees, and back. Second a commander cannot force a Soldier to wear clothing attire of the opposite sex. A commander CAN have a policy describing what 'proper attire' includes on his/her military installation (like no halter tops, cutoff jeans etc.) in public places like the PX or post bank. But he/she cannot prescribe the attire of the opposite sex as mandatory 'uniform' for an official event. If the Soldier, Airmen, Marine or Sailor voluntarily does so, then there is no foul other than destroying over two centuries of military tradition and good order and discipline. Lastly, and most important of the three reasons....This is just plain STUPID. Patton is rolling in his grave. Now I can see most of the Navy doing this voluntarily:)
No "order" was given. Don't believe things you read from Infowars.
Patriotic young cadets — America’s future warrior — pressured to walk around in bright red high heels on campus — against their will – or face retribution. I don’t even know what to say… Army ROTC cadets are complaining on message boards that they were pressured to walk in high heels on Monday for an Arizona State University campus event designed to raise awareness of sexual violence against women. The Army openly encouraged participating in April’s “Walk A Mile in Her Shoes” events in 2014, but now it appears as though ROTC candidates at ASU were faced with a volunteer event that became mandatory. “Attendance is mandatory and if we miss it we get a negative counseling and a ‘does not support the battalion sharp/EO mission’ on our CDT OER for getting the branch we want. So I just spent $16 on a pair of high heels that I have to spray paint red later on only to throw them in the trash after about 300 of us embarrass the U.S. Army tomorrow,” one anonymous cadet wrote on the social media sharing website Imgr, IJReview reported Monday.
The Army openly encouraged participating in April’s “Walk A Mile in Her Shoes” events in 2014, but now it appears as though ROTC candidates at ASU were faced with a volunteer event that became mandatory. The Army brass are very sensitive to young cadets being subjected to such 'mandatory events.' IF there is something in writing making the event mandatory OR enough sworn written witness statements show the commander verbally made it mandatory...Then that commander will be relieved. The flipside is even if there is absence of the above, the commander will still be investigated for potentially using his/her command authority to promote a private event as a military event. Sponsoring an event is not the same as say a military formation, physical training, or military training events. Finally, the commander is an idiot. He/she should have known better that not even a local commander can change or modify the US Army uniform outside of AR 670-1 regulations. Commanders can make calls on mixing duty and PT uniforms for road march or sporting events.
You would hope the Commander would be relieved but I don't know if I would count on that happening. They way the political process is being instituted into everyday military business I wouldn't be surprised if he/she kept their job. I'm curious as to what advice the Commander got from his/her SRNCOs??
Yep. Maybe they are females or homosexuals... Back in the day Army ROTC had one SF (green beret) SGM at each 'hub' school. Fordham back then had a large program and was a hub command with an 06. I don't see any SF SRNCO allowing that garbage to happen.
There are no replies to Comment # 44. End Trace Mode for Comment # 44.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#19. To: redleghunter (#14)
An unlawful order for a few reasons...
The event was not mandatory for Temple cadets....
no command pressure had been applied to convince members to participate....
105 of the brigade's 120 members ignored it.
#23. To: Gatlin (#19)
Don't believe things you read from Infowars.
#29. To: Deckard, CZ82, liberator, GarySpFc (#23)
Army ROTC cadets are complaining on message boards that they were pressured to walk in high heels on Monday for an Arizona State University campus event designed to raise awareness of sexual violence against women.
#37. To: redleghunter (#29)
The Army brass are very sensitive to young cadets being subjected to such 'mandatory events.' IF there is something in writing making the event mandatory OR enough sworn written witness statements show the commander verbally made it mandatory...Then that commander will be relieved.
#44. To: CZ82 (#37)
I'm curious as to what advice the Commander got from his/her SRNCOs??
Replies to Comment # 44.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]